Automated identification of protein-ligand interaction features using Inductive Logic Programming: a hexose binding case study

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  A Santos, Jose C ^a   Nassif, Houssam ^b   Page, David ^b   Muggleton, Stephen H ^a   E Sternberg, Michael J ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b University of Wisconsin   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION; AUTOMATED METHODS; COMMON FEATURES; CONFIDENCE LEVELS; MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES; PREDICTIVE ACCURACY; PROTEIN RECEPTORS; PROTEIN STRUCTURES; PROTEIN-LIGAND INTERACTIONS; STRUCTURAL FEATURE;

AROMATIC COMPOUNDS; AROMATIZATION; HYDROGEN BONDS; PROTEINS;

INDUCTIVE LOGIC PROGRAMMING (ILP);

HEXOSE; LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; PROTEIN BINDING;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; HEXOSES; LIGANDS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 84863562709     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-162     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Solomon E, Berg L, Martin DW. Biology 2007, Brooks Cole, Belmont, CA.
2. Shionyu-Mitsuyama C, Shirai T, Ishida H, Yamane T. An empirical approach for structure-based prediction of carbohydrate-binding sites on proteins. Protein Eng 2003, 16(7):467-478. 10.1093/protein/gzg065, 12915724.
3. Sujatha MS, Sasidhar YU, Balaji PV. Energetics of galactose- and glucose-aromatic amino acid interactions: implications for binding in galactose-specific proteins. Protein Sci 2004, 13(9):2502-2514. 10.1110/ps.04812804, 2280018, 15322288.
4. Chakrabarti R, Klibanov AM, Friesner RA. Computational prediction of native protein ligand-binding and enzyme active site sequences. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2005, 102(29):10153-10158. 10.1073/pnas.0504023102, 1177389, 15998733.
5. Doxey AC, Cheng Z, Moffatt BA, McConkey BJ. Structural motif screening reveals a novel, conserved carbohydrate-binding surface in the pathogenesis-related protein PR-5d. BMC Struct Biol 2010, 10:23. 10.1186/1472-6807-10-23, 2924342, 20678238.
6. Gold ND, Jackson RM. Fold independent structural comparisons of protein-ligand binding sites for exploring functional relationships. J Mol Biol 2006, 355(5):1112-1124. 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.11.044, 16359705.
7. Cipriano G, Wesenberg G, Grim T, Jr GNP, Gleicher M. GRAPE: GRaphical Abstracted Protein Explorer. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38:W595-W601. 10.1093/nar/gkq398, 2896102, 20462864.
8. Malik A, Ahmad S. Sequence and structural features of carbohydrate binding in proteins and assessment of predictability using a neural network. BMC Struct Biol 2007, 7:1. 10.1186/1472-6807-7-1, 1780050, 17201922.
9. Nassif H, Al-Ali H, Khuri S, Keirouz W. Prediction of protein-glucose binding sites using support vector machines. Proteins 2009, 77:121-132. 10.1002/prot.22424, 19415755.
10. Kawabata T. Detection of multi-scale pockets on protein surfaces using mathematical morphology. Proteins 2010, 78(5):1195-1211. 10.1002/prot.22639, 19938154.
11. Wong GY, Leung FH. Predicting Protein-Ligand Binding Site with Support Vector Machine. Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2010, 1-5. , Barcelona, Spain.
12. Nassif H, Al-Ali H, Khuri S, Keirouz W, Page D. An inductive logic programming approach to validate hexose biochemical knowledge. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on ILP 2009, 149-165. , Leuven, Belgium.
13. Srinivasan A: The Aleph Manual. 4th 2007. [http://www.comlab.ox.ac.uk/activities/machinelearning/Aleph/aleph.html]..
14. Srinivasan A, King RD, Muggleton SH, Sternberg MJE. Carcinogenesis predictions using ILP. Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming 1997, 273-287. , Prague, Czech Republic.
15. Dutra I, Nassif H, Page D, Shavlik J, Strigel R, Wu Y, EM E, Burnside E. Integrating machine learning and physician knowledge to improve the accuracy of breast biopsy. American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA'11) Symposium Proceedings 2011, 349-355. , Washington, DC, 3327041, 22530179.
