Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: Is there any value?

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 103, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 269-281

  Uematsu, Takayoshi ^a   Yuen, Sachiko ^a   Kasami, Masako ^a   Uchida, Yoshihiro ^a  

^a SHIZUOKA CANCER CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

BI RADS; Microcalcification; MR imaging; Negative predictive value; Positive predictive value; Screening mammography; Stereotactic vacuum assisted breast biopsy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; BREAST SURGERY; CALCIFICATION; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALCINOSIS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;

EID: 34250684640     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-006-9373-y     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, et al (2005) Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353(17):1784-1792
2. Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, et al (2002) Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 137:347-360
3. Morrow M, Schnitt SJ, Harris JR (2000) Ductal carcinoma in situ and microinvasive carcinoma. In: Harris JR (ed) Disease of the breast, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia
4. Bassett LW (1992) Mammographic analysis of calcifications. Radiol Clin North Am 30(1):93-105
5. American College of Radiology (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 4th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston
6. Olsen O, Gotzsche PC (2001) Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet 358(9290):1340-1342
7. Kettritz U, Rotter K, Schreer I, et al (2004) Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients. Cancer 100(2):245-251
8. Liberman L, Abramson AF, Squires FB, et al (1998) The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171(1):35-40
9. Orel SG, Kay N, Reynolds C, et al (1999) BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. Radiology 211(3):845-850
10. Mendez A, Cabanillas F, Echenique M, et al (2004) Evaluation of breast imaging reporting and data system category 3 mammograms and the use of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in a nonacademic community practice. Cancer 100(4):710-714
11. Mendez A, Cabanillas F, Echenique M, et al (2003) Mammographic features and correlation with biopsy findings using 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVABB). Ann Oncol 15(3):450-454
12. Sickles EA (1991) Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. Radiology 179(2):463-468
13. Varas X, Leborgne F, Leborgne JH (1992) Nonpalpable, probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography. Radiology 184(2):409-414
14. Pijnappel RM, Peeters PH, Hendriks JH, et al (2004) Reproducibility of mammographic classifications for non-palpable suspect lesions with microcalcifications. Br J Radiol 77(916):312-314
15. Fondrinier E, Lorimier G, Guerin-Boblet V, et al (2002) Breast microcalcifications: multivariate analysis of radiologic and clinical factors for carcinoma. World J Surg 26(3):290-296
16. Liberman L (2004) Breast cancer screening with MRI-what are the data for patients at high risk? N Engl J Med 351(5):497-500
17. Orel SG, Schnall MD (2001) MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 220:13-30
18. Kneeshaw PJ, Lowry M, Manton D, et al (2006) Differentiation of benign from malignant breast disease associated with screening detected microcalcifications using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Breast 15(1):29-38
19. Westerhof JP, Fischer U, Moritz JD, et al (1998) MR imaging of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications: is there any value? Radiology 207(3):675-681
20. Gilles R, Meunier M, Lucidarme O, et al (1996) Clustered breast microcalcifications: evaluation by dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20(1):9-14
21. Nakahara H, Namba K, Fukami A, et al (2001) Three-dimensional MR imaging of mammographically detected suspicious microcalcifications. Breast Cancer 8:116-124
22. Bazzocchi M, Zuiani C, Panizza P, et al (2006) Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1723-1732
23. Rubin E (1999) Six-month follow-up: an alternative view. Radiology 213:15-18
24. Hall FM (2002) Malignancy in BI-RADS category 3 mammographic lesions. Radiology 225(3):918-919
25. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, et al (1997) Clip placement after stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology 205(2):417-422
26. D'Orsi CJ (1996) The American College of Radiology mammography lexicon: an initial attempt to standardize terminology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166(4):779-780
27. Berg WA, Arnoldus CL, Teferra E, et al (2001) Biopsy of amorphous breast calcifications: pathologic outcome and yield at stereotactic biopsy. Radiology 221:495-503
28. Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MJ, et al (2002) Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179(1):171-178
29. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG, et al (1997) Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology 202:833-841
30. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Siegelman ES, et al (1997) Diagnostic performance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169(2):409-415
31. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, et al (2003) Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181(2):519-525
32. Liberman L, Morris EA, Benton CL, et al (2003) Probably benign lesions at breast magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 98(2):377-388
33. Kuhl CK, Bieling HB, Gieseke J, et al (1997) Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. Radiology 203:137-144
34. Echevarria JJ, Martin M, Saiz A, et al (2006) Overall breast density in MR mammography: diagnostic and therapeutic implications in breast cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30(1):140-147