Pharmacophore discovery using the Inductive Logic Programming system PROGOL

Machine Learning

Volumn 30, Issue 2-3, 1998, Pages 241-270

  Finn, Paul ^a   Muggleton, Stephen ^b   Page, David ^c   Srinivasan, Ashwin ^d  

^a PFIZER GLOBAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^c University of Louisville   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Inductive logic programming; Pharmacophore; Structure activity prediction

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DRUG PRODUCTS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; LOGIC PROGRAMMING; PROLOG (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE); ALGORITHMS; COMMUNICATION; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; HEURISTIC METHODS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

PHARMACOPHORE; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY PREDICTION; INDUCTIVE LOGIC PROGRAMMING;

LEARNING SYSTEMS; FORMAL LOGIC;

EID: 0031997218     PISSN: 08856125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1007460424845     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Andrews, P., Carson, J., Caselli, A., Spark, M., & Woods, R. (1985). Conformational analysis and active site modelling of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 28:393-399.
2. Bohacek, R., Lombaert, S. D., McMartin, C., Priestle, J., & Grutter, M. (1996). Three-dimensional models of ACE and NEP inhibitors and their use in the design of potent dual ACE/NEP inhibitors. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 118:8231-8249.
3. Brint, A. & Willett, P. (1987). Algorithms for the identification of three-dimensional maximal common substructures. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 27(152):152-158.
4. Buchanan, B., Feigenbaum, E., & Sridharan, N. (1972). Heuristic theory formation: data interpretation and rule formation. In Meltzer, B. and Michie, D., editors, Machine intelligence 7, pages 267-290. Edinburgh University Press.
5. Debnath, A., de Compadre, R. L., Debnath, G., Schusterman, A., & Hansch, C. (1991). Structure-activity relationship of mutagenic aromatic and heteroaromatic nitro compounds, correlation with molecular orbital energies and hydrophobicity. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 34(2):786-797.
6. Dietterich, T., Lathrop, R., & Lozano-Perez, T. (1997). Solving the multiple-instance problem with axis-parallel rectangles. Artificial Intelligence, 89(1-2):31-71.
7. Fayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P., & Uthurasamy, R. (1996). Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining. AAAI Press/MIT Press.
8. Finn, P. (1996). Computer-based screening of compound databases for the indentification of novel leads. Drug Discovery Today, 1:363-370.
9. Hansch, C. & Leo, A. (1995). Exploring QSAR. ACS.
10. Hansch, C., Maloney, P., Fujita, T., & Muir, M. (1962). Correlation of biological activity of phenoxyacetic acids with Hammett substituent constants and partition coefficients. Nature, 194:178-180.
11. Hassell, C., Krohn, A., Moody, C., & Thomas, W. (1982). The design of a new group of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. FEBS Letters, 147:175-179.
12. Jain, A., Dietterich, T., Lathrop, R., Chapman, D., Critchlow, R., Bauer, B., Webster, T., & Lozano-Pérez, T. (1994a). Compass: a shape-based machine learning tool for drug design. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 8:635-652.
13. Jain, A., Koile, K., Bauer, B., & Chapman, D. (1994b). Compass: Predicting biological activities from molecular surface properties. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 37:2315-2327.
14. King, R., Muggleton, S., Lewis, R., & Sternberg, M. (1992). Drug design by machine learning: The use of inductive logic programming to model the structure-activity relationships of trimethoprim analogues binding to dihydrofolate reductase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89(23): 11322-11326.
15. King, R., Muggleton, S., Srinivasan, A., & Sternberg, M. (1996). Structure-activity relationships derived by machine learning: the use of atoms and their bond connectives to predict mutagenicity by inductive logic programming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93:438-442.
16. Leach, A. (1991). A survey of methods for searching conformational space of small and medium sized molecules. In Lipkowitz and Boyd, editors, Reviews of Computational Chemistry, Vol. 2. VCH USA.
17. Lee, Y., Buchanan, B., & Aronis, J. (1998). Knowledge-based learning in exploratory science: Learning rules to predict rodent carcinogenicity. Machine Learning, 30, 217-240.
18. Lombaert, S. D., Chatelain, R., Fink, C., & Trapani, A. (1996). Design and pharmacology of dual angiotensin-converting enzyme and neutral endopeptidase inhibitors. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 2:443-462.
19. Martin, Y., Bures, M., Danaher, E., DeLazzer, J., Lico, I., & Pavlik, P. (1993). A fast new approach to pharmacophore mapping and its application to dopaminergic and benzodiazepine agonists. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 7:83-102.
20. Mayer, D., Naylor, C., Motoc, I., & Marshall, G. (1987). A unique geometry of the active site of angiotensin-converting enzyme consistent with structure-activity studies. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 1:3-16.
21. Michalski, R., Mozetic, I., Hong, J., & Lavrac, N. (1986). The AQ15 inductive learning system: an overview and experiments. In Proceedings of IMAL 1986, Orsay. Université de Paris-Sud.
22. Muggleton, S. (1995). Inverse entailment and Progol. New Generation Computing, 13:245-286.
23. Muggleton, S. (1996). Learning from positive data. In Proceedings of the Sixth Inductive Logic Programming Workshop, Lecture notes in artificial intelligence, Berlin. Springer-Verlag.
24. Muggleton, S. & Feng, C. (1990). Efficient induction of logic programs. In Proceedings of the First Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory, Tokyo. Ohmsha.
25. Muggleton, S., Page, C., & Srinivasan, A. (1996). An initial experiment into stereochemistry-based drug design using ILP. In Proceedings of the Sixth Inductive Logic Programming Workshop, Lecture notes in artificial intelligence, Berlin. Springer-Verlag.
26. Nilsson, N. (1980). Principles of Artificial Intelligence. Tioga, Palo Alto, CA.
27. Provost, F. & Aronis, J. (1996). Scaling up inductive learning with massive parallelism. Machine Learning, 23:33-46.
28. Saith, R., Srinivasan, A., Michie, D., & Sargent, I. (1997). The relationship between embryo, oocyte and follicular features and the developmental potential of human IVF embryos. Human Reproduction (Submitted).
29. Shapiro, E. (1983). Algorithmic program debugging. MIT Press.
30. Srinivasan, A. & Camacho, R. (1996). Experiments in numerical reasoning with ILP. Technical Report PRG-TR-22-96, Oxford University Computing Laboratory, Oxford.
31. Srinivasan, A. & Camacho, R. (1997). Experiments in numerical reasoning with ILP. Journal of Logic Programming (accepted).
32. Whittle, P. & Blundell, T. (1994). Protein structure-based drug design. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct., 23:349-375.