ERP post-implementation learning, ERP usage and individual performance impact

PACIS 2011 - 15th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: Quality Research in Pacific

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Chang, Hsiu Hua ^a   Chou, Huey Wen ^b   Yin, Chun Po ^c   Lin, Cecilia I ^d  

^a TAJEN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d CHIA NAN UNIVERSITY OF PHARMACY AND SCIENCE   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

ERP usage; Individual performance impact; Post implementation learning

Indexed keywords

CRITICAL ISSUES; CUSTOMER SERVICES; DATA SETS; DECISION SUPPORTS; ERP IMPLEMENTATION; ERP SYSTEM; INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE; INDIVIDUAL PRODUCTIVITY; MANAGEMENT CONTROL; POST-IMPLEMENTATION; POST-IMPLEMENTATION LEARNING; SURVEY METHODS;

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING;

EID: 84862917872     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (50)

1. Agarwal, R. and Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage, MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694.
2. Amoako-Gyampah, K. and Salam, A.F. (2004). An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment, Information & Management, 41, 731-745.
3. Barker, T. and Frolick, M.N. 2003. ERP implementation failure: A case study, Information Systems Management, 20(4), 43-49. (Pubitemid 37179674)
4. Bingi, P., Sharma, M. and Godla, J. (1999). Critical issues affecting an ERP implementation, Information Systems Management, 16(3), 7-15.
5. Bock, G.W., Zmud, R.W., Kim, Y.G., and Lee, J.N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate, MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87-111. (Pubitemid 44151824)
6. th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 235-243.
7. Burton-Jones, A. and Straub, Jr. D.W. (2006). Reconceptualizing system usage: An approach and empirical test, Information Systems Research, 17(3), 228-246. (Pubitemid 44371787)
8. Clark, Jr. T.D., Jones, M.C., and Zmud, R.W. (2006). Post adoptive ERP system analysis: A system dynamic modeling approach, Working Paper, http://www.bus.lsu.edu./centers/decid/WorkingPaper.asp.
9. Chin, W.W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structure equation modeling, MIS Quarterly, 22(1), vii-xvi.
10. Collins, M. (1990). Artificial Experts: Social Knowledge and Intelligent Machines, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
11. Compeau, D.R., and Higgins, C.A. (1995). Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills, Information Systems Research, 6(2), 118-143. (Pubitemid 126102975)
12. Compeau, D.R., Higgins, C.A., and Huff, S.L. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study, MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 145-158.
13. Cook, J.S. and Cook, L.L. (1994). Achieving competitive advantages of advanced manufacturing technology, Benchmarking for Quality Management and Technology, 1(2), 42-63.
14. Cooper, R.B. and Zmud, R. (1990). Information technology implementation research: A technological diffusion approach, Management Science, 36(2), 123-139.
15. DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten year update, Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
16. Deng, X. (2000), Developing an Information Technology Learning Model in a Computer-Integrated Manufacturing (CIM) Context, Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Toledo, College of Business Administration, Toledo, OH.
17. Deng, S., Doll, W.J., and Truong, D. (2004). Computer self-efficacy in an ongoing use context, Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(6), 395-412.
18. Diamantopoulos, A. and Winklhofer, H.M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development, Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269-277.
19. Doll, W.J., Deng, X., and Scazzero, J.A. (2003). A process for post-implementation IT benchmarking, Information & Management, 41, 199-212.
20. Doll, W.J. and Torkzadeh, G. (1998). Developing a multidimensional measure of system-use in an organizational context, Information & Management, 33(4), 171-185. (Pubitemid 128424765)
21. Ehie, I.C. and Madsen, M. (2005). Identifying critical issues in enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementation, Computers in Industry, 56, 545-557. (Pubitemid 41162314)
22. Fornell, C.L. and Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equations models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
23. Gattiker, T.F. and Goodhue, D.L. (2005). What happens after ERP implementation: Understanding the impact of interdependence and differentiation on plant-level outcomes, MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 559-585. (Pubitemid 46063141)
