Residue centrality in alpha helical polytopic transmembrane protein structures

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 309, Issue , 2012, Pages 78-87

  Arnold Emerson, I ^a   Gothandam, K M ^a  

^a VIT UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Amino acids; Deleterious mutation; Hubs; Small world network; Stability

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; CARRIER PROTEIN; ENZYME; LIGAND; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; METAL ION; POLYTOPIC TRANSMEMBRANE PROTEIN; RECEPTOR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO ACID; ENZYME ACTIVITY; MEMBRANE; MUTATION; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STABILITY ANALYSIS;

ALPHA HELIX; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CELL ACTIVITY; CELL MIGRATION; GENETIC CONSERVATION; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

AMINO ACIDS; AQUAPORINS; CATALYTIC DOMAIN; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; DATABASES, PROTEIN; DNA MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; LIGANDS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; POTASSIUM CHANNELS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY;

EID: 84863114942     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Aftabuddin M., Kundu S. Weighted and unweighted network of amino acids within protein. Physica A 2006, 369(2):895-904.
2. Aftabuddin M., Kundu S. Hydrophobic, hydrophilic and charged amino acid networks within protein. Biophys. J. 2007, 93(1):225-231.
3. Aloy P., Querol E., Aviles F.X., Sternberg M.J. Automated structure-based prediction of functional sites in proteins: applications to assessing the validity of inheriting protein function from homology in genome annotation and to protein docking. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 311:395-408.
4. Alves N.A., Martinez A.S. Inferring topological features of proteins from amino acid residue networks. Physica A 2007, 375(1):336-344.
5. Amitai G., Shemesh A., Sitbon E., Shklar M., Netanely D., Venger I., Pietrokovski S. Network analysis of protein structures identifies functional residues. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 344:1135-1146.
6. Ashkenazy H., Erez E., Martz E., Pupko T., Ben-Tal N. ConSurf 2010: calculating evolutionary conservation in sequence and structure of proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38:W529-W533.
7. Atilgan A.R., Akan P., Baysal C. Small-world communication of residues and significance for protein dynamics. Biophys. J. 2004, 86(1 Pt 1):85-91.
8. Atilgan A.R., Akan P., Baysal C., Vendruscolo M., Dokholyan N.V., Paci E., Karplus M. Small-world communication of residues and significance for protein dynamics. Small-world view of the amino acids that play a key role in protein folding. Biophys. J. 2004, 86:85-91.
9. Bagler G., Sinha S. Network properties of protein structures. Physica A 2005, 346(1-2):27-33.
10. Baker D. A surprising simplicity to protein folding. Nature 2000, 405:39-42.
11. Barabasi A.L., Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 1999, 286(5439):509-512.
12. Barabasi A.L., Oltvai Z.N. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004, 5(2):101-113.
13. Berman H.M., Westbrook J., Feng Z., Gilliland G., Bhat T.N., Weissig H., Shindyalov I.N., Bourne P.E. The protein databank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28:235-242.
14. Bezanilla F. The voltage-sensor structure in a voltage-gated channel. Proc. Aust. Physiol. Soc. 2006, 37:15-27.
15. Bode C., Kovacs I.A., Szalay M.S., Palotai R., Korcsmaros T., Csermely P. Network analysis of protein dynamics. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581(2):2776-2782.
16. Bollobas B. Random Graphs 1985, Academic Press, London; Orlando.
17. Borgnia M.J., Kozono D., Calamita G., Maloney P.C., Agre P. Functional reconstitution and characterization of AqpZ, the E. coli water channel protein. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 291:1169-1179.
18. Brinda K.V., Vishveshwara S. A network representation of protein structures: implications for protein stability. Biophys. J. 2005, 89(6):4159-4170.
19. del Sol A., Fujihashi H., Amoros D., Nussinov R. Residues crucial for maintaining short paths in network communication mediate signaling in proteins. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2006, 1-12.
