Climate Change Communication: A Provocative Inquiry into Motives, Meanings, and Means

Risk Analysis

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 973-991

  Johnson, Branden B ^a  

^a DECISION RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Communication; Deliberation; Persuasion; Social movements

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC CAUSE; COLLECTIVE ACTION; DELIBERATION; PERSUASION; RESOURCE CONSTRAINT; RISK COMMUNICATION; SELF REFLECTION; SOCIAL MOVEMENTS;

COMMUNICATION;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

ACTION PLAN; CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; IDEOLOGY; NUMERICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGY; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; RISK FACTOR; SOCIAL MOVEMENT; STRATEGIC APPROACH; THEORETICAL STUDY;

ALTRUISM; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CLIMATE CHANGE; CULTURAL FACTOR; ENVIRONMENT; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PERCEPTION; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLIC OPINION; RISK; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL CHANGE; SOCIAL MARKETING;

ALTRUISM; BEHAVIOR; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMMUNICATION; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; ENVIRONMENT; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; HUMANS; PERCEPTION; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLIC OPINION; RISK; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL CHANGE; SOCIAL MARKETING;

EID: 84862630474     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01731.x     Document Type: Article

References (186)

1. Weber EU. Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic Change, 2006; 77:103-120.
2. Cox R. Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage, 2010.
3. Fischhoff B. Risk perception and communication unplugged: Twenty years of process. Risk Analysis, 1995; 15:137-145.
4. Moser S, Dilling L (eds). Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. New York : Cambridge University Press, 2007.
5. Hulme M. Why We Disagree About Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. New York : Cambridge University Press, 2009.
6. Schweizer V. Deliberative democracy to create a climate for change. Behavior, Energy and Climate Change Conference, Washington, DC, November 15-18, 2009.
7. U.S. National Research Council. Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. Washington, DC : National Academy Press, 2005.
8. U.S. National Research Council. Adapting to the Impacts of Climate Change. Washington, DC : National Academy Press, 2010.
9. U.S. National Research Council. Advancing the Science of Climate Change. Washington, DC : National Academy Press, 2010.
10. U.S. National Research Council. Informing an Effective Response to Climate Change. Washington, DC : National Academy Press, 2010.
11. U.S. National Research Council. Limiting the Magnitude of Climate Change. Washington, DC : National Academy Press, 2010.
12. Kasemir B, Schibli D, Stoll S, Jaeger CC. Involving the public in climate and energy decisions. Environment, 2000; 42:32-42.
13. Renn O. Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. London : Earthscan, 2008.
14. Sarewitz D. Does climate change knowledge really matter Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2011, 2:475-481.
15. U.K. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. Development of the UK's Campaign to Stimulate Public Action to Protect the Environment. London, UK : DETR, 2000.
16. U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. RISA Workshop Report: Looking Ahead at Climate Service, Assessment, and Adaptation. Washington, DC : U.S. Department of Commerce, 2010.
17. Fischhoff B. Communicating about the risks of terrorism (or anything else). American Psychologist, 2011; 66:520-531.
18. Weber EU, Stern PC. Public understanding of climate change in the United States. American Psychologist, 2011; 66:315-328.
19. Pidgeon NF, Lorenzoni I, Poortinga W. Climate change or nuclear power-no thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain. Global Environmental Change, 2008; 18:69-85.
20. Stern PC, Fineberg HV (eds). Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, DC : National Academy Press, 1996.
21. Renn O. Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. London : Earthscan, 2008.
22. Akrich M. User representations: Practices, methods and sociology. Pp. 167-184 in Rip A, Misa TJ, Schot J. (eds). Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment. London : Pinter, 1995.
23. McCright AM, Dunlap RE. The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001-2010. Sociological Quarterly, 2011; 99:491-503.
24. Douglas M, Wildavsky A. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley : University of California Press, 1982.