16. Finn P, Muggleton S, Page D, Srinivasan A. Pharmacophore discovery using the inductive logic programming system PROGOL. Machine Learning 1998, 30(2-3):241-270.
17. Szaboova A, Kuzelka O, Zelezny F, Tolar J. Prediction of DNA-binding proteins from structural features. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Machine Learning in Systems Biology 2010, 273-287. , Edinburgh.
18. Muggleton S, Santos J, Tamaddoni-Nezhad A. ProGolem: a system based on relative minimal generalisation. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on ILP 2009, 131-148. Springer, Leuven, Belgium.
19. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000, 28:235-242. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235, 102472, 10592235.
20. Fox MA, Whitesell JK. Organic Chemistry 2004, Jones & Bartlett Publishers, Boston, MA.
21. Wang G, Dunbrack RL. PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(12):1589-1591. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg224, 12912846.
22. Yamashita MM, Wesson L, Eisenman G, Eisenberg D. Where metal ions bind in proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 1990, 87(15):5648-5652.
23. Mitchell TM. Machine Learning 1997, McGraw-Hill International Editions, Singapore.
24. Kowalski RA, Kuehner D. Linear resolution with selection function. Artif Intelligence 1971, 2(3/4):227-260.
25. Santos J, Muggleton S. Subsumer: A Prolog theta-subsumption engine. Technical communications of the International Conference on Logic Programming 2010, 172-181. Edinburgh, Scotland, .
26. Sujatha MS, Balaji PV. Identification of common structural features of binding sites in galactose-specific proteins. Proteins 2004, 55:44-65. 10.1002/prot.10612, 14997539.
27. Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning 2001, 45:5-32.
28. Díaz-Uriarte R, de A. Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random forest. BMC Bioinf 2006, 7:3.
29. Santos Costa V. The life of a logic programming system. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Logic Programming 2008, 1-6. Springer-Verlag, Udine, Italy, de la Banda MG, Pontelli E.
30. Orengo C, Michie A, Jones S, Jones D, Swindells M. CATH-a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 1997, 5:1093-1108. 10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00260-8, 9309224.
31. Jain AK, Duin RPW, Mao J. Statistical pattern recognition: a review. IEEE Trans Pattern Analysis Machine Intelligence 2000, 22:4-37.
32. Vapnik VN. Statistical Learning Theory 1998, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
33. Kononenko I, Simec E, Robnik-Sikonja M. Overcoming the myopia of inductive learning algorithms with RELIEFF. Appl Intell 1997, 7:39-55.
34. Rao VSR, Lam K, Qasba PK. Architecture of the sugar binding sites in carbohydrate binding proteins-a computer modeling study. Int J Biol Macromol 1998, 23(4):295-307. 10.1016/S0141-8130(98)00056-7, 9849627.
35. Zhang Y, Swaminathan GJ, Deshpande A, Boix E, Natesh R, Xie Z, Acharya KR, Brew K. Roles of individual enzyme-substrate interactions by alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase in catalysis and specificity. Biochemistry 2003, 42(46):13512-13521. 10.1021/bi035430r, 14621997.
36. Quiocho FA, Vyas NK. Atomic interactions between proteins/enzymes and carbohydrates. Bioorganic Chemistry: Carbohydrates 1999, 441-457. Oxford University Press, New York, Hecht SM.
37. Screen J, Stanca-Kaposta EC, Gamblin DP, Liu B, Macleod NA, Snoek LC, Davis BG, Simons JP. IR-spectral signatures of aromatic-sugar complexes: probing carbohydrate-protein interactions. Angew Chem Int Ed 2007, 46:3644-3648.
38. Boraston AB, Bolam DN, Gilbert HJ, Davies GJ. Carbohydrate-binding modules: fine-tuning polysaccharide recognition. Biochem J 2004, 382:769-781. 10.1042/BJ20040892, 1133952, 15214846.
39. Taroni C, Jones S, Thornton JM. Analysis and prediction of carbohydrate binding sites. Protein Eng 2000, 13(2):89-98. 10.1093/protein/13.2.89, 10708647.