Research ethics I: Responsible conduct of research (RCR)-Historical and contemporary issues pertaining to human and animal experimentation

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Horner, Jennifer ^a   Minifie, Fred D ^b  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal research; Historical review; Human research; Responsible conduct of research; Scientific integrity

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ETHICS; HISTORY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION; ANIMALS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; ETHICS, MEDICAL; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 21ST CENTURY; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79551717812     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0265)     Document Type: Article

References (324)

1. Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. Von Eschenbach, No. 04-5350. (D.C. Cir. Ct. App. August 7, 2007).
2. Abney v. Amgen, U.S. Dist. LEXIS14258 (E.D. Ky. 2005), aff 'd 443 F.3d 540 (6th Cir. 2006).
3. Adams, M., Clay, P., Ferguson, J. A., Fletcher, J. C., Gamble, V. N., Green, L., . . . Winn, A. (1996, May 20). Final report of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study Legacy Committee. Retrieved from http://www.hsl.virginia.edu / historical /medical-history/ bad-blood/report.cfm.
4. Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. (1996). The human radiation experiments. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http:// hss.energy.gov/healthsafety/ohre/roadmap/achre/index. Html.
5. Alt-White, A. C.,& Pranulis, M. F. (2006). Addressing nurses' ethical concerns about research in critical care settings. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 30, 67-75.
6. Ambrose, N. G.,& Yairi, E. (2002). The Tudor study: Data and ethics. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 190-203.
7. American Association for the Advancement of Science,& Edsall, J. (Eds.). (1975). Scientific freedom and responsibility: A report of the AAAS Committee on Scientific Freedom and Responsibility. Washington, DC: Author.
8. American Medical Association. (1946, December). Proceedings of the Chicago Session. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 133, 35.
9. AmericanMedical Association. (1989). Animals in research. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 261, 3602-3606.
10. American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Guidelines for ethical conduct in the care and use of animals. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ science/anguide.html.
11. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1994). The role of research and the state of research training within communication sciences and disorders [Technical report]. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/docs/ html/ TR1994-00254.html.
12. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2003). Code of ethics. ASHA Supplement, 23, 13-15. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/docs/html/ ET2003-00166.html.
13. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005). Protection of human subjects. Rockville, MD: Author. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/docs/html/ ET2005-00176.html.
14. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2007). Guidelines for the responsible conduct of research: Ethics and the publication process. Rockville, MD: Author. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/docs/html / GL2007-00282.html.
15. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association,& U.S. Public Health Service. (2001). Promoting research integrity in communication sciences and disorders and related disciplines [Monograph]. Rockville, MD: Author.
16. Anderlik, M. R.,& Elster, N. (2001). Lawsuits against IRBs: Accountability or incongruity? Journal of Law, Medicine& Ethics, 29, 220-228.
17. Anderson, L. C. (2007). Institutional and IACUC responsibilities for animal care and use education and training programs. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) Journal, 48, 90-95.
18. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. (n.d.). Animal welfare: Publications and reports. Retrieved from http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal- welfare/publications-and-reports.shtml.
19. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. (2007). Animal care policy manual. Retrieved from http://www. Aphis.usda.gov/animal-welfare/policy.shtml.
20. Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act. (2006). Pub. L. 109-374 x 2(a), 18 U.S.C. Chap. 3, x43. Retrieved from http://www. Law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/ uscode18/usc-sec-18-00000043-000-.html.
21. Animal Liberation Front. (n.d.). Philosophy behind the animal liberation movement. Woodland Hills, CA: Author. Retrieved from http://www. animalliberationfront.com/ Philosophy/Philosophy-index.htm.
22. Animal Welfare Act, Pub. L. 89-544, Aug. 24, 1966, 80 Stat. 350, 7 U.S.C. 2131 et seq. Beltsville, MD: National Agricultural Library. Retrieved from http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ animal-welfare/publications-and-reports.shtml.
23. Animals as cold warriors: Missiles, medicine, and man's best friend. (2006). Retrieved from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/ exhibition/animals/worldwar2. html.
24. Annas, G. J. (1998). Protecting soldiers from friendly fire: The consent requirement for using investigational drugs and vaccines in combat. American Journal of Law& Medicine, 24, 245-260. (Pubitemid 28374134)
25. Annas, G. J.,& Grodin, M. A. (Eds.). (1992). The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human rights in human experimentation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26. Appelbaum, P. S., Roth, L. H., Lidz, C. W., Benson, P.,& Winslade, W. (1987). False hopes and best data: Consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Center Report, 17, 20-24.
27. Applied Research Ethics National Association,& Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare. (2002). Institutional animal care and use committee guidebook (2nd ed.). Retrieved from http://www.grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/ GuideBook.pdf.
28. Association of American Medical Colleges. (1982). The maintenance of high ethical standards in the conduct of research. Journal of Medical Education, 57, 895-902.
29. Association of American Medical Colleges. (1997). Developing a code of ethics in research: A guide for scientific societies. Washington, DC: Author.
30. Association of American Medical Colleges, AAMC Task Force on Financial Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research. (2003a). Protecting subjects, preserving trust, promoting progress I: Policy and guidelines for the oversight of individual financial interest in human subjects research. Academic Medicine, 78, 225-236.
31. Association of American Medical Colleges, AAMC Task Force on Financial Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research. (2003b, February). Protecting subjects, preserving trust, promoting progress II: Principles and recommendations for oversight of an institution's financial interests in human subjects research. Academic Medicine, 78, 237-245.
32. Association of American Universities. (1983). Report of the Association of American Universities Committee on the integrity of research. Washington, DC: Author.
33. Association of AmericanUniversities. (1989, November 20). Framework for institutional policies and procedures to deal with fraud in research. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved fromhttp://www.aau.edu/reports/FrwkRschFraud. Html.
34. Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International. (n.d.). About AAALAC. Retrieved from http://www.aaalac.org/about / index.cfm.
35. Barnes, M.,& Heffernan, K. G. (2004). The "future uses" dilemma: Secondary uses of data and materials by researcher and commercial research sponsors. Medical Research Law& Policy Report, 3, 440-450.
36. Barnes, M., Hermes, C.,& Brooks, A. (2006). Clinical trials in 2006: Trial registration, international research, research billing, adverse events, and secondary uses of data and tissue. Medical Research Law& Policy Report, 5, 26-31.
37. Bateman, B. T., Meyers, P. M., Schumacher, C., Mangla, S.,& Pile-Spellman, J. (2003). Conducting stroke research with an exception from the requirement for informed consent. Stroke, 34, 1317-1323. (Pubitemid 36547535)
38. Beecher, H. K. (1966). Ethics and clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine, 274, 1354-1360.
39. Beecher, H. K. (1970). Research and the individual human subject. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
40. Beirne, P. (1994). The law is an ass: Reading E.P. Evans' The medieval prosecution and capital punishment of animals. Society& Animals: Journal of Human-Animal Studies, 2(1), 27-46.
