Estimation of heritability, evolvability and genetic correlations of two pollen and pistil traits involved in a sexual conflict over timing of stigma receptivity in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae)

Annals of Botany

Volumn 110, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 91-99

  Madjidian, Josefin A ^a,b   Andersson, Stefan ^a   Lankinen, Åsa ^a,b  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Antagonistic trait; co evolution; Collinsia heterophylla; evolvability; genetic correlation; genetic variation; heritability; mate choice; pollen competition; sexual conflict; stigma receptivity

Indexed keywords

ANTAGONISM; ASSESSMENT METHOD; COEVOLUTION; ESTIMATION METHOD; FERTILIZATION (REPRODUCTION); GENETIC VARIATION; HERB; HERITABILITY; MATE CHOICE; POLLEN; SEED SET; SELECTION; SEXUAL CONFLICT;

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; FLOWER; GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANTAGO; POLLEN;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; FLOWERS; PLANTAGO; POLLEN;

COLLINSIA HETEROPHYLLA; PLANTAGINACEAE;

EID: 84862979368     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcs084     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Agrawal AF, Stinchcombe JR. 2009. How much do genetic covariances alter rate of adaptation? Proceedings of the Royal Society London Series B 276: 1183-1191.
2. Andersson M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Armbruster WS. 1996. Evolution of floral morphology and function: an inte-grative approach to adaptation, constraint, and compromise in Dalechampia (Euphorbiaceae). In: Loyd DG, Barrett SCH. eds. Floral biology. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall, 241-272.
4. Armbruster WS, Rogers DG. 2004. Does pollen competition reduce the cost of inbreeding? American Journal of Botany 91: 1939-1943. (Pubitemid 43186490)
5. Armbruster WS, Schwaegerle KE. 1996. Causes of covariation of phenotyp-ic traits among populations. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 9: 261-276.
6. Armbruster WS, Mulder CPH, Baldwin BG, Kalisz S, Wessa B, Nute H. 2002. Comparative analysis of late floral development and mating-system evolution in tribe Collinsiae (Scrophulariaceae s.l.). American Journal of Botany 89: 37-49. (Pubitemid 34196569)
7. Arnqvist G, Rowe L. 2005. Sexual conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8. Ashman T-L, Majetic CJ. 2006. Genetic constraints on floral evolution: a review and evaluation patterns. Heredity 96: 343-352. (Pubitemid 43670397)
9. Bedhomme S, Bernasconi G, Koene JM, et al. 2009. How does breeding system variation modulate sexual antagonism? Biology Letters 5: 717-720.
10. Bernasconi G. 2003. Seed paternity in flowering plants: an evolutionary perspective. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 6: 149-158. (Pubitemid 38319225)
11. Bernasconi G, Paschke M, Schmid B. 2003. Diversity effects in reproductive biology. Oikos 102: 217-220. (Pubitemid 36726372)
12. Bernasconi G, Ashman T-L, Birkhead TR, et al. 2004. Evolutionary ecology of the prezygotic stage. Science 303: 971-975. (Pubitemid 38209693)
13. Borg M, Brownfield L, Twell D. 2009. Male gametophyte development: a molecular perspective. Journal of Experimental Biology 60: 1465-1478.
14. Charlesworth D, Mayer SS. 1995. Genetic variability of plant characters in the partial inbreeder Collinsia heterophylla (Scrophulariaceae). American Journal of Botany 82: 112-120.
15. Crawley MJ. 2007. The R Book. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
16. Dahl AE, Fredriksson M. 1996. The timetable for development of maternal tissues sets the stage for male genomic selection in Betula pendula (Betulaceae). American Journal of Botany 83: 895-902. (Pubitemid 26311501)
17. Darwin C. 1859. On the origin of species: the illustrated edition. Quammen D. ed. New York, NY: Sterling.
18. Darwin C. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.
19. Eberhard WG. 1996. Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20. Falconer DS, McKay TFC. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Harlow: Longman.
21. Fisher RA. 1958. The genetical theory of natural selection, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Dover.
22. Galen C, Shykoff JA, Plowright RC. 1986. Consequences of stigma receptivity schedules for sexual selection in flowering plants. American Naturalist 127: 462-476.
23. Gavrilets S, Hayashi TI. 2005. Speciation and sexual conflict. Evolutionary Ecology 19: 167-198. (Pubitemid 41279645)
