Contributions of Psychology to Limiting Climate Change

American Psychologist

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 303-314

  Stern, Paul C ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavioral change; Climate change; Energy consumption; Environmentally significant behavior

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CLIMATE CHANGE; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HUMAN; POLICY;

BEHAVIOR; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONSERVATION OF ENERGY RESOURCES; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; HUMANS; POLICY;

EID: 79955969016     PISSN: 0003066X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0023235     Document Type: Article

References (112)

1. Abrahamse W., Steg L. How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households' direct and indirect energy use and savings?. Journal of Economic Psychology 2009, 30:711-720. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2009.05.006.
2. Abrahamse W., Steg L., Vlek C., Rothengatter T. A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2005, 25:273-291. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.002.
3. Abroms L.C., Maibach E.W. The effectiveness of mass communication to change public behavior. Annual Review of Public Health 2008, 29:219-234. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090824.
4. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991, 50:179-211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
5. Ajzen I., Fishbein M. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research 1975, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
6. Ajzen I., Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior 1980, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
7. Allcott H., Mullainathan S. Behavior and energy policy. Science 2010, March 5, 327:1204-1205. doi: 10.1126/science.1180775.
8. Aronson E., O'Leary M. The relative effectiveness of models and prompts on energy conservation: A field experiment in a shower room. Journal of Environmental Systems 1983, 12:219-224.
9. Bamberg S., Möser G. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2007, 27:14-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002.
10. Bin S., Dowlatabadi H. Consumer lifestyle approach to US energy use and the related CO2 emissions. Energy Policy 2005, 33(2):197-208. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00210-6.
11. Black J.S., Stern P.C., Elworth J.T. Personal and contextual influences on household energy adaptations. Journal of Applied Psychology 1985, 70:3-21. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.70.1.3.
12. Cialdini R.B. Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2003, 12(4):105-109. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.01242.
13. Cialdini R.B., Reno R.R., Kallgren C.A. A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Readings about the social animal 2004, 56-79. Worth, New York, NY, (Reprinted from Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990, 58, 1015-1026). 9th ed. E. Aronson (Ed.).
14. Clark C.F., Kotchen M.J., Moore M.R. Internal and external influences on pro-environmental behavior: Participation in a green electricity program. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2003, 23:237-246. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00105-6.
15. Creyts J., Derkach A., Nyquist S., Ostrowski K., Stephenson J. Reducing U.S. greenhouse gas emissions: How much at what cost? 2007, Retrieved from McKinsey & Company website: http://www.mckinsey.com/clientservice/ccsi/pdf/US_ghg_final_report.pdf.
16. Daamen D.D.L., Staats H., Wilke H.A.M., Engelen M. Improving environmental behavior in companies: The effectiveness of tailored versus nontailored interventions. Environment and Behavior 2001, 33(2):229-248. doi: 10.1177/00139160121972963.
17. Darley J.M. Energy conservation techniques as innovations and their diffusion. Energy and Buildings 1978, 1:339-343. doi: 10.1016/0378-7788(78)90013-0.
18. Darnton A. Reference report: An overview of behaviour change models and their uses (GSR Behaviour Change Knowledge Review) 2008, Government Social Research Service, London, England, Retrieved from http://www.civilservice.gov.uk/Assets/Behaviour_change_reference_report_tcm6-9697.pdf.
19. Dietz T. Narrowing the US energy efficiency gap. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2010, 107:16007-16008. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010651107.
20. Dietz T., Dan A., Shwom R. Support for climate change policy: Social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociology 2007, 72:185-214. doi: 10.1526/003601107781170026.
21. Dietz T., Gardner G.T., Gilligan J., Stern P.C., Vandenbergh M.P. Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2009, 106:18452-18456. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908738106.
22. Dunlap R.E., McCright A.M. A widening gap: Republican and Democratic views on climate change. Environment 2008, 50(5):26-35.
23. Dunlap R.E., Van Liere K.D. The new environmental paradigm: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education 1978, 9:10-19.
