Computer self-efficacy in an ongoing use context

Behaviour and Information Technology

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 395-412

  Deng, Xiaodong ^a   Doll, William J ^b   Truong, Dothang ^c  

^a OAKLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

^c FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; ENGINEERS; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; HUMAN ENGINEERING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

COMPUTER SELF-EFFICACY; STRUCTURE EQUATION MODELING; USE CONTEXT;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 8344241153     PISSN: 0144929X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01449290410001723454     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. ADLER, P. S. 2001, Market, hierarchy and trust: the knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organization Science, 12, 215-234.
2. AGARWAL, R. and KARAHANNA, E. 2000, Time file when you're having fun: cognitive absorption technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24, 665-694.
3. AGARWAL, R. and PRASAD, J. 1998, A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology, Information Systems Research. 9, 204-215.
4. AGARWAL, R., SAMBAMURTHY, V. and STAIR, R. 2000, Research report: the evolving relationships between general and specific computer self-efficacy - an empirical assessment. Information Systems Research, 11, 418-430.
5. AMABILE, T. M. 1988, A model of creativity and innovation in organisations. In B. M. Straw and L. L. Cummings (eds) Research in Organizational Behaviour, Vol. 10 (Greenwich: JAI Press), pp. 123-167.
6. ARNOLD, H. J. 1985, Task performance, perceived competence, and attributed causes of performance as determinants of intrinsic motivation. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 876-888.
7. BAGOZZI, R. P. and HEATHERTON, T. F. 1994, A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: application to state self-esteem. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 35-67.
8. BAGOZZI, R. P. and PHILLIPS, L. W. 1982, Representing and testing organizational theories: a holistic construal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 459-489.
9. BAGOZZI, R. P. and YI, Y. 1988, On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.
10. BANDURA, A. 1977a, Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review. 84, 191-215,
11. BANDURA, A. 1977b, Social Learning Theory (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall).
12. BANDURA, A. 1978, The self system in reciprocal determinism. American Psychologist, 33, 344-358.
13. BANDURA, A. 1982, Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
14. BANDURA, A. 1986, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social-Cognitive View (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall).
15. BANDURA, A. and SCHUNK, D. H. 1981, Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation, Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 41, 586-598.
16. BANDURA, A., JEFFERY, R. W. and GAJDOS, E. 1975, Generalizing change through participant modeling with self-directed mastery, Behavior Research and Therapy, 13, 141-152.
17. BOLT, M. A., KILLOUGH, L. N. and KOH, H. C. 2001, Testing the interaction effects of task complexity in computer training using the social cognitive model. Decision Sciences, 32, 1-20.
18. BROWN, J. S. and DUGUID, P. 1991, Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2, 40-57.
19. BURKHARDT, M. E. and BRASS, D. J. 1990, Changing patterns or patterns of change: the effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power, Administrative Science Quarterly. 35, 104-127.
20. BUSCH, T. 1995, Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 147-158.
21. CHOU, H. and WANG, T. 2000, The influence of learning style and training method on self-efficacy and learning performance in www homepage design training, International Journal of Information Management, 20, 455-472,
22. COHEN, J. and COHEN, P. 1983, Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. (Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
23. COHEN, W. M. and LEVINTHAL, D. A. 1990, Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly. 33, 128-152.
24. COMPEAU, D. R. and HIGGINS, C. A. 1995a, Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Information Systems Research, 6, 118-143,
25. COMPLAU, D. R. and HIGGINS, C. A. 1995b, Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19, 189-211.
26. COMPEAU, D. R., HIGGINS, C. and HUFF, S. 1999, Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: a longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, 23, 145-158.
27. CORSUN, D. L. and ENZ, C. 1999, Predicting psychological empowerment among service workers: the effect of support-based relationships. Human Relations, 52, 205-224.
28. CRONBACH, L. J. 1951, Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
29. DAVIS, F. D., BAGOZZI, R. P. and WARSHAW, P. R. 1992, Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychohgy, 22, 1111-1132.
30. DECI, E. L. 1975, Intrinsic Motivation (New York: Plenum Press).
31. DENG, X. 2000, Developing an information technology learning model in a computer-integrated manufacturing (CIM) context. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio.
32. DOLL, W. J. and TORKZADEH, G. 1991, The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction: theoretical and methodological issues. MIS Quarterly, 15, 5-10.
33. DOLL, W. J. and TORKZADEH, G. 1998, Developing a multidimensional measure of system-use in an organizational context. Information and Management, 33, 171-185.
34. EVANS, P. B. and WURSTER, T. S. 1997, Strategy and the new economics of information. Harvard Business Review, 75, 70-82.
35. GARDNER III, W. L. and ROZELL, E. L. 2000, Computer efficacy: determinants, consequences, and malleability. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 11, 109-136.
36. GIST, M. E. 1987, Self-efficacy: implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 17, 472-485.
37. GIST, M. E. and MITCHFLL, T. R. 1992, Self-efficacy: a theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17, 183-211.
38. GIST, M. E., SCHWOERER, C. and ROSEN, B. 1989, Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 884-891.
39. HACKMAN, J. R. and OLDHAM, G. R. 1980, Work Redesign (Reading: Addison-Wesley).
