Structure and age jointly influence rates of protein evolution

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2012, Pages

  Toll Riera, Macarena ^a,b   Bostick, David ^b   Albà, M Mar ^a,c   Plotkin, Joshua B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

AGE GROUPS; EVOLUTIONARY RATE; HISTORICAL FACTORS; INTRINSIC FACTORS; KNOWLEDGE BASED; ORTHOLOGS; PROTEIN EVOLUTION; SOLVENT ACCESSIBILITY; STRUCTURAL BIAS; STRUCTURAL CORRELATION;

PROTEINS;

ALPHA HELIX; ARTICLE; BETA SHEET; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; EUKARYOTE; EVOLUTIONARY RATE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MUTATION RATE; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STABILITY; RESIDUE ANALYSIS; SOLVENT EFFECT; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; VERTEBRATE;

EID: 84863663815     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002542     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Drummond DA, Bloom JD, Adami C, Wilke CO, Arnold FH, (2005) Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 14338-14343.
2. Hirsh AE, Fraser HB, (2001) Protein dispensability and rate of evolution. Nature 411: 1046-1049.
3. Green P, Lipman D, Hillier L, Waterston R, States D, et al. (1993) Ancient conserved regions in new gene sequences and the protein databases. Science 259: 1711-1716.
4. Pál C, Papp B, Hurst LD, (2001) Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. Genetics 158: 927-931.
5. Drummond DA, Raval A, Wilke CO, (2006) A single determinant dominates the rate of yeast protein evolution. Mol Biol Evol 23: 327-337.
6. Wall DP, Hirsh AE, Fraser HB, Kumm J, Giaever G, et al. (2005) Functional genomic analysis of the rates of protein evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 5483-5488.
7. Fraser HB, Hirsh AE, Steinmetz LM, Scharfe C, Feldman MW, (2002) Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network. Science 296: 750-752.
8. Marais G, Duret L, (2001) Synonymous codon usage, accuracy of translation, and gene length in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Mol Evol 52: 275-280.
9. Lipman DJ, Souvorov A, Koonin EV, Panchenko AR, Tatusova TA, (2002) The relationship of protein conservation and sequence length. BMC Evol Biol 2: 20.
10. Hahn MW, Kern AD, (2005) Comparative genomics of centrality and essentiality in three eukaryotic protein-interaction networks. Mol Biol Evol 22: 803-806.
11. Bloom JD, Drummond DA, Arnold FH, Wilke CO, (2006) Structural determinants of the rate of protein evolution in yeast. Mol Biol Evol 23: 1751-1761.
12. Franzosa EA, Xia Y, (2009) Structural determinants of protein evolution are context-sensitive at the residue level. Mol Biol Evol 26: 2387-2395.
13. Lobkovsky AE, Wolf YI, Koonin EV, (2010) Universal distribution of protein evolution rates as a consequence of protein folding physics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 2983-2988.
14. Plotkin JB, Fraser HB, (2007) Assessing the determinants of evolutionary rates in the presence of noise. Mol Biol Evol 24: 1113-1121.
15. Drummond DA, Wilke CO, (2008) Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution. Cell 134: 341-352.
16. Franzosa E, Xia Y, (2008) Structural perspectives on protein evolution. Annu Rep Comput Chem 4: 3-21.
17. Pál C, Papp B, Lercher MJ, (2006) An integrated view of protein evolution. Nat Rev Genet 7: 337-348.
18. Goldman N, Thorne JL, Jones DT, (1998) Assessing the impact of secondary structure and solvent accessibility on protein evolution. Genetics 149: 445-458.
19. Mirny LA, Shakhnovich EI, (1999) Universally conserved positions in protein folds: reading evolutionary signals about stability, folding kinetics and function. J Mol Biol 291: 177-196.
20. Bustamante CD, Townsend JP, Hartl DL, (2000) Solvent accessibility and purifying selection within proteins of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica. Mol Biol Evol 17: 301-308.
21. Conant GC, Stadler PF, (2009) Solvent exposure imparts similar selective pressures across a range of yeast proteins. Mol Biol Evol 26: 1155-1161.
22. England JL, Shakhnovich EI, (2003) Structural determinant of protein designability. Phys Rev Lett 90: 218101.
23. Zhou T, Drummond DA, Wilke CO, (2008) Contact density affects protein evolutionary rate from bacteria to animals. J Mol Biol 66: 395-404.
24. Ferrada E, Wagner A, (2008) Protein robustness promotes evolutionary innovations on large evolutionary time-scales. Proc Biol Sci 275: 1595-1602.
25. Toft C, Fares MA, (2010) Structural Calibration of the Rates of Amino Acid Evolution in a Search for Darwin in Drifting Biological Systems. Mol Biol Evol 27: 2375-2385.
26. Albà MM, Castresana J, (2005) Inverse relationship between evolutionary rate and age of mammalian genes. Mol Biol Evol 22: 598-606.
