Responsible Conduct of Research Training and Trust Between Research Postgraduate Students and Supervisors

Ethics and Behavior

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 297-314

  Jordan, Sara R ^a   Gray, Phillip W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY AT QATAR   (Qatar)

Author keywords

postgraduate students; responsible conduct of research; supervision; survey; training; trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863510733     PISSN: 10508422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508422.2012.680350     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ajuwon, A. J. and Kass, N. 2008. Outcome of a research ethics training workshop among clinicians and scientists in a Nigerian university. BMC Medical Ethics, 9: 1-9.
2. Alfredo, K. and Hart, H. 2011. The university and the responsible conduct of research: Who is responsible for what?. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17: 447-457.
3. Antes, A. L., Wang, X., Mumford, M. D., Brown, R. P., Connelly, S. and Devenport, L. D. 2010. Evaluating the effects that existing instruction on responsible conduct of research has on ethical decision making. Academic Medicine, 85: 519-526.
4. Bird, S. J. 2001. Mentors, advisors and supervisors: their role in teaching responsible research conduct. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7: 455-468.
5. Bird, S. J. 2006. Research ethics, research integrity and the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12: 411-412.
6. Brown, M. A., Ablin, R. J. and Wheatley, D. N. 2010. Reflections on the responsible conduct of cancer research. Cancer Cell International, 10: 1-2.
7. Bulger, R. E. and Heitman, E. 2007. Expanding responsible conduct of research instruction across the university. Academic Medicine, 82: 876-878.
8. Committee on Assessing Integrity in Research Environments. 2002. Integrity in scientific research: Creating an environment that promotes responsible conduct of research, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
9. Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy. 1995. On being a scientist: Responsible conduct in research, 2nd, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
10. Council of Graduate Schools. 2009. Best practices in graduate education for the responsible conduct of research, Washington, DC: Author.
11. DuBois, J. M., Dueker, J. M., Anderson, E. E. and Campbell, J. 2008. The development and assessment of an NIH-funded research ethics training program. Academic Medicine, 83: 596-603.
12. DuBois, J. M., Schilling, D. A., Heitman, E., Steneck, N. H. and Kon, A. A. 2010. Instruction in the responsible conduct of research: An inventory of programs and materials within CTSAs. Clinical and Translational Science, 3: 109-111.
13. European Science Foundation Member Organisation Forum on Research Integrity. 2010. Fostering research integrity in Europe-Executive report, Strasbourg, France: European Science Foundation.
14. Fiore, R. N. and Cushman, R. 2011. Responsible conduct of research, globalization and academic psychiatry. Asia-Pacific Psychiatry, 3: 187-191.
15. Fritsch, S. 2009. Can review boards be trusted?. Scrip Clinical Research, 16: 3-7.
16. Gefenas, E. 2006. The concept of risk and responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12: 75-83.
17. Grinnell, F. 1999. Ambiguity, trust, and the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 5: 205-214.
18. Hallowell, N. 2008. Encounters with medical professionals: A crisis of trust or matter of respect?. Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy, 11: 427-437.
19. Hammersley, M. 2009. Against the ethicists: On the evils of ethical regulation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12: 211-225.
20. Hanawalt, P. C. 2006. Research collaborations: Trial, trust, and truth. Cell, 126: 823-825.
21. Hatcher, T. 2005. Research integrity: Ensuring trust in the Academy. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16: 1-6.
22. Heitman, E., Olsen, C. H., Anestidou, L. and Bulger, R. E. 2007. New graduate students' baseline knowledge of the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82: 838-854.
23. Horner, J. and Minifie, F. D. 2011a. Research ethics I: Responsible conduct of research (RCR)-Historical and contemporary issues pertaining to human and animal experimentation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54: S303-S329.
24. Horner, J. and Minifie, F. D. 2011b. Research ethics II: Mentoring,collaboration, peer review, and data management and ownership. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54: S330-S345.
25. Horner, J. and Minifie, F. D. 2011c. Research ethics III: Publication practices and authorship, conflicts of interest, and research misconduct. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54: S346-S362.
26. Hren, D., Vujaklija, A., Ivanišević, R., Knežević, J., Marušić, M. and Marušić, A. 2006. Students' moral reasoning, Machiavellianism and socially desirable responding: Implications for teaching ethics and research integrity. Medical Education, 40: 269-277.
