Beyond responsible conduct in research: New pedagogies to address macroethics of nanobiotechnologies

Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-12

  Vallero, Daniel Alan ^a  

^a Duke University   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomedical engineering; Engineering education; Engineering research; Ethics; Macroethics; Materials science; Nanobiotechnology; Risk

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; MATERIALS SCIENCE; NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY;

LABORATORY RESEARCH; MACROETHICS; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES;

ENGINEERING RESEARCH;

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; MORALITY; NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESPONSIBILITY; THEORY; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 39449099374     PISSN: 10506934     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v17.i1.10     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Wulf WA. Great achievements and grand challenges. Th e Bridge. 2000;30 (3-4): 5-10.
2. Bassingthwaighte JB. Th e Physiome project: Th e macroethics of engineering toward health. Th e Bridge. 2000; 32 (3): 24-9.
3. Herkert JR. Microethics, macroethics, and professional engineering societies. In: Emerging technologies and ethical issues in engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004. pp. 107-14.
4. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. (ABET). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs: effective for evaluations during the 2004-2005 accreditation cycle. Baltimore: ABET; 2003.
5. National Academy of Engineering. Emerging technologies and ethical issues in engineering. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2004.
6. Bruce D. Ethical and social issues in nanobiotechnologies. EMBO Reports. 2006;7,754-8.
7. Bruce D. Making the world better? New Scientist. 2005;186:21.
8. Office of Science and Technology Policy, Executive Office of the President quoted by NH Steneck. Introduction to Responsible Conduct of Research, Office of Research Integrity, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC; 2004.
9. Rando WC, Menges RJ. How practice is shaped by personal theories, In: New directions for teaching and learning, Menges RJ, Svinicki MD, editors. Vol. 45, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1991.
10. Handelsman J, Ebert-May D, Beichner R, Bruns P, Chang A, DeHaan R, Lauffer S, Steward J, Tilghman S, Wood WB. Scientific thinking. Science. 2004;304 (5670), 521-2.
11. Penslar R. Research ethics: cases and materials. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; 1995.
12. Shamoo A, Resnik D. Responsible conduct of research. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.
13. Schrag B. Research ethics: cases and commentaries, Vols. 1-6. Bloomington, IN: Association for Practical and Professional Ethics; 1997-2002.
14. Bebeau MJ, Pimple KD, Muskavitch KMT, Borden SL, Smith DH. Moral reasoning in scientific research: cases for teaching and assessment. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University; 1995.
15. Elliott D, Stern J. Evaluating teaching and students' learning of academic research ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics. 1996; 2 (3): 345-66.
16. Pimple K. Assessing teaching and learning in the responsible conduct of research. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine Committee on Assessing Integrity in Research Environments; 2001.
17. Kohlberg L. Child psychology and childhood education: a cognitive-developmental view, New York: Longman Press; 1987.
18. Vallero DA, Vesilind PA. Socially Responsible Engineering, Hoboken: Wiley; 2006.