Exploring variation in nurse educators perceptions of the inclusive curriculum

International Journal of Inclusive Education

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 741-755

  Carey, Philip ^a  

^a LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

curriculum and instruction; higher education; inclusive curriculum; nursing; professional education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864256753     PISSN: 13603116     EISSN: 14645173     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2010.516773     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Åkerlind, G. 2005. Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research and Development 24: 321-34.
2. Argyris, C., R. Putnam, and D.M. Smith. 1985. Action science: Concepts, methods and skills for research and intervention. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3. Barbour, R.S. 2001. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal 322: 1115-7.
4. Blanden, J., and S. Machin. 2004. Educational inequality and the expansion of UK higher education Scottish. Journal of Political Economy 51, no. 2: 230-49.
5. Brown, R. 2007. Reeking hypocrisy? New Labour and widening participation in higher education. Perspectives 11, no. 4: 97-102.
6. Chambers, D., D. Porock, and L. Aston. 2009. National Health Service funding for nursing education: Nursing's nemesis? Nurse Education Today 30, no. 1: 1-3.
7. Dale, C., and F. Aiken. 2007. A review of the literature into dyslexia in nursing practice. London: Royal College of Nursing. DES (Department for Education & Skills). 2001. Special Educational Needs and Disability Act. London: HMSO.
8. Ecclestone, K. 2004. Learning or therapy: The demoralisation of education. British Journal of Educational Research 52, no. 2: 112-37.
9. ECU. 2007. Conducting equality impact assessments in higher education. London: Equality Challenge Unit.
10. Fraser, S., and A.M. Bosanquet. 2006. The curriculum? That's just a unit outline, isn't it? Studies in Higher Education 31, no. 3: 269-84.
11. Freire, P. 1995. Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed. Hammondsworth: Penguin.
12. Gallacher, J. 2006. Widening access or differentiation and stratification in higher education in Scotland. Higher Education Quarterly 60, no. 4: 349-69.
13. Gravestock, P. 2009. Inclusive curriculum practice inclusive practice. E-bulletin Series. Cheltenham: Higher Education Academy, University of Gloucestershire.
14. Grey, J. 2008. No quality without equality. Nursing Standard 22, no. 39: 1.
15. Hooks, B. 1994. Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. London: Routledge.
16. James, A. 2006. What subjects do dyslexic students study at university? Dyslexic.com. http://www.dyslexic.com/articlecontent.asp?CAT=General&slug= 200 (accessed March 15, 2010).
17. Jessop, T., and A. Williams. 2009. Equivocal tales about identity, racism and the curriculum. Teaching in Higher Education 14, no. 1: 95-106.
18. Konur, O. 2002. Access to nursing education by disabled students: Rights and duties of nursing programs. Nurse Education Today 22: 364-74.
19. Konur, O. 2007. A judicial outcome analysis of the Disability Discrimination Act: A windfall for employers? Disability and Society 22, no. 2: 187-204.
20. Levinson, D., P.W. Cookson, and A.R. Sadovnik. 2002. Education and sociology: An encyclopedia. London: Taylor & Francis.
21. Lincoln, Y.S., and E.G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage.
22. Marton, F., and W.P. Pong. 2005. On the unit of description in phenomenography. Higher Education Research and Development 24, no. 4: 321-34.
23. Morris, D., and P. Turnbull. 2006. Clinical experiences of students with dyslexia. Journal of Advanced Nursing 54, no. 2: 238-47.
24. Morris, J. 2006. The implications of either 'discovering' or 'constructing' categories of description in phenomenographic analysis. Paper presented at the Challenging the Orthodoxies Conference, December, in Middlesex University.
25. National Audit Office. 2007. Staying the course: The retention of students in higher education. London: The Stationary Office.
26. National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education (NCIHE). 1997. Higher education in the learning society (The Dearing Report). London: HMSO.
27. National Nursing Research Unit. 2009. Who wants to be a nurse? Policy+: Policy plus evidence, issues and opinions in healthcare (Issue 15). London: Kings College London.
28. NMC. 2007a. Essential Skills Clusters (ESCs) for Pre-registration Nursing Programmes: Annex 2 to NMC circular 07/2007. London: Nursing and Midwifery Council.
29. NMC. 2007b. Good health and good character: Guidance for students, nurses and midwives. London: Nursing and Midwifery Council.
30. NMC. 2008. Good health and good character: Guidance for educational institutions. London: Nursing and Midwifery Council.
31. Nunan, T., R. George, and H. McCausland. 2000. Inclusive education in universities: Why it is important and how it might be achieved. International Journal of Inclusive Education 4, no. 1: 63-88.
32. Open University. 2006. Making your teaching inclusive. www.open.ac.uk/inclusiveteaching (accessed January 11, 2010).
33. Pryjmachuk, S., K. Easton, and A. Littlewood. 2009. Nurse education: Factors associated with attrition. Journal of Advanced Nursing 65, no. 1: 149-60.
34. Quality Assurance Agency. 2010. Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education, Section 3: Disabled students. Gloucester: QAA.
35. Richardson, J.T.E. 1999. The concepts and methods of phenomenographic research. Review of Educational Research 69: 53-82.
36. Riddell, S., T. Tinklin, and A. Wilson. 2005. New Labour, social justice and disabled students in higher education. British Educational Research Journal 31, no. 5: 623-43.
37. Rogers, C., and H.J. Freiberg. 1993. Freedom to learn. 3rd ed. New York: Merrill.
38. Rust, C. 2002. The impact of assessment on student learning: How can the research assessment literature practically help to inform the development of departmental strategies and learner-centred assessment practices? Active Learning in Higher Education 3, no. 2: 145-58.
39. Sharp, K., and S. Earle. 2000. Assessment, disability and the problem of compensation. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 25, no. 2: 191-9.
40. Sin, C.H., and G.J. Fong. 2008. 'Do no harm'? Professional regulation of disabled nursing students and nurses in Great Britain. Journal of Advanced Nursing 62, no. 6: 642-52.
41. The Equality Act 2010. London: The Stationery Office.
42. White, T. 2007. Supporting nursing students with dyslexia in clinical practice. Nursing Standard 21: 35-42.
43. Wraga, W., and P. Hlebowitsh. 2003. Toward a renaissance in curriculum theory and development in the USA. Journal of Curriculum Studies 35, no. 4: 425-37.
44. Wray, J., P. Harrison, J. Aspland, D. Taghzouit, K. Pace, and H. Gibson. 2008. The impact of Specific Learning Difficulties (SpLD) on the progression and retention of student. New York: Higher Education Academy-Health Sciences and Practice.