Breast magnetic resonance imaging

Radiologic Technology

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Johnson, Marlene M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST; BREAST DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY;

BREAST; BREAST DISEASES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

EID: 84861422624     PISSN: 00338397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Breast cancer facts & figures 2011-2012. American Cancer Society website. www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document /acspc-030975.pdf. Accessed October 31, 2011.
2. Newstead G. Breast MRI - update on DCIS. Course presented at: the Institute for Advanced Medical Education Practical Breast MRI Conference; February 25-27, 2011; Las Vegas, NV.
3. Jermal A, Siegel R, Xu J, et al. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60(5):277-300.
4. Shah SK, Greatrex K. Current role of magnetic resonance imaging in breast imaging: a primer for the primary care physician. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2005;18(6):478-490.
5. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007; 57(2):75-89.
6. Hoisington LA, Scherer DL, Berger KL. Breast MR imaging: applications and pitfalls. Radiol Technol. 2007;78(5):367-377.
7. ACR practice guideline for the performance of contrastenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast. The American College of Radiology website. www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality _safety/guidelines/breast/mri_breast.aspx. Accessed February 8, 2011.
8. Reddy DH, Mendelson EB. Incorporating new imaging models in breast cancer management. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2005;6(2):135-145.
9. Prasad SN, Houserkova D. The role of various modalities in breast imaging. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2007;151(2):209-218.
10. Ojeda-Fournier H, Comstock CE. MRI for breast cancer: current indications. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2009;19(2):161-169.
11. Smith AP, Hall PA, Marcello DM. Emerging technologies in breast cancer detection. Radiol Manage. 2004;26(4): 16-24.
12. Hata T, Takahashi H, Watanabe K, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198(2):190-197.
13. Hendrick RE. Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies. Radiology. 2010;257(1):246-253.
14. Bassett LW, Dhaliwal S, Eradat J, et al. National trends and practices in breast MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(2):332-339.
15. Lufkin RB. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. In: Lufkin RB, ed. The MRI Manual. 2nd ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 1998:301-314.
16. Westbrook C. Contrast agents in MRI. In: Westbrook C, ed. MRI in practice. 4th ed. Chelsea, MI: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011:393-395.
17. Macura KJ, Ouwerkerk R, Jacobs MA, Bluemke DA. Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls. Radiographics. 2006;26(6):1719-1734.
18. Kinkel K, Vlastos G. MR imaging: breast cancer staging and screening. Semin Surg Oncol. 2001;20(3):187-196.
19. Odle T. Breast MR. Radiol Tech. 2006;78(1):45M-66M.
20. Rausch DR, Hendrick RE. How to optimize clinical breast MR imaging practices and techniques on your 1.5-T system. Radiographics. 2006;26(5);1469-1484.
21. MRI of the breast. RadiologyInfo.org. www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info.cfm?pg=breastmr. Accessed January 30, 2011.
22. Breast MRI. Mayo Clinic website. www.mayoclinic.com /health/breast-mri/MY00300. Accessed February 5, 2011.
23. Hendrick R, Morris E, Tanenbaum L. State-of-the-art contrast enhanced MRI of the breast: technical considerations. Bracco eLearning Center website. www.bracco.theonlinelearningcenter.com. Accessed February 20, 2011.
24. Eby P. Basics of image acquisition. Course presented at: Institute for Advanced Medical Education Practical Breast MRI Conference; February 25-27, 2011; Las Vegas, NV.
25. American College of Radiology Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media. ACR Manual on Contrast Media, Version 7, 2010. Adverse reactions to gadolinium-based contrast media. www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories /quality_safety/contrast_manual/FullManual. aspx#page=48. Accessed January 20, 2011.
26. Yee KM. Breast MRI screening benefits women with radiation therapy history. AuntMinnie website. www.aunt minnie.com/index.asp?sec=ser&sub=def&pag=dis&Item ID=94227. Accessed March 17, 2011.
27. Lehman CD, Blume JD, Weatherall P, et al. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2005;103(9):1898-1905.
28. Lord SJ, Lei W, Craft P, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an addition to mammography and ultrasound in screening young women at high risk of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43(13):1905-1917.