41. BeLue, R., Taylor-Richardson, K. D., Lin, J., Rivera, A. T.,& Grandison, D. (2006). African Americans and participation in clinical trials: Differences in beliefs and attitudes by gender. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 27, 498-505. (Pubitemid 44635339)
42. Benos, D. J., Fabres, J., Farmer, J., Gutierrez, J. P., Hennessy, K., Kosek, D., . . . Wang, K. (2005). Ethics and scientific publication. Advances in Physiology Education, 29, 59-74. (Pubitemid 41003031)
43. Bernstein, D.,& American Pediatric Society. (1999). Code of responsible conduct of research. Pediatric Research, 45, 613-614. Bill for the Regulation of Scientific Experiments upon Human Beings in the District of Columbia, S.3424, 56th Congress, 1st session, March, 1900.
44. Boozang, K. M. (1998). Western medicine opens the door to alternative medicine. American Journal of Law& Medicine, 24, 185-212. (Pubitemid 28374132)
45. Brainard, J. (2000). An inside look at how a university tries to protect human subjects. Chronicle of Higher Education, 46, A31-A33.
46. Brandt, A. M. (1978). Racism and research: The case of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Hastings Center Report, 8, 21-29.
47. Broad,W. J., &Wade, N. (1982). Betrayers of the truth: Fraud and deceit in the halls of science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
48. Brody, B. A., McCullough, L. B.,& Sharp, R. R. (2005). Consensus and controversy in clinical research ethics. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 294, 1411-1414. (Pubitemid 41345825)
49. Brooman, S. (2007, January 23). The new age of law relating to animals-A vision of our future treatment of other species [Seminar summary]. Retrieved from http://www.vero.org. Uk/seminar2.asp.
50. Brown, K. D. (2006). An ethical obligation to our service members: Meaningful benefits for informed consent violations. South Texas Law Review, 47, 919-947.
51. Brown, T. M.,& Fee, E. (2002). Walter Bradford Cannon- Pioneer physiologist of human emotions. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 1594-1595.
52. Bulger, R. E.,& Heitman, E. (2007). Expanding responsible conduct of research instruction across the university. Academic Medicine, 82, 876-878. (Pubitemid 47339819)
53. Bullock, M.,& Panicker, S. (2003). Ethics for all: Differences across scientific society codes. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9, 159-170. (Pubitemid 37130475)
54. Calleigh, A. S. (2000). Prisoners. Academic Medicine, 75, 999.
55. Cannon, W. B. (1916). The right and wrong of making experiments on human beings [Editorial]. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 57, 1372-1373.
56. Capron, A. M. (1999). Ethical and human-rights: Issues in research on mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity. New England Journal of Medicine, 340, 1430-1434. (Pubitemid 29205411)
57. Cassell, E. J. (2000). The principles of the Belmont Report revisited: How have respect for persons, beneficence, and justice been applied to clinical medicine? Hastings Center Report, 30, 12-21.
58. Chadwick, J.,& Mann, W. N. (Trans.). (1950). Hippocratic writings. New York, NY: Penguin Books. Retrieved from http:// history.nih.gov/research/ downloads/ hippocratic.pdf.
59. Childress, J. F., Meslin, E. M.,& Shapiro, H. T. (2005). Belmont revisited: Ethical principles for research with human subjects. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
60. Clayton, E. W. (2004). So what are we going to do about research using clinical information and samples? IRB: Ethics& Human Research, 26, 14-15. (Pubitemid 43362250)
61. Cohen, C. (1978). Medical experimentation on prisoners. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 21, 357-372.
62. Cohen, J. J. (2001). Trust us to make a difference: Ensuring public confidence in the integrity of clinical research. Academic Medicine, 76, 209-214. (Pubitemid 32151890)
63. Cohen-Mansfield, J. (2003). Consent and refusal in dementia research: Conceptual and practical considerations. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 17(Suppl. 1), S17-S25. (Pubitemid 36736834)
64. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering,& Institute of Medicine. (1995). On being a scientist: Responsible conduct of research (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn= 0309051967 &page=R1.
65. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering,& Institute of Medicine. (1997). Adviser, teacher, role model, friend: On being a mentor to students in science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/ catalog.php?record-id=5789.
66. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering,& Institute of Medicine. (2009). On being a scientist: Responsible conduct of research (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php? record-id=12192.
67. Conarello, S. L.,& Shepherd, M. J. (2007). Training strategies for research investigators and technicians. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) Journal, 48, 120-130.
68. Corbie-Smith, G., Durant, R. W.,& St. George, D. M. M. (2006). Investigators' assessment of NIHmandated inclusion of women and minorities in research. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 27, 571-579. (Pubitemid 44740405)
69. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. (1985). International guiding principles for biomedical research involving animals. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
70. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. (2008). International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
71. Council of Graduate Schools. (2009). Best practices in graduate education for the responsible conduct of research. Washington, DC: Author.
72. Cramer, S. C. (2003). Clinical issues in animal models of stroke and rehabilitation. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) Journal, 44, 83-84. (Pubitemid 36410961)
73. Cruse, J. M. (1999). History of medicine: The metamorphosis of scientific medicine in the ever-present past. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 318, 171-180.
74. Cunningham, E.,& Janson, C. (2007). A socioecological perspective on primate cognition, past and present. Animal Cognition, 10, 273-281. (Pubitemid 47139312)
75. De Melo-Martin, I., Palmer, L. I.,& Fins, J. J. (2007). Developing a research ethics consultation service to foster responsive and responsible clinical research [Viewpoint]. Academic Medicine, 82, 900-904. (Pubitemid 47339824)
76. Dingell, J. D. (1993). Misconduct inmedical research [Shattuck lecture]. New England Journal of Medicine, 328, 1610-1615. (Pubitemid 23151922)
77. Donnelley, S. (1999). How and why animals matter. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) Journal, 40, 22-28. (Pubitemid 129661462)
78. Douglas, J. D. (1993). Deviance in the practice of science. Academic Medicine, 68(Suppl. 3), S77-S83. (Pubitemid 23283896)
79. Dyer, J. (2001, June 10). Ethics and orphans: The "Monster Study." San Jose Mercury News. Retrieved from http:// www-psych.stanford. edu/~bigopp/stutter2.html.
