Seed paternity in flowering plants: An evolutionary perspective

Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 149-158

  Bernasconi, Giorgina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Genetic markers; Paternity analysis; Pollen competition; Post pollination sexual selection

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; EVOLUTION; GENETIC MARKER; PATERNITY; POLLINATION; SELECTION;

MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 1542288747     PISSN: 14338319     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1078/1433-8319-00075     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Armbruster WS, Debevec EM & Willson MF (2002) Evolution of syncarpy in Angiosperm: theoretical and phylogenetic analyses of the effects of carpel fusion on offspring quantity and quality. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15: 657-672.
2. Baker AM & Shore JS (1995) Pollen competition in Turnera ulmifolia (Turneraceae). American Journal of Botany 82: 717-725.
3. Bañuelos MJ & Obeso JR (2003) Maternal provisioning, sibling rivalry and seed mass variability in the dioecious shrub, Rhamnus alpinus. Evolutionary Ecology 17: 19-31.
4. Barrett SCH (2003) Mating stretegies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 358: 991-1004.
5. Bernasconi G, Krieger M & Keller L (1997) Unequal partitioning of reproduction and investment between cooperating queens in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, as revealed by microsatellites. Proceedings of the Royal Society 264: 1331-1336.
6. Bernasconi G, Paschke M & Schmid B (2003) Diversity effects in reproductive biology. Oikos 102: 217-220.
7. Bertin RI & Sullivan M (1988) Pollen interference and cryptic self-fertility in Campsis radicans. American Journal of Botany 75: 1140-1147.
8. Birkhead TR & Møller AP (1998) Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. Academic Press, San Diego.
9. Broyles SB & Wyatt R (1990) Paternity analysis in a natural population of Asclepias exaltata: multiple patenity, functional gender, and the 'pollen-donation hypothesis'. Evolution 44: 1454-1468.
10. Broyles SB & Wyatt R (1993) The consequences of self-pollination in Asclepias exaltata, a self-incompatible milkweed. American Journal of Botany 80: 41-44.
11. Campbell D (1998) Multiple paternity in fruits of Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 85: 1022-1027.
12. Campbell D, Alarcòn R & Wu CA (2003) Reproductive isolation and hybrid pollen disadvantage in Ipomopsis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16: 536-540.
13. Charlesworth D & Charlesworth B (1992) The effects of selection in the gametophyte stage on mutational load. Evolution 46: 703-720.
14. Cowan AA, Marshall AH & Michaelson-Yates TPT (2000) Effect of pollen competition and stigmatic receptivity on seed set in white clover (Trifolium repens L.). Sexual Plant Reproduction 13: 37-42.
15. Cruzan MB (1990) Variation in pollen size, fertilization ability, and postfertilization siring ability in Erythronium grandiflorum. Evolution 44: 843-856.
16. Dahl AE & Fredrikson M (1996) The timetable for development of maternal tissues sets the stage for male genomic selection. American Journal of Botany 83: 895-902.
17. Delph LF & Havens K (1998) Pollen competition in flowering plants. Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (eds. TR Birkhead & AP Møller), pp. 149-173. Academic Press, San Diego.
18. Delph LF, Weinig C & Sullivan K (1998) Why fast-growing pollen tubes give rise to vigorous progeny: the test of a new mechanism. Proceedings of the Royal Society 265: 935-939.
19. De Nettancourt D (2001) Incompatibility and Incongruity in Wild and Cultivated Plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
20. Elle E & Meagher TR (2000). Sex allocation and reproduction success in the andromonoecious perennial Solanum carolinense (Solanaceae). II. Paternity and functional gender. The American Naturalist 156: 622-636.
21. Ellstrand NC (1984) Multiple paternity within the fruits of the wild radish, Raphanus sativus. The American Naturalist 123: 819-828.
22. Ellstrand NC & Marshall DL (1985) Interpopulation gene flow by pollen in wild radish, Raphanus sativus. The American Naturalist 126: 606-616.
23. Ellstrand NC & Devlin B (1989) Transmission genetics of isozyme loci in Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae): Stress-dependent non-mendelian segregation. American Journal of Botany 76: 40-46.
24. Endress PK (1982) Syncarpy and alternative modes of escaping disadvantages of apocarpy in primitive angiosperms. Taxon 31: 48-52.
25. Guéritaine G, Bonavent JF & Darmency H (2003) Variation of prezygotic barriers in the interspecific hybridization between oilseed rape and wild radish. Euphytica 130: 349-353.
26. Haig D & Bergström CT (1995) Multiple mating, sperm competition and meiotic drive. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 8: 265-282.
