Involving the public in climate and energy decisions

Environment

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 32-42

  Kasemir, Bernd ^a   Schibli, Daniela ^a   Stoll, Susanne ^a   Jaeger, Carlo C ^a  

^a SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF AQUATIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; POLICY; PUBLIC OPINION; REVIEW;

EID: 0034107088     PISSN: 00139157     EISSN: 19399154     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00139150009604874     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. E. B. Skolnikoff, “The Role of Science in Policy: The Climate Change Debate in the United States," Environment. June 1999, 16-20 and 42-45.
2. S. Jasaiiotf, “Acceptable Evidence in a Pluralistic Society." in D. G. Mayo and R. D. Hollander. eds., Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management (New York: Oxford University Press, 1901), 29-47.
3. B. Wynne. “May the Sheep Safely Graze?: A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide,” in S. Lash. B. Szersynski, and B. Wynne, eds., Risk, Environment, and Modernity (London: Sage Publications. 1996), 44 -83.
4. R. K. Merton. "The Focussed Interview and Focus Groups; Continuities and Discontinuities." Public Opinion Quarterly 51, no. 4 (1987): 550-66
5. D. L. Morgan and R. A. Krueger, The Focus Group Kit, vols. 1-6 (London: Sage Publications. 1998).
6. J. Weyant et al., "Integrated Assessment of Climate Change: An Overview and Comparison of Approaches and Results,” in J. Bruce. II. Lee. and E. Haitcs. eds., Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change (Cambridge. U.K.: Cambridge University Press tor the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1996)
7. J. Rotnians and M. R. A. van Asselt. “Integrated Assessment: A Growing Child on Its Way to Maturity—An Fditorial Essay,'“Climatic Change 34. no. 3-4 (1996): 327-36
8. S. J. Tol and P Vcllinga. “The European Forum on Integrated Environmental Assessment,” Environmental Modeling and Assessment 3, no. 3 (1998): 181-91.
9. J. Ale Amo, R Shaw, and L. Hordijk. The RAIHS Model of Acidification: Science and Strategies in Europe (Dordrccht. the Nctheilands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1990).
10. F. Toth and E. Httsnyik, “Integrated Environmental Assessment Methods: Evaluation and Applications,” Environmental Modeling and Assessment 3, no. 3 (1998): 193-207
11. S. H. Schneider. "Integrated Assessment Modeling of Global Climate Change: Transparent Rational Tool for Policy Making or Opaque Screen Hiding Value-Laden Assumptions? Environmental Modeling and Assessment 2. no. 4 (1997): 229-49.
12. B. Kasemir, M. B. A. van Asselt, G Diirrcnbergcr, and C. C. Jaeger, "Integrated Assessment of Sustainable Development: Multiple Perspectives in Interaction.” International Journal of Environment and Pollution 11. no. 4 (1999): 407-25.
13. A. GuimarSes Pereira, C. Gough, and B. De March, “Computers, Citizens, and Climate Change: The An of Communicating Technical Issues,” International Journal of Fminmment and Pollution 11. no. 3 (1999): 266-89
14. U. Dahinden, C. Querol. J. Jagcr, and M. Nilsson. Using Computer Models in Participatory Integrated Assessment: Experiences Gathered in the ULYSSF.S Project and Recommendations for Further Steps, ULYSSES WP-99-2 (Darmstadt. Germany: Center for Interdisciplinary Studies in Technology, Darmstadt University of Technology, 1999).
15. J. Alcaino, ed., IMAGE 2.0: Integrated Modeling of Global Climate Change (London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1994)
16. J. Rotmans and B. de Vries, eds., Perspectives on Global Change: The TARGETS Approach (Cambridge. U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1997)
17. C. Heaps, J. Sieber, and G. Pontius, Polestar System Manual (Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute. 1996)
18. C. Pahl-Wostl, C. Schlumpf, M. Bilssenschuit, A. Schonbom, and J. Burse. ‘Models at the Interface between Science and Society: Impacts and Options." Integrated Assessment(forthcoming).
19. C. C. Jaeger, R. Schlile, and B. Kasemir, “Focus Groups in Integrated Assessment: A Micro-Cosmos for Reflexive Modernization,” Innovation 12, no. 2 (1999): 195-219.
20. T Parson. The Struc ture of Social Action (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1937).
21. T. O’Rioidan. “From Environmentalism to Sustainability," Scottish Geography Journal 115, no. 2 (1999): 151-65.
22. J. Pretty, R. Hine, and K Deighton. "Participatory Appraisal for Community Assessment: Principles and Methods" (unpublished report. Centre for Environment and Society. University of Essex, Colchester. U.K., 1999). (accessed via www2.cssex.ac.uk/ces/CorcRcscarch/pacaoverview.html on 17 January 2000).
23. W. C. Clark and N. M. Dickson, The Global Environmental Assessment Project: Overview for 1998. GEA working paper (John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 1998).
24. O. Renn, T. Webler, and P. Wiedemann, eds., Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Models for Environmental Discourse (London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1995).
25. J. Jager, R Mitchell, and W. C. Clark. The Science/Policy Interface and the Role of Participation in Assessment Processes, Institutions Working Group Theme Paper, Global Environmental Assessment Project (John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. 1998)
26. W. Kempton and P. P. Cnug.”European Perspectives on Global Climate Change," Environment, April 1993. 16-20 and 41-45.
27. W. Kempton, "Lay Perspectives on Global Climate Change," Global Environmental Change 1, no. 3 (1991): 183-208.