24. Dunlap R.E., Van Liere K.D., Mertig A.G., Jones R.E. Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues 2000, 56(3):425-442.
25. Ehrhardt-Martinez K., Donnelly K.A., Laitner J.A. Advanced metering initiatives and residential feedback programs: A meta-review for household electricity-saving opportunities 2010, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, DC.
26. Fischer C. Feedback on household electricity consumption: A tool for saving energy?. Energy Efficiency 2008, 1:79-104. doi: 10.1007/s12053-008-9009-7.
27. Fischhoff B., Slovic P., Lichtenstein S., Read S., Combs B. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences 1978, 9:127-152. doi: 10.1007/BF00143739.
28. Forster P., Ramaswamy V., Artaxo P., Berntsen T., Betts R., Fahey D.W., Van Dorland R. Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, 129-234. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, H.L. Miller (Eds.).
29. Gallagher K.S., Muehlegger E.J. Giving green to get green: Incentives and consumer adoption of hybrid vehicle technology. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2011, 61:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2010.05.004.
30. Gardner G.T., Stern P.C. Environmental problems and human behavior 2002, Pearson Custom, Boston, MA. 2nd ed.
31. Gardner G.T., Stern P.C. The short list: Most effective actions U.S. households can take to limit climate change. Environment 2008, 50(5):12-25. doi: 10.3200/ENVT.50.5.12-25.
32. Gardner, G. T., Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Vandenbergh, M. P., & Gilligan, J. M. (2010, November 15). A comprehensive program to rapidly reduce U.S. residential carbon emissions. Paper presented at the Behavior, Energy, and Climate Change Conference, Sacramento, CA.
33. Gatersleben B., Steg L., Vlek C. Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior. Environment and Behavior 2002, 34(3):335-362. doi: 10.1177/0013916502034003004.
34. Geller E.S., Winett R.A., Everett P.B. Preserving the environment: New strategies for behavior change 1982, Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY.
35. Gifford R.D. Psychology's essential role in alleviating the impacts of climate change. Canadian Psychology 2008, 49:273-280. doi: 10.1037/a0013234.
36. Goldstein N.J., Griskevicius V., Cialdini R.B. Invoking social norms: A social psychology perspective on improving hotels' linen-reuse programs. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly 2007, 48(2):145-150.
37. Gonzales M.H., Aronson E., Costanzo M.A. Using social cognition and persuasion to promote energy conservation: A quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1988, 18(12):1049-1066. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01192.x.
38. Guagnano G., Stern P.C., Dietz T. Influences on attitude-behavior relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior 1995, 27:699-718. doi: 10.1177/0013916595275005.
39. Harland P., Staats H., Wilke H.A.M. Situational and personality factors as direct or personal norm mediated predictors of pro-environmental behavior: Questions derived from norm-activation theory. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2007, 29(4):323-334. doi: 10.1080/01973530701665058.
40. Heberlein T.A., Warriner G.K. The influence of price and attitude on shifting electricity consumption from on- to off-peak periods. Journal of Economic Psychology 1983, 4:1097-1300. doi: 10.1016/0167-4870(83)90048-X.
41. Hirst E. The Hood River Conservation Project: An evaluator's dream. Evaluation Review 1988, 12:310-325. doi: 10.1177/0193841X8801200306.
42. Hobson K. Thinking habits into action: The role of knowledge and process in questioning household consumption practices. Local Environment 2003, 8(1):95-112. doi: 10.1080/135498303200041359.
43. Hunecke M., Haustein S., Grischkat S., Böhler S. Psychological, sociodemographic, and infrastructural factors as determinants of ecological impact caused by mobility behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2007, 27(4):277-292. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.001.
44. Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Author, Geneva, Switzerland. Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri, A. Reisinger (Eds.).
45. Jaffe A.B., Stavins R.N. The energy-efficiency gap: What does it mean?. Energy Policy 1994, 22:804-810. doi: 10.1016/0301-4215(94)90138-4.