40. HENRY, J. W. and STONE, R. W. 1994, A structural equation model of end-user satisfaction with a computer-based medical information system. Information Resources Management Journal, 7, 21-33.
41. HILL, T., SMITH, N. D. and MANN, M. F. 1985, Communicating innovations: convincing computer phobics to adopt innovative technologies. In R. J. Lutz (ed.) Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 13 (Provo: Association for Consumer Research).
42. HILL, T., SMITH, N. D. and MANN, M. F. 1987, Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: the case for computers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 307-313.
43. IGBARIA, M. 1990, End-user computing effectiveness: a structural equation model. Omega, 18, 637-652.
44. IGBARIA, M. and IIVARI, J. 1995, The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega, 23, 587-605.
45. IGBARIA, M., PARASURAMAN, S. and BAROUDI, J. 1996, A motivational model of microcomputer usage. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13, 127-143.
46. JABRI, M. 1991, The development of conceptually independent subscales in the measurement of modes of problem solving. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 975-983.
47. JOHNSON, R. D. and MARAKAS, G. M. 2000, Research report: the role of behavioral modeling in computer skills acquisition - toward refinement of the model. Information Systems Research, 11, 402-417.
48. JORDE-BLOOM, P. and FORD, M. 1988, Factors influencing early childhood administrators' decisions regarding the adoption of computer technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 4, 31-47.
49. KIM, W. C. und MAL BORGNE, R. 1997, Fair process: managing in the knowledge economy. Harvard Business Review, 75, 65-75.
50. LOCKE, E. A., FREDERICK, E., LEE, C. and BOBKO, P. 1984, Effects of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 241-251.
51. MARAKAS, G. M., YI,. M. Y. and JOHNSON, R. D. 1998, The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information Systems Research, 9, 126-163.
52. MARTOCCHIO, J. J. 1992, Microcomputer usage as an opportunity: the influence of context in employee training. Personnel Psychology, 45, 529-552.
53. MARTOCCHIO, J. J. 1994, Effects of conceptions of ability on anxiety, self-efficacy, and learning in training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 819-825.
54. MARTOCCHIO, J. J. and DULEBOHN, J. 1994, Performance feedback effects in training: the role of perceived controllability. Personnel Psychology, 47, 357-373.
55. MARTOCCHIO, J. J. and WEBSTER, J. 1992, Effects of feedback and cognitive playfulness on performance in microcomputer software training. Personnel Psychology. 45, 553-578.
56. NEEF, D. 1998, The Knowledge Economy (Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann).
57. NUNNALLY, J. C. 1978, Psychometric Theory (New York: McGraw-Hill).
58. SCHUNK, D. H. and GUNN, T. P. 1986, Self-efficacy and skill development: influence of task strategies and attributions. Journal of Educational Research, 79, 238-244.
59. SHUELL, T. J. 1986, Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of Educational Research, 56, 411-436.
60. SILVER, W. S., MITCHELL, T. R. and GIST, M. E. 1995, Responses to successful and unsuccessful performance: the moderating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between performance and attributions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 62, 286-299.
61. SKINNER, E. A., WELLBORN, J. G. and CONNELL, J. P. 1990, What it takes to do well in school and whether I've got it: a process model of perceived control and children's engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 22-32.
62. SMITH, J. M. 1994, The effects of education on computer selfefficacy. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 31, 51-65.
63. SPREITZER, G. M. 1995, Psychological empowerment in the workplace: dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442-1465.
64. SPREITZER, G. M. 1996, Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment, Academy of Management Journal, 39, 483-504.
65. SPREITZER, G. M., DE JANASZ, S. C. and QUINN, R. E. 1999, Empowered to lead: the role of psychological empowerment in leadership, Journal of Organisational Behavior, 20, 511-526.
66. TAYLOR, M. S., LOCKE, E. A., LEE, C. und GIST, M. E. 1984, Type a behavior and faculty research productivity: what are the mechanisms? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 34, 402-418.
67. TAYLOR, S. and TODD, P. A. 1995, Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6, 145-176.
68. THOMAS, K. W. and VELTHOUSE, B. A. 1990, Cognitive elements of empowerment: an 'interpretive' model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15, 666-681.
69. TORKZADEH, G. and DOLL, W. J. 1999, The development of a tool for measuring the perceived impact of information technology on work. OMEGA, 27, 327-339.
70. TORKZADEH, G. and KOUFTEROS, X. 1994, Factorial validity of a computer self-efficacy scale and the impact of computer training. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 54. 813-821.
71. VENKATESH, A. and VITALARI, N. P. 1992, An emerging distributed work arrangement: an investigation of computer-based supplemental work at home. Management Science, 38, 1687-1706.
72. VENKATESH, V. 1999, Creation of favorable user perceptions: exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly, 23, 239-260.
73. VENKATESH, V. 2000, Determinants of perceived case of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systetm Research, 11, 342-365.
74. VENKATESH, V. and DAVIS, F. D. 1996, A model of the antecedents of perceived case of use: development and test. Decision Sciences, 27, 451-482.
75. WEBSTER, J. and MARTOCCHIO, J. J. 1992, Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications, MIS Quarterly, 16, 201-226.
76. WEBSTER, J. and MARTOCCHIO, J. J. 1993, Turning work into play: implications for microcomputer software training. Journal of Management, 19, 1127-1146.
77. WEBSTER, J. and MARTOCCHIO, J. J. 1995, The differential effects of software training previews on training outcomes, Journal of Management, 21, 757-787.
78. WRZESNIEWSKI, A. and DUTTON, J. 2001, Crafting a job: revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 28, 179-201.
79. ZUBOFF, S. 1982, New worlds of computer-mediated work, Harvard Business Review, 60, 142-152.