Detection of multiscale pockets on protein surfaces using mathematical morphology

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 78, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1195-1211

  Kawabata, Takeshi ^a  

^a NARA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Binding site; Geometry; Mathematical morphology; Pocket

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METABOLISM; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SURFACE PROPERTY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; LIGANDS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 77951217659     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22639     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Kawabata T, Go N. Detection of pockets on protein surfaces using small and large probe spheres to find putative ligand binding sites. Proteins 2007;68:516-529.
2. Brady P, Stouten PFW. Fast prediction and visualization of protein binding pockets with PASS. J Comput-Aided Mol Des 2000; 14:383-401.
3. Laskowski RA. SURFNET: a program for visualizing molecular surfaces, cavities, and intermolecular interactions. J Mol Graph 1995;13:323-330.
4. Laskowski RA, Luscombe NM, Swindells MB, Thornton JM. Protein clefts in molecular recognition and function. Protein Sci 1996;5: 2438-2452.
5. Matheron G. Random sets and integral geometry. New York: Wiley: Wiley; 1975.
6. Serra J. Image analysis and mathematical morphology. London: Academic Press: Academic Press; 1982.
7. Haralick RM, Sternberg SR, Zhuaug X. Image analysis using mathematical morphology. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 1987; 9:523-550.
8. Kobata H, Moruforoji. Tokyo: Korona-Sha; 1996.
9. Delaney JS. Finding and filling protein cavities using cellular logic operations. J Mol Graph 1992;10:174-177.
10. Masuya M, Doi J. Detection and geometric modeling of molecular surfaces and cavities using digital mathematical morphological operations. J Mol Graph 1995;13:331-1330
11. Lee B, Richards FM. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol 1971;55:379-400.
12. Connolly ML. Analytical molecular surface calculation. J Appl Crystallogr 1983;16:548-558.
13. Connolly ML. Solvent-accessible surface of proteins and nucleic acids. Science 1983;221:709-713.
14. Maragos P. Pattern spectrum and multiscale shape representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 1989;11:701-716.
15. Chothia C. The nature of the accessible and buried surfaces in proteins. J Mol Biol 1976;105:1-14.
16. Liang J, Edelsbrunner H, Woodward C. Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: measurement of binding site geometry and implication for ligand design. Protein Sci 1998;7:1884-1897.
17. Laurie ATR, Jackson RM. Q-SiteFinder: an energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites. Bioinformatics 2005;21:1908-1916.
18. csc predicting ligand binding sites using the Connolly surface and degree of conservation. BMC Struct Biol 2006;6:19.
19. Weisel M, Proschak E, Schneider G. PocketPicker: analysis of ligand binding sites with shape descriptors. Chem Centr J 2007; 1:7.
20. Li B, Turuvekere S, Agrawal M, La D, Ramani K, Kihara D. Characterization of local geometry of protein surfaces with the visibility criterion. Proteins 2008;71:670-683.
21. Morita M, Nakamura S, Shimizu K. Highly accurate method for ligand-binding site prediction in unbound state (apo) protein structures. Proteins 2008;73:468-479.
22. Andreeva A, Howorth D, Chandonia J-M, Brenner SE, Hubbard TJP, Chothia C, Murzin AG. Data growth and its impact on the SCOP database: new developments. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36: D419-D425.
23. Kuntz ID, Blaney JM, Oatley SJ, Langridge R, Ferrin TE. A geometric approach to macromolecular-ligand interactions. J Mol Biol 1982;161:269-288.
24. Gutteridge A, Bartlett GJ, Thornton JM. Using a neural network and spatial clustering to predict the location of active sites in enzymes. J Mol Biol 2003;330:719-734.
25. Graser F, Morris RJ, Najmanovich RJ, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM. A method for localizing ligand binding pockets in protein structures. Proteins 2006;62:479-488.
26. The UniProt Consortium. The universal protein resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res 2008:6:D190-D195.
27. Diller DJ, Merz LM, Jr., High throughput docking for library design and library prioritization. Proteins 2001;43:113-124.
28. Nayal M, Honig B. On the nature of cavities on protein surfaces: application to the identification of drug-binding sites. Proteins 2006;63:892-906.
29. Yeates TO. Algorithms for evaluating the long-range accessibility of protein surfaces. J Mol Biol 1995;249:804-815.
30. Nichols A, Sharp KM, Honig B. Protein folding and association: insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons. Proteins 1991;11:281-296.
31. Connolly ML. Measurement of protein surface shape by solid angle. J Mol Graph 1986;4:3-6.
32. Levitt DG, Banaszak LJ. POCKET: a computer graphics method for identifying and displaying protein cavities and their surrounding amino acids. J Mol Graph 1995;13:323-330.
33. Hendrich M, Rippmann F, Barnickel G. LIGSITE: automatic and efficient detection of potential small molecule-binding sites in proteins. J Mol Graph Model 1997;15:359-363.
34. Goodford PJ. A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important macromolecules. J Med Chem 1985;28:849-857.