20. del Sol A., Pazos F., Valencia A. Automatic methods for predicting functionally important residues. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 326:1289-1302.
21. del Sol A., O'Meara P. Small-world network approach to identify key residues in protein-protein interaction. Proteins 2004, 58:672-682.
22. del Sol A., Fujihashi H., O'Meara P. Topology of small-world networks of protein-protein complex structures. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:1311-1315.
23. del Sol A., Fujihashi H., Amoros D., Nussinov R. Residue centrality, functionally important residues, and active site shape: analysis of enzyme and non-enzyme families. Protein Sci. 2006, 15(9):2120-2128.
24. Dokholyan N.V., Li L., Ding F., Shakhnovich E.I. Topological determinants of protein folding. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99(13):8637-8641.
25. Drews J. Genomic sciences and the medicine of tomorrow: commentary on drug development. Nat. Biotech. 1996, 14:1516-1518.
26. Dundas J., Ouyang Z., Tseng J., Binkowski A., Turpaz Y., Liang J. CASTp: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins with structural and topographical mapping of functionally annotated residues. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34:W116-W118.
27. Emerson I.A., Gothandam K.M. Network analysis of transmembrane protein structures. Physica A 2012, 391:905-916.
28. Fleming K.G. Riding the wave: structural and energetic principles of helical membrane proteins. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2000, 11:67-71.
29. Floyd R.W. Algorithm 97. Commun. ACM 1962, 5-6:345.
30. Gao J., Li Z. Conserved network properties of helical membrane protein structures and its implication for improving membrane protein homology modeling at the twilight zone. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2009, 23:755-763.
31. Glaser F., Pupko T., Paz I., Bell R.E., Bechor D., Martz E., Ben-Tal N. ConSurf: identification of functional regions in proteins by surface-mapping of phylogenetic information. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:163-164.
32. Greene L.H., Higman V.A. Uncovering network systems within protein structures. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 334(4):781-791.
33. Hargrave P.A., McDowell J.H., Curtis Donna R., Wang Janet K., Juszczak Elizabeth, Shao-Ling Fong J.K., Mohana Rao P. Argos, The structure of bovine rhodopsin. Biophys. Struct. Mech. 1983, 9:235-244.
34. Jordan F., Liu W.C., Davis A.J. Topological keystone species: measures of positional importance in food webs. Oikos 2006, 112:535-546.
35. Karnik S.S., Gogonea C., Patil S., Saad Y., Takezako T. Activation of G-protein-coupled receptors: a common molecular mechanism. Trends. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003, 14:431-437.
36. Klabunde T., Hessler G. Drug design strategies for targeting G-protein-coupled receptors. Chem. Biol. Chem. 2002, 3:928-944.
37. Kundu S. Amino acid network within protein. Physica A 2005, 346(1-2):104-109.
38. Landau M., Mayrose I., Rosenberg Y., Glaser F., Martz E., Pupko T., Ben-Tal N. ConSurf 2005: the projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33:W299-W302.
39. Landgraf R., Xenarios I., Eisenberg D. Three-dimensional cluster analysis identifies interfaces and functional residue clusters in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 307:1487-1502.
40. Li T., Fan K., Wang J., Wang W. Reduction of protein sequence complexity by residue grouping. Protein Eng. 2003, 16:323-330.
41. Li J., Wang J., Wang W. Identifying folding nucleus based on residue contact networks of proteins. Proteins 2008, 71:1899-1907.
42. Lichtarge O., Bourne H.R., Cohen F.E. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 257:342-358.
43. Liu Y., Engelman D.M., Gerstein M. Genomic analysis of membrane protein families: abundance and conserved motifs. Genome Biol. 2002, 3. research0054.
44. Mathai J.C., Agre P. Hourglass pore-forming domains restrict aquaporin-1 tetramer assembly. Biochemistry 1999, 38:923-928.
45. Milo R., Shen-Orr S., Itzkovitz S., Kashtan N., Chklovskii D., Alon U. Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science 2002, 298(5594):824-827.
