Climate change or nuclear power-No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain

Global Environmental Change

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 69-85

  Pidgeon, Nick F ^a   Lorenzoni, Irene ^b   Poortinga, Wouter ^c  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^c CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

British public risk perceptions; Climate change; Energy policy; Framing; Nuclear power

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; CLIMATE CHANGE; ENERGY POLICY; MITIGATION; NUCLEAR POWER; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; RISK PERCEPTION; TRADE-OFF;

EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 38949205613     PISSN: 09593780     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Allan S., Adam B., and Carter C. Environmental Risks and the Media (2000), Routledge, London
2. Bell D., Gray T., and Haggett C. The 'social gap' in wind farm siting decisions: explanations and policy responses. Environmental Politics 14 (2005) 460-477
3. Benford R.D., and Snow D.A. Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26 (2000) 611-639
4. Bickerstaff K. Risk perception research: socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution. Environment International 30 (2004) 827-840
5. Bickerstaff K., and Walker G. Risk, responsibility and blame: an analysis of vocabularies of motive in air-pollution(ing) discourses. Environment and Planning A 34 (2002) 2175-2192
6. Bickerstaff, K., Lorenzoni, I., Pidgeon, N.F., Poortinga, W., Simmons, P., in press, a. Reframing the nuclear debate in the UK: radioactive waste and climate change mitigation. Public Understanding of Science.
7. Bickerstaff, K., Simmons, P., Pidgeon, N.F., in press, b. Constructing responsibility for risk(s): negotiating citizen-state relationships. Environment and Planning A.
8. Bord R.J., Fisher A., and O'Connor R.E. Public perceptions of global warming: United States and international perspectives. Climate Research 11 (1998) 75-84
9. Bostrom A., Morgan M.G., Fischhoff B., and Read D. What do people know about global climate change? 1. Mental models. Risk Analysis 14 (1994) 959-970
10. Brechin S.R. Comparative public opinion and knowledge on global climatic change and the Kyoto Protocol: the US versus the rest of the World?. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 23 10 (2003) 106-134
11. Carvalho A., and Burgess J. Cultural circuits of climate change in the UK broadsheet newspapers, 1985-2003. Risk Analysis 25 (2005) 1457-1469
12. Clayton, H., Pidgeon, N.F., Whitby, M., 2006. Is a Cross-party Consensus on Climate Change Possible-or Desirable? First Report of the All Party Parliamentary Climate Change Group, Westminster, London.
13. Collingridge D. The Social Control of Technology (1990), Open University Press, Milton Keynes
14. CoRWM, 2005a. Radioactive Waste Inventory, Document 1279. Committee on Radioactive Waste Management, London. Also at 〈http://www.corwm.org.uk/pdf/InventoryReport.pdf〉 (accessed 20 November 2006)
15. CoRWM, 2005b. Statement on New Nuclear Build, dated 16 December 2005. Committee on Radioactive Waste Management, London. Also at 〈http://www.corwm.org.uk/PDF/1593.1%20-%20New%20build%20statement.pdf〉 (accessed 20 November 2006).
16. CoRWM, 2006. Managing our Radioactive Waste Safely. CoRWM's Recommendations to Government. Committee on Radioactive Waste Management, London. Also at 〈http://www.corwm.org.uk/pdf/FullReport.pdf〉 (accessed 20 November 2006).
17. DEFRA. Survey of Public Attitudes to Quality of Life and to the Environment: 2001 (2002), Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London
18. DETR. Climate Change: The UK Programme (2000), Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions, London
19. DTI. Energy White Paper: Our Energy Future-Creating a Low Carbon Economy (2003), Department of Trade and Industry, London
20. DTI. The Energy Challenge: Energy Review Report 2006 (2006), Department of Trade and Industry, London
21. DTI. The Future of Nuclear Power: The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon Economy (2007), Department of Trade and Industry, London
22. Eiser R.E., van de Pligt J., and Spears R. Nuclear Neighbourhoods: Community Responses to Reactor Siting (1995), University of Exeter Press, Exeter, Devon
23. European Commission, 2006. Attitudes Towards Energy. Special Eurobarometer 247, Wave 64.2, administered by TNS Opinion and Social Research, 〈http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_247_en.pdf〉 (accessed 20 July 2006).
24. European Environment Agency (EEA). Greenhouse Gas Emission Trends and Projections in Europe 2006. Report 9/2006 (2006), Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
25. Fischhoff B. Value elicitation: is there anything in there?. American Psychologist 46 (1991) 835-847
26. Flynn J. Nuclear stigma. In: Pidgeon N.F., Kasperson R.E., and Slovic P. (Eds). The Social Amplification of Risk (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
