Instructional Contexts for Students with Moderate, Severe, and Profound Intellectual Disabilities in General Education Elementary Classrooms

Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 62-75

  Logan, Kent R ^a   Malone, D Michael ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042786147     PISSN: 10793917     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bayley, N. (1969). Manual for the Bayley scales of infant development. New York: Psychological Corporation.
2. Bauwens J., Hourcade, J. J., & Friend, M. (1989). Cooperative teaching: A model for general and special education integration. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 217-222.
3. Bulgren, J. A., & Carta, J. J. (1993). Examining the instructional contexts of students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59, 182-191.
4. Carta, J. J., Atwater, J. B., Schwartz, I. S., & Miller, P. A. (1990). Applications of ecobehavioral analysis to the study of transitions across early education settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 13, 298-315.
5. Carta, J. J., Greenwood, C. R., Schulte, D., Arreaga-Mayer, C., & Terry, B. (1988). Code for instructional structure and student academic response: Mainstream version (MS-CISSAR). Kansas City, KS: Juniper Gardens Children's Project, Bureau of Student Research, University of Kansas.
6. Clark, K. N., & Astuto, T. A. (1994). Redirecting reform. Phi Delta Kappa, 75, 512-520.
7. Cooper, D. H., & Speece, D. L. (1990). Maintaining at-risk children in regular education settings: Initial effects of individual differences and classroom environment. Exceptional Children, 54, 117-128.
8. Delaney, E. P., & Hopkins, T. F. (1987). The Stanford-Binet intelligence scale, 4th edition. Chicago: Riverside Publishing Corporation.
9. Falvey, M. A. (1995). Inclusive and heterogeneous schooling. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
10. Giangreco, M. F., & Putnam, J. (1991). Supporting the education of children with severe disabilities in the regular education environment. In L. H. Meyer, C. A. Peck, & L. Brown (Eds.), Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities (pp.245-270). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
11. Greenwood, C. R. (1991). Longitudinal analysis of time, engagement, and achievement in at-risk versus non-risk students. Exceptional Children, 57, 521-535.
12. Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., Kamps, D., & Arreaga-Mayer, C. (1990). Ecobehavioral analysis of classroom instruction. In S. Schroeder (Ed.), Ecobehavioral analysis and developmental disabilities. (pp. 33-63). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
13. Greenwood, C. A., Delquadri, J., Stanley, S., Terry, D., & Hall, R. V. (1985). Assessment of eco-behavioral interaction in school settings. Behavioral Assessment, 17, 521-538.
14. Hollowood, T. M., Salisbury, C. L., Rainforth, B., & Palombaro, M. M. (1995). Use of instructional time in classrooms serving students with and without severe disabilities. Exceptional Student, 61, 242-253.
15. Hunt, P., Farron-Davis, F., Beckstead, S., Curtis, D., & Goetz, L. (1994). Evaluating the effects of placement of students with severe disabilities in general education versus special classes. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 200-214.
16. Hunt, P., Staub, D., Alwell, M., & Goetz, L. (1994). Achievement by all students within the context of cooperative learning groups. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 290-301.
17. Kamps, D., Carta, J. J., Delquadri, J. C., Arreaga-Mayer, C., Terry, B., & Greenwood, C. R. (1989). School-based research and intervention. Education and Treatment of Children, 12, 359-390.
18. Kamps, D. M., Leonard, B. R., Dugan, E. P., Boland, B., & Greenwood, C. R. (1991). The use of ecobehavioral assessment to identify naturally occurring effective procedures in classrooms serving children with autism another developmental disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 1, 367-397.
19. Keefe, E. B. (1994). Ecobehavioral analysis of integrated settings for students with moderate to profound disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of New Mexico.
20. Logan, K. R., & Keefe, E. B. (1997). A comparison of instructional context, teacher behavior, and engaged behavior for students with severe disabilities in general education self-contained elementary school classrooms. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 22, 16-27.
21. Logan, K. R., & Malone, D. M. (1998). Comparing instructional contexts of students with and without severe disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 64, 343-358.
22. Logan, K. R., Bakeman, R., & Keefe, E. B. (1997). Effects of instructional variables on engaged behavior of students with disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 63, 481-499.
23. O'Sullivan, P. (1988). Quantitative and qualitative aspects of reading instruction for mildly handicapped elementary students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
24. Sparrow, S. S., Dalla, D. A., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1984). Vineland adaptive behavior scale. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
25. Stillman, R. D. (1975). Assessment of deaf-blind children: The Callier-Azusa scale. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
26. Thurlow, M., Ysseldyke, J., Graden, J., & Algozzine, B. (1983). What's "special" about the special education resource room for learning disabled students? Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 283-288.
27. Werts, M. G., Wolery, M., Snyder, E. D., & Caldwell, N. K. (1996). Teacher's perceptions of the supports critical to the success of inclusive programs. The Journal of the Association of Persons with Severe Handicaps, 21, 9-21.
28. Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Doyle, P. M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate to significant disabilities. White Plains: Longman Publishers.
29. Ysseldyke, J. E., Thurlow, M. L., Christenson, S. L., & Weiss, J. (1987). Time allocated to instruction of mentally retarded, learning disabled, emotionally disturbed, and nonhandicapped elementary students. Journal of Special Education, 21, 43-55.