ERP systems success: An integration of IS success model and balanced scorecard

Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 215-227

  Lin, Hua Yang ^a   Hsu, Ping Yu ^b   Ting, Ping Ho ^c  

^a CHUNG SHAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c TUNGHAI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTEGRATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SPECIFICATIONS;

INFORMATION QUALITY; RESEARCH MODEL; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; USER SATISFACTION;

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING;

EID: 33748544611     PISSN: 1443458X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. ANDERSON, J.C. and GERBING, D.W. (1988): Structural equation modelling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103(3):411-423.
2. BINGI, P., SHARMA, M. and GODLA, I. (1999): Critical issues affecting an ERP implementation. Information Systems Management 16(3):7-14.
3. CHAND, D., HACHEY, G., HUNTON, J., OWHOSO, V. and VASUDEVAN, S. (2005): A balanced scorecard based framework for assessing the strategic impacts of ERP systems. Computers in Industry 56(6):558-572.
4. CHIN, W.W. (1998): Issues and opinion on structural equation modelling. MIS Quarterly 22(1):7-16.
5. CHIN, W.W. and TODD, P.A. (1995): On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modelling in MIS research: a note of caution. MIS Quarterly 19(2):237-246.
6. CHUNG, S. and SNYDER, C. (1999): ERP Initiation - a Historical Perspective. Proc. Americas Conference on Information Systems. Milwaukee, USA.
7. DAVENPORT, T. H. (1998): Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Business Review 76(4):121-131.
8. DAVENPORT, T. H. (2000): Mission critical: realizing the promise of enterprise systems. Harvard Business School Press.
9. DAVISON, R. (2002): Cultural complications of ERP. Communications of the ACM 45(7): 109-111.
10. DELONE, W.H. and MCLEAN, E.R. (1992): Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information System Research 3(1):60-95.
11. DELONE, W.H. and MCLEAN, E.R. (2003): The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4):9-30.
12. DELONE, W.H. and MCLEAN, E.R. (2004): Measuring e-commerce success: Applying the DeLone and McLean information systems success model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 9(1):31-47.
13. ETEZADI-AMOLI, J. and FARHOOMAND, A.F. (1996): A structural model of end user computing satisfaction and user performance. Information & Management 30(2):65-73.
14. FORNELL, C. and LARCKER, D.F. (1981): Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18(1):39-50.
15. GELDERMAN, M. (1998): The relationship between user satisfaction, usage of information systems, and performance. Information & Management 34(1):11-18.
16. GUIMARAES, T. and IGBARIA, M. (1997): Client/server system success: Exploring the human side. Decision Sciences 28(4):851-875.
17. HAIR, J.F.J., ANDERSON, R.E., TATHAM, R.L. and BLACK, W.C. (1998): Multivariate data analysis. Prentice-Hall.
18. HAYDUK, L.A. (1987): Structural equation modelling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Johns Hopkins University Press.
19. HEMPEL, P.S. (2001): Differences between Chinese and Western managerial views of performance. Personnel Review 30(2):203-226.
20. HOFSTEDE, G. (1991): Cultures and organizations: Software of the minds. McGraw-Hill.
21. HOLLAND, C., LIGHT, B. and GIBSON, N. (1998): Global ERP Implementation. Proc. American Conference of Information Systems (AMCIS '98), Baltimore, USA..
22. IGBARIA, M. and TAN, M. (1997): The consequences of the information technology acceptance on subsequent individual performance. Information & Management 32(3):113-121.
23. JURISON, J. (1996): The temporal nature of IS benefits: A longitudinal study. Information & Management 30(2):75-79.
24. JÖRESKOG, K.G. and SÖRBOM, D. (1993): LISREL 8: structural equation modelling with the SIMPLIS™ command language. Scientific Software International.
25. KAPLAN R.S. and NORTON, D.P. (1992): The balanced scorecard - measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review 70(1):71-79.
26. KAPLAN R.S. and NORTON, D.P. (1993): Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harvard Business Review 71(5):134-142.
27. KAPLAN R.S. and NORTON, D.P. (1996): Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review 74(1):75-85.