80. Elliott, D.,& Stern, J. E. (Eds.). (1997). Research ethics: A reader. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
81. Emanuel, E. J. (2005). Undue inducement: Nonsense on stilts? American Journal of Bioethics, 5, 9-13. (Pubitemid 41673924)
82. Emanuel, E. J., Crouch, R. A., Arras, J. D., Moreno, J. D.,& Grady, C. (Eds.). (2003). Ethical and regulatory aspects of clinical research: Readings and commentary. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
83. Emanuel, E. J., Wendler, D.,& Grady, C. (2000). What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 2701-2711. (Pubitemid 30337334)
84. Emanuel, E. J., Wood, A., Fleischman, A., Bowen, A., Getz, K. A., Grady, C., . . . Sugarman, J. (2004). Oversight of human research: Identifying problems to evaluate reform proposals. Annals of Internal Medicine, 141, 282-291. (Pubitemid 39089129)
85. Encina, G. B. (2004). Milgram's experiment on obedience to authority. Retrieved from http://www.cnr.berkeley.edu/ ucce50/ag-labor/7article/article35. htm.
86. Ernst, A. A.,& Fish, S. (2005). Exception from informed consent: Viewpoint of institutional review boards-Balancing risks to subjects, community consultation, and future directions. Academic Emergency Medicine, 12, 1050-1055. (Pubitemid 41503532)
87. Faden, R. R., Klag, M. J., Kass, N. E.,& Krag, S. S. (2002). On the importance of research ethics and mentoring. American Journal of Bioethics, 2, 50-51.
88. Faden, R. R., Lederer, S. E.,& Moreno, J. D. (1996). U.S. Medical researchers, the Nuremberg doctors trial, and the Nuremberg Code: A review of findings of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 276, 1667-1671. (Pubitemid 26404866)
89. Feussner, J. R., Burris, J. F., McGlynn, G.,& Lavori, P.W. (2002). Enhancing protections for human participants in clinical and health services research. Medical Care, 40(9; Suppl.), V4-V11.
90. Fisher, C. B. (2005). Deception research involving children: Ethical practices and paradoxes. Ethics& Behavior, 15, 271-287. (Pubitemid 43082579)
91. Flory, J.,& Emanuel, E. (2004). Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: A systematic review. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 292, 1593-1601. (Pubitemid 39314966)
92. Folkins, J.W., Gorga, M. P., Luschei, E. S., Vetter, D. K.,& Watson, C. S. (1993). The use of nonhuman animals in speech, language, and hearing research. ASHA, 34, 57-65.
93. Fortner v. Koch, 269 N.W. 222 (Mich. 1935). Foshay, W. R.,& Tinkey, P. T. (2007). Evaluating the effectiveness of training strategies: Performance goals and testing. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) Journal, 48, 156-162.
94. Fost, N. (1998). Waived consent for emergency research. American Journal of Law& Medicine, 24, 163-183. (Pubitemid 28374131)
95. Foundation for Biomedical Research. (n.d.). Fact vs. myth about the essential need for animals in medical research. Washington, DC: Author.
96. Franck, L. S. (2005). Research with newborn participants: Doing the right research and doing it right. Journal of Perinatology& Neonatal Nursing, 19, 177-186. (Pubitemid 40806991)
97. Fuchs, B. A.,& Macrina, F. L. (2005a). Ethics and the scientist. In F. L. Macrina ( Ed.), Scientific integrity: Text and cases in responsible conduct of research (3rd ed., pp. 19-38). Washington, DC: ASM Press.
98. Fuchs, B. A.,& Macrina, F. L. (2005b). Use of animals in biomedical experimentation. In F. L. Macrina ( Ed.), Scientific integrity: Text and cases in responsible conduct of research (3rd ed., pp. 127-158). Washington, DC: ASM Press.
99. Garnett, R. W. (1996). Why informed consent? Human experimentation and the ethics of autonomy. Catholic Lawyer, 36, 455-511.
100. Gelsinger v. Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia Cnty, Ct. of C.P., filed September 18, 2000). Retrieved from http://www.sskrplaw.com/links/healthcare2. Html.
101. Gercas, A. (2006). The Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights: Promoting international discussion on the morality of non-therapeutic research on children. Michigan Journal of International Law, 27, 629-655.
102. Gibelman, M.,& Gelman, S. R. (2001). Learning from the mistakes of others: A look at scientific misconduct in research. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 241-254.
103. Girgen, J. (2003). The historical and contemporary prosecution and punishment of animals. Animal Law, 9, 97-133.
104. Glantz, L. H. (1998). Research with children. American Journal of Law& Medicine, 24, 213-244. (Pubitemid 28374133)
105. Gluck, J. P.,& Bell, J. (2003). Ethical issues in the use of animals in biomedical and psychopharmacological research. Psychopharmacology, 171, 6-12. (Pubitemid 38139328)
106. Goldfarb, R. ( Ed.). (2006). Ethics: A case study from fluency. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
107. Goldner, J. A. (1998). The unending saga of legal controls over scientific misconduct: A clash of cultures needing resolution. American Journal of Law& Medicine, 24, 293-343. (Pubitemid 28374136)
108. Goodman, E. P. (2006, Winter). Animal ethics and the law: A review of animal rights [Review of the book Animal rights: Current debates and new directions, by C.R. Sunstein& M.C. Nussbaum, Eds., Oxford University Press, 2004]. Temple Law Review, 79, 1291-1316.
109. Grady, C., Dickert, N., Jawetz, T., Gensler, G.,&Emanuel, E. (2005). An analysis of U.S. practices of paying research participants. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 26, 365-375. (Pubitemid 40725999)
110. Grant, R. W.,& Sugarman, J. (2004). Ethics in human subjects research: Do incentives matter? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 29, 717-738. (Pubitemid 40065031)
111. Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc., 782 A.2d 807 (Ct. App. Md. 2001). Grodin, M. A. (1992). Historical origins of the Nuremberg Code. In G. J. Annas& M. A. Grodin ( Eds.), The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code ( pp. 121-148). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
112. Grodin, M. A.,& Glantz, L. H. (Eds.). (1994). Children as research subjects: Science, ethics, and law. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
113. Gross, C. P., Krumholz, H. M., Van Wye, G., Emanuel, E. J.,& Wendler, D. (2006). Does random treatment assignment cause harm to research participants? PLoS Medicine, 3(6), e188.
114. Harris, S. H. (2003). Japanese biomedical experimentation during the World-War-II era. Military Medical Ethics, 2, ( pp. 463-506). Washington, DC: Department of Defense. Retrieved from http://www.bordeninstitute.army.mil / published-volumes/ethicsVol2/Ethics-ch-16.pdf.
115. Hartman, R. G. (2006). Word from the academies: A primer for legal policy analysis regarding adolescent research participation. Rutgers Journal of Law& Public Policy, 4, 151-199.
116. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Pub. Law 104-191, Aug. 21, 1996, 110 Stat. 1936, 45 C.F.R. Pts. 160, 164. Retrieved from http://aspe.hhs.gov/admnsimp/ pl104191.htm.
117. Health Research Extension Act of 1985. Pub. L. No. 99-158, Nov. 20, 1985, 99 Stat. 820, 7 U.S.C. xx2131 et seq., 9 CFR, Subpart A. Retrieved from http://awic.nal.usda.gov/nal-display/index.php?info-center=3&tax-level= 1&tax-subject=182.
