Mitosis puts sisters in a strained relationship: Force generation at the kinetochore

Experimental Cell Research

Volumn 318, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1361-1366

  Umbreit, Neil T ^a   Davis, Trisha N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Aurora B; Chromosome segregation; Dam1 complex; Kinetochore; Microtubule; Mitosis; Ndc80 complex; Phosphorylation; Tension

Indexed keywords

AURORA B KINASE;

CELL DIVISION; CELL MATURATION; CENTROMERE; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; ENERGY CONVERSION; HUMAN; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPINDLE CELL;

EID: 84861939174     PISSN: 00144827     EISSN: 10902422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.04.008     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Nicklas R.B. Measurements of the force produced by the mitotic spindle in anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 1983, 97:542-548.
2. Cheeseman I.M., Desai A. Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9:33-46.
3. Asbury C.L., Gestaut D.R., Powers A.F., Franck A.D., Davis T.N. The Dam1 kinetochore complex harnesses microtubule dynamics to produce force and movement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103:9873-9878.
4. Franck A.D., Powers A.F., Gestaut D.R., Gonen T., Davis T.N., Asbury C.L. Tension applied through the Dam1 complex promotes microtubule elongation providing a direct mechanism for length control in mitosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9:832-837.
5. Powers A.F., Franck A.D., Gestaut D.R., Cooper J., Gracyzk B., Wei R.R., Wordeman L., Davis T.N., Asbury C.L. The Ndc80 kinetochore complex forms load-bearing attachments to dynamic microtubule tips via biased diffusion. Cell 2009, 136:865-875.
6. Akiyoshi B., Sarangapani K.K., Powers A.F., Nelson C.R., Reichow S.L., Arellano-Santoyo H., Gonen T., Ranish J.A., Asbury C.L., Biggins S. Tension directly stabilizes reconstituted kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Nature 2010, 468:576-579.
7. Tien J.F., Umbreit N.T., Gestaut D.R., Franck A.D., Cooper J., Wordeman L., Gonen T., Asbury C.L., Davis T.N. Cooperation of the Dam1 and Ndc80 kinetochore complexes enhances microtubule coupling and is regulated by aurora B. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 189:713-723.
8. Lampson M.A., Cheeseman I.M. Sensing centromere tension: Aurora B and the regulation of kinetochore function. Trends Cell Biol. 2011, 21:133-140.
9. Khodjakov A., Pines J. Centromere tension: a divisive issue. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12:919-923.
10. Kelly A.E., Funabiki H. Correcting aberrant kinetochore microtubule attachments: an Aurora B-centric view. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2009, 21:51-58.
11. Nicklas R.B., Ward S.C. Elements of error correction in mitosis: microtubule capture, release, and tension. J. Cell Biol. 1994, 126:1241-1253.
12. Nicklas R.B. Chromosome velocity during mitosis as a function of chromosome size and position. J. Cell Biol. 1965, 25:119-135. (Suppl.).
13. Kline-Smith S.L., Walczak C.E. Mitotic spindle assembly and chromosome segregation: refocusing on microtubule dynamics. Mol. Cell 2004, 15:317-327.
14. Cheeseman I.M., Anderson S., Jwa M., Green E.M., Kang J., Yates J.R., Chan C.S., Drubin D.G., Barnes G. Phospho-regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by the Aurora kinase Ipl1p. Cell 2002, 111:163-172.
15. Pinsky B.A., Tatsutani S.Y., Collins K.A., Biggins S. An Mtw1 complex promotes kinetochore biorientation that is monitored by the Ipl1/Aurora protein kinase. Dev. Cell 2003, 5:735-745.
16. King E.M., Rachidi N., Morrice N., Hardwick K.G., Stark M.J. Ipl1p-dependent phosphorylation of Mad3p is required for the spindle checkpoint response to lack of tension at kinetochores. Genes Dev. 2007, 21:1163-1168.
17. Shang C., Hazbun T.R., Cheeseman I.M., Aranda J., Fields S., Drubin D.G., Barnes G. Kinetochore protein interactions and their regulation by the Aurora kinase Ipl1p. Mol. Biol. Cell 2003, 14:3342-3355.
18. Dewar H., Tanaka K., Nasmyth K., Tanaka T.U. Tension between two kinetochores suffices for their bi-orientation on the mitotic spindle. Nature 2004, 428:93-97.
19. Tanaka T.U., Rachidi N., Janke C., Pereira G., Galova M., Schiebel E., Stark M.J., Nasmyth K. Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections. Cell 2002, 108:317-329.
20. Pinsky B.A., Kung C., Shokat K.M., Biggins S. The Ipl1-Aurora protein kinase activates the spindle checkpoint by creating unattached kinetochores. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8:78-83.
21. Hauf S., Cole R.W., LaTerra S., Zimmer C., Schnapp G., Walter R., Heckel A., van Meel J., Rieder C.L., Peters J.M. The small molecule Hesperadin reveals a role for Aurora B in correcting kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in maintaining the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 161:281-294.
22. Liu D., Vader G., Vromans M.J., Lampson M.A., Lens S.M. Sensing chromosome bi-orientation by spatial separation of aurora B kinase from kinetochore substrates. Science 2009, 323:1350-1353.
23. Maresca T.J., Salmon E.D. Intrakinetochore stretch is associated with changes in kinetochore phosphorylation and spindle assembly checkpoint activity. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 184:373-381.
24. Uchida K.S., Takagaki K., Kumada K., Hirayama Y., Noda T., Hirota T. Kinetochore stretching inactivates the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 184:383-390.
