How does breeding system variation modulate sexual antagonism?

Biology Letters

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 717-720

  Bedhomme, Stéphanie ^a,g   Bernasconi, Giorgina ^b   Koene, Joris M ^c   Lankinen, Åsa ^d   Arathi, H S ^e   Michiels, Nico K ^f   Anthes, Nils ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^e Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^g Ciudad Politécnica de la Innovación   (Spain)

Author keywords

Dioecy; Selfing; Sex allocation; Sex chromosomes; Sexual conflict; Simultaneous hermaphroditism

Indexed keywords

BREEDING; DIOECY; HERMAPHRODITISM; MATING; NONHUMAN; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTION; SELFING; SEX ALLOCATION; SEX CHROMOSOME;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 70349275284     PISSN: 17449561     EISSN: 1744957X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0401     Document Type: Note

References (42)

1. Anthes, N. & Michiels, N. K. 2007 Precopulatory stabbing, hypodermic injections and unilateral matings in a hermaphroditic sea slug. Biol. Lett. 3, 121-124. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2006.0596)
2. Anthes, N., Putz, A. & Michiels, N. K. 2005 Gender trading in a hermaphrodite. Curr. Biol. 15, R792-R793. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.09.035)
3. Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 2005 Sexual conflict. Monographs in Behavior and Ecology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Bernasconi, G. et al. 2004 Evolutionary ecology of the prezygotic stage. Science 303, 971-975. (doi:10.1126/science.1092180)
5. Calsbeek, R. & Sinervo, B. 2004 Within-clutch variation in offspring sex determined by differences in sire body size: cryptic mate choice in the wild. J. Evol. Biol. 17, 464-470. (doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00665.x)
6. Chapman, T., Arnqvist, G., Bangham, J. & Rowe, L. 2003 Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 41-47. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00004-6)
7. Charlesworth, B. & Charlesworth, D. 1978 A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. Am. Nat. 112, 975. (doi:10.1086/283342)
8. Charlesworth, D., Charlesworth, B. & Marais, G. 2005 Steps in the evolution of heteromorphic sex chromosomes. Heredity 95, 118-128. (doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800697)
9. Charnov, E. L. 1979 Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 76, 2480-2484. (doi:10.1073/pnas.76.5.2480)
10. Cox, R. M. & Calsbeek, R. 2009 Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict. Am. Nat. 173, 176-187. (doi:10.1086/595841)
11. Ellegren, H. & Parsch, J. 2007 The evolution of sex-biased genes and sex-biased gene expression. Nat. Rev. Gen. 8, 689-698. (doi:10.1038/nrg2167)
12. Goodwillie, C., Kalisz, S. & Eckert, C. G. 2005 The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36, 47-79. (doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.091704.175539)
13. Jarne, P. & Auld, J. R. 2006 Animals mix it up too: the distribution of self-fertilization among hermaphroditic animals. Evolution 60, 1816-1824.
14. Johnston, M. O. et al. 2009 Correlations among fertility components can maintain mixed mating in plants. Am. Nat. 173, 1-11. (doi:10.1086/593705)
15. Joseph, S. B. & Kirkpatrick, M. 2004 Haploid selection in animals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 592-597. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.08.004)
16. Koene, J. M. 2005 Allohormones and sensory traps: a fundamental difference between hermaphrodites and gonochorists? Invert. Reprod. Dev. 48, 101-107.
17. Koene, J. M. & Ter Maat, A. 2001 'Allohormones': a class of bioactive substances favoured by sexual selection. J. Comp. Physiol. A 187, 323-326. (doi:10.1007/s003590100214)
18. Lande, R. & Schemske, D. W. 1985 The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39, 24-40. (doi:10.2307/2408514)
19. Lankinen, A. & Kiboi, S. 2007 Pollen donor identity affects timing of stigma receptivity in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae): a sexual conflict during pollen competition? Am. Nat. 170, 854-863. (18171168). (doi:10.1086/522839)