28. KUMAR, K. and BJØRN-ANDERSEN, N. (1990): A cross-cultural comparison of IS designer values. Communications of the ACM 33(5):528-538.
29. LI, C. (1999): ERP packages: what's next? Information Systems Management 16(3):31-36.
30. LIU, C. and ARNETT, K.P. (2000): Exploring the factors associated with Web site success in the context of electronic commerce. Information & Management 38(1):23-33.
31. MABERT, V.A., SONI, A. and VENKATARAMANAN, M.A. (2000): Enterprise resource planning survey of U.S. manufacturing firms. Production and Inventory Management Journal 41(2):52-58.
32. MALTZ, A.C., SHENHAR, A.J. and REILLY, R.R. (2003): Beyond the balanced scorecard: refining the search for organizational success measures. Long Range Planning 36(2):187-204.
33. MARKUS, M.L. and TANIS, C. (2000): The enterprise systems experience - from adoption to success. In Framing the Domains of IT Research: Glimpsing the Future Through the Past. ZMUD, R.W. (Ed.). Cincinnati, Pinnafles Educational Resources Inc.
34. MARTINSONS, M.G. (1992): Strategic thinking about information management. Proc. 11th annual conference of the International Association of Management Consultants, Toronto.
35. MARTINSONS, M., DAVISON, M.R. and TSE, D. (1999): The balanced scorecard: A foundation for the strategic management of information systems. Decision Support Systems 25(1):71-88.
36. MCGILL, T. and HOBBS, V. (2003): User-developed applications and information systems success: A test of DeLone and McLean's model. Information Resource Management Journal 16(1):24-45.
37. MCKINNEY, V., YOON, K. and ZAHEDI, F. M. (2002): The measurement of web-customer satisfaction: An expectation and disconfirmation approach. Information Systems Research 13(3):296-315.
38. MICHALSKA, J. (2005): The usage of the balanced scorecard for the estimation of the enterprise's effectiveness. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 162-163:751-758.
39. MOLLA, A. and LICKER, P.S. (2001): E-commerce systems success: an attempt to extend and respecify the DeLond and McLean model of IS success. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 2(4):131-141.
40. NUNNALLY, J.C. (1978): Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
41. OLHAGER, J. and SELLDIN, E. (2003): Enterprise resource planning survey of Swedish manufacturing firms. European Journal of Operational Research 146(2):365-373.
42. RAI, A., LANG, S.S. and WELKER, R.B. (2002): Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis. Information System Research 13(1):50-69.
43. ROSEMANN, M. (2001): Evaluating the management of enterprise systems with the balanced scorecard. In IT Evaluation Methods and Management. VAN GREMBERGEN, W. (Ed.). Hershey, Idea Group Publishing.
44. SCOTT, W.W., MEYER, J.W. (1991): The organization of societal sectors: Propositions and early evidence. In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. POWELL, W. and DIMAGGIO, P. (Eds.). Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
45. SEDDON, P.B. (1997): A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information System Research 8(3):240-253.
46. SEDDON, P.B. and KIEW, M. (1996): A partial test and development of DeLone and McLean's model of IS success. Australian Journal of Information Systems 4(1):90-109.
47. STRAUB, D.W. (1994): The effect of culture on IT diffusion: e-mail and fax in Japan and the U.S. Information System Research 5(1):24-47.
48. STRAUB, D., KEIL, M. and BRENNER, W. (1997): Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study. Information & Management 33(1):1-11.
49. TEO, T.S.H. and WONG, P.K. (1998): An empirical study of the performance impact of computerization in the retail industry. Omega 26(5):611-621.
50. TORKZADEH, G. and DOLL, W.J. (1999): The development of a tool for measuring the perceived impact of information technology on work. Omega 27(3):327-339.
51. UMBLE, E.J., HAFT, R.R. and UMBLE, M.M. (2003): Enterprise resource planning: implementation procedures and critical success factors. European Journal of Operational Research 146(2):241-257.
52. VAN EVERDINGEN, Y., VAN HILLEGERSBERG, J. and WAARTS, E. (2000): ERP adoption by European midsize companies. Communication of the ACM 43(4):27-31.
53. VAN GREMBERGEN, W., SAULL, R. and DE HAES, S. (2003): Linking the IT balanced scorecard to the business objectives at a major Canadian financial group. Journal for Information Technology Cases and Applications 5(1):23-45.