27. Freudenburg W.R. Heuristics, biases and the not so general public: expertise and error in the assessment of risks. In: Krimsky S., and Golding D. (Eds). Social Theories of Risk (1992), Praeger, Westport, CT
28. Freudenburg W.R., and Rosa E.A. Public Reaction to Nuclear Power; Are there Critical Masses? (1984), American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC
29. Gamson W.A., and Modigliani A. Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power. American Journal of Sociology 95 (1989) 1-37
30. Gregory R., Lichtenstein S., and Slovic P. Valuing environmental resources: a constructive approach. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7 (1993) 177-197
31. Gregory R., Fischhoff B., and McDaniels T. Acceptable input: using decision analysis to guide public policy deliberations. Decision Analysis 2 (2005) 4-16
32. Grove-White R., Kearnes M., Macnaghten P., and Wynne B. The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low-carbon Economy. Public Perceptions and Community Issues (2006), Sustainable Development Commission, London
33. Hecht G. The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after WWII (1998), MIT Press, Cambridge MA
34. HM Government. Climate Change: The UK Programme 2006 (2006), HMSO, London
35. Horlick-Jones T., Walls J., Rowe G., Pidgeon N.F., Poortinga W., Murdock G., and O'Riordan T. The GM Debate: Risk, Politics and Public Deliberation (2007), Routledge, London
36. House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee (EAC), 2007. Beyond Stern: From the Climate Change Programme to the Draft Climate Change Bill. The Seventh Report of Session 2006-07. HMSO, London.
37. Jasanoff S. Designs on Nature (2005), Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ
38. Jordan A.J. Decarbonising the UK: a 'radical agenda' from the Cabinet Office. Political Quarterly 73 (2002) 344-352
39. Kahan, D.M., Slovic, P., Braman, D., Gastil, J., Cohen, G.L., 2007. Affect, Values, and Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions: An Experimental Investigation. Cultural Cognition Project Working Paper No. 22. Yale University. Obtained from 〈http://research.yale.edu/culturalcognition/content/view/117〉 (accessed 25 May 2007).
40. Kasperson R.E., Jhaveri N., and Kasperson J.X. Stigma and the social amplification of risk: towards a framework of analysis. In: Flynn J., Slovic P., and Kunreuther H. (Eds). Risk, Media and Stigma (2001), Earthscan, London
41. Kasperson J.X., Kasperson R.E., Pidgeon N.F., and Slovic P. The social amplification of risk: assessing fifteen years of research and theory. In: Pidgeon N.F., Kasperson R.E., and Slovic P. (Eds). The Social Amplification of Risk (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
42. King, D., 2005. Select Committee on Environmental Audit Sixth Report. Oral evidence given on 17 November 2005, by Prof. Sir David King. See 〈http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmselect/cmenvaud/584/5111703.htm〉 (accessed 24 July 2006).
43. Kitzinger J. Framing and frame analysis. In: Devereux E. (Ed). Media Studies: Key Issues and Debates (2007), Sage, London
44. Knight R. What the polls tell us. Nuclear Engineering International April 2005 (2005) 24-25
45. Lichtenstein S., and Slovic P. The Construction of Preference (2006), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
46. Lorenzoni I., and Pidgeon N.F. Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic Change 77 1-2 (2006) 73-95
47. Lorenzoni I., Leiserowitz A., Doria M., Poortinga W., and Pidgeon N.F. Cross-national comparisons of image associations with 'global warming' and 'climate change' among laypeople in the United States of America and Great Britain. Journal of Risk Research 9 (2006) 265-281
48. McGowan, F., Sauter, R., 2005. Public Opinion on Energy Research: Desk Study for the Research Councils. Sussex Energy Group, Science and Technology Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex.
49. Miller C. The dynamics of framing environmental values and policy: four models of societal processes. Environmental Values 9 (2000) 211-233
50. Morgan M.G., Fischhoff B., Bostrom A., and Atman C.J. Risk Communication: a Mental Models Approach (2002), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
51. MORI/OST. Science in Society: Findings from Qualitative and Quantitative Research Conducted for the Office of Science and Technology (2005), Market and Opinion Research International (Social Research Institute), London
52. Norton A., and Leaman J. The Day After Tomorrow: Public Opinion on Climate Change (2004), Market and Opinion Research International (Social Research Institute), London
53. O'Riordan T., Kemp R., and Purdue M. Sizewell B: An Anatomy of the Inquiry (1988), MacMillan Press, Basingstoke