118. Heitman, E. (2000). Ethical values in the education of biomedical researchers. Hastings Center Report, 30(4; Suppl.), S40-S44.
119. Henderson, G. E., Davis, A. M., King, N. M., Moreno, J. D., Marshall, M. F., Silvers, A., . . . Clark, C. C. (2004). Vulnerability to influence: A two-way street. American Journal of Bioethics, 4, 50-86.
120. Hollander, R.,& Arenberg, C. R. (Eds.), Center for Engineering, Ethics, and Society. (2009). Ethics education and scientific and engineering research: What's been learned? What should be done? [Summary of a workshop]. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
121. Holmes-Farley, S. R.,& Grodin, M. A. (1998). Law, medicine and socially responsible research [Foreword]. American Journal of Law& Medicine, 24(2-3), 153-162.
122. Horner, J. (Symposium ed.). (1998). Law, medicine and socially responsible research [Preface]. American Journal of Law& Medicine, 24, 151.
123. Horner, J. (Guest ed.). (2003). Ethical, moral, and legal issues in speech and language pathology. Seminars in Speech and Language, 24.
124. Horner, J. (2007). Professional liability. In R. Lubinski, L. A.
125. Golper,& C. Frattali ( Eds.), Professional issues in speechlanguage pathology and audiology (3rd ed., pp. 106-122). Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Publishers.
126. Horner, J.,& Minifie, F. D. (2011a). Research ethics II: Mentoring, collaboration, peer review, and data management and ownership. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(Suppl.), S330-S345.
127. Horner, J.,& Minifie, F. D. (2011b). Research ethics III: Publication practices and authorship, conflicts of interest, and research misconduct. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(Suppl.), S346-S362.
128. Horner, J.,& Wheeler, M. (2005a). HIPAA: Impact on clinical practice. The ASHA Leader, 10-11, 22-23.
129. Horner, J.,& Wheeler, M. (2005b). HIPAA: Impact on research practices. The ASHA Leader, 8-9, 26-27.
130. Hueston, W. J., Mainous, A. G., Weiss, B. D., Macaulay, A. C., Hickner, J.,& Sherwood, R. A. (2006). Protecting participants in family medicine research. Family Medicine, 38, 116-120.
131. Humane Society of the United States. (n.d.). Statement on animals in biomedical research, testing, and education. Washington, DC: Author.
132. Ibrahim, D. M. (2006). Reduce, refine, replace: The failure of the three R's and the future of animal experimentation. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 2006, 195-229.
133. Illes, J., de Vries, R., Cho, M. K.,& Schraedley-Desmond, P. (2006). ELSI priorities for brain imaging. American Journal of Bioethics, 6, W24-W31. (Pubitemid 43323308)
134. Ingham, J. C. (2003). Research ethics 101: The responsible conduct of research. Seminars in Speech and Language, 24, 323-337.
135. Ingham, J. C.,& Horner, J. (2004). Ethics and research. The ASHA Leader, 9, 10-15, 24-25.
136. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Assessing the System for Protecting Human Research Subjects,& Board on Health Sciences Policy. (2001). Preserving public trust: Accreditation and human research participant protection programs. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php? record-id=10085.
137. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Assessing the System for Protecting Human Research, Federman, D. D., Hanna, K. E.,& Rodriguez, L. L. (Eds.). (2003). Responsible research: A systems approach to protecting research participants. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php? record-id=10508.
138. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Clinical Research Involving Children, Field,M. J.,& Berman, R. E. (Eds.). (2004). Ethical conduct of clinical research involving children. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record-id=10958.
139. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Ethical Considerations for Revisions to DHHS Regulations for Protection of Prisoners Involved in Research. (2006). Ethical considerations for research involving prisoners.
140. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record-id=11692.
141. Institute of Medicine,& National Research Council, Committee on Assessing Integrity in Environments. (2002). Integrity in scientific research: Creating an environment that promotes responsible conduct. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://books. Nap.edu/openbook.php? record-id=10430.
142. Institute of Medicine,& National Research Council, Committee on the Responsible Conduct of Research. (1989). The responsible conduct of research in the health sciences. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record-id=1388.
143. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2008). Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Writing and editing for biomedical publication. Retrieved from http://www.icmje.org.
144. Iverson, M., Frankel, M. S.,& Siang, S. (2003). Scientific societies and research integrity: What are they doing and how well are they doing it? Science and Engineering Ethics, 9, 141-158. (Pubitemid 37130474)
145. Janssen, R. L. (2003). Researcher liability for negligence in human subject research: Informed consent and researcher malpractice actions. Washington Law Review, 78, 229-260.
146. Joffe, S., Fernandez, C. V., Pentz, R. D., Ungar, D. R., Mathew, N. A., Turner, C. W., . . . Kodish, E. (2006). Involving children with cancer in decision-making about research participation. Journal of Pediatrics, 149, 862-868.
147. Jones, J. H. (1993). Bad blood: The Tuskegee syphilis experiment. New York, NY: Free Press.
148. Jones, S. M. (2000). Integrity in research. Seminars in Hearing, 21, 87-95.
149. Jones, S. M.,& Mock, B. E. (2007). Responsible conduct of research in audiology. Seminars in Hearing, 28, 206-215. (Pubitemid 47122738)
150. Judson, H. F. (2004). The great betrayal: Fraud in science. New York, NY: Harcourt.
151. Kahn, J. P.,& Mastroianni, A. C. (2001). Moving from compliance to conscience: Why we can and should improve on the ethics of clinical research [Commentary]. Archives of Internal Medicine, 161, 925-928. (Pubitemid 32295645)
152. Kapp, M. B. (2006). Ethical and legal issues in research involving human subjects: Do you want a piece of me? Journal of Clinical Pathology, 59, 335-339.
153. Karlawish, J. H. T. (2003). Research involving cognitively impaired adults. New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 1389-1392. (Pubitemid 36384110)
154. Katz, J. (1996). The Nuremberg Code and the Nuremberg trial. A reappraisal. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 276, 1662-1666.
155. Katz, J., Capron, A. M.,& Glass, E. W. (Eds.). (1972). Experimentation with human beings. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
156. Keefe, F. J., Fillingim, R. B.,& Williams, D. A. (1991). Behavioral assessment of pain: Nonverbal measures in animals and humans. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) Journal, 33, 3-13. Retrieved from http://dels-old.nas.edu/ilar-n/ilarjournal/33-1-2/V33-1-2Question.shtml.
157. Keefe, K. A. (1995). Applying basic neuroscience to aphasia therapy: What the animals are telling us. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 88-93. (Pubitemid 126002759)
158. Keen, W. W. (1914). Animal experimentation and medical progress. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
159. Keith-Spiegel, P., Koocher, G. P.,& Tabachnick, B. (2006). What scientists want from their research ethics committee. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1, 67-82.