46. 2008 energy efficiency indicator 2008, Johnson Controls, Inc., Retrieved from http://www.johnsoncontrols.com/publish/us/en/news.html?newsitem=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnsoncontrols.mediaroom.com%2Findex.php%3Fs%3D112%26amp%3Bcat%3D94.
47. Kaiser F.G. A general measure of ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1998, 28:395-422. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01712.x.
48. Kaiser F.G., Gutscher H. The proposition of a general version of the theory of planned behavior: Predicting ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2003, 33:586-603. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01914.x.
49. Kaiser F.G., Wölfing S., Fuhrer U. Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1999, 19:1-19. doi: 10.1006/jevp.1998.0107.
50. Kaufmann-Hayoz R., Gutscher H. Changing things-Moving people: Strategies for promoting sustainable development at the local level 2001, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.
51. Kempton W., Darley J.M., Stern P.C. Psychological research for the new energy problems: Strategies and opportunities. American Psychologist 1992, 47:1213-1223. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.47.10.1213.
52. Kollmuss A., Agyeman J. Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?. Environmental Education Research 2002, 8(3):239-260. doi: 10.1080/13504620220145401.
53. Kopelman S., Weber J.M., Messick D.M. Factors influencing cooperation in commons dilemmas: A review of experimental psychological research. The drama of the commons 2002, National Academy Press, Washington, DC. National Research Council, E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P.C. Stern, S. Stonich, E. Weber (Eds.).
54. Krantz D.H., Kunreuther H.C. Goals and plans in decision making. Judgment and Decision Making 2007, 2(3):137-168.
55. Leiserowitz A., Maibach E., Roser-Renouf C. Global warming's " six Americas" An audience segmentation 2008, Retrieved from http://www.climatechangecommunication.org/images/files/SixAmericas-final-v3-Web.pdf.
56. Lindenberg S., Steg L. Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior. Journal of Social Issues 2007, 63(1):117-137. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00499.x.
57. Lutzenhiser L., Cesafsky L., Chappells H., Gossard M., Moezzi M., Moran D., Wilhite H. Behavioral assumptions underlying California residential sector energy efficiency programs (White Paper 04259 prepared for the California Institute for Energy and Environment and the California Public Utilities Commission) 2009, California Institute for Energy and Environment, Berkeley, CA, Retrieved from http://ciee-dev.eecs.berkeley.edu/energyeff/documents/ba_ee_res_wp.pdf.
58. Lutzenhiser L., Hackett B. Social stratification and environmental degradation: Understanding household CO2 production. Social Problems 1993, 40(1):50-73. doi: 10.1525/sp.1993.40.1.03x0072t.
59. Maio G.R., Verplanken B., Manstead A.S.R., Stroebe W., Abraham C.S., Sheeran P., Conner M. Social psychological factors in lifestyle change and their relevance to social policy. Social Issues and Policy Review 2007, 1:99-137. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-2409.2007.00005.x.
60. Matthies E. One to bind them all: How the modified moral decision making model can be used for the integration of measures to promote pro-environmental travel mode choices. Crossing boundaries-The value of interdisciplinary research 2003, 103-109. Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland. T. Craig (Ed.).
61. Matthies E., Hansmeier N. Planning interventions on a theoretical basis: Applying a new integrative influence model of pro-environmental behaviour. International Journal of Psychology 2008, 43:46.
62. McKenzie-Mohr D. Fostering sustainable behavior through community-based social marketing. American Psychologist 2000, 55:531-537. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.531.
63. McKenzie-Mohr D., Smith W. Fostering sustainable behavior: An introduction to community-based social marketing 1999, New Society, Gabriola Island, British Columbia, Canada.
64. Möser G., Bamberg S. The effectiveness of soft transport policy measures: A critical assessment and meta-analysis of empirical evidence. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2008, 28:10-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.09.001.
65. Improving risk communication 1989, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
66. Global environmental change: Understanding the human dimensions 1992, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC. P.C. Stern, O.R. Young, D. Druckman (Eds.).