29. Lee JM, Kopans DB, McMahon PM, et al. Breast cancer screening in BRCA1 mutation carriers: effectiveness of MR imaging-Markov Monte Carlo decision analysis. Radiology. 2008;246(3):763-771.
30. Warner E, Plewes D, Hill KA, et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA. 2004;292(11):1317-1325.
31. Uematsu T, Yuen S, Kasami M, Uchida Y. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;103(3):269-281.
32. MARIBS study group. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet. 2005;365(9473):1769-1778.
33. Le-Petross HT. Breast MRI as a screening tool: the appropriate role. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2006;4(5):523-526.
34. Rankin SC, MRI of the breast. Br J Radiol. 2000;73 (872):806-818.
35. Phillips C. MRI detects nearly all contralateral breast cancers. NCI Cancer Bulletin. National Cancer Institute website. www.cancer.gov/aboutnci/ncicancerbulletin/archive /2007/040307/page2. Accessed September 14, 2011.
36. Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(13):1295-1303.
37. Gutierrez RL, DeMartini WB, Silbergeld JJ, et al. High cancer yield and positive predictive value: outcomes at a center routinely using preoperative breast MRI for staging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196W93-W99.
38. Schell A, Rosenkranz K, Lewis P. Role of breast MRI in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(5):1438-1444.
39. Smith RA. The evolving role of MRI in the detection and evaluation of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356 (13):1362-1364.
40. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examinations, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology. 2004;233(3):830-849.
41. Houssami N, Hayes DF. Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer? CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59 (5):290-302.
42. Mann RM. The effectiveness of MR imaging in the assessment of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2010;18(2):259-276.
43. DiCostanzo D, Rosen PP, Gareen I, et al. Prognosis in infiltrating lobular carcinoma. An analysis of "classical" and variant tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 1990;14(1):12-23.
44. Berg W, Birdwell R, Gombos E, et al. Diagnostic Imaging: Breast. 1st ed. Salt Lake City, UT: Amirsys; 2006.
45. Chung A, Saouaf R, Scharre K, Phillips E. The impact of MRI on the treatment of DCIS. Am Surg. 2005;71(9): 705-710.
46. Hlawatsch A, Teifke A, Schmidt M, Thelen M. Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179(6):1493-1501.
47. Hardy K. Technology update: MRI. Radiology Today. 2011;12(1):12. www.radiologytoday.net/archive/rt0111p12.shtml. Accessed January 10, 2011.
48. Brennan S, Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Morris E. Breast MRI screening of women with a personal history of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195(2):510-516.
49. Hashimoto B, Bauermeister D. Breast Imaging: A Correlative Atlas. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2003.
50. Liberman L, Mason G, Morris EA, Dershaw DD. Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(2):426-430.
51. Ellis RL. Optimal timing of breast MRI examinations for premenopausal women who do not have a normal menstrual cycle. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:1738-1740.
52. Ganau S, Sentis M, Tortajada L. Use of serum progesterone concentration for timing breast MRI examinations and avoiding false-negative findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195(1):W85.
53. Moore SG, Shenoy PJ, Fanucchi L, et al. Cost-effectiveness of MRI compared to mammography for breast cancer screening in a high risk population. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:9.
54. Le-Petross CH, Bidaut L, Yang WT. Evolving role of imaging modalities in inflammatory breast cancer. Semin Oncol. 2008;35(1):51-63.
55. Abramovici G, Mainiero MB. Screening breast MR imaging: comparison of interpretation of baseline and annual follow-up studies. Radiology. 2011;259(1):85-91.
56. Nelson M. How to use breast MRI in a breast center including how to evaluate coils. Course presented at: Institute for Advanced Medical Education Practical Breast MRI Conference; February 25-27, 2011; Las Vegas, NV.
