Chapter 1 Structural Perspectives on Protein Evolution

Annual Reports in Computational Chemistry

Volumn 4, Issue , 2008, Pages 3-21

  Franzosa, Eric ^a   Xia, Yu ^a,b  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Boston University   (United States)

Author keywords

Designability; Evolutionary determinants; Evolvability; Fitness density; Molecular evolution; Protein structure

Indexed keywords

EID: 54849410447     PISSN: 15741400     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1574-1400(08)00001-7     Document Type: Chapter

References (91)

1. Dobzhansky T. Biology, molecular and organismic. Am. Zool. 4 (1964) 443-452
2. McInerney J.O. The causes of protein evolutionary rate variation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21 5 (2006) 230-232
3. Kellis M., Birren B.W., and Lander E.S. Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 428 6983 (2004) 617-624
4. Hurst L.D. The Ka/Ks ratio: Diagnosing the form of sequence evolution. Trends Genet. 18 9 (2002) 486
5. Pal C., Papp B., and Lercher M.J. An integrated view of protein evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7 5 (2006) 337-348
6. Rocha E.P. The quest for the universals of protein evolution. Trends Genet. 22 8 (2006) 412-416
7. Bloom J.D., et al. Structural determinants of the rate of protein evolution in yeast. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23 9 (2006) 1751-1761
8. Plotkin J.B., and Fraser H.B. Assessing the determinants of evolutionary rates in the presence of noise. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24 5 (2007) 1113-1121
9. Rocha E.P., and Danchin A. An analysis of determinants of amino acids substitution rates in bacterial proteins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21 1 (2004) 108-116
10. Akashi H. Translational selection and yeast proteome evolution. Genetics 164 4 (2003) 1291-1303
11. Drummond D.A., et al. Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 40 (2005) 14338-14343
12. Goldberg A.L. Protein degradation and protection against misfolded or damaged proteins. Nature 426 6968 (2003) 895-899
13. Crick F. Central dogma of molecular biology. Nature 227 5258 (1970) 561-563
14. Dill K.A., et al. The protein folding problem: When will it be solved?. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 17 3 (2007) 342-346
15. Hubbard T.J., et al. SCOP: A structural classification of proteins database. Nucleic Acids Res. 25 1 (1997) 236-239
16. Chothia C. Proteins. One thousand families for the molecular biologist. Nature 357 6379 (1992) 543-544
17. Bateman A., et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 30 1 (2002) 276-280
18. Helling R., et al. The designability of protein structures. J. Mol. Graph Model 19 1 (2001) 157-167
19. Kimura M. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution (1983), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge
20. Wagner A. Robustness, evolvability, and neutrality. FEBS Lett. 579 8 (2005) 1772-1778
21. Sharp P.M., et al. DNA sequence evolution: The sounds of silence. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 349 1329 (1995) 241-247
22. Wong P., and Frishman D. Fold designability, distribution, and disease. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2 5 (2006) e40
23. Li H., Tang C., and Wingreen N.S. Are protein folds atypical?. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 9 (1998) 4987-4990
24. Li H., et al. Emergence of preferred structures in a simple model of protein folding. Science 273 5275 (1996) 666-669
25. Kirschner M., and Gerhart J. Evolvability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 15 (1998) 8420-8427
26. Huynen M.A., Stadler P.F., and Fontana W. Smoothness within ruggedness: The role of neutrality in adaptation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 1 (1996) 397-401
27. Stadler B.M., et al. The topology of the possible: Formal spaces underlying patterns of evolutionary change. J. Theor. Biol. 213 2 (2001) 241-274
28. Fontana W., and Schuster P. Shaping space: The possible and the attainable in RNA genotype-phenotype mapping. J. Theor. Biol. 194 4 (1998) 491-515
29. Schuster P., et al. From sequences to shapes and back: A case study in RNA secondary structures. Proc. Biol. Sci. 255 1344 (1994) 279-284
30. Itzhaki L., and Wolynes P. The quest to understand protein folding. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 18 1 (2008) 1-3