25. Thompson M, Ellis R, Wildavsky A. Cultural Theory. Boulder, CO : Westview Press, 1990.
26. Kahan DM, Slovic P, Braman D, Gastil J. Fear of democracy: A cultural critique of Sunstein on risk. Harvard Law Review, 2006; 119:1071-1109.
27. Schwartz SH. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Pp. 1-65 in Zanna M (ed). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 25. New York : Academic Press, 1992.
28. Bilsky W, Janik M, Schwartz SH. The structural organization of human values-Evidence from three rounds of the European Social Survey (ESS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2010; 42:759-776.
29. Crompton T. Weathercocks and Signposts: The Environment Movement at a Crossroads. Godalming, UK : World Wildlife Fund, 2008.
30. Habermas J. Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 2. Boston, MA : Beacon Press, 1984, 1987.
31. Renn O, Webler T, Wiedemann P (eds.) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Norwell, MA : Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995.
32. Witte K. Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel processing model. Communication Monographs, 1992; 59:329-349.
33. Foust CR, Murphy WO. Revealing and reframing apocalyptic tragedy in global warming discourse. Environmental Communication, 2009; 3:151-167.
34. Emirbayer M, Goldberg C. Pragmatism, Bourdieu, and collective emotions in contentious politics. Theory and Society, 2005; 34:469-518.
35. Scott JC. Weapons of the Weak. New Haven, CT : Yale University Press, 1985.
36. Lopez A. Defusing the cannon: An organic media approach to environmental communication. Environmental Communication, 2010; 4:99-108.
37. Pidgeon N, Fischhoff B. The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nature Climate Change, 2011; 1(7): Available at Accessed on October 19, 2011.
38. Stern PC. Contributions of psychology to limiting climate change. American Psychologist, 2011; 66:303-314.
39. Miller CA. Energy technology. Soapbox post at Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes, November 20, 2009. Available at:
40. Nisbet MC. Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment, 2009; 51:12-23.
41. Bostrom A, Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Read D. What do people know about global climate change? I. Mental models. Risk Analysis, 1994; 14:959-970.
42. Kahan D. Fixing the communications failure. Nature, 2010; 463:296-297.
43. Whitmarsh L. What's in a name? Commonalities and differences in public understanding of "climate change" and "global warming." Public Understanding of Science, 2009; 18:401-420.
44. Antal M, Hukkinen JI. The art of the cognitive war to save the planet. Ecological Economics, 2010; 69:937-943.
45. Norgaard KM "We don't really want to know": Environmental justice and socially organized denial of global warming in Norway. Organization and Environment, 2006; 19:347-370.
46. Norgaard K. Living in Denial: Climate Change, Emotions, and Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 2011.
47. McKenzie-Mohr D. Fostering sustainable behavior through community-based social marketing. American Psychologist, 2000; 55:531-537.
48. Gilligan J, Dietz T, Gardner GT, Stern PC, Vandenbergh MP. The behavioural wedge: Reducing greenhouse gas by individuals and households. Significance, 2010; 17-20.
49. Corner A, Randall A. Selling climate change? The limitations of social marketing as a strategy for climate change public engagement. Global Environmental Change, 2011; 21:1005-1014.
50. Guagnano G, Stern PC, Dietz T. Influences on attitude-behavior relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 1995; 27:699-718.
51. Stern PC, Dietz T, Abel T, Guagnano GA, Kalof L. A social-psychological theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 1999; 6:81-97.
52. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991; 50:179-211.
53. Gifford R. The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 2011; 66:290-302.
54. Nerlich B, Koteyko N, Brown B. Theory and language of climate change communication. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2010; 1:97-110.
55. Schwartz SH, Bilsky W. Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990; 58:878-891.
56. Baldwin R. Football and climate change: Strange bedfellows or a means of going beyond the usual suspects in encouraging pro-environmental behavioural change Local Environment, 2010; 15:851-866.
57. Fiske AP. Structures of Social Life: The Four Elementary Forms of Human Relations. New York : Free Press (Macmillan), 1991.
58. Craig-Lees M, Hill C. Understanding voluntary simplifiers. Psychology and Marketing, 2002; 19:187-210.
59. Stern PC. Psychology and the science of human-environment interactions. American Psychologist, 2000; 55:523-530.
60. Dietz T, Stern PC (eds). New Tools for Environmental Protection: Education, Information, and Voluntary Measures. Washington, DC : National Academy Press, 2002.
