Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: A comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Volumn 198, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 190-197

  Hata, Tunetake ^a   Takahashi, Hiromasa ^a,b   Watanabe, Kenichi ^a   Takahashi, Masato ^a   Taguchi, Kazunori ^a   Itoh, Tomoo ^a   Todo, Satoru ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NONE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0842286506     PISSN: 10727515     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.10.008     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Heywang S.H., Hahn D., Schmidt H., et al. MR imaging of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA. J Comput Assist Tomograr. 10:1986;99-204.
2. Lindley R., Bulman A., Parsons P., et al. Histologic features predictive of an increased risk of early local recurrence after treatment of breast cancer by local tumor excision and radical radiotherapy. Surgery. 105:1989;13-20.
3. Holland R., Connolly J.L., Gelman R., et al. The presence of an extensive intraductal component following a limited excision correlates with prominent residual disease in the remainder of the breast. J Clin Oncol. 8:1990;113-118.
4. Mumtaz H., Hall-Craggs M.A., Davidson T., et al. Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 169:1997;417-424.
5. Hiramatu H., Enomoto K., Ikeda T., et al. The role of contrast-enhanced high resolution MRI in the surgical planning of breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 4:1997;285-290.
6. Date S. Diagnosis of intraductal spread of breast cancer by high-resolution MR imaging correlation between MR imaging and pathohistological findings . Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 58:1998;212-220.
7. Drew P.J., Chatterjee S., Turnbull L.W., et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast is superior to triple assessment for the pre-operative detection of multifocal breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 6:1999;599-603.
8. Gatzemeier W., Liesch T., Stylianou A., et al. Preoperative MR mammography in breast carcinoma. Effect on operative treatment from the surgical viewpoint. Chirurg. 70:1999;1460-1468.
9. Shiraishi A., Suzuki M., Nozu S., et al. Diagnosis of breast cancer extent and enhance patterns using 3D-dynamic imaging correlation with intraductal component . Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 59:1999;122-130.
10. Malur S., Wurdinger S., Moritz A., et al. Comparison of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography. Breast Cancer Res. 3:2001;55-60.
11. Tamaki Y., Akashi-Tanaka S., Ishida T., et al. 3D imaging of intraductal spread of breast cancer and its clinical application for navigation surgery. Breast Cancer Res. 9:2002;289-295.
12. Nakahara H., Namba K., Wakamatsu H., et al. Extension of breast cancer comparison of CT and MRI . Radiat Med. 20:2002;17-23.
13. Hermanke L.H., Sobin L.H. International Union Against Cancer (UICC): TNM classification of malignant tumors, 4th ed. 1989;Springer, Berlin.
14. Kuhl C.K., Mielcareck P., Klaschik S., et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging. Are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology. 211:1989;101-110.
15. Heywang S.H., Wolf A., Pruss E., et al. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA; use and limitations. Radiology. 171:1989;95-103.
16. Kaiser W.A., Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast; Fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. Radiology. 170:1989;681-686.
17. Stack J.P., Redmond O.M., Codd M.B., et al. Breast disease tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles . Radiology. 174:1990;491-494.
18. Histological typing of breast tumours. International histological classification of tumours. 2nd ed. 1981;World Health Organization, Geneva.
19. Gilles R., Guinebretiere J.M., Lucidarme O., et al. Nonpalpable breast tumors diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging . Radiology. 191:1994;625-631.
20. Boetes C., Mus R.D., Holland R., et al. Breast tumor comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent . Radiology. 197:1995;743-747.
21. Orel S.G., Schnall M.D. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology. 220:2001;13-30.
22. Bone B., Aspelin P., Bronge L., et al. Sensitivity and specificity of MR mammography with histopathological correlation in 250 breasts. Acta Radiol. 37:1996;208-213.
23. Helbich T.H., Becherer A., Trattnig S., et al. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions MR imaging versus Tc-99m sestamibi scintimammography . Radiology. 202:1997;421-429.
24. Fischer U., Kopka L., Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach . Radiology. 213:1999;881-888.
25. Wedegartner U., Bick U., Wortler K., et al. Differentiation between benign and malignant findings on MR-mammography usefulness of morphological criteria . Eur Radiol. 11:2001;1645-1650.
26. Davis P.L., Staiger M.J., Harris K.B., et al. Breast cancer measurement with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 37:1996;1-9.
27. Ando Y., Fukatsu H., Ishiguchi T., et al. Diagnostic utility of tumor vascularity on magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Magn Reson Imaging. 18:2000;807-813.
28. Nunes L.W., Schnall M.D., Orel S.G., et al. Breast MR imaging. Interpretation model. Radiology. 202:1997;833-841.
29. Orel S.G. Differentiating benign from malignant enhancing lesions identified at MR imaging of the breast are time-signal intensity curves an accurate predictor? Radiology. 211:1999;5-7.
30. Abner A.L., Recht A., Eberlein T., et al. Prognosis following salvage mastectomy for recurrence in the breast after conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 11:1993;44-48.
31. Fisher B., Bauer M., Margolese R., et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 14:1985;312. 665-673.
32. Lagios M.D., Margolin F.R., Westdahl P.R., et al. Mammographically detected duct carcinoma in situ. Frequency of local recurrence following tylectomy and prognostic effect of nuclear grade on local recurrence. Cancer. 63:1989;15. 618-624.
33. Fisher E.R., Sass R., Fisher B., et al. Pathologic findings of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (Protocol 6). I. Intraductal carcinoma (DCIS). Cancer. 15:(57):1986;197-208.
34. Satake H., Shimamoto K., Sawaki A., et al. Role of ultrasonography in the detection of intraductal spread of breast cancer correlation with pathologic findings, mammography and MR imaging . Eur Radiol. 10:2000;1726-1732.
35. Gilles R., Zafrani B., Guinebretiere J.M., et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ MR imaging-histopathologic correlation . Radiology. 196:1995;415-419.
36. Kawashima H. Fat suppressed dynamic MR imaging of breast cancer. Radiologic-pathologic correlation. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 56:1996;459-569.
37. Orel S.G., Mendonca M.H., Reynolds C., et al. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology. 202:1997;413-420.
38. Ando Y., Fukatsu H., Ishigaki T., et al. Intramammary extension of breast cancer diagnosis with MR mammography . Breast Cancer. 5:1998;291-300.