160. Kelch, R. P. (2002). Maintaining the public trust in clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine, 346, 285-287. (Pubitemid 34438871)
161. Kennedy, D. (2006, September 15). Animal activism: Out of control. Science, 313, 1541. (Pubitemid 44414008)
162. Ketelhut, D. J.,& Niemi, S. M. (2007). Emerging technologies in education and training: Applications for the laboratory animal science community. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) Journal, 48, 163-169.
163. Kimmelman, J. (2007). The therapeutic misconception at 25: Treatment, research, and confusion. Hastings Center Report, 37, 36-42.
164. Klein, H. J.,& Bayne, K. A. (2007). Establishing a culture of care, conscience, and responsibility: Addressing the improvement of scientific discovery and animal welfare through science-based performance standards. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) Journal, 48, 3-11.
165. Kolar, R. (2006). Animal experimentation. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12, 111-122. (Pubitemid 43242433)
166. Kopelman, L. M. (2004). What conditions justify risky nontherapeutic or "no benefit" pediatric studies: A sliding scale analysis. Journal of Law, Medicine& Ethics, 32, 749-756.
167. Kopp, V. J. (1999). Henry Knowles Beecher and the development of informed consent in anesthesia research. Anesthesiology, 90, 1756-1765. (Pubitemid 29254823)
168. Korenman, S. G., Berk, R.,Wenger, N. S.,& Lew, V. (1998). Evaluation of the research norms of scientists and administrators responsible for academic research integrity. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 279, 41-47. (Pubitemid 28070549)
169. Koski, G. (2003). Changing the paradigm: New directions in federal oversight of human research. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 37(Suppl.), S2-S6.
170. Kubetin, W. R. (2006). Clinical trial billing, grant administration, conflict of interest said key issues this year. Medical Research Law& Policy Report, 5, 5-9.
171. Kulynych, J. (2002). Legal and ethical issues in neuroimaging research: Human subjects protection, medical privacy, and the public communication of research results. Brain& Cognition, 50, 345-357. (Pubitemid 36042961)
172. Kulynych, J.,& Korn, D. (2003). The new HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996)medical privacy rule: Help or hindrance for clinical research? Circulation, 108, 912-914. (Pubitemid 37048215)
173. Laboratory Animal Training Association. (n.d.). About the online training program. Retrieved from http://www.latanet. Com/training/training.html.
174. LaFollette, H.,& Shanks, N. (1994). Animal experimentation: The legacy of Claude Bernard. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 8, 195-210.
175. LaFollette, H.,& Shanks, N. (1995). Two models of models in biomedical research. The Philosophical Quarterly, 45, 141-160.
176. Law, M. (2005). Reduce, reuse, recycle: Issues in the secondary use of research data. IASSIST Quarterly, 29, 5-10.
177. Lederer, S. E. (1995). Subjected to science: Human experimentation in America before the second world war. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
178. Lederer, S. E.,& Grodin, M. A. (1994). Historical overview: Pediatric experimentation. In M. A. Grodin& L. H. Glantz ( Eds.), Children as research subjects: Science, ethics& law ( pp. 3-25). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
179. Lemaire, F. (2004). Patient care versus research: Does clinical research provide individual benefit to patients enrolled in trials? Current Opinion in Critical Care, 10, 565-569. (Pubitemid 39620210)
180. Lenrow, D. A. (2006). The treating physician as researcher: Is assuming this dual role a violation of the Nuremberg Code? Temple Journal of Science, Technology& Environmental Law, 25, 15-48.
181. Lerner, B. H. (2007). Subjects or objects? Prisoners and human experimentation. New England Journal of Medicine, 356, 1806-1807. (Pubitemid 46698460)
182. Levine, C., Faden, R., Grady, C., Hammerschmidt, D., Eckenwiler, L.,& Sugarman, J. (2004). The limitations of "vulnerability" as a protection for human research participants. American Journal of Bioethics, 4, 44-49. (Pubitemid 41706523)
183. Macrina, F. L. ( Ed.). (2005). Scientific integrity: Text and cases in responsible conduct of research (3rd ed.).Washington, DC: ASM Press.
184. Macrina, F. L. (2007). Scientific societies and promotion of the responsible conduct of research: Codes, policies, and education. Academic Medicine, 82, 865-869. (Pubitemid 47339817)
185. Magnotti, L. (2006). Giving a voice to those who can't speak for themselves: Toward greater regulation of animal experimentation. Buffalo Environmental Law Journal, 13, 179-204.
186. Mangan, K. (2007). Medical schools stop using dogs and pigs in teaching. Chronicle of Higher Education, A12.
187. Man's mirror: History of animal rights. (1991). The Economist ( U.S.), 321, 21-23.
188. Marco, C. A.,&Larkin, G. L. (2000). Research ethics: Ethical issues of data reporting and the quest for authenticity. Academic Emergency Medicine, 7, 691-694. (Pubitemid 30390498)
189. Mastroianni, A. C.,& Kahn, K. P. (2002). Risk and responsibility: Ethics, Grimes v Kennedy Krieger, and public health research involving children. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 1073-1076. (Pubitemid 34700965)
190. McCarthy, C. R. (1999). Introduction: Toward a coherent ethic of research involving laboratory animals. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) Journal, 40(1). Retrieved from http://dels-old.nas.edu/ilar-n/ilarjournal/40-1/ 40-1Introduction.shtml.
191. Medina, L. V.,& Anderson, L. C. (2007). New frontiers in education and training for the laboratory animal community and the public: An overview and select proceedings from the June 2006 Forum of the American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) Journal, 48, 65-71.
192. Medina, L. V., Hrapkiewica, K., Tear, M.,& Anderson, L. C. (2007). Fundamental training for individuals involved in the care and use of laboratory animals: A review and update of the 1991 NRC core training module. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) Journal, 48, 96-108.
193. Menikoff, J. (2007). Toward a general theory of research ethics. Hastings Center Report, 37, 3.
194. Metz, E.,& Folkins, J. W. (1985). Protection of human subjects in speech and hearing research. ASHA, 27, 25-29.
195. Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York, NY: Harper& Row.
196. Miller, F. G., Gluck, J. P., Jr., &Wendler, D. (2008). Debriefing and accountability in deceptive research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 18, 235-251.
197. Miller, F. G.,& Joffe, S. (2006). Evaluating the therapeutic misconception. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 16, 353-366.
198. Miller, F. G.,& Rosenstein, D. L. (2003). The therapeutic orientation to clinical trials. New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 1383-1386. (Pubitemid 36384108)
199. Miser, W. F. (2005). Educational research-To IRB, or not to IRB? Family Medicine, 37, 168-173. (Pubitemid 40354002)
200. Moreno, J. D. (1998). Convenient and captive populations. In J. P. Kahn, A. C. Mastroianni,& J. Sugarman ( Eds.), Beyond consent: Seeking justice in research (pp. 111-130). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
201. Moreno, J. D., Caplan, A. L.,& Wolpe, P. R.,& Members of the Project on Informed Consent, Human Research Ethics Group. (1998). Updating protections for human subjects involved in research. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 1951-1958.