61. Mitchell-Jackson J. Welcome home: Using ethnographic research to understand residential energy practices. Behavior, Energy and Climate Change Conference, Washington, DC, November 15-18, 2009.
62. Jenkins H. A business opportunity model of corporate social responsibility for small and medium sized enterprises. Business Ethics: A European Review, 2009; 18:21-36.
63. Pinceti S. Green jobs: Siloing the environment to a specialty niche. Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Washington, DC, April 14, 2010.
64. Henning A. The illusion of economic objectivity: Linking local risks of credibility loss to global risks of climate change. Journal of Risk Research, 2008; 11:223-235.
65. Stern, PC, Aronson E, Darley JM, Hill DH, Hirst E, Kempton W, Wilbanks TJ. The effectiveness of incentives for residential energy conservation. Evaluation Review, 1986; 10:147-176.
66. Gallagher KS, Muehlegger EJ. Giving green to get green: Incentives and consumer adoption of hybrid vehicle technology. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2011; 61:1-15.
67. Hoffman AJ. Linking organizational and field-level analyses: The diffusion of corporate environmental practice. Organization and Environment, 2001; 14:133-156.
68. Bingham S. Climate change: A moral issue. Pp. 153-166 in Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. New York : Cambridge University Press, 2007.
69. DeHanas DN. Broadcasting green: Grassroots environmentalism on Muslim women's radio. Sociological Review, 2010; 57:141-155.
70. Chess C, Johnson BB. Information is not enough. Pp. 223-233 Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. New York : Cambridge University Press, 2007.
71. Haines A, McMichael AJ, Smith KR, Roberts I, Woodcock J, Markandya A, Armstrong BG, Campbell-Lendrum D, Dangour AD, Davies M, Bruce N, Tonne C, Barrett M, Wilkinson P. Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: Overview and implications for policy makers. Lancet, 2009; 374:2104-2114.
72. Nemet GF, Holloway T, Meier P. 2010. Implications of incorporating air-quality co-benefits into climate change policymaking. Environmental Research Letters, 5: 9. Available at: Accessed October 19, 2011.
73. Winston K. Activists cite health over climate in push for methane cuts in EPA oil rules. Risk Policy Report, 4 January 2010; 5-6.
74. Maibach EW, Nisbet M, Baldwin P, Akerlof K, Diao G. Reframing climate change as a public health issue: An exploratory study of public reactions. BMC Public Health, 2010; 10:299. Available at: Accessed October 19, 2011.
75. Orr DW. Death and resurrection: The future of environmentalism. Conservation Biology, 2005; 19:992-995.
76. Feygina I, Jost JT, Goldsmith RE. System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of "system-sanctioned change." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2010; 36:326-338.
77. Griskevicius V, Tybur JM, Van den Bergh B. Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2010; 98:392-404.
78. Ferguson MA, Branscombe NR. Collective guilt mediates the effect of beliefs about global warming on willingness to engage in mitigation behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010; 30:135-142.
79. Shaw A, Sheppard S, Burch S, Flanders D, Wiek A, Carmichael J, Robinson J, Cohen S. Making local futures tangible-Synthesizing, downscaling, and visualizing climate change scenarios for participatory capacity building. Global Environmental Change, 2009; 19:447-463.
80. O'Neill SJ, Hulme M. An iconic approach for representing climate change. Global Environmental Change, 2009; 19:402-410.
81. Berk RA, Fovell RG. Public perceptions of climate change: A "willingness to pay" assessment. Climatic Change, 1999; 41:413-446.
82. Hamilton LC, Keim BD. Regional variation in perceptions about climate change. International Journal of Climatology, 2009; 29:2348-2352.
83. Zahran S, Brody SD, Grover H, Vedlitz A. Climate change vulnerability and policy support. Society and Natural Resources, 2006; 19:771-789.
84. Brody SD, Zahran S, Vedlitz A, Grover H. Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Environment and Behavior, 2008; 40:72-95.
85. Albrecht G, Sartore G, Connor L, Higginbotham N, Freeman S, Kelly B, Stain H, Tonna A, Pollard G. Solastalgia: The distress caused by environmental change. Australasian Psychiatry, 2007; 15:895-898.
86. Zaalberg R, Midden C, Meijnders A, McCalley T. Prevention, adaptation, and threat denial: Flooding experiences in the Netherlands. Risk Analysis, 2009; 29:1759-1778.
87. Shackley S, Deanwood R. Stakeholder perceptions of climate change impacts at the regional scale: Implications for the effectiveness of regional and local responses. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2002; 45:381-402.
88. Johnson BB. Advancing understanding of knowledge's role in lay risk perception. RISK: Issues in Health & Safety, 1993; 4:189-212.
89. Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership. Available at: Accessed 2 May 2010.
90. Wong-Parodi G, Dowlatabadi H, McDaniels T, Ray I. Influencing attitudes towards carbon capture and sequestration: A social marketing approach. Environmental Science and Technology, 2011; 45:6743-6751.
91. Freeman CP. Meat's place on the campaign menu: How US environmental discourse negotiates vegetarianism. Environmental Communication, 2010; 4:255-276.
92. Smith A, Watkiss P, Tweddle G, McKinnon A, Browne M, Hunt A, Treleven C, Nash C, Cross S. The Validity of Food Miles as an Indicator of Sustainable Development. London : DEFRA Publications, 2005.
93. Weber CL, Matthews HS. Food-miles and the relative climate impacts of food choices in the United States. Environmental Science and Technology, 2008; 42:3508-3513.
94. Lawson N. Time for a climate change plan B. Wall Street Journal, 22 December 2009, A-23.
95. Reser JP, Swim JK. Adapting to and coping with the threat and impacts of climate change. American Psychologist, 2011; 66:277-289.
96. Verplanken B, Wood W. Interventions to break and create consumer habits. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 2006; 25:90-103.
97. Gardner GT, Stern PC. Environmental Problems and Human Behavior (2nd edition). Boston, MA : Pearson Custom, 2002.
98. Black JS, Stern PC, Elworth JT. Personal and contextual influences on household energy adaptations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985; 70:3-21.
99. Norgaard KM "People want to protect themselves a little bit": Emotions, denial, and social movement nonparticipation. Sociological Inquiry, 2006; 76:372-396.
100. Doherty TJ, Clayton S. The psychological impacts of global climate change. American Psychologist, 2011; 66:265-276.
101. Randall R. Loss and climate change: The cost of parallel narratives. Ecopsychology, 2009; 1:118-129.
102. Lertzman R. The myth of apathy: Psychoanalytic explorations of environmental degradation. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Cardiff, Wales : Cardiff University, Cardiff School of Social Sciences, 2010.
103. Carrigan M, Moraes C, Leek S. Fostering responsible communities: A community social marketing approach to sustainable living. Journal of Business Ethics, 2011; 100:515-534.
104. Leiserowitz AA. American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous? Risk Analysis, 2005; 25:1433-1442.
105. Cools M. Shifting towards environment-friendly modes: Profiling travelers using Q-methodology. Transportation, 2009; 36:437-453.
106. Dethman L. Challenges and rewards of comparing seven West Coast segmentation studies. Behavior, Energy and Climate Change Conference, Washington, DC, November 15-18, 2009.
107. Maibach E. Global warming's six Americas. Behavior, Energy and Climate Change Conference, Washington, DC, November 15-18, 2009.
108. Wolf J, Brown K, Conway D. Ecological citizenship and climate change: Perceptions and practice. Environmental Politics, 2009; 18:503-521.
109. Featherstone H, Weitkamp E, Ling K, Burnet F. Defining issue-based publics for public engagement: Climate change as a case study. Public Understanding of Science, 2009; 18:214-228.
110. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change in smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1983; 51:390-395.
111. Weinstein ND. The precaution adoption process. Health Psychology, 1988; 7:355-386.
112. Weinstein ND, Rothman AM, Sutton SR. Stage theories of health behavior: Conceptual and methodological issues. Health Psychology, 1998; 17:290-299.
113. Astyk S. Moloch's children: Do climate change skeptics and climate change activists need to agree? Casaubon's Book, 2009. Available at:, Accessed on May 12, 2010.
114. Hopkin M. Climate sceptics switch focus to economics. Nature, 2007; 445:582-583.
115. Stewart CJ. A functional approach to the rhetoric of social movements. Central States Speech Journal, 1980; 31:298-305.
116. Bell R. Christine Todd Whitman says clean air, not climate, should be focus of energy talks. Greenville, South Carolina. News, March 3 cited in ClimateWire, March 4, 2010. Available at:
117. Moser SC, Dilling L. Making climate hot: Communicating the urgency and challenge of global climate change. Environment, 2004; 46:33-46.
118. Weingart P. Risks of communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 2000; 9:261-283.
119. McCright AM, Dunlap RE. Defeating Kyoto: The conservative movement's impact on U.S. climate change policy. Social Problems, 2003; 50:348-373.
120. Oreskes N, Conway EM. Merchants of Doubt. New York : Bloomsbury Press, 2010.
121. Johnson BB. Ethical issues in risk communication: Continuing the discussion. Risk Analysis, 1999; 19:335-348.
122. Fischhoff B. Non-persuasive communication about matters of greatest urgency: Climate change. Environmental Science and Technology, 2007; 41:7204-7208.