27. Haig D & Westoby M (1989) Parent-specific gene expression and the triploid endosperm. The American Naturalist 134: 147-155.
28. Hauser TP, Jorgensen RB & Østergård H (1997) Preferential exclusion of hybrids in mixed pollinations between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and weedy B. campestris. American Journal of Botany 84: 756-762.
29. Havens K & Delph LF (1996) Differential seed maturation uncouples fertilization and siring success in Oenothera organensis (Onagraceae). Heredity 76: 623-632.
30. He T & Smouse P (2002) Paternity analysis in Ophiopogon xylorrhizus Wang et Tai (Liliaceae s.l.): selfing assures reproductive success. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15: 487-494.
31. Husband BC, Schemske DW, Burton TL & Goodwillie C (2002) Pollen competition as a unilateral reproductive barrier between sympatric diploid and tetraploid Chamerion angustifolium. Proceedings of the Royal Society 269: 2565-2571.
32. Jesson LK & Barrett SCH (2002) Enantiostyly: Solving the puzzle of mirror-image flowers. Nature 417: 707-707.
33. Kaufman SR, Smouse PE & Alvarez-Buylla E (1998) Pollen-mediated gene flow and differential male reproductive success ina tropical pioneer tree, Cecropia obtusifolia Bertol (Moraceae): a paternity analysis. Heredity 81: 164-173.
34. Korbecka G, Klinkhamer PGL & Vrieling K. (2002) Selective embryo abortion hypothesis revisited - a molecular approach. Plant Biology 4: 298-310.
35. Krauss SL (1999) Complete exclusion of nonsires in an analysis of paternity in a natural plant population using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP). Molecular Ecology 8: 217-226.
36. Krauss SL (2000) The realized effect of postpollination sexual selection in a natural plant population. Proceedings of the Royal Society 267:1925-1929.
37. Lankinen Å (2000) Effects of soil pH and phosphorus on in vitro pollen competitive ability and sporophytic traits in clones of Viola tricolor. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: 885-893.
38. Lau TC & Stephenson AG (1994) Effect of soil phosphorus on pollen production, pollen size, pollen phosphorous content, and the ability to sire seeds in Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). Sexual Plant Reproduction 7: 215-220.
39. Levin DA (1990) Sizes of microgametophyte populations in pistils of Phlox drummondii. American Journal of Botany 77: 356-363.
40. Mahy G & Jacquemart AL (1999) Early inbreeding depression and pollen competition in Calluna vulgaris (L) Hull. Annals of Botany 83: 697-704.
41. Marshall DL (1991) Nonrandom mating in wild radish: variation in pollen donor success and effects of multiple paternity among one-to six-donor pollinations. American Journal of Botany 78: 1404-1418.
42. Marshall DL & Diggle PK (2001) Mechanisms of differential pollen donor perfomance in wild radish, Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 88: 242-257.
43. Marshall DL & Ellstrand NC (1985) Proximal causes of multiple paternity in wild radish, Raphanus sativus. The American Naturalist 126: 596-605.
44. Marshall DL & Ellstrand NC (1986) Sexual selection in Raphanus sativus: Experimental data on nonrandom fertilization, maternal choice, and consequences of multiple paternity. The American Naturalist 127: 446-461.
45. Marshall DL, Avritt JI, Shaner M & Saunders RL (2000) Effects of pollen load size and composition on pollen donor performance in wild radish, Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 87: 1619-1627.
46. Meagher TR (1986) Analysis of paternity within a natural population of Chamaelirium luteum. I. Identification of most-likely male parents. The American Naturalist 127: 199-215.
47. Melser C, Rademaker MCJ & Klinkhammer PGL (1997) Selection on pollen donors by Echium vulgare (Boraginaceae). Sexual Plant Reproduction 10: 305-312.
48. Mitchell RJ & Marshall DL (1995) Effects of pollination method on paternal success in Lesquerella fendleri (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 82: 462-467.
49. Montalvo AM (1992) Relative success of self and outcross pollen comparing mixed- and single-donor pollinations in Aquilegia caerulea. Evolution 46: 1181-1198.
50. Morgan MT & Conner JK (2001) Using genetic markers to directly estimate male selection gradients. Evolution 55: 272-281.
51. Mulcahy DL (1979) The rise of the Angiosperm, a genecological factor. Science 206: 20-23.
52. Nason JD, Herre EA & Hamrick JL (1998) The breeding structure of a tropical keystone plant resource. Nature 391: 685-687.
53. Pasonen HL, Pulkkinen P, Kapyla M & Blom A (1999) Pollen-tube growth rate and seed-siring success among Betula pendula clones. New Phytologist 143: 243-251.