27. Wolf YI, Novichkov PS, Karev GP, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ, (2009) The universal distribution of evolutionary rates of genes and distinct characteristics of eukaryotic genes of different apparent ages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 7273-7280.
28. Vishnoi A, Kryazhimskiy S, Bazykin Ga, Hannenhalli S, Plotkin JB, (2010) Young proteins experience more variable selection pressures than old proteins. Genome Res 20: 1574-1581.
29. Domazet-Loso T, Tautz D, (2003) An evolutionary analysis of orphan genes in Drosophila. Genome Res 13: 2213-2219.
30. Toll-Riera M, Bosch N, Bellora N, Castelo R, Armengol L, et al. (2009) Origin of primate orphan genes: a comparative genomics approach. Mol Biol Evol 26: 603-612.
31. Kuo C-H, Kissinger JC, (2008) Consistent and contrasting properties of lineage-specific genes in the apicomplexan parasites Plasmodium and Theileria. BMC Evol Biol 8: 108.
32. Cai JJ, Woo PCY, Lau SKP, Smith DK, Yuen K-Y, (2006) Accelerated evolutionary rate may be responsible for the emergence of lineage-specific genes in ascomycota. J Mol Biol 63: 1-11.
33. Daubin V, Ochman H, (2004) Bacterial genomes as new gene homes: the genealogy of ORFans in E. coli. Genome Res 14: 1036-1042.
34. Wong P, Frishman D, (2006) Fold designability, distribution, and disease. PLoS Comput Biol 2: e40.
35. Gan HH, Tropsha A, Schlick T, (2001) Lattice protein folding with two and four-body statistical potentials. Proteins 43: 161-174.
36. Krishnamoorthy B, Tropsha A, (2003) Development of a four-body statistical pseudo-potential to discriminate native from non-native protein conformations. Bioinformatics 19: 1540-1548.
37. Deutsch C, Krishnamoorthy B, (2007) Four-body scoring function for mutagenesis. Bioinformatics 23: 3009-3015.
38. Carter CW, LeFebvre BC, Cammer SA, Tropsha A, Edgell MH, (2001) Four-body potentials reveal protein-specific correlations to stability changes caused by hydrophobic core mutations. J Mol Biol 311: 625-638.
39. Samudrala R, Levitt M, (2000) Decoys "R" Us: a database of incorrect conformations to improve protein structure prediction. Protein Sci 9: 1399-1401.
40. Wingreen N, Li H, Tang C, (2003) Designability and Thermal Stability of Protein Structures. Polymer 45: 12.
41. Bloom JD, Silberg JJ, Wilke CO, Drummond DA, Adami C, et al. (2005) Thermodynamic prediction of protein neutrality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 606-611.
42. Bloom JD, Labthavikul ST, Otey CR, Arnold FH, (2006) Protein stability promotes evolvability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 5869-5874.
43. Kabsch W, Sander C, (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22: 2577-2637.
44. Toll-Riera M, Radó-Trilla N, Martys F, Albà MM, (2011) Role of Low-Complexity Sequences in the Formation of Novel Protein Coding Sequences. Mol Biol Evol 29: 883-6.
45. Simon M, Hancock JM, (2009) Tandem and cryptic amino acid repeats accumulate in disordered regions of proteins. Genome Biol 10: R59.
46. Choi I-G, Kim S-H, (2006) Evolution of protein structural classes and protein sequence families. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 14056-14061.
47. Cai JJ, Petrov DA, (2010) Relaxed purifying selection and possibly high rate of adaptation in primate lineage-specific genes. Genome Biol Evol 2: 393-409.
48. Flicek P, Amode MR, Barrell D, Beal K, Brent S, et al. (2011) Ensembl 2011. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D800-6.
49. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389-3402.
50. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, et al. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 235-242.
51. Miller S, Janin J, Lesk AM, Chothia C, (1987) Interior and surface of monomeric proteins. J Mol Biol 196: 641-656.
52. Ramsey DC, Scherrer MP, Zhou T, Wilke CO, (2011) The relationship between relative solvent accessibility and evolutionary rate in protein evolution. Genetics 188: 479-488.
53. Notredame C, Higgins DG, Heringa J, (2000) T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J Mol Biol 302: 205-217.
54. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T, (2002) MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 3059-3066.
55. Yang Z, (2007) PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol 24: 1586-1591.
56. Wang G, Dunbrack RL, (2003) PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics 19: 1589-1591.
57. Masso M, Lu Z, Vaisman II, (2006) Computational mutagenesis studies of protein structure-function correlations. Proteins 64: 234-245.
58. Feng Y, Kloczkowski A, Jernigan RL, (2007) Four-body contact potentials derived from two protein datasets to discriminate native structures from decoys. Proteins 68: 57-66.