54. Pidgeon N.F., and Gregory R. Judgment, decision making and public policy. In: Koehler D., and Harvey N. (Eds). Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (2004), Blackwell, Oxford
55. Pidgeon N.F., Hood C., Jones D., Turner B.A., and Gibson R. Risk perception. Risk: Analysis, Perception and Management (1992), The Royal Society, London
56. Pidgeon N.F., Kasperson R.E., and Slovic P. The Social Amplification of Risk (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
57. Pidgeon N.F., Poortinga W., Rowe G., Horlick-Jones T., Walls J., and O'Riordan T. Using surveys in public participation processes for risk decision-making: the case of the 2003 British GM Nation? Public Debate. Risk Analysis 25 (2005) 467-480
58. Poortinga W., and Pidgeon N.F. Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Analysis 23 (2003) 961-972
59. Poortinga W., and Pidgeon N.F. Public Perceptions of Risk, Science and Governance: Main Findings of a British Survey of Five Risk Cases (2003), University of East Anglia Centre for Environmental Risk, Norwich
60. Poortinga W., and Pidgeon N.F. Trust in risk regulation: cause or consequence of the acceptability of GM food?. Risk Analysis 25 (2005) 197-207
61. Poortinga W., Pidgeon, N.F., Lorenzoni, I., 2006. Public Perceptions of Nuclear Power, Climate Change and Energy Options in Britain: Summary Findings of a Survey Conducted during October and November 2005. Technical Report (Understanding Risk Working Paper 06-02). University of East Anglia Centre for Environmental Risk, Norwich.
62. Rosa E.A. Déjà vu all over again for nuclear power? (Letter). Science 310 5748 (2005) 619
63. Rosa E.A., and Clark D.L. Historical routes to technological gridlock: nuclear technology as prototypical vehicle. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy 7 (1999) 21-57
64. Rosa E.A., and Dunlap R.E. Nuclear power-3 decades of public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly 58 2 (1994) 295-324
65. Rosa E.A., and Freudenburg W.R. The historical development of public reactions to nuclear power: implications for nuclear waste policy. In: Dunlap R.E., Kraft M.E., and Rosa E.A. (Eds). Public Reactions to Nuclear Waste: Citizens' Views of Repository Siting (1993), Duke University Press, Durham
66. Rosa E.A., Matsuda N., and Kleinhesselink R.R. The cognitive architecture of risk: pan-cultural unity or cultural shaping?. In: Renn O., and Rohrmann B. (Eds). Cross-cultural Risk Perception (2000), Kluwer, Dordrecht
67. Shackley S., McLachlan C., and Gough C. The public perception of carbon dioxide capture and storage in the UK: results from focus groups and a survey. Climate Policy 4 (2005) 377-398
68. Slovic P. The Perception of Risk (2000), Earthscan, London
69. Slovic P., Fischhoff B., and Lichtenstein S. Facts and fears: understanding perceived risk. In: Schwing R., and Albers W.A. (Eds). Societal Risk Assessment (1980), Plenum, New York
70. Slovic P., Layman M., Kraus N., Flynn J., Chalmers J., and Gesell G. Perceived risk, stigma and potential economic impacts of a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada. Risk Analysis 11 (1991) 683-696
71. Slovic P., Flynn J., Mertz C.K., Poumadère M., and Mays C. Nuclear power and the public: a comparative study of risk perception in France and the United States. In: Renn O., and Rohrmann B. (Eds). Cross-cultural Risk Perception (2000), Kluwer, Dordrecht
72. Slovic P., Finucane M., Peters E., and MacGregor D.G. The affect heuristic. In: Gilovich T., Griffin D., and Kahnman D. (Eds). Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (2002), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
73. Steg L., and Vlek C. Understanding and managing environmental resource use: a behavioral science perspective. In: Boersema J.J., and Reijnders L. (Eds). Principles of Environmental Science (2005), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam and Boston
74. Stern N. The Economics of Climate Change (2006), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
75. Sustainable Development Commission. The Role of Nuclear Power in a Low Carbon Economy (2006), Sustainable Development Commission, London
76. Tester J.W., Drake E.M., Driscoll M.J., Golay M.W., and Peters W.A. Sustainable Energy: Choosing Amongst Options (2005), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
77. Van der Pligt J. Nuclear Energy and the Public (1992), Blackwell, Oxford
78. Wolsink M. Wind power implementation: the nature of public attitudes-equity and fairness instead of 'backyard motives'. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 11 (2007) 1188-1207
79. Wynne B. Technology, risk and participation: on the social treatment of uncertainty. In: Conrad J. (Ed). Society, Technology and Risk (1980), Academic Press, New York
80. Wynne B. Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science 1 (1992) 281-304
81. Wynne B. Risk and social learning: reification to engagement. In: Krimsky S., and Golding D. (Eds). Social Theories of Risk (1992), Praeger, Westport, CT