The dynamics of sexually antagonistic coevolution and the complex influences of mating system and genetic correlation

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 260, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 276-282

  Härdling, Roger ^a   Karlsson, Kristina ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Assortative mating; Genetic polymorphism; Indirect selection; Sexual conflict; Speciation

Indexed keywords

ANTAGONISM; COEVOLUTION; CORRELATION; EVOLUTION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; POLYGYNY; POLYMORPHISM; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); THEORETICAL STUDY;

ARTICLE; ASSORTATIVE MATING; COEVOLUTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC CORRELATION; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MATE CHOICE; MATING SYSTEM; POLYGYNY; POPULATION GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; GENETIC SPECIATION; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 68949173925     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.05.024     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Andersson M. Sexual Selection. first ed (1994), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
2. Arnqvist G., and Rowe L. Sexual Conflict (2005), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
3. Arnqvist G., Edvardsson M., Friberg U., and Nilsson T. Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97 19 (2000) 10460-10464
4. Arnqvist G., and Rowe L. Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature (London) 415 6873 (2002) 787-789
5. Arnqvist G., and Rowe L. Correlated evolution of male and female morphologies in water striders. Evolution 56 5 (2002) 936-947
6. Bergsten J., and Miller K.B. Phylogeny of diving beetles reveals a coevolutionary arms race between the sexes. PLoS ONE 2 6 (2007) e522
7. Chapman T., Liddle L.F., Kalb J.M., Wolfner M.F., and Partridge L. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature (London) 373 6511 (1995) 241-244
8. Clark A.G., and Begun D.J. Female genotypes affect sperm displacement in Drosophila. Genetics 149 3 (1998) 1487-1493
9. Clark A.G., Begun D.J., and Prout T. Female×male interactions in Drosophila sperm competition. Science (Washington, DC) 283 5399 (1999) 217-220
10. Edelstein-Keshet L. Mathematical Models in Biology (1988), McGraw-Hill, New York
11. Emlen S.T., and Oring L.W. Ecology sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science (Washington, DC) 197 4300 (1977) 215-223
12. Falconer D.S., and MacKay T.F.C. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics (1989), Pearson, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
13. Fedorka K.M., and Zuk M. Sexual conflict and female immune suppression in the cricket, Allonemobious socius. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18 6 (2005) 1515-1522
14. Fowler K., and Partridge L. A cost of mating in female fruit flies. Nature (London) 338 6218 (1989) 760-761
15. Gavrilets S. Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species (2004), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
16. Gavrilets S. Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict. Nature (London) 403 6772 (2000) 886-889
17. Gavrilets S., and Hayashi T.I. Speciation and sexual conflict. Evolutionary Ecology 19 2 (2005) 167-198
18. Gavrilets S., and Waxman D. Sympatric speciation by sexual conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99 16 (2002) 10533-10538
19. Gosden T.P., and Svensson E.I. Female sexual polymorphism and fecundity consequences of male mating harassment in the wild. PLoS ONE 2 6 (2007) e580
20. Härdling R., and Bergsten J. Nonrandom mating preserves intrasexual polymorphism and stops population differentiation in sexual conflict. The American Naturalist 167 3 (2006) 401-409
21. Haygood R. Sexual conflict and protein polymorphism. Evolution 58 7 (2004) 1414-1423
22. Holland B., and Rice W.R. Perspective: chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52 1 (1998) 1-7
23. Holland B., and Rice W.R. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96 9 (1999) 5083-5088
24. Jormalainen V., Merilaita S., and Riihimaki J. Costs of intersexual conflict in the isopod Idotea baltica. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14 5 (2001) 763-772
25. Kirkpatrick M. Sexual selection and the evolution of female mate choice. Evolution 36 (1982) 1-12
26. Kirkpatrick M., and Barton N. The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94 4 (1997) 1282-1286
27. Kokko H. Treat 'em mean, keep 'em (sometimes) keen: evolution of female preferences for dominant and coercive males. Evolutionary Ecology 19 (2005) 123-135
28. Lande R. Models of speciation by sexual selection on Poly Genic Traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 78 6 (1981) 3721-3725
29. Martin O.Y., and Hosken D.J. The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict. Nature (London) 423 6943 (2003) 979-982
30. Muhlhauser C., and Blanckenhorn W.U. The costs of avoiding matings in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Behavioral Ecology 13 3 (2002) 359-365
31. Nei M. Mathematical models of speciation and genetic distance. In: Karlin S., and Nevo E. (Eds). Population Genetics and Ecology (1976), Academic Press, New York 723-768
32. Parker G.A. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Blum M.S., and Blum N.A. (Eds). Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (1979), Academic Press, London 123-166
33. Rice W.R. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381 (1996) 232-234
34. Rice S.H. Evolutionary Theory: Mathematical and Conceptual Foundations (2004), Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
35. Rice W.R. Intergenomic conflict, interlocus antagonistic coevolution, and the evolution of reproductive isolation. In: Howard D.J., and Berlocher S.H. (Eds). Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (1998), Oxford University Press, Oxford 261-270
36. Sakurai G., and Kasuya E. The costs of harassment in the adzuki bean beetle. Animal Behaviour 75 Part 4 (2008) 1367-1373
37. Schlupp I., Mc Knab R., and Ryan M.J. Sexual harassment as a cost for molly females: bigger males cost less. Behaviour 138 2 (2001) 277-286
38. Shuster S.M., and Wade M.J. Mating Systems and Strategies (2003), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
39. Svensson E.I., Abbott J., and Härdling R. Female polymorphism, frequency dependence, and rapid evolutionary dynamics in natural populations. The American Naturalist 165 5 (2005) 567-576
40. Udovic D. Frequency dependent selection disruptive selection and the evolution of reproductive isolation. American Naturalist 116 5 (1980) 621-641
41. Watson P.J., Arnqvist G., and Stallmann R.R. Sexual conflict and the energetic costs of mating and mate choice in water striders. American Naturalist 151 1 (1998) 46-58