24. Hirschhorn, L. and Farduhar, K. (1985). Productivity, technology and the decline of the autonomous professional, Office: Technology and People, 2, 245-265.
25. Hoegl, M. and Gemuenden, H.G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence, Organization Science, 12(4), 435-449.
26. Jasperson, J., Carter, P.E., and Zmud, R.W. (2005). A comprehensive conceptualization of postadoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems, MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 525-558.
27. Jonassen, D.H. and Grabowski, B.L. (1993). Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning, and Instruction, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Kim, D.H. (1993). The link between individual and organizational learning, Sloan Management Review, 35(1), 37-50.
29. Kositanurit, B., Ngwenyama, O., and Osei-Bryson, K. (2006). An exploration of factors that impact individual performance in an ERP environment: An analysis using multiple analytical techniques, European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 556-568.
30. Kraemer, K.L. and Danziger, J.N. (1990). The impacts of computer technology on the worklife of information workers, Social Science Computer Review, 8(4), 592-613.
31. Kwok, S.H. and Gao, S. (2005/2006). Attitude towards knowledge sharing behavior, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46(2), 45-51. (Pubitemid 43293595)
32. Lin, H.Y., Hsu, P.Y. and Ting, P.H. (2006). ERP systems success: An integration of IS success model and balanced scorecard, Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology, 38(3), 215- 228.
33. Loizos, C. (1998). ERP: Is it the ultimate software solution? Industry Week, 33-48.
34. Lorenzo, O. (2001). Human, contextual, and processual issues influencing enterprise system use, Americas Conference on Information Systems, (AMCIS2001), Boston, USA.
35. Melone N.P. 1990. A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research, Management Science, 36(1), 76-91.
36. Nah, F.F. and Delgado, S. (2006). Critical success factors for enterprise resource planning implementation and upgrade, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46(5), 99-114.
37. Nunnally, J.C., (1978). Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.
38. Orr, J. 1996. Talking about Machines: An ethnography of a modern job, ILR Press, Ithaca, NY.
39. Park, J.H., Suh, H.J., and Yang, H.D. (2007). Perceived absorptive capacity of individual users in performance of enterprise resource planning (ERP) usage: The case for Korean firms, Information & Management, 44, 300-312.
40. Pozzebon, M. (2000). Combining a structuration approach with a behavioral-based model to investigate ERP usage, Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS2000), Long Beach, California.
41. Saga, V.L. and Zmud, R.W. (1994). The nature and determinants of IT acceptance, routinization, and infusion, in Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology, L. Levine (ed.) North-Holland, Amsterdam, 67-86.
42. Scott, J.E. and Vessey, I. (2002). Managing risks in enterprise systems implementations, Communications of the ACM, 45(4), 74-81. (Pubitemid 135700540)
43. Straub, D. (1989). Validating instruments in MIS research, MIS Quarterly, 13(2), 147-169.
44. Torkzadeh, G. and Doll, W.J. (1999). The development of a tool for measuring the perceived impact of information technology on work, Omega, The International Journal of Management Science, 27, 327-339.
45. Tsoukas, H. and Vladimirou, E. (2001). What is organizational knowledge? Journal of Management Studies, 38(7), 973-993.
46. Van den Hooff, B. and de Ridder, J.A. 2004. Knowledge sharing in context: The influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing, Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), 117-130.
47. Venkatesh, V., Brown, S.A., Maruping, L.M., and Bala, H. (2008), Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: The competing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation, MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 483-502.
48. Yi, M.Y. and Davis, F.D. (2003). Developing and validating an observational learning model of computer software training and skill acquisition, Information System Research, 14(2), 146-169.
49. Yu, C.S. (2005). Causes influencing the effectiveness of the post-implementation ERP system, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(1), 115-132.
50. Zhang, Z., Lee, M.K.O., Huang, P., Zhang, L., and Huang, X. (2005). A framework of ERP systems implementation success in China: An empirical study, International Journal of Production Economics, 98(1), 56-80. (Pubitemid 41084695)