31. Dill K.A., et al. Principles of protein folding-A perspective from simple exact models. Protein Sci. 4 4 (1995) 561-602
32. Shakhnovich E.I. Theoretical studies of protein-folding thermodynamics and kinetics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7 1 (1997) 29-40
33. Xia Y., and Levitt M. Simulating protein evolution in sequence and structure space. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 14 2 (2004) 202-207
34. Hinds D.A., and Levitt M. From structure to sequence and back again. J. Mol. Biol. 258 1 (1996) 201-209
35. Park B.H., and Levitt M. The complexity and accuracy of discrete state models of protein structure. J. Mol. Biol. 249 2 (1995) 493-507
36. Mirny L., and Shakhnovich E. Protein folding theory: From lattice to all-atom models. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30 (2001) 361-396
37. Xia Y., and Levitt M. Roles of mutation and recombination in the evolution of protein thermodynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 16 (2002) 10382-10387
38. Xia Y., and Levitt M. Funnel-like organization in sequence space determines the distributions of protein stability and folding rate preferred by evolution. Proteins 55 1 (2004) 107-114
39. Mirny L.A., Abkevich V.I., and Shakhnovich E.I. How evolution makes proteins fold quickly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 9 (1998) 4976-4981
40. Gutin A.M., Abkevich V.I., and Shakhnovich E.I. Evolution-like selection of fast-folding model proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92 5 (1995) 1282-1286
41. Wagner A. Robustness and evolvability: A paradox resolved. Proc. Biol. Sci. 275 1630 (2008) 91-100
42. Lenski R.E., Barrick J.E., and Ofria C. Balancing robustness and evolvability. PLoS Biol. 4 12 (2006) e428
43. Bloom J.D., et al. Protein stability promotes evolvability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 15 (2006) 5869-5874
44. Bloom J.D., et al. Stability and the evolvability of function in a model protein. Biophys. J. 86 5 (2004) 2758-2764
45. Earl D.J., and Deem M.W. Evolvability is a selectable trait. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101 32 (2004) 11531-11536
46. Drenth J. Principles of X-Ray Crystallography (1999), Springer, New York
47. Clore G.M., and Gronenborn A.M. Determining the structures of large proteins and protein complexes by NMR. Trends Biotechnol. 16 1 (1998) 22-34
48. Bernstein F.C., et al. The Protein Data Bank: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. 112 3 (1977) 535-542
49. Altschul S.F., et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25 17 (1997) 3389-3402
50. Perutz M.F., Kendrew J.C., and Watson H.C. Structure and function of haemoglobin II. Some relations between polypeptide chain configuration and amino acid sequence. J. Mol. Biol. 13 (1965) 669-678
51. Lin Y.S., et al. Proportion of solvent-exposed amino acids in a protein and rate of protein evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24 4 (2007) 1005-1011
52. Sasidharan R., and Chothia C. The selection of acceptable protein mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104 24 (2007) 10080-10085
53. Choi S.S., Vallender E.J., and Lahn B.T. Systematically assessing the influence of 3-dimensional structural context on the molecular evolution of mammalian proteomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23 11 (2006) 2131-2133
54. Zuckerkandl E. Evolutionary processes and evolutionary noise at the molecular level. I. Functional density in proteins. J. Mol. Evol. 7 3 (1976) 167-183
55. England J.L., and Shakhnovich E.I. Structural determinant of protein designability. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 21 (2003) 218101
56. Warringer J., and Blomberg A. Evolutionary constraints on yeast protein size. BMC Evol. Biol. 6 (2006) 61
57. Dayhoff M., Schwartz R.M., and Orcutt B. Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure (1978), National Biomedical Research Foundation, Silver Spring
58. Henikoff S., and Henikoff J.G. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89 22 (1992) 10915-10919
59. Graur D. Amino acid composition and the evolutionary rates of protein-coding genes. J. Mol. Evol. 22 1 (1985) 53-62
60. Tourasse N.J., and Li W.H. Selective constraints, amino acid composition, and the rate of protein evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17 4 (2000) 656-664
