Carcinogenesis predictions using ILP

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1297, Issue , 1997, Pages 273-287

  Srinivasan, A ^a   King, R D ^b   Muggleton, S H ^a   Sternberg, M J E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH FUND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84957891317     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3540635149_56     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. J. Ashby and R.W. Tennant. Definitive relationships among chemical structure, carcinogenicity and mutagenicity for 301 chemicals tested by the U.S. NTP, Mutation Research, 257:229-306, 1991.
2. D. Bahler and D. Bristol. The induction of rules for predicting chemical carcinogenesis. In Proceedings of the 26th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Los Alamitos, 1993. IEEE Computer Society Press.
3. D. Bahler and D. Bristol. The induction of rules for predicting chemical carcinogenesis in rodents. In L. Hunter, D. Searls, and J. Shavlick, editors, Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology-93, pages 29-37. MA:AAI/MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1993.
4. G. Bakale and R.D. McCreary. Prospective ke screening of potential carcinogens being tested in rodent bioassays by the US National Toxicology Program. Mutagenesis, 7:91-94, 1992.
5. R. Benigni. Predicting chemical carcinogenesis in rodents: the state of the art in the light of a comparative exercise. Mutation Research, 334:103-113, 1995.
6. D.W. Bristol, J.T. Wachsman, and A. Greenwell. The NIEHS Predictive- Toxicology Evaluation Project. Environmental Health Perspectives, pages 1001-1010, 1996. Supplement 3.
7. A.K. Debnath, R.L Lopez de Compadre, G. Debnath, A.J. Schusterman, and C. Hanscli. Structure-Activity Relationship of Mutagenic Aromatic and Heteroaro- matic Nitro compounds. Correlation with molecular orbital energies and hydrophobicity. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 34(2):786 - 797, 1991.
8. K. Enslein, B.W. Blake, and H.H. Borgstedt. Predicition of probability of carcino- genecity for a set of ntp bioassays. Mutagenesis, 5:305-306, 1990.
9. J.E. Huff, J.K. Haseman, and D.P. Rail. Scientific concepts, value and significance of chemical carcinogenesis studies. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol, 31:621-652, 1991.
10. T.D. Jones and C.E. Easterly. On the rodent bioassays currently being conducted on 44 chemicals: a RASH analysis to predict test results from the National Toxicology Program. Mutagenesis, 6:507-514, 1991.
11. R.D. King, S. Muggleton, A.Srinivasan, C. Feng, R.A. Lewis, and M.J.E. Sternberg. Drug design using inductive logic programming. In Proceedings of the 26th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Los Alamitos, 1993. IEEE Computer Society Press.
12. R.D. King, S.H. Muggleton, A. Srinivasan, and M.J.E. Sternberg. Structure- activity relationships derived by machine learning: The use of atoms and their bond connectivities to predict mutagenicity by inductive logic programming. Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, 93:438-442, 1996.
13. R.D. King, S.H. Muggleton, and M.J.E. Sternberg. Drug design by machine learning: The use of inductive logic programming to model the structure-activity relationships of trimethoprim analogues binding to dihydrofolate reductase. Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, 89(23):11322-11326, 1992.
14. R.D. King and A. Srinivasan. Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays from molecular structure using inductive logic programming. Environmental Health Perspectives, 104(5):1031-1040, 1996.
15. H. Kubini. QSAR: Hansch Analysis and Related Approaches. VCH, New York, 1993.
16. D.F.V. Lewis, C. Lonnides, and D.V. Parke. A prospective toxicity evaluation (COMPACT) on 40 chemicals currently being tested by the National Toxicology Program. Mutagenesis, 5:433-436, 1990.
17. S. Muggleton. Inverse Entailment and Progol. New Gen. Comput., 13:245-286, 1995.
18. H.S. Rosenkranz and G. Klopman. Predicition of the carcinogenecity in rodents of chemicals currently being tested by the US National Toxicology Program. Mutagenesis, 5:425-432, 1990.
19. D.M. Sanderson and C.G. Eamshaw. Computer prediction of possible toxic action from chemical structure. Human Exp Toxicol, 10:261-273, 1991.
20. A. Srinivasan, Ross D. King, and Stephen Muggleton. The role of background knowledge: using a problem from chemistry to examine the performance of an ILP program. Under review (available from the first author), 1996.
21. A. Srinivasan, S.H. Muggleton, R.D. King, and M.J.E. Sternberg. Mutagenesis: ILP experiments in a non-determinate biological domain. In S. Wrobel, editor, Proceedings of the Fourth International Inductive Logic Programming Workshop. Gesellschaft fur Mathematik und Datenverarbeitung MBH, 1994. GMD-Studien Nr 237.
22. A. Srinivasan, S.H. Muggleton, R.D. King, and M.J.E. Sternberg. Theories for mutagenicity: a study of first-order and feature based induction. Artificial Intelligence, 85:277-299, 1996.
23. R.W. Tennant, J. Spalding, S. Stasiewicz, and J. Ashby. Prediction of the outcome of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays currently being conducted on 44 chemicals by the National Toxicology Program. Mutagenesis, 5:3-14, 1990.