57. Berman CG. Recent advances in breast-specific imaging. Cancer Control. 2007;14(4):338-349.
58. Ferrara A. Nuclear imaging in breast cancer. Radiol Tech. 2010;81(3):233-246.
59. Kerr M. Routine MRI at breast cancer diagnosis linked to treatment delays. American College of Radiology website. www.acr.org/Secondary MainMenu Categories/NewsPublications/Featured Categories /CurrentHealthCareNews/More/BreastMRILinked toTreatmentDelays.aspx. Last updated September 9, 2008. Accessed March 2, 2011.
60. Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL, et al. Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209(2):180-187.
61. Forrest W. Pre-op MRI finds added tumors with no major delay in surgery. AuntMinnie website. www.auntminnie.com/index.aspx?sec=prtf&sub=def&pag=dis&itemId=94 487&prin. Accessed March 15, 2011.
62. Griebsch I, Brown J, Boggis C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of screening with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging vs X-ray mammography of women at high familial risk of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006;95 (7):801-810.
63. Hayes E. Elastography stretches horizons of breast ultrasound. Diagnostic Imaging website. www.diagnosticimag ing.com/ultrasound/content/article/113619/1191987. Accessed November 8, 2011.
64. Forrest W. Breast MRI benefits from CAD for distant metastasis. AuntMinnie website. www.auntminnie.com /index.asp?sec=ser&sub=def&pag=dis&ItemID=94571. Accessed March 15, 2011.
65. Quantitative image analysis/computer-aided diagnosis. The University of Chicago Medical Center Department of Radiology website. www.radiology.uchicago.edu/index.php?q=quantitative-image-analysis-and-computer-aided -diagnosis/quantitative-image-analysiscomputer-aided-d. Accessed September 15, 2011.
66. McCarthy, Alice. ARRS 2009: diffusion-weighted imaging may improve accuracy of breast MRI. Medscape Medical News website. http://medscape.com/viewarticle/702282. Accessed November 9, 2011.
67. Kul S, Cansu A, Alhan E, et al. Contribution of diffusionweighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(1):210-217.
68. Gutierrez R, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, et al. BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(4):994-1000.
69. Implementing the ACR BI-RADS - MRI lexicon in clinical practice. American College of Radiology website. www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories /quality_safety/BIRADSAtlas/BIRADSAtlasexcerpted text/BIRADSMRIFirstEdition/Implementingthe ACRBIRADSMRIinClinicalPracticeDoc3.aspx. Accessed September 15, 2011.
70. Baltzer PA, Benndorf M, Dietzel M, Gajda M, Runnebaum IB, Kaiser WA. False-positive findings at contrast enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(6):1658-1663.
71. Elsamaloty H, Elzawawi MS, Mohammad S, Herial N. Increasing accuracy of detection of breast cancer with 3-T MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(4):1142-1148.
72. Yang WT, Lai CJ, Whitman GJ, Murphy WA Jr, et al. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection and characterization of simulated small masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187(6):W576-W581.
73. Helvie M. Full field digital mammography: a new breast cancer screening tool. CancerNews website. http:// cancernews.com/data/Article/210.asp. Accessed September 15, 2011.
74. FDA approves first 3-D mammography imaging system. U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements /ucm243072.htm. Accessed September 15, 2011.
75. Berg WA, Madsen KS, Schilling K, et al. Breast cancer: comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MR imaging in presurgical planning for the ipsilateral breast. Radiology. 2011;258(1):59-72.
76. Hruska CB, Boughey JC, Phillips SW, et al. Scientific Impact Recognition Award: molecular breast imaging: a review of the Mayo Clinic experience. Am J Surg. 2008;196(4):470-476.
77. Imbriaco M, Caprio MG, Limite G, et al. Dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT versus dynamic breast MRI of suspicious breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(5):1323-1330.
78. Elastography. Wikipedia website. http://en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Elastography. Accessed September 15, 2011.
79. Satake H, Nishio A, Ikeda M, et al. Predictive value for malignancy of suspicious breast masses of BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 using ultrasound elastography and MR diffusion-weighted imaging. AJR Women's Imaging Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(1):202-209.
80. Zhi H, Ou B, Luo BM, Feng X, Wen YL, Yang HY. Comparison of ultrasound elastography, mammography, and sonography in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions. J Ultrasound Med. 2007;26(6):807-815.