Responding to challenges in educating for the responsible conduct of research

Academic Medicine

Volumn 82, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 870-875

  Kalichman, Michael W ^a,b  

^a Research Ethics Program   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSENSUS; DEONTOLOGY; EDUCATION; EMPOWERMENT; ETHICAL DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; HUMAN; MORALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 34548316279     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f77fe     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Institute of Medicine, Committee on the Responsible Conduct of Research, National Research Council. The Responsible Conduct of Research in the Health Sciences. Available at: (http://www.nap.edu/books/0309062373/html). Accessed May 30, 2007.
2. Commission on Research Integrity. Integrity and Misconduct in Research. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services; 1995.
3. National Academy of Sciences, Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. Responsible Science, Volume I: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process. Available at: (http://www.nap.edu/books/ 0309047315/html). Accessed May 30, 2007.
4. Institute of Medicine, Board on Health Sciences Policy and Division of Earth and Life Studies, Institute of Medicine and National Research Council of the National Academies. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct. Available at: (http://www.nap.edu/books/0309084792/html). Accessed May 30, 2007.
5. Steneck N, Bulger RE. The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Acad Med. 2007;82:829-834.
6. National Institutes of Health. Reminder and update: requirement for instruction in the responsible conduct of research in National Research Service Award institutional training grants. NIH Guide Grants Contracts. 1992;21:43.
7. National Institutes of Health. Training grant requirement. NIH Guide Grants Contracts. 1989;18:45.
8. Engler RL, Covell JW, Friedman PJ, Kitcher PS, Peters RM. Misrepresentation and responsibility in medical research. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1383-1389.
9. Kevles DJ. The Baltimore Case: A Trial of Politics, Science, and Character. New York, NY: Norton; 1998.
10. Crewdson J. Science Fictions: A Scientific Mystery, A Massive Cover-Up, and the Dark Legacy of Robert Gallo. New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company; 2002.
11. Plemmons D, Brody SA, Kalichman M. Student perceptions of the effectiveness of education in the responsible conduct of research. Sci Eng Ethics. 2006;12:571-582.
12. Plemmons D, Kalichman M. Goals reported by instructors for teaching of research ethics [abstract]. Tampa, Fla: Office of Research Integrity 4th Research Conference on Research Integrity; 2006.
13. Kalichman M, Plemmons D. Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses. Acad Med. 2007;82:846-852.
14. Bebeau MJ, Pimple KD, Muskavitch KMT, Smith DH. Moral Reasoning in Scientific Research: A Tool for Teaching and Assessment. Bloomington, Ind: Indiana University; 1995.
15. Springer L, Stanne ME, Donovan SS. Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis. Madison, Wisc: National Institute for Science Education; 1997. Research Monograph No. 11.
16. Brown S, Kalichman MW. Effects of training in the responsible conduct of research: a survey of graduate students in experimental sciences. Sci Eng Ethics. 1998;4:487-498.
17. Swazey JP, Anderson MS. Mentors, advisors and role models in graduate and professional education. In: Rubin ER, ed. Mission Management. Vol. 2. Washington, DC: Association of Academic Health Centers; 1998:165-185.
18. Kalichman MW. Ethical decision-making in research: identifying all competing interests. Sci Eng Ethics. 2002;8:215-218.
19. Gunsalus CK. How to blow the whistle and still have a career afterwards. Sci Eng Ethics. 1998;4:51-64.
20. Kalichman M. Ethics and science: a 0.1% solution. Issues Sci Technol. Fall 2006:34-36.
21. Mastroianni A, Kahn J. The importance of expanding current training in responsible conduct of research. Acad Med. 1998;73:1249-1254.
22. Mastroianni A, Kahn J. Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts. Account Res. 1999;7:85-100.