54. Pasonen HL, Kapyla M & Pulkkinen P (2000) Effects of temperature and pollination site on pollen performance. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 100: 1108-1112.
55. Paschke M, Abs C & Schmid B (2002) Effects of population size and pollen diversity on reproductive success and offspring size in the narrow endemic Cochlearia bavarica (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 89: 1250-1259.
56. Reusch T (2000) Pollination in the marine realm: microsatellites reveal high outcrossing rates and multiple paternity in eelgrass Zostera marina. Heredity 85: 459-464.
57. Richards CM, Church S & McCauley DE (1999) The influence of population size and isolation on gene flow by pollen in Silene alba. Evolution 14: 129-138.
58. Rigney LP, Thomson JD, Cruzan MB & Brunet J (1993) Differential success of pollen donors in a self-compatible lily. Evolution 47: 915-924.
59. Rognli OA, Nilsson NO & Nurminiem M (2000) Effects of distance and pollen competition on gene flow in the wind-pollinated grass Festuca pratensis Huds. Heredity 85: 550-560.
60. Schlichting CD, Stephenson AG & Small LE (1990) Pollen loads and progeny vigor in Cucurbita pepo: the next generation. Evolution 44: 1358-1372.
61. Skogsmyr I & Lankinen Å (1999) Selection on pollen competitive ability in relation to stochastic factors influencing pollen deposition. Evolutionary Ecology Research 1: 971-985.
62. Skogsmyr I & Lankinen Å (2000) Potential selection for female choice in Viola tricolor. Evolutionary Ecology Research 2: 965-979.
63. Smouse PE & Meagher TR (1994) Genetic analysis of male reproductive contributions in Chamaelirium luteum (L) Gray (Liliaceae). Genetics 136: 313-322.
64. Smouse PE, Dyer RJ, Westfall RD & Sork VL (2001) Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. I. Male gamete heterogeneity among females. Evolution 55: 260-271.
65. Snow AA & Lewis PO (1993) Reproductive traits and male fertility in plants: Empirical approaches. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 331-351.
66. Snow AA & Mazer SJ (1988) Gametophytic selection in Raphanus raphanistrum: A test for heritable variation in pollen competitive ability. Evolution 42: 1065-1075.
67. Snow AA & Spira T P (1991) Pollen vigor and the potential for sexual selection in plants. Nature 352: 796-797.
68. Snow AA, Spira TP & Liu H (2000) Effects of sequential pollination on the success of fast and slow pollen donors. American Journal of Botany 87: 1656-1659.
69. Souto C P, Aizen MA & Premoli AC (2002) Effects of crossing distance and genetic relatedness on pollen performance in Alstroemeria aurea (Alstroemeriaceae). American Journal of Botany 89: 427-432.
70. Stanton ML, Snow AA & Handel SN (1986) Floral evolution: Attractiveness to pollinators increases male fitness. Science 232: 1625-1627.
71. Starr CK (1984) Sperm competition, kinship, and sociality in the aculeate Hymenoptera. Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems (ed. RL Smith), pp. 427-464. Academic Press, Orlando.
72. Steiner W & Gregorius H-R (1999) Incompatibility and pollen competition in Alnus glutinosa: Evidence from pollinations experiments. Genetica 105: 259-271.
73. Stone JL, Thomson JD & Dent-Acosta S J (1995) Assessment of pollen viability in hand-pollination experiments: A review. American Journal of Botany 82: 1186-1197.
74. Taylor DR, Saur MJ & Adams E (1999) Pollen performance and sex-ratio evolution in a dioecious plant. Evolution 53: 1028-1036.
75. Travers SE & Holtsford T (2000) Differential siring success of Pgi genotypes in Clarkia unguiculata. American Journal of Botany 87: 1091-1098.
76. Travers SE & Mazer SJ (2001) Trade-off between male and female reproduction associated with allozyme variation in phosphoglucoisomerase in an annual plant (Clarkia unguiculata: Onagraceae). Evolution 55: 2421-2428.
77. Werlemark G & Nybom H (2003) Pollen donor impact on progenies of pseudogamous blackberries (Rubus subgen. Rubus). Euphytica 133: 71-80.
78. White GM, Boshier DH & Powell W (2002) Increased pollen flow counteracts fragmentation in a tropical dry forest: An example from Swietenia humilis Zuccarini. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99: 2038-2042.
79. Wilkinson GS & Fry CL (2001) Meiotic drive alters sperm competitive ability in stalk-eyed flies. Proceedings of the Royal Society 268: 2559-2564.
80. Winsor JA, Peretz S & Stephenson AG (2000) Pollen competition in a natural population of Cucurbita foetidissima (Cucurbitaceae). American Journal of Botany 87: 527-532.