27. Kalichman, M. W. 2007. Responding to challenges in educating for the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82: 870-875.
28. Kalichman, M. 2009. Evidence-based research ethics. American Journal of Bioethics, 9: 85-87.
29. Kalichman, M. W. and Plemmons, D. K. 2007. Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses. Academic Medicine, 82: 846-852.
30. King, J. 1999. The scientific endeavor is based on vigilance, not trust: Commentary on "Ambiguity, Trust, and the Responsible Conduct of Research" (F. Grinnell). Science and Engineering Ethics, 5: 215-217.
31. Lee, C. (2009, September 4). Former med school dean sent to jail. China Daily. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/hkedition/2009-09/04/content_8653308.htm (http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/hkedition/2009-09/04/content_8653308.htm)
32. Macrina, F. L., Funk, C. L. and Barrett, K. 2004. Effectiveness of responsible conduct of research instruction: Initial findings. Journal of Research Administration, 35: 6-12.
33. Master, Z. 2011. The responsible conduct of bioethics research. Accountability in Research, 18: 102-119.
34. Minifie, F. D., Robey, R. R., Horner, J., Ingham, J. C., Lansing, C., McCartney, J. H. and Moss, S. E. 2011. Responsible conduct of research in communication sciences and disorders: Faculty and student perceptions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54: S363-S393.
35. National Institutes of Health. 1989. Requirement for programs on the responsible conduct of research in national research service award institutional training programs. NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, 18(45): 1-10.
36. National Institutes of Health. 1994. Reminder and update: Requirement for instruction in the responsible conduct of research in national research training grants. NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, 23(23)
37. National Institutes of Health. (2009). Update on the requirement for instruction in the responsible conduct of research (NOT-OD-10-019). Washington, DC: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-10-019.html (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-10-019.html)
38. National Science Foundation. 2009. Request for public comment on requirement for students and postdoctoral researchers involved in NSF proposals to be educated in the responsible and ethical conduct of research, Washington, DC: Author.
39. Newgard, C. D., Hui, S. H. J., Stamps-White, P. and Lewis, R. J. 2005. Institutional variability in a minimal risk, population-based study: Recognizing policy barriers to health services research. Health Services Research, 40: 1247-1258.
40. Pimple, K. D. 2002. Six domains of research ethics: A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8: 191-205.
41. Plemmons, D. 2011. A broader discussion of authorship. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17: 389-398.
42. Plemmons, D. K., Brody, S. A. and Kalichman, M. W. 2006. Student perceptions of the effectiveness of education in the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12: 571-582.
43. Powell, S. T., Allison, M. A. and Kalichman, M. W. 2007. Effectiveness of a responsible conduct of research course: A preliminary study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13: 249-264.
44. Rhoades, L. J. 2002. Beyond conflict of interest: The responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8: 459-468.
45. Roland, M. C. 2007. Who is responsible? Supervisors and institutions need to focus on training in the responsible conduct of research and change the culture in the laboratory. EMBO Reports, 8: 706-711.
46. Scheetz, M. D. 2007. The teaching scholars programs: A proposed approach for promoting research integrity. Medicine and Law, 26: 599-614.
47. Shamoo, A. E. and Moreno, J. D. 2004. Ethics of research involving mandatory drug testing of high school athletes in Oregon. American Journal of Bioethics, 4: 25-31.
48. Shamoo, A. and Resnik, D. 2009. Responsible conduct of research, 2nd, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
49. Steneck, N. H. and Bulger, R. E. 2007. The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82: 829-834.
50. University of Hong Kong. (2012). Research ethics compliance. http://www3.hku.hk/rss/index.php/integrity/ethics-compliance (http://www3.hku.hk/rss/index.php/integrity/ethics-compliance)
51. Vallero, D. A. 2007. Beyond responsible conduct in research: New pedagogies to address macroethics of nanobiotechnologies. Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, 17: 1-12.
52. Vasgird, D. R. 2007. Prevention over cure: The administrative rationale for education in the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82: 835-837.
53. Whitbeck, C. 2001. Group mentoring to foster the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7: 541-558.
54. Yarborough, M. and Sharp, R. R. 2009. Public trust and research a decade later: What have we learned since Jesse Gelsinger's death?. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, 97: 4-5.
55. Zeng, W. and Resnik, D. 2010. Research integrity in China: Problems and prospects. Developing World Bioethics, 10: 164-171.