202. Morreim, E. H. (2003). Medical research litigation and malpractice tort doctrines: Courts on a learning curve. Houston Journal of Health Law& Policy, 4, 1-86.
203. Morreim, E. H. (2004). Litigation in clinical research: Malpractice doctrines versus research realities. Journal of Law, Medicine& Ethics, 32, 474-484. (Pubitemid 39334804)
204. Moss, S. E. (2011). Research integrity in communication sciences and disorders: Preface. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(Suppl.), S300-S302.
205. Mozes-Kor, E. (1992). The Mengele twins and human experimentation: A personal account. In G. J. Annas& M. A. Grodin ( Eds.), The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code ( pp. 53-59). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
206. Mulford, R. D. (1967). Experimentation on human beings. Stanford Law Review, 20, 99-117.
207. National Association for Biomedical Research. (n.d.a). A voice in government. Retrieved from http://www.nabr.org/ About-NABR/Government.aspx. Washington, DC: Author.
208. National Association for Biomedical Research. (n.d.b). Welfare vs. right. Retrieved from http://www.nabr.org/ Animal-Activism/Welfare-vs-Rights.aspx. Washington, DC: Author.
209. National Bioethics Advisory Commission,Commissioned papers by the National Bioethics Advisory Commission]. Retrieved from NationalBioethicsAdvisoryCommission. (1999). Research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decision making capacity, Vol. 2 [Commissioned papers by the National Bioethics Advisory Commission]. Retrieved from http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/nbac/capacity/volumeii.pdf.
210. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. (2001). Ethical and policy issues in research involving human participants, Vol. 1 [Report and recommendations]. Retrieved from http:// bioethics.georgetown.edu/nbac /human/overvol1.html.
211. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/ humansubjects/guidance/ belmont.htm.
212. National Institutes of Health. (n.d.a). Frequently asked questions for the requirement for education on protection of human subjects. Retrieved from http://grants.nih.gov/ grants/policy/hs-educ-faq.htm.
213. National Institutes of Health. (n.d.b). Research involving vulnerable populations. Retrieved from http://grants.nih.Gov/grants/policy/hs/populations. htm.
214. National Institutes of Health. (1992, November 27). Reminder and update: Requirement for instruction in the responsible conduct of research in National Research Service Award Institutional Training Grants. NIH Guide, 21(43). Retrieved from http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not92-236.html.
215. National Institutes of Health. (1998). NIH policy and guidelines on the inclusion of children as participants in research involving human subjects. Retrieved from http:// grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not98-024.html.
216. National Institutes of Health. (2003). Protecting personal health information in research: Understanding the HIPAA privacy rule (Public No. 03-5388). Retrieved from http://privacyruleandresearch.nih.gov/pdf/HIPAA- Booklet-4-14-2003.pdf.
217. National Institutes of Health,& Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration. (1989). Requirement for programs on the responsible conduct of research in National Research Service Award Institutional Training Programs. NIHGuide, 18, 1. Retrieved fromhttp://grants.nih.Gov/grants/guide/ historical/1989-12-22-Vol-18-No-45.pdf.
218. National Institutes of Health, Office of Extramural Research. (1999). Research involving individuals with questionable capacity to consent: Points to consider. Retrieved fromhttp://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/ questionablecapacity.Htm.
219. National Institutes of Health Revitalization Act of 1993, Pub. L. No. 103-43, June 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 122, 42 U.S.C. Chap. 6A.
220. National Research Act of 1974, Pub. L. No. 93-348, July 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 342, 42 U.S.C. xx201 et seq.
221. National Research Council, Committee on Educational Programs in Laboratory Animal Science. (1991). Education and training in the care and use of laboratory animals: A guide for developing institutional programs. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.Nap.edu/catalog.php? record-id=1592#toc.
222. National Research Council, Committee on Guidelines for the Use of Animals in Neuroscience and Behavioral Research. (2003). Guidelines for the care and use of mammals in neuroscience and behavioral research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.Nap.edu/catalog.php?record-id=10732.
223. National Research Council, Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources. (1996). Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals (7th ed.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/ openbook.php?record-id=5140 (Original work published 1963).
224. National Research Council, International Workshop on the Development of Science-based Guidelines for Laboratory Animal Care Program Committee. (2004). The development of science-based guidelines for laboratory animal care: Proceedings of the November 2003 international workshop. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record- id=11138.
225. National Research Council, Panel on Institutional Review Boards, Surveys, and Social Science Research, Citra, C. F., Ilgen, D. R.,& Marrett, C. B. (Eds.). (2003). Protecting participants and facilitating social and behavioral sciences research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nap.edu/catalog.Php?record-id=10638.
226. National Science Foundation. (2002). Research misconduct (final rule). Federal Register, 67, 11936-11939.
227. Neale, A. V.,& Schwartz, K. L. (2004). A primer of the HIPAA Privacy Rule for practice-based researchers. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 17, 461-465.
228. Nelkin, D.,& Andrews, L. (1998). Do the dead have interests? Policy issues for research after life. American Journal of Law& Medicine, 24, 261-291. (Pubitemid 28374135)
229. O'Connor, M. J. (2002, Summer). Bearing true faith and allegiance? Allowing recovery for soldiers under fire in military experiments that violate the Nuremberg Code. Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 25, 649-686.
230. Office for Human Research Protections. (2009). OHRP compliance oversight activities: Determinations of noncompliance. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ ohrp/compliance/ findings.pdf.
231. Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare. (1985). U.S. governmental principles for the utilization and care of vertebrate animals used in testing, research and training. Retrieved from http://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/references/ phspol.Htm#USGovPrinciples.
232. Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare. (2002). Public Health Service policy on humane care and use of laboratory animals. Bethesda, MD: Author. Retrieved from http:// grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/references/phspol.htm.
233. Office of Research Integrity. (n.d.). Responsible conduct of research [Education]. Retrieved from http://www.ori.dhhs.Gov/education.
234. Office of Research Integrity. (1992). U.S. DHHS, statement of organization, functions and delegation of authority. Federal Register, 57, 24262-24263.
235. Office of Research Integrity. (2000a). Managing allegations of scientific misconduct: A guidance document for editors. Rockville, MD: Author.
236. Office of Research Integrity. (2000b). PHS policy for instruction in the responsible conduct of research; Availability of new draft. Federal Register, 65, 45381.
237. Office of Research Integrity. (2000c, August 15). Extension of comment period on draft PHS policy for instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Federal Register, 65, 49809.
238. Office of Research Integrity. (2000d). Assurance-retaliation complaints. Retrieved from http://www.ori.dhhs.gov/assurance/ whistle.shtml.