61. Brown C.J., et al. Evolutionary rate heterogeneity in proteins with long disordered regions. J. Mol. Evol. 55 1 (2002) 104-110
62. Wright P.E., and Dyson H.J. Intrinsically unstructured proteins: Re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. J. Mol. Biol. 293 2 (1999) 321-331
63. Ponting C.P., and Russell R.R. The natural history of protein domains. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 31 (2002) 45-71
64. Orengo C.A., and Thornton J.M. Protein families and their evolution-A structural perspective. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 74 (2005) 867-900
65. Lupas A.N., Ponting C.P., and Russell R.B. On the evolution of protein folds: Are similar motifs in different protein folds the result of convergence, insertion, or relics of an ancient peptide world?. J. Struct. Biol. 134 2-3 (2001) 191-203
66. Orengo C.A., et al. CATH-A hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 5 8 (1997) 1093-1108
67. Chothia C., et al. Evolution of the protein repertoire. Science 300 5626 (2003) 1701-1703
68. Bjorklund A.K., et al. Domain rearrangements in protein evolution. J. Mol. Biol. 353 4 (2005) 911-923
69. Zhang C., and DeLisi C. Estimating the number of protein folds. J. Mol. Biol. 284 5 (1998) 1301-1305
70. Dokholyan N.V., Shakhnovich B., and Shakhnovich E.I. Expanding protein universe and its origin from the biological Big Bang. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 22 (2002) 14132-14136
71. Kimura M., and Ota T. Mutation and evolution at the molecular level. Genetics 73 Suppl 73 (1973) 19-35
72. Dickerson R.E. The structures of cytochrome c and the rates of molecular evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 1 1 (1971) 26-45
73. Valdar W.S., and Thornton J.M. Protein-protein interfaces: Analysis of amino acid conservation in homodimers. Proteins 42 1 (2001) 108-124
74. Grantham R. Amino acid difference formula to help explain protein evolution. Science 185 4154 (1974) 862-864
75. Caffrey D.R., et al. Are protein-protein interfaces more conserved in sequence than the rest of the protein surface?. Protein Sci. 13 1 (2004) 190-202
76. Mintseris J., and Weng Z. Structure, function, and evolution of transient and obligate protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 31 (2005) 10930-10935
77. Albert R. Scale-free networks in cell biology. J. Cell. Sci. 118 Pt 21 (2005) 4947-4957
78. Jordan I.K., Wolf Y.I., and Koonin E.V. No simple dependence between protein evolution rate and the number of protein-protein interactions: Only the most prolific interactors tend to evolve slowly. BMC Evol. Biol. 3 (2003) 1
79. Han J.D., et al. Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Nature 430 6995 (2004) 88-93
80. Aloy P., and Russell R.B. Structural systems biology: Modelling protein interactions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7 3 (2006) 188-197
81. Kim P.M., et al. Relating three-dimensional structures to protein networks provides evolutionary insights. Science 314 5807 (2006) 1938-1941
82. Fraser H.B., et al. Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network. Science 296 5568 (2002) 750-752
83. Kiel C., Beltrao P., and Serrano L. Analyzing protein interaction networks using structural information. Ann. Rev. Biochem. (2008)
84. Deng M., et al. Inferring domain-domain interactions from protein-protein interactions. Genome Res. 12 10 (2002) 1540-1548
85. Schlicker A., et al. Functional evaluation of domain-domain interactions and human protein interaction networks. Bioinformatics 23 7 (2007) 859-865
86. Kiel C., and Serrano L. Prediction of Ras-effector interactions using position energy matrices. Bioinformatics 23 17 (2007) 2226-2230
87. Haynes C., et al. Intrinsic disorder is a common feature of hub proteins from four eukaryotic interactomes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2 8 (2006) e100
88. Kim P.M., et al. The role of disorder in interaction networks: A structural analysis. Mol. Syst. Biol. 4 (2008) 179
89. Papp B., Pal C., and Hurst L.D. Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast. Nature 424 6945 (2003) 194-197
90. Pokala N., and Handel T.M. Review: protein design-Where we were, where we are, where we're going. J. Struct. Biol. 134 2-3 (2001) 269-281
91. Farinas E.T., Bulter T., and Arnold F.H. Directed enzyme evolution. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 12 6 (2001) 545-551