67. Understanding risk: Informing decisions in a democratic society 1996, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC. P.C. Stern, H.V. Fineberg (Eds.).
68. Environmentally significant consumption: Research directions 1997, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC. P.C. Stern, T. Dietz, V.R. Ruttan, R.H. Socolow, J.L. Sweeney (Eds.).
69. Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making 2008, National Research Council, National Academies Press, Washington, DC. T. Dietz, P.C. Stern (Eds.).
70. Advancing the science of climate change 2010, National Research Council, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
71. Facilitating climate change responses: A report of two workshops on knowledge from the behavioral and social sciences 2010, National Research Council, National Academies Press, Washington, DC. P.C. Stern, R.E. Kasperson (Eds.).
72. Nilsson A., von Borgstede C., Biel A. Willingness to accept climate change strategies: The effect of values and norms. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2004, 24:267-277. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.06.002.
73. Nolan J.M., Schultz P.W., Cialdini R.B., Goldstein N.J., Griskevicius V. Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2008, 34(7):913-923. doi: 10.1177/0146167208316691.
74. Prochaska J.O., Velicer W.F. Behavior change: The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. American Journal of Health Promotion 1997, 12:38-48.
75. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of innovations 2003, Free Press, New York, NY. 5th ed.
76. Ruderman H., Levine M.D., McMahon J.E. The behavior of the market for energy efficiency in residential appliances including heating and cooling equipment. The Energy Journal 1987, 8:101-124.
77. Schahn J., Holzer E. Studies of individual environmental concern: The role of knowledge, gender, and background variables. Environment and Behavior 1990, 22:767-786. doi: 10.1177/0013916590226003.
78. Schultz P.W., Khazian A., Zaleski A. Using normative social influence to promote conservation among hotel guests. Social Influence 2008, 3:4-23. doi: 10.1080/15534510701755614.
79. Schultz P.W., Nolan J.M., Cialdini R.B., Goldstein N.J., Griskevicius V. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science 2007, 18:429-434. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x.
80. Schwartz S.H. Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1977, 10:221-279. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5.
81. Schwartz S.H. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1992, 25:1-65. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6.
82. Shwom R., Bidwell D., Dan A., Dietz T. Understanding U.S. public support for domestic climate change policies. Global Environmental Change 2010, 20:472-482. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.02.003.
83. Siero F.W., Bakker A.B., Dekker G.B., Van Den Burg M.T.C. Changing organizational energy consumption behaviour through comparative feedback. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1996, 16(3):235-246. doi: 10.1006/jevp.1996.0019.
84. Slovic P. The perception of risk 2000, Earthscan, London, England.
85. Slovic P., Flynn J., Layman M. Perceived risk, trust, and the politics of nuclear waste. Science 1991, December 13, 254:1603-1607. doi: 10.1126/science.254.5038.1603.
86. Snyder L.B., Hamilton M.A., Mitchell E.W., Kiwanuka-Tondo J., Fleming-Milici F., Proctor D. A meta-analysis of the effect of mediated health communication campaigns on behavior change in the United States. Journal of Health Communication 2004, 9(Supplement 1):71-96. doi: 10.1080/10810730490271548.
87. Sonderegger R.C. Movers and stayers: The resident's contribution to variation across houses in energy consumption for space heating. Energy and Buildings 1978, 1:313-324. doi: 10.1016/0378-7788(78)90011-7.
88. Steg L., Dreijerink L., Abrahamse W. Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2005, 25:415-425. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.003.
89. Stern P.C. Blind spots in policy analysis: What economics doesn't say about energy use. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 1986, 5(2):200-227. doi: 10.2307/3323541.
90. Stern P.C. Toward a working definition of consumption for environmental research and policy. Environmentally significant consumption: Research directions 1997, 12-25. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. National Research Council, P.C. Stern, T. Dietz, V.W. Ruttan, R.H. Socolow, J.L. Sweeney (Eds.).