25. Sandall S., Severin F., McLeod I.X., Yates J.R., Oegema K., Hyman A., Desai A. A Bir1-Sli15 complex connects centromeres to microtubules and is required to sense kinetochore tension. Cell 2006, 127:1179-1191.
26. Shimogawa M.M., Widlund P.O., Riffle M., Ess M., Davis T.N. Bir1 is required for the tension checkpoint. Mol. Biol. Cell 2009, 20:915-923.
27. Ricke R.M., van Deursen J.M. Aurora B hyperactivation by Bub1 overexpression promotes chromosome missegregation. Cell Cycle 2011, 10:3645-3651.
28. Gestaut D.R., Graczyk B., Cooper J., Widlund P.O., Zelter A., Wordeman L., Asbury C.L., Davis T.N. Phosphoregulation and depolymerization-driven movement of the Dam1 complex do not require ring formation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10:407-414.
29. Chan Y.W., Jeyaprakash A.A., Nigg E.A., Santamaria A. Aurora B controls kinetochore-microtubule attachments by inhibiting Ska complex-KMN network interaction. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 196:563-571.
30. Welburn J.P., Vleugel M., Liu D., Yates J.R., Lampson M.A., Fukagawa T., Cheeseman I.M. Aurora B phosphorylates spatially distinct targets to differentially regulate the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Mol. Cell 2010, 38:383-392.
31. Cheeseman I.M., Chappie J.S., Wilson-Kubalek E.M., Desai A. The conserved KMN network constitutes the core microtubule-binding site of the kinetochore. Cell 2006, 127:983-997.
32. Ciferri C., Pasqualato S., Screpanti E., Varetti G., Santaguida S., Dos Reis G., Maiolica A., Polka J., De Luca J.G., De Wulf P., Salek M., Rappsilber J., Moores C.A., Salmon E.D., Musacchio A. Implications for kinetochore-microtubule attachment from the structure of an engineered Ndc80 complex. Cell 2008, 133:427-439.
33. Guimaraes G.J., Dong Y., McEwen B.F., Deluca J.G. Kinetochore-microtubule attachment relies on the disordered N-terminal tail domain of Hec1. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:1778-1784.
34. Cimini D., Fioravanti D., Salmon E.D., Degrassi F. Merotelic kinetochore orientation versus chromosome mono-orientation in the origin of lagging chromosomes in human primary cells. J. Cell Sci. 2002, 115:507-515.
35. Cimini D., Wan X., Hirel C.B., Salmon E.D. Aurora kinase promotes turnover of kinetochore microtubules to reduce chromosome segregation errors. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:1711-1718.
36. Cimini D., Howell B., Maddox P., Khodjakov A., Degrassi F., Salmon E.D. Merotelic kinetochore orientation is a major mechanism of aneuploidy in mitotic mammalian tissue cells. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 153:517-527.
37. Cimini D., Moree B., Canman J.C., Salmon E.D. Merotelic kinetochore orientation occurs frequently during early mitosis in mammalian tissue cells and error correction is achieved by two different mechanisms. J. Cell Sci. 2003, 116:4213-4225.
38. Gregan J., Polakova S., Zhang L., Tolic-Norrelykke I.M., Cimini D. Merotelic kinetochore attachment: causes and effects. Trends Cell Biol. 2011, 21:374-381.
39. Knowlton A.L., Lan W., Stukenberg P.T. Aurora B is enriched at merotelic attachment sites, where it regulates MCAK. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:1705-1710.
40. DeLuca J.G., Gall W.E., Ciferri C., Cimini D., Musacchio A., Salmon E.D. Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and attachment stability are regulated by Hec1. Cell 2006, 127:969-982.
41. DeLuca K.F., Lens S.M., DeLuca J.G. Temporal changes in Hec1 phosphorylation control kinetochore-microtubule attachment stability during mitosis. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124:622-634.
42. Lampson M.A., Renduchitala K., Khodjakov A., Kapoor T.M. Correcting improper chromosome-spindle attachments during cell division. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004, 6:232-237.
43. Guse A., Carroll C.W., Moree B., Fuller C.J., Straight A.F. In vitro centromere and kinetochore assembly on defined chromatin templates. Nature 2011, 477:354-358.
44. Gautier A., Juillerat A., Heinis C., Correa I.R., Kindermann M., Beaufils F., Johnsson K. An engineered protein tag for multiprotein labeling in living cells. Chem. Biol. 2008, 15:128-136.
45. Rieder C.L., Alexander S.P. Kinetochores are transported poleward along a single astral microtubule during chromosome attachment to the spindle in newt lung cells. J. Cell Biol. 1990, 110:81-95.
46. Hayden J.H., Bowser S.S., Rieder C.L. Kinetochores capture astral microtubules during chromosome attachment to the mitotic spindle: direct visualization in live newt lung cells. J. Cell Biol. 1990, 111:1039-1045.
47. Tanaka K., Mukae N., Dewar H., van Breugel M., James E.K., Prescott A.R., Antony C., Tanaka T.U. Molecular mechanisms of kinetochore capture by spindle microtubules. Nature 2005, 434:987-994.
48. Kapoor T.M., Lampson M.A., Hergert P., Cameron L., Cimini D., Salmon E.D., McEwen B.F., Khodjakov A. Chromosomes can congress to the metaphase plate before biorientation. Science 2006, 311:388-391.
49. Shimogawa M.M., Graczyk B., Gardner M.K., Francis S.E., White E.A., Ess M., Molk J.N., Ruse C., Niessen S., Yates J.R., Muller E.G., Bloom K., Odde D.J., Davis T.N. Mps1 phosphorylation of Dam1 couples kinetochores to microtubule plus ends at metaphase. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:1489-1501.
50. Shimogawa M.M., Wargacki M.M., Muller E.G., Davis T.N. Laterally attached kinetochores recruit the checkpoint protein Bub1, but satisfy the spindle checkpoint. Cell Cycle 2010, 9:3619-3628.