Addition of functional content during core content instruction with students with moderate disabilities

Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 22-39

  Collins, Belva C ^a   Hager, Karen L ^a   Galloway, Carey Creech ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b Clark County Schools ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862602671     PISSN: 21541647     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Billingsley, F., White, O., & Munson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229-241.
2. Bracken, B., & McCallum, R. S. (1998). Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing Company.
3. Browder, D., & Cooper-Duffy, K. (2003). Evidencebased practices for students with severe disabilities and the requirement for accountability in "No Child Left Behind." Journal of Special Education, 37, 157-163. (Pubitemid 37364725)
4. Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Harris, A. A., & Wakeman, S. (2008). A metaanalysis o teaching mathematics to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74, 407-432.
5. Browder, D. M., Wakeman, S. Y, Sponer, F., Ahlgrim-Delzill, L., & Algozzine, B. (2006). Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 392-408. (Pubitemid 44126402)
6. Browder, D. M., & Xin, Y. P. (1998). A meta-analysis and review of sight word research and its implications for teacing functional reading to individuals with moderate and severe disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 32, 130-153.
7. Carter, E. W., Siseo, L. G., Melekoglu, M. A., & Kurkowski, C. (2007). Peer supports as an alternative to individually assigned paraprofessionals in inclusive high school classrooms. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 32, 213227.
8. Collins, B. C. (2007). Moderate to Severe Disabilities: A Foundational Approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
9. Collins, B. C., Evans, A., Galloway, C. G., Karl, A., & Miller, A. (2007). A comparison of the acquisition and maintenance of teaching functional and core content in special and general education settings. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 220-233.
10. Collins, B. C., Hall, M., Branson, T., & Holder, M. (1999). Acquisition of related and nonrelated nontargeted information presented by a teacher within an inclusive setting. Journal of Behavioral Education, 9, 223-237.
11. Collins, B. C., & Schuster, J. W. (2001). Some thoughts on the history of rural special education: A first hand account. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 20, 22-29.
12. Courtade, G. R., Spooner, F., & Browder, D. M. (2007). Review of studies with students with significant cognitive disabilities which link to science standards. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 32, 43-49.
13. Dymond, S. K., Renzaglia, A., Rosenstein, A., Chun, E. J., Banks, R. A., Niswanter, V., et al. (2006). Using a participatory action research approach to create a universally designed inclusive high school science course: A case study. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 293-308.
14. Dymond, S. K., Renzaglia, A., Gilson, C. L., & Slagor, M. T. (2007). Defining access to the general curriculum for high school students with significant cognitive disabilities. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 32, 1-15.
15. Falkenstine, K. J., Collins, B. C., Schuster, J. W., & Kleinert, K. (2009). Presenting chained and dis-crete tasks as nontargeted information when teaching discrete academic skills through small group instruction. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44, 127-142.
16. Harrison, P. L., & Oakland, T. (2003). Adaptive Behavior Assessment. USA: The Psychological Corp.
17. Helmstetter, E., Curry, C. A., Brennan, M., & Sampson-Saul, M. (1998). Comparison of general and special education classrooms of students with severe disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 216-227. (Pubitemid 128456185)
18. Holcombe, A., Wolery, M., & Gast, D. L. (1994). Comparative single-subject research: Description of designs and discussion of problems. Teacher Education and Special Education, 14, 119-145.
19. Horner, R. H., Albin, R. W., Todd, A. W., & Sprague, J. (2006). Positive behavior support for individuals with severe disabilities. In M. E. Snell & F. Brown (Eds.) Instruction of Students with Severe Disabilities (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Peason Merrill Prentice Hall.
20. Jameson, J. M., McDonnell, J., Johnson, J. W., Riesen, T., & Polychronis, S. (2007). A comparison of one-to-one embedded instruction in the general education classroom and one-to-one massed practice instruction in the special education classroom. Education and Treatment of Children, 30, 23-44.
21. Kennedy, C. H., Shukla, S., & Fryxell, D. (1997). Comparing the effects of educational placement on the social relationships of intermediate school students with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64, 31-47. (Pubitemid 127461251)
22. Logan, K. R., & Malone, D. M. (1998). Instructional contexts for students with moderate, severe, and profound intellectual disabilities in general education elementary classrooms. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 62-75. (Pubitemid 128453986)
23. McDonnell, J., Johnson, J. W., Polychronis, S., Riesen, T., Jameson, M., & Kercher, K. (2006). Comparison of one-to-one embedded instruction in general education classes with small group instruction in special education classes. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 125-138. (Pubitemid 44870292)
24. McDonnell, J., Thorson, N., & McQuivey, C. (2000). Comparison of the instructional contexts of students with severe disabilities and their peers in general education setting. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 25, 54-58.
25. McDonnell.J., Thorson, N., & McQuivey, C. (1998). The instructional characteristics of inclusive classes for elementary students with severe disabilities: An exploratory study. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 415-437.
26. Palmer, T., Collins, B. C., & Schuster.J. W. (1999). The use of a simultaneous prompting procedure to teach receptive manual sign identification to adults with disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 11, 179-191.
27. Schuster, J. W., Morse, T. E., Ault, M. J., Doyle, P. M., Crawford, M. R., & Wolery, M. (1998). Constant time delay and chained tasks: A review of literature. Education and Treatment of Children, 21, 74-106.
28. Smith, R. L., Collins, B. C., Schuster.J. W., & Kleinert, H. (1999). Teaching table cleaning skills to secondary students with moderate/severe disabilities: Measuring observational learning during downtime. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 342-353.
29. Stonecipher, E. L, Schuster.J. W., Collins, B. C., & Grisham-Brown, J. (1999). Teaching gift wrapping skills in a quadruple instructional arrangement using constant time delay, Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, II, 139-158.
30. Tawney.J., & Gast, D. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
31. Wechsler, D. (1997). The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children III. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment, Inc.
32. Wolery, M., AuIt, M. J., & Doyle, P. M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate to severe disabilities. NY: Longman.
33. Wolery, M., & Schuster.J. W. (1997). Instructional methods with students who have significant disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 31, 61-79.