24. Gavrilets S, Waxman D. 2002. Sympatric speciation by sexual conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99: 10533-10538.
25. Gay L, Brown E, Tregenza T, et al. 2010. The genetic architecture of sexual conflict: male harm and female resistance in Callosobruchus maculatus. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24: 449-456.
26. Geber MA, Griffen LR. 2003. Inheritance and natural selection on functional traits. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: S21-S42. (Pubitemid 36832490)
27. Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Eckert CG. 2005. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36: 47-79.
28. Hansen TF, Pélabon C, Armbruster WS, Carlson ML. 2003. Evolvability and genetic constraint in Dalechampia blossoms: components of variance and measures of evolvability. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16: 756-766.
29. Härdling R, Karlsson K. 2009. The dynamics of sexually antagonistic co-evolution and the complex influences of mating system and genetic correlation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 260: 276-282.
30. Härdling R, Nilsson P. 2001. A model of triploid endosperm evolution driven by parent-offspring conflict. Oikos 92: 417-423. (Pubitemid 32276694)
31. Havens K. 1994. Clonal repeatability of in vitro pollen tube growth rates in Oenothera organensis (Onagraceae). American Journal of Botany 81: 161-165. (Pubitemid 2052497)
32. Herrero M. 2003. Male and female synchrony and the regulation of mating in flowering plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society London Series B 358: 1019-1024. (Pubitemid 36774895)
33. Herrero M, Hormaza JI. 1996. Pistil strategies controlling pollen tube growth. Sexual Plant Reproduction 9: 343-347. (Pubitemid 27015629)
34. Holland B, Rice WR. 1998. Perspective: chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52: 1-7. (Pubitemid 28195144)
35. Hiscock SJ. 2011. Sexual plant reproduction. Annals of Botany 4: 585-587.
36. Houle D. 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130: 195-204.
37. Jennions MD, Petrie M. 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biological Reviews 72: 283-327. (Pubitemid 27207611)
38. Jóhannsson MH, Stephenson AG. 1997. Effects of pollination intensity on the vigor of the sporophytic and gametophytic generation of Cucurbita texana. Sexual Plant Reproduction 10: 236-240. (Pubitemid 27413980)
39. Jolivet C, Bernasconi G. 2007. Within/between population crosses reveal genetic basis for siring success in Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 1361-1374. (Pubitemid 46956656)
40. Kalisz S, Vogler B, Fails M, et al. 1999. The mechanism of delayed selfing in Collinsia verna (Scrophulariaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 1239-1247.
41. Kearns CA, Inouye DW. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. Boulder, CO: University Press.
42. Kokko H, Brooks R, McNamara JM, Houston AI. 2002. The sexual selection continuum. Proceedings of the Royal Society London Series B 269: 1331-340. (Pubitemid 34753665)
43. Kokko H, Brooks R, Jennions MD, Morley J. 2003. The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 270: 653-664. (Pubitemid 36359742)
44. Lamborn E, Cresswell JE, Macnair MR. 2005. The potential for adaptive evolution of pollen grain size in Mimulus guttatus. New Phytologist 167: 289-296. (Pubitemid 40885848)
45. Lankinen A, Armbruster WS. 2007. Pollen competition reduces inbreeding depression in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 737-749.
46. Lankinen A, Larsson M. 2009. Conflicting selection pressures on reproductive functions and speciation in plants. Evolutionary Ecology 23: 147-157
47. Lankinen A, Kiboi S. 2007. Pollen donor identity affects timing of stigma receptivity in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae): a sexual conflict during pollen competition? American Naturalist 170: 854-863. (Pubitemid 350211435)
48. Lankinen A, Madjidian JA. 2011. Enhancing pollen competition by delaying stigma receptivity: pollen deposition schedules affect siring ability, paternal diversity and seed production in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae). American Journal of Botany 98: 1-10.
49. Lankinen A, Skogsmyr I. 2001. Evolution of pistil length as a choice mechanism for pollen quality. Oikos 92: 81-90. (Pubitemid 32160888)
50. Lankinen A, Hellriegel B, Bernasconi G. 2006. Sexual conflict over floral receptivity. Evolution 60: 2454-2465. (Pubitemid 46220856)