123. MacKenzie D, Wajcman J (eds). The Social Shaping of Technology. Milton Keynes, UK : Open University, 1985.
124. Bijker WE, Hughes TP, Pinch TJ (eds). The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 1987.
125. Ockwell D, Whitmarsh L, O'Neill S. Reorienting climate change communication for effective mitigation: Forcing people to be green or fostering grass-roots engagement? Science Communication, 2009; 30:305-327.
126. Brulle RJ. From environmental campaigns to advancing the public dialog: Environmental communication for civic engagement. Environmental Communication, 2010; 4:82-98.
127. Oberschall A. Social Conflict and Social Movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall, 1973.
128. Jenkins JC, Perrow C. Insurgency of the powerless. American Sociological Review, 1977; 42:249-267.
129. Tarrow S. Power in Movement. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press, 1994.
130. McAdam D, Tarrow S, Tilly C. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press, 2001.
131. Cohen JL. Strategy or identity. Social Research, 1985; 52:663-716.
132. Melucci A, Challenging Codes. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press, 1996.
133. Snow DA, Rochford EB, Jr, Worden SK, Benford RD. Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 1986; 51:464-481.
134. Jasper JM. The Art of Moral Protest. Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press, 1997.
135. Diani M. The concept of social movement. Sociological Review, 1992; 40:1-25.
136. Bourdieu P. The social space and the genesis of groups. Theory and Society, 1984; 14:723-744.
137. Bourdieu P. Pascalian Meditations (tr. Nice R). Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press, 2000 (1997).
138. Bourdieu P. Masculine Domination (tr. Nice R). Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press, 2001 (1998).
139. Snow DA, Benford RD. Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1988; 1:197-217.
140. Stern PC, Dietz T, Black JS. Support for environmental protection: The role of moral norms. Population and Environment, 1986; 8:204-222.
141. Bickerstaff K, Walker G. Risk, responsibility and blame: An analysis of vocabularies of motive in air-pollution(ing) discourses. Environment and Planning A, 2003; 34:2175-2192.
142. Bickerstaff K, Simmons P, Pidgeon N. Constructing responsibilities for risk: Negotiating citizen-state relationships. Environment and Planning A, 2007; 40:1312-1330.
143. Hale S. The new politics of climate change: Why we are failing and how we will succeed. Environmental Politics, 2010; 19:255-275.
144. Agyeman J, Doppelt B, Lynn K, Hatic H. The climate-justice link: Communicating risk with low-income and minority audiences. Pp. 119-138 in Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. New York : Cambridge University Press.
145. Brulle R. Personal communication, 20 May 2010.
146. Cox JR. Beyond frames: Recovering the strategic in climate communication. Environmental Communication, 2010; 4:122-133.
147. Haines HH. Black radicalization and the funding of civil rights: 1957-1970. Social Problems, 1984; 32:31-43.
148. Bosso CJ. The color of money: Environmental groups and the pathologies of fund raising. Pp. 101-130 in Cigler AJ, Loomis (eds). Interest Group Politics (4th edition). Washington, DC : CQ Press, 1994.
149. Bosso C. Seizing back the day: The challenge to environmental activism in the 1990s. Pp. 53-74 in Vig NJ, Kraft ME (eds). Environmental Policy in the 1990s: Reform or Reaction? (3d edition). Washington, DC : CQ Press, 1997.
150. Derville T. Radical activist tactics: Overturning public relations conceptualizations. Public Relations Review, 2005; 31: 527-533.
151. Nye M, Hargreaves T. Exploring the social dynamics of proenvironmental behavior change: A comparative study of intervention processes at home and work. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2009; 14:137-149.
152. Williams J. The phenomenology of global warming: The role of proposed solutions as competitive factors in the public arenas of discourse. Human Ecology Review, 2000; 7:63-72.
153. Brulle RJ. Politics and the environment. Pp. 385-406 in Leicht KT, Jenkins JC (eds). The Handbook of Politics: State and Civil Society in Global Perspective. New York : Springer, 2010.
154. Vliegenthart R, van Zoonen L. Power to the frame: Bringing sociology back to frame analysis. European Journal of Communication, 2011; 26:101-115.
155. Lounsbury M, Ventresca M, Hirsch P. Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: A cultural-political perspective on U.S. recycling. Socio-Economic Review, 2003; 1:71-104.
156. Fenton Communications. About us. Available at: Accessed on October 23, 2009
157. Lakoff G. Don't Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction, VT : Chelsea Green, 2004.