91. Stern P.C. Psychology and the science of human-environment interactions. American Psychologist 2000, 55:523-530. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.523.
92. Stern P.C. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues 2000, 56(3):407-424. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00175.
93. Stern P.C. Environmentally significant behavior in the home. The Cambridge handbook of psychology and economic behaviour 2008, 363-382. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. A. Lewis (Ed.).
94. Stern P.C., Aronson E., Darley J.M., Hill D.H., Hirst E., Kempton W., Wilbanks T.J. The effectiveness of incentives for residential energy conservation. Evaluation Review 1986, 10(2):147-176. doi: 10.1177/0193841X8601000201.
95. Stern P.C., Black J.S., Elworth J.T. Responses to changing energy conditions among Massachusetts households. Energy 1983, 8:515-523. doi: 10.1016/0360-5442(83)90077-4.
96. Stern P.C., Dietz T., Abel T., Guagnano G.A., Kalof L. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review 1999, 6:81-97.
97. Stern P.C., Dietz T., Guagnano G.A. The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment and Behavior 1995, 27:723-743. doi: 10.1177/0013916595276001.
98. Stern P.C., Gardner G.T. Psychological research and energy policy. American Psychologist 1981, 36:329-342. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.36.4.329.
99. Stern P.C., Gardner G.T., Vandenbergh M.P., Dietz T., Gilligan J.M. Design principles for carbon emissions reduction programs. Environmental Science & Technology 2010, 44:4847-4848. doi: 10.1021/es100896p.
100. Stevenson F., Leaman A. Evaluating housing performance in relation to human behaviour: New challenges. Building Research and Information 2010, 38:437-441. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2010.497282.
101. Swim J.K., Stern P.C., Doherty T.J., Clayton S., Reser J.P., Weber E.U., Gifford R., Howard G.S. Psychology's contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change. American Psychologist 2011, 66:241-250. doi: 10.1037/a0023220.
102. Thøgersen J., Crompton T. Simple and painless? The limitations of spillover in environmental campaigning. Journal of Consumer Policy 2009, 32:141-163. doi: 10.1007/s10603-009-9101-1.
103. Tuler, S. P. (2009, December 3-4). Factors influencing public support and opposition to renewable energy facility siting: A review of the literature. Paper presented at the Workshop on Addressing the Challenges of Climate Change Through the Behavioral and Social Sciences, National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC.
104. Annual energy review 2006 [DOE/EIA-0384(2006)] 2007, U.S. Energy Information Administration, Author, Washington, DC, Retrieved from http://www.eia.doe.gov/aer/.
105. Vale B., Vale R. Domestic energy use, lifestyles, and POE: Past lessons for current problems. Building Research and Information 2010, 38:578-588. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2010.481438.
106. Vandenbergh, M. P., Dietz, T., & Stern, P. C. (in press). Time to try carbon labeling. Nature Climate Change.
107. Vandenbergh M.P., Stern P.C., Gardner G.T., Dietz T., Gilligan J.M. Implementing the behavioral wedge: Designing and adopting effective carbon emissions reduction programs. Environmental Law Reporter 2010, 40:10547-10554.
108. Van Lange P.A.M. The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 77:337-349. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.337.
109. Van Lange P.A.M., Joireman J. How we can promote behavior that serves all of us in the future. Social Issues and Policy Review 2008, 2:127-157. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-2409.2008.00013.x.
110. Wall R., Devine-Wright P., Mill G.A. Comparing and combining theories to explain proenvironmental intentions: The case of commuting-mode choice. Environment and Behavior 2007, 39(6):731-753. doi: 10.1177/0013916506294594.
111. Weber E.U., Stern P.C. Public understanding of climate change in the United States. American Psychologist 2011, 66:315-328. doi: 10.1037/a0023253.
112. Wilson C., Dowlatabadi H. Models of decision making & residential energy use. Annual Review of Environment & Resources 2007, 32:169-203. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.053006.141137.