51. Lankinen A, Armbruster WS, Antonsen L. 2007. Delayed stigma receptivity in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae): genetic variation and adaptive significance in relation to pollen competition, delayed self-pollination, and mating-system evolution. American Journal of Botany 94: 1183-1192. (Pubitemid 47052459)
52. Lankinen A, Maad J, Armbruster WS. 2009. Pollen-tube growth rates in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae): one-donor crosses reveal herit-ability but no effect on sporophytic-offspring fitness. Annals of Botany 103: 941-950.
53. Madjidian JA, Lankinen A. 2009. Sexual conflict and sexually antagonistic coevolultion in an annual plant. PLoS One 4: e5477. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0005477.
54. Maklakov AA, Arnqvist G. 2009. Testing for direct and indirect effects of mate choice by manipulating female choosiness. Current Biology 19: 1903-1906.
55. Manly BFJ. 1991. Randomization and Monte Carlo methods in biology. London: Chapman and Hall.
56. Marshall DL, Whittaker KL. 1989. Effects of pollen donor quality in wild radish, Raphanus sativus. American Journal of Botany 76: 1081-1088. (Pubitemid 20425266)
57. Mazer SJ, Hove AA, Miller BS, Barbet-Massin M. 2010. The joint evolution of mating system and pollen performance: predictions regarding male gametophytic evolution in selfers vs. outcrossers. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 12: 31-41.
58. Michiels NK, Koene JM. 2006. Sexual selection favours harmful mating in hermaphrodites more than in gonochorists. Integrative and Comparative Biology 46: 473-480. (Pubitemid 44290611)
59. Moore AJ, Pizzari T. 2005. Quantitative genetic models of sexual conflict based on interacting phenotypes. American Naturalist 165: S88-S97. (Pubitemid 40561141)
60. Moore JC, Pannell JR. 2011. Sexual selection in plants. Current Biology 21: R176-R182.
61. Mulcahy DL. 1971. A correlation between gametophytic characters in Zea mays L. Science 171: 1155-1156.
62. Mulcahy DL. 1979. The rise of the angiosperms: a genecological factor. Science 206: 20-23.
63. Mulcahy DL. 1983. Models of pollen-tube competition in Geranium macula-tum. In: Real L. ed. Pollination biology. New York, NY: Academic Press, 151-161.
64. Neese EC. 1993. Collinsia. In: Hickman JC. ed. The Jepson manual: higher plants of California. Berkeley, CA; University of California Press, 1024-1027.
65. Newsom VM. 1929. A revision of the genus Collinsia. Botanical Gazette 87: 260-231.
66. Parker GA. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Blum MS, Blum NA. eds. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. London: Academic Press, 123-166.
67. Paschke M, Abs C, Schmid B. 2002. Effects of population size and pollen diversity on reproductive success and offspring size in the narrow endemic Cochlearia bavarica (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 89: 1250-1259. (Pubitemid 34915474)
68. Prasad NG, Bedhomme S. 2006. Sexual conflict in plants. Journal of Genetics 85: 161-164. (Pubitemid 46496090)
69. Queller DC. 1983. Sexual selection in a hermaphroditic plant. Nature 305: 706-707.
70. Quesada M, Fuchs EJ, Lobo JA. 2001. Pollen load size, reproductive success, and progeny kinship of naturally pollinated flowers of the tropical dry forest tree Pachira quinata (Bombacaceae). American Journal of Botany 88: 2113-2118. (Pubitemid 33649789)
71. R Development Core team. 2011. R: a language and environment for statistical computing, version 2.12.2. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.r-project.org/.
72. Ruane LG. 2009. Post-pollination processes and non-random mating among compatible mates. Evolutionary Ecology Research 11: 1031-1051.
73. Rodrigo J, Herrero M, Hormaza JI. 2009. Pistil traits and flower fate in apricot (Prunus armeniaca). Annals of Applied Biology 154: 365-375.
74. Skogsmyr I, Lankinen A. 2000. Potential selection for female choice in Viola tricolor. Evolutionary Ecology Research 2: 965-979.
75. Skogsmyr I, Lankinen A. 2002. Sexual selection: an evolutionary force in plants? Biological Reviews 77: 537-562. (Pubitemid 35415694)
76. Snow AA, Spira TP. 1991. Differential pollen-tube growth rates and nonran-dom fertilization in Hibiscus moscheutos (Malvaceae). American Journal of Botany 78: 1419-1426.
77. Statistica. 2005. STATISTICA 7.1. Chicago, IL: Statsoft Inc.
78. Weil J, Allard RW. 1964. The mating system and genetic variability in natural populations of Collinsia heterophylla. Evolution 18: 515-525.
79. Wilson MF, Burley N. 1983. Mate choice in plants: tactics, mechanisms, and consequences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.