158. Moraes C, Szmigin I, Carrigan M. Living production-engaged alternatives: An examination of new consumption communities. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 2010; 13:273-298.
159. Antonio RJ, Brulle RJ. The unbearable lightness of politics: Climate change denial and political polarization. Sociological Quarterly, 2011; 52:195-202.
160. Ramsey K. Adapting (to) the "climate crisis": Activism, governmentality, and the politics of mobility in Seattle. Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Washington, DC, April 17, 2010.
161. Cigler AJ, Loomis BA. Introduction: The changing nature of interest group politics. Pp. 1-33 in Cigler AJ, Loomis BA (eds). Interest Group Politics (3rd edition). Washington, DC : Congressional Quarterly Press, 1991.
162. Jenkins JC. Democratic politics and the long march on global warming: Comments on McCright and Dunlap. Sociological Quarterly, 2011; 52:211-219.
163. Jasanoff S. Heaven and earth: The politics of environmental images. Ch. 1, pp. 31-52 in Martello ML, Jasanoff S (eds). Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance (Politics, Science, and the Environment). Cambridge : Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2004.
164. Moser SC. Talk of the city: Engaging urbanites on climate change. Environmental Research Letters, 2006; 1:10. Available at
165. Burgess J. Sustainable consumption: Is it really achievable? Consumer Policy Review, 2003; 13:78-84.
166. Hornborg A. Zero-sum world: Challenges in conceptualizing environmental load displacement and ecologically unequal exchange in the world-system. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 2009; 50:237-262.
167. Victor P. Managing Without Growth: Slower by Design, Not Disaster. Northampton, MA : Edward Elgar, 2008.
168. Foster JB. The Ecological Revolution: Making Peace with the Planet. New York : Monthly Review Press, 2009.
169. Jackson T. Prosperity Without Growth. London : Earthscan, 2009.
170. Schnaiberg A. The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity. New York : Oxford University Press, 1980.
171. Sen A. Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny. New York : W.W. Norton, 2006.
172. Mol APJ, Sonnenfeld DA (eds). Ecological Modernisation Around the World: Perspectives and Critical Debates. London : Frank Cass, 2000.
173. York R, Rosa EA. Key challenges to ecological modernization theory: Institutional efficacy, case study evidence, units of analysis, and the pace of eco-efficiency. Organization and Environment, 2003; 16:273-288.
174. Miller CA. International review of geoengineering. Soapbox post at Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes, 2010, March 19. Available at:
175. Gober P, Kirkwood CW, Balling RC, Jr., Ellis AW, Deitrick S. Water planning under climatic uncertainty in Phoenix: Why we need a new paradigm. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2009; 100:1-17.
176. Satterfield T, Slovic P, Gregory R. Narrative valuation in a policy judgment context. Ecological Economics, 2000; 34:315-331.
177. Dietz T. Climate risk management and deliberative processes. Pp. 20-22 in Climate Change Perceptions, Risk Communication and Public Engagement. Cumberland Lodge, Great Windsor Park, UK, 2010.
178. US National Research Council. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, DC : National Academy Press, 1996.
179. Gregory R, Fischhoff B, McDaniels T. Acceptable input: Using decision analysis to guide public policy deliberations. Decision Analysis, 2005; 2:4-16.
180. Rowan KE. Why rules for risk communication are not enough: A problem-solving approach to risk communication. Risk Analysis, 2006; 14:365-374.
181. Tidwell M. Consider using the N-word less: Voluntary actions didn't get us civil rights, and they won't fix the climate. ; Brook A (and 26 others). The power of voluntary actions: Social scientists respond to Mike Tidwell. ; Tidwell M. Forget the light bulbs: Part II: Tidwell responds to scientists responding to Tidwell.
182. Jeffers JM. Conceptualising climate hazards: Reflections on adaptation, vulnerability and decision-making in coastal cities. Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Washington, DC, April 17, 2010.
183. Jablonski CJ. Promoting radical change in the Roman Catholic Church: Rhetorical requirements, problems, and strategies of the American bishops. Central States Speech Journal, 1980; 31:282-289.
184. Zaller JR. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press, 1992.
185. Prins G, Galiana I, Green C, Grundmann R, Hulme M, Korhola A, Laird F, Nordhaus T, Pielke R Jr, Rayner S, Sarewitz D, Shellenberger M, Stehr N, Tezuka H. The Hartwell paper: A new direction for climate policy after the crash of 2009. Available at: Accessed October 19, 2011.
186. Kaufman L. In Kansas, climate skeptics embrace cleaner energy. New York Times, 18 October 2010 ().