239. Office of Research Integrity. (2000e). Final PHS policy for instruction in the responsible conduct of research [Announcement]. Federal Register, 65(236), 76647. Retrieved from http://www.ori.dhhs.gov/policies/RCR-Policy. shtml.
240. Office of Research Integrity. (2001). Responsible conduct of research education: PHS policy on instruction in the responsible conduct of research (RCR)-Suspended. Federal Register, 66, 11032-11033.
241. Office of the Inspector General. (1998a). Institutional review boards: A system in jeopardy? Washington, DC:Author.
242. Office of the Inspector General. (1998b). Institutional review boards: A time for reform. Washington, DC: Author.
243. Office of the Inspector General. (2000a). Recruiting human subjects: Sample guidelines for practice. Washington, DC: Author.
244. Office of the Inspector General. (2000b). Recruiting human subjects: Pressures in industry-sponsored clinical research. Washington, DC: Author.
245. Oliver, A. A. (2001). Human experimentation at the brink of life. George Mason Law Review, 9, 1177-1203.
246. Palmer, C. R.,& Rosenberger, W. F. (1999). Ethics and practice: Alternative designs for Phase III randomized clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 20, 172-186. (Pubitemid 29164458)
247. Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering,& Institute of Medicine. (1992). Responsible science, Vol. I: Ensuring the integrity of the research process. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php? record-id=1864.
248. Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering,& Institute of Medicine. (1993). Responsible science, Vol. II: Background papers and resource documents. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from: http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php? record-id=2091.
249. Pellegrino, E. D. (1997). The Nazi Doctors and Nuremberg: Some moral lessons revisited. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127, 307-308. (Pubitemid 27352053)
250. Penslar, R. L. ( Ed.). (1995). Research ethics: Cases& materials. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
251. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. (n.d.). PETA's mission statement. Norfolk, VA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.peta.org/about.
252. Petersdorf, R. G. (1986). The pathogenesis of fraud in medical science. Annals of Internal Medicine, 104, 252-254. (Pubitemid 16134716)
253. Petersen, R. A. (1990). Animals in research: The American Medical Association's position. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 263, 1766. (Pubitemid 20113566)
254. Pimple, K. D. (2002). Six domains of research ethics: A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8, 191-205.
255. Pluhar, E. B. (2006). Experimentation on humans and nonhumans. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 27, 333-355. (Pubitemid 44480292)
256. Powell, D. J. (2002). Using the False Claims Act as a basis for institutional review board liability. University of Chicago Law Review, 69, 1399-1426.
257. Price, A. R. (1994). Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct. Journal of Higher Education, 65, 286-297.
258. Protection of Human Subjects, 45 C.F.R. pt. 46 (1991, rev. 2005, June 23). Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/ humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm.
259. Public Health Service. (2005). Public Health Service policies on research misconduct (final rule). Federal Register, 70, 28370-28400.
260. Racker, E. (1997). A view of misconduct in science. In D. Elliott& J. E. Stern ( Eds.), Research ethics: A reader ( pp. 34-68). Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
261. Resnik, D. B. (1998). The ethics of science: An introduction. New York, NY: Routledge.
262. Resnik, D. B., &Sharp, R. R. (2006). Protecting third parties in human subjects research. IRB: Ethics&Human Research, 28, 1-7. (Pubitemid 44358617)
263. Reynolds, G. (2003, March 16). The stuttering doctor's "Monster Study." The New York Times. Retrieved from http:// www.nytimes.com/2003/03/ 16/magazine/the-stuttering-doctors- monster-study.html.
264. Rollin, B. E. (2007a). Animal research: A moral science. EMBO Reports (European Molecular Biology Organization), 8, 521-525.
265. Rollin, B. E. (2007b). Overcoming ideology: Why it is necessary to create a culture in which the ethical review of protocols can flourish. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) Journal, 48, 47-53.
266. Rose, S. L.,& Pietri, C. E. (2002). Workers as research subjects: A vulnerable population. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 44, 801-805. (Pubitemid 34988569)
267. Rothman, D. J. (1987). Ethics and human experimentation: Henry Beecher revisited. New England Journal of Medicine, 317, 1195-1999.
268. Rothman, J. K.,& Michels, K. B. (1994). The continuing unethical use of placebo controls. New England Journal of Medicine, 331, 394-398. (Pubitemid 24233862)
269. Russell, N. J. C. (2010). Milgram's obedience to authority experiments: Origins and early evolution [Corrected proof ]. British Journal of Social Psychology. doi: 10.1348/ 0144666zIOX492205.
270. Russow, L.-M. (1999). Bioethics, animal research, and ethical theory. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) Journal, 40, 15-21. (Pubitemid 129661461)
271. Ryan, K. J.,&Commission on Research Integrity. (1995). Integrity and misconduct in research. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
272. Saver, R. S. (2006). Medical research and intangible harm. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 74, 941-1012. (Pubitemid 43972623)
273. Schaeffer, M. H., Krantz, D. S., Wichman, A., Masur, H., Reed, E.,& Vinicky, J. K. (1996). The impact of disease severity on the informed consent process in clinical research. American Journal of Medicine, 100, 261-268. (Pubitemid 26111622)
274. Schloendorff V. The Society of New York Hospital, 105 N.E. 92 (Ct. App. N.Y. 1914).
275. Schwartz, J. (2002). The Kennedy Krieger Case: Judicial anger and the research enterprise. Journal of Health Care Law& Policy, 6, 148-168.
276. Schwartz, R. G. (2006). Would today's IRB approve the Tudor study? Ethical considerations in conducting research involving children with communication disorders. In R. Goldfarb ( Ed.), Ethics: A case study from fluency ( pp. 83-96). San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
277. Seto, B. (2001). History of medical ethics and perspectives on disparities in minority recruitment and involvement in health research. American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 322, 246-250. (Pubitemid 33055216)
278. Shalala, D. (2000). Protecting research subjects-What must be done? New England Journal of Medicine, 343, 808-810.
279. Shalowitz, D. I., Garrett-Mayer, E.,& Wendler, D. (2006). The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: A systematic review. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166, 493-497.
280. Shamoo, A. E.,& Resnik, D. B. (2003). Responsible conduct of research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
281. Sharav, V. H. (n.d.). Human experiments: A chronology of human research. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ahrp.org/history/ chronology.php.
282. Shuster, E. (1997). Fifty years later: The significance of the Nuremberg Code. New England Journal of Medicine, 337, 1436-1440. (Pubitemid 127777477)
283. Sideris, L., McCarthy, C.,& Smith, D. H. (1999). Roots of concern with nonhuman animals in biomedical ethics. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) Journal, 40, 3-14. (Pubitemid 129661460)
284. Singer, P. (1975). Animal liberation. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
285. Slater v. Baker and Stapleton, 95 Eng. Rep. 860 (K.B. 1767).
286. Slater v. Baker and Stapleton, 95 Eng. Rep. 860 (K.B. 1767). Slater, M., Antley, A., Davison, A., Swapp, D., Guger, C., Barker, C., . . . Sanchez-Vive, M. V. (2006). A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments. PLoS ONE, 1, e39. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000039.