46. Mullen E., Akhtar M. FEBS Lett. 1981, 132:261-264.
47. Mullen E., Akhtar M. Structural studies on membrane-bound bovine rhodopsin. Biochem. J. 1983, 211:45-54.
48. Ng P.C., Henikoff S. SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31:3812-3814.
49. Ondrechen M.J., Clifton J.G., Ringe D. THEMATICS: a simple computational predictor of enzyme function from structure. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 2001, 98:12473-12478.
50. Palla G., Derenyi I., Farkas I., Vicsek T. Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society. Nature 2005, 435(7043):814-818.
51. Pabuwal V., Li Z. Comparative analysis of the packing topology of structurally important residues in helical membrane and soluble proteins, Protein Engineering. Des. Sel. 2009, 22:67-73.
52. Pandini A., Fornili A., Fraternali F., Kleinjung J. Detection of allosteric signal transmission by information-theoretic analysis of protein dynamics. FASEB J. 2011, Nov. 10.1096/fj.11-190868.
53. Ravasz E., Somera A.L., Mongru D.A., Oltvai Z.N., Barabasi A.L. Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science 2002, 297(5586):1551-1555.
54. Savage D.F., Egea P.F., Robles-Colmenares Y., O'Connell J.D., Stroud R.M. Architecture and selectivity in aquaporins: 2.5 A X-ray structure of aquaporin Z. PLoS Biol. 2003, 1:334-340.
55. Sobolev V., Sorokine A., Prilusky J., Abola E.E., Edelman M. Automated analysis of interatomic contacts in proteins. Bioinformatics 1999, 15:327-332.
56. Strogatz S.H. Exploring complex networks. Nature 2001, 410:268-276.
57. Tieleman D.P. Computer simulations of transport through membranes: passive diffusion, pores, channels and transporters. Proc. Aust. Physiol. Soc. 2006, 37:15-27.
58. Tusnady G.E., Dosztanyi Z., Simon I. Transmembrane proteins in the protein databank: identification and classification. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:2964-2972.
59. Tusnady G.E., Dosztanyi Z., Simon I. PDB_TM: selection and membrane localization of transmembrane proteins in the protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33:D275-D278.
60. Vagmita Pabuwal1, Li Zhijun Network pattern of residue packing in helical membrane proteins and its application in membrane protein structure prediction. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 2008, 21:55-64.
61. Vendruscolo M., Paci E., Dobson C.M., Karplus M. Three key residues form a critical contact network in a protein folding transition state. Nature 2001, 409(6820):641-645.
62. Vendruscolo M., Dokholyan N.V., Paci E., Karplus M. Small-world view of the amino acids that play a key role in protein folding. Phys. Rev. E: Stat. Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys. 2002, 65(6 Pt 1):061910.
63. Vendruscolo M., Dokholyan N.V., Paci E., Karplus M. Smallworld view of the amino acids that play a key role in protein fold. Phys. Rev. E: Stat. Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys. 2002, 65: 0619101-0619104.30.
64. Wallin E., Heijne G.V. Genome-wide analysis of integral membrane proteins from eubacterial, archaean, and eukaryotic organisms. Protein Sci. 1998, 7:1029-1038.
65. Wang J., Wang W. A computational approach to simplifying the protein folding alphabet. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1999, 6:1033-1038.
66. Wang J., Wang W. Modeling study on the validity of a possibly simplified representation of proteins. Phys. Rev. E 2000, 61:6981-6986.
67. Wangikar P.P., Tendulkar A.V., Ramya S., Mali D.N., Sarawagi S. Functional sites in protein families uncovered via an objective and automated graph theoretic approach. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 326(3):955-978.
68. Wassermann S., Faust K. Social Network Analysis 1995, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.
69. Watts D.J., Strogatz S.H. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature 1998, 393(6684):440-442.
70. White S.H. The progress of membrane protein structure determination. Protein Sci. 2004, 13:1948-1949.
71. Wolynes P., Onuchic J.N., Thirumalai D. Navigating the folding routes. Science 1995, 267:1619-1620.
72. Zhang Y., Cui Y., Chen L.Y. Mercury inhibits the L170C mutant of aquaporin Z by making waters clog the water channel. Biophys. Chem. 2012, 160:69-74.