Comparison of the Acquisition and Maintenance of Teaching Functional and Core Content Sight Words in Special and General Education Settings

Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 220-233

  Collins, Belva C ^a   Evans, Abby ^a   Creech Galloway, Carey ^a   Karl, Jennifer ^a   Miller, Angela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993734448     PISSN: 10883576     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/10883576070220040401     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Billingsley, F., White, O., & Munson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229—241.
2. Branham, R.S., Collins, B.C., Schuster, J.W., & Kleinert, H. (1999). Teaching community skills to students with moderate disabilities: Comparing combined techniques of classroom simulation, videotape modeling, and community-based instruction. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 170—181.
3. Brown, L., Branston, M.B., Hamre-Nietupski, S., Pumpian, I., Certo, N., & Gruenwald, L. (1979). A strategy for developing functional curricular content for severely handicapped adolescents and young adults. The Journal of Special Education, 13, 81—90.
4. Browder, D., & Cooper-Duffy, K. (2003). Evidence-based practices for students with severe disabilities and the requirement for accountability in “No Child Left Behind.” The Journal of Special Education, 37, 157—163.
5. Browder, D., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Flowers, C., Algozzine, B., & Karvonen, M. (2003). A content analysis of the curricular philosophies reflected in states' alternate assessment performance indicators. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 28, 165—181.
6. Browder, D.M., & Xin, Y.P. (1998). A meta-analysis and review of sight word research and its implications for teaching functional reading to individuals with moderate and severe disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 130—153.
7. Collins, B.C. (2007). Moderate to severe disabilities: A foundational approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
8. Collins, B.C., Branson, T.A., Hall, M., & Rankin, S.W. (2001). Teaching secondary students with moderate disabilities in an inclusive academic classroom setting. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 13, 41—59.
9. Collins, B.C., & Griffen, A.K. (1996). Teaching students with moderate disabilities to make safe responses to product warning labels. Education & Treatment of Children, 19, 30—45.
10. Collins, B.C., Hall, M., Branson, T., & Holder, M. (1999). Acquisition of related and nonrelated nontargeted information presented by a teacher within an inclusive setting. Journal of Behavioral Education, 9, 223-237.
11. Helmstetter, E., Curry, C.A., Brennan, M., & Sampson-Saul, M. (1998). Comparison of general and special education classrooms of students with severe disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 216—227.
12. Holcombe, A., Wolery, M., & Gast, D.L. (1994). Comparative single-subject research: Description of designs and discussion of problems. Teacher Education and Special Education, 14, 119—145.
13. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 120 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
14. Kennedy, C.H., Shukla, S., & Fryxell, D. (1997). Comparing the effects of educational placement on the social relationships of intermediate school students with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64, 31—47.
15. Logan, K.R., & Malone, D.M. (1998). Instructional contexts for students with moderate, severe, and profound intellectual disabilities in general education elementary classrooms. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 33, 62—75.
16. McDonnell, J., Johnson, J.W., Polychronis, S., Riesen, T., Jameson, M., & Kercher, K. (2006). Comparison of one-to-one embedded instruction in general education classes with small group instruction in special education classes. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 125—138.
17. McDonnell, J., Thorson, N., & McQuivey, C. (1998). The instructional characteristics of inclusive classes for elementary students with severe disabilities: An exploratory study. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 415—437.
18. McLeskey, J., Henry, D., & Hodges, D. (1999). Inclusion: What progress is being made across disability categories? Teaching Exceptional Children, 31(3), 60—64.
19. Miller, C., Collins, B.C., & Hemmeter, M.L. (2002). Using a naturalistic time delay procedure to teach nonverbal adolescents with moderate-to-severe intellectual disabilities to initiate manual signs. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 14, 247—261.
20. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq. (2002)
21. Palmer, T., Collins, B.C., & Schuster, J.W. (1999). The use of a simultaneous prompting procedure to teach receptive manual sign identification to adults with disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 11, 179—191.
22. Sindelar, P.T., Rosenberg, M.S., & Wilson, R.J. (1985). An adapted alternating treatments design for instructional research. Education & Treatment of Children, 8, 67—76.
23. Tawney, J., & Gast, D. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
24. Wechsler, D. (1997). The Wechsler intelligence scale for children III. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
25. Wechsler, D. (2003). The Wechsler intelligence scale for children IV. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
26. Wilkinson, G.S. (1993). Wide range achievement test 3. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
27. Zigmond, N. (2003). Where should students with disabilities receive special education services? Is one place better than another? The Journal of Special Education, 37, 193—199.