20. Lankinen, A., Hellriegel, B. & Bernasconi, G. 2006 Sexual conflict over floral receptivity. Evolution 60, 2454-2465.
21. Leonard, J. L. & Lukowiak, K. 1984 Male-female conflict in a simultaneous hermaphrodite resolved by sperm trading. Am. Nat. 124, 282-286. (doi:10.1086/284269)
22. Levitan, D. R. 2008 Gamete traits influence the variance in reproductive success, the intensity of sexual selection, and the outcome of sexual conflict among congeneric sea urchins. Evolution 62, 1305-1316. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646. 2008.00378.x)
23. Lloyd, D. G. 1975 The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms. Genetica 45, 325-339. (doi:10.1007/BF01508307)
24. Lloyd, D. G. 1977 Genetic and phenotypic models of selection. J. Theor. Biol. 69, 543-560. (doi:10.1016/0022-5193(77)90155-2)
25. López, S. & Domínguez, C. A. 2003 Sex choice in plants: facultative adjustment of the sex ratio in the perennial herb Begonia gracilis. J. Evol. Biol. 16, 1177-1185. (doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00622.x)
26. Luscher, A. & Milinski, M. 2003 Simultaneous hermaphrodites reproducing in pairs self-fertilize some of their eggs: an experimental test of predictions of mixed-mating and Hermaphrodite's Dilemma theory. J. Evol. Biol. 16, 1030-1037. (doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00552.x)
27. Mank, J. E. 2009 Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism: lessons from the genome. Am. Nat. 173, 141-150. (doi:10.1086/595754)
28. Michiels, N. K. 1998 Mating conflicts and sperm competition in simultaneous hermaphrodites. In Sperm competition and sexual selection (eds T. R. Birkhead & A. P. Møller), pp. 219-254. London, UK: Academic Press.
29. Michiels, N. K. & Koene, J. M. 2006 Sexual selection favours harmful mating in hermaphrodites more than in gonochorists. Integr. Comp. Biol. 46, 473-480. (doi:10.1093/icb/icj043)
30. Morgan, M. T. 1994 Models of sexual selection in hermaphrodites, especially plants. Am. Nat. 144, S100-S125. (doi:10.1086/285655)
31. Murphy, C. G. 1998 Interaction-independent sexual selection and the mechanisms of sexual selection. Evol. 52, 8-18. (doi:10.2307/2410915)
32. Pannell, J. R., Dorken, M. E., Pujol, B. & Berjano, R. 2008 Gender variation and transitions between sexual systems in Mercurialis annua (Euphorbiaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 169, 129-139. (doi:10.1086/523360)
33. Parker, G. A. 1979 Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects (eds N. S. Blum & N. A. Blum), pp. 123-166. London, UK: Academic Press.
34. Parker, G. A. 2006 Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 361, 235-259. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1785)
35. Reinhold, K. 2000 Maintenance of a genetic polymorphism by fluctuating selection on sex-limited traits. J. Evol. Biol. 13, 1009-1014. (doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2000.00229.x)
36. Rice, W. R. 1984 Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38, 735-742. (doi:10.2307/2408385)
37. Rice, W. R. & Chippindale, A. K. 2001 Intersexual ontogenetic conflict. J. Evol. Biol. 14, 685-693. (doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00319.x)
38. Schärer, L. & Janicke, T. In press. Sex allocation and sexual conflict in simultaneously hermaphroditic animals. Biol. Lett.
39. Schärer, L., Karlsson, L. M., Christen, M. & Wedekind, C. 2001 Size-dependent sex allocation in a simultaneous hermaphrodite parasite. J. Evol. Biol. 14, 55-67. (doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00263.x)
40. Van Doorn, G. S. & Kirkpatrick, M. 2007 Turnover of sex chromosomes induced by sexual conflict. Nature 449, 909-912. (doi:10.1038/nature06178)
41. West, S. A. & Sheldon, B. C. 2002 Constraints in the evolution of sex ratio adjustment. Science 295, 1685-1688. (doi:10.1126/science.1069043)
42. Wright, S. 1969 Evolution and the genetics of populations, vol.2. The theory of gene frequencies, pp. 56-57. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.