BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 193, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 994-1000

  Gutierrez, Robert L ^a,b   DeMartini, Wendy B ^a,b   Eby, Peter R ^a,b   Kurland, Brenda F ^c   Peacock, Sue ^a,b   Lehman, Constance D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b SEATTLE CANCER CARE ALLIANCE   (United States)

^c Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

BI RADS; Breast; Masses; Morphology; MRI

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST LESION; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER RISK; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TUMOR VOLUME;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 70349656676     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.1983     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Lehman CD, Schnall MD. Imaging in breast cancer: magnetic resonance imaging. Breast Cancer Res 2005; 7:215-219
2. Lehman CD, Blume JD, Weatherall P, et al. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 2005; 103:1898-1905 (Pubitemid 40563263)
3. Lehman CD, Schnall MD, Kuhl CK, Harms SE. Report of the Working Groups on Breast MRI: report of the High-Risk Screening Group. Breast J 2004; 10[suppl 2]:S9-S12 (Pubitemid 39287475)
4. Liberman L, Mason G, Morris EA, Dershaw DD. Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size. AJR 2006; 186:426-430 (Pubitemid 46100312)
5. DeMartini WB, Lehman CD, Peacock S, Russell MT. Computer-aided detection applied to breast MRI: assessment of CAD-generated enhancement and tumor sizes in breast cancers before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Acad Radiol 2005; 12:806-814 (Pubitemid 41008673)
6. Harms SE, Flamig DP. MR imaging of the breast: technical approach and clinical experience. RadioGraphics 1993; 13:905-912
7. Lehman CD, Blume JD, Thickman D, et al. Added cancer yield of MRI in screening the contralateral breast of women recently diagnosed with breast cancer: results from the International Breast Magnetic Resonance Consortium (IBMC) trial. J Surg Oncol 2005; 92:9-15; discussion 15-16 (Pubitemid 41416422)
8. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, et al. MRI detection of distinct incidental cancer in women with primary breast cancer studied in IBMC 6883. J Surg Oncol 2005; 92:32-38 (Pubitemid 41416426)
9. Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel SG, et al. Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 2003; 98:468-473 (Pubitemid 36885985)
10. Tan JE, Orel SG, Schnall MD, Schultz DJ, Solin LJ. Role of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging-guided surgery in the evaluation of patients with early-stage breast cancer for breast conservation treatment. Am J Clin Oncol 1999; 22:414-418
11. Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1295-1303 (Pubitemid 46513295)
12. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG, et al. Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology 1997; 202:833-841
13. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG. Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model. Radiology 2001; 219:484-494 (Pubitemid 32336366)
14. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Siegelman ES, et al. Diagnostic performance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast. AJR 1997; 169:409-415
15. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 2006; 238:42-53 (Pubitemid 43010579)
16. American College of Radiology. ACR BI-RADS: magnetic resonance imaging. In: ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast imaging atlas. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
17. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986; 73:13-22
18. Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MJ, et al. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR 2002; 179:171-178 (Pubitemid 34694831)
19. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999; 211:101-110 (Pubitemid 29161739)
20. Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ, et al. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. AJR 2000; 175:35-43 (Pubitemid 30415534)