287. Smallwood, S. (2005). Speaking for the animals, or the terrorists? Chronicle of Higher Education, 51, A8.
288. Smith, J. A. (1991). A question of pain in invertebrates. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) Journal, 33, 25-32. Retrieved from http://dels-old.nas.edu/ilar-n/ilarjournal/33-1-2/V33-1-2Question.shtml.
289. Spriggs, M. (2004). Canaries in the mines: Children, risk, non-therapeutic research, and justice. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 176-181. (Pubitemid 38559867)
290. Steinbrook, R. (2002a). Protecting research subjects-The crisis at Johns Hopkins. New England Journal of Medicine, 346, 716-720. (Pubitemid 34815887)
291. Steinbrook, R. (2002b). Improving protection for research subjects [Health policy report]. New England Journal of Medicine, 346, 1425-1430. (Pubitemid 34754628)
292. Steneck, N. H. (1994). Research universities and scientific misconduct: History, policies and the future. Journal of Higher Education, 65, 310-330.
293. Steneck, N. H. (2002). Assessing the integrity of publicly supported research. In N. H. Steneck& M. D. Scheetz ( Eds.), Investigating research integrity, proceedings of the first ORI research conference on research integrity ( pp. 1-16). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
294. Steneck, N. H. (2006). ORI introduction to the responsible conduct of research [Online monograph]. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from http://ori.hhs.gov/education/products/RCRintro.
295. Steneck, N. H.,& Bulger, R. E. (2007). The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82, 829-834. (Pubitemid 47339811)
296. Stineman, M.G.,&Musick, D.W. (2001). Protection of human subjects with disability: Guidelines for research. Archives of Physical Medicine& Rehabilitation, 82(Suppl. 2), S9-S14. (Pubitemid 34052157)
297. Sundram, C. J. (1998). In harm's way: Research subjects who are decisionally impaired. Journal of Health Care Law& Policy, 1, 36-65.
298. Sung, N. S., Crowley, W. F., Genel, M., Salber, P., Sandy, L., Sherwood, L. M., . .. Rimoin, D. (2003). Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 289, 1278-1287. (Pubitemid 37432909)
299. Swerdlow, P. S. (2005). Use of humans in biomedical experimentation. In F. L. Macrina ( Ed.), Scientific integrity: Text and cases in responsible conduct of research (3rd ed., pp. 91-126). Washington, DC: ASM Press.
300. Tudor, M. (1939). An experimental study of the effect of evaluative labeling on speech fluency. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Iowa.
301. U.S. Government Accountability Office. (1996). Scientific research: Continued vigilance critical to protecting human subjects. Washington, DC: Author.
302. U.S. Government Printing Office. (1949-1953). The Nuremberg Code. From Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.Ushmm.org/ research/doctors/Nuremberg-Code.htm.
303. U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Science and Technology, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. (1981, 97th Cong., 1st sess., March 31 and April 1). Fraud in biomedical research.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
304. U.S. House of Representatives, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Energy and Commerce. (1989a, 100th Congress, 2nd session, April 12). Fraud in NIH grant programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office (Serial No. 100-189).
305. U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Energy and Commerce. (1989b, 101st Congress, 1st session, May 4 and 9). Scientific fraud. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office (Serial No. 101-164).
306. U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Energy and Commerce. (1989c, 101st Congress, 1st session, May 4 and 9). Scientific fraud. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office (Serial No. 101-s187).
307. U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Energy and Commerce. (1989c, 101st Congress, 1st session, May 4 and 9). Scientific fraud. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office (Serial No. 101-s187). Venderau, M. L. (2006). Science at any cost: The ineffectiveness and underenforcement of the AnimalWelfare Act. Penn State Environmental Law Review, 14, 721-742.
308. Watanabe, S.,& Huber, L. (2006). Animal logics: Decisions in the absence of human language. Animal Cognition, 9, 235-245.
309. Weijer, C.,& Miller, P. B. (2004). When are research risks reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits? Nature Medicine, 10, 570-573. (Pubitemid 38796840)
310. Weil, E., Nelson, R. M.,& Ross, L. F. (2002). Are research ethics standards satisfied in pediatric journal publications? Pediatrics, 110, 364-370. (Pubitemid 34833024)
311. Wendler, D. (2004). Deception in the pursuit of science. Archives of Internal Medicine, 164, 597-600. (Pubitemid 38392973)
312. Wendler, D. (2006). One-time general consent for research on biological samples: Is it compatible with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act? Archives of Internal Medicine, 166, 1449-1452. (Pubitemid 44125863)
313. Wendler, D.,& Glantz, L. (2007). A standard for assessing the risks of pediatric research: Pro and con. Journal of Pediatrics, 150, 579-582. (Pubitemid 46755810)
314. Wendler, D., Kington, R., Madans, J., VanWye, G., Christ-Schmidt, H., Pratt, L. A., . . . Emanuel, E. (2006). Are racial and ethnic minorities less willing to participate in health research? PLoS Medicine, 3, e19.
315. Whitbeck, C. (2004). Trust and the future of research. Physics Today, 57, 48-53.
316. Whittle, A., Shah, S., Wilfond, B., Gensler, G.,& Wendler, D. (2004). Institutional review board practices regarding assent in pediatric research. Pediatrics, 113, 1747-1752. (Pubitemid 38697986)
317. Wicclair, M. R. (2008). Ethics and research with deceased patients. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 17, 87-97.
318. Williams, J. R. (2006). The physician's role in the protection of human research subjects. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12, 5-12. (Pubitemid 43242424)
319. Williams, M. A.,& Haywood, C. (2003). Critical care research on patients with advance directives or do-not-resuscitate status: Ethical challenges for clinician-investigators. Critical Care Medicine, 31(Suppl.), S167-S171. (Pubitemid 36379562)
320. Wolf, L. E., Croughan, M.,& Lo, B. (2002). The challenges of IRB review and human subjects protections in practicebased research. Medical Care, 40, 521-529.
321. Woolley, M.,& Propst, S. M. (2005). Public attitudes and perceptions about health-related research. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 294, 1380-1384. (Pubitemid 41345818)
322. World Medical Association. (2008). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Retrieved from http://www.wma.net/e /policy/ b3.
323. Htm (Original work published 1964). Wynia, M. K.,& Gamble, V. (2006). Mistrust among minorities and the trustworthiness of medicine. PLoS Medicine, 3, e244.
324. Yarborough, M.,& Sharp, R. R. (2002). Restoring and preserving trust in biomedical research. Academic Medicine, 77, 8-14. (Pubitemid 34059627)