False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: A BI-RADS descriptor study

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 194, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1658-1663

  Baltzer, Pascal A T ^a   Benndorf, Matthias ^a   Dietzel, Matthias ^a   Gajda, Mieczyslaw ^a   Runnebaum, Ingo B ^a   Kaiser, Werner A ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast MRI; False positive; MR mammography; Sensitivity; Specificity

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST LESION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; BIOPSY; BREAST TUMOR; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 77953269614     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3486     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Kuhl CK. Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications. Radiology 2007; 244:672-691
2. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, et al. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:8469-8476 (Pubitemid 46260243)
3. Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA, et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 2004; 292:1317-1325 (Pubitemid 39223222)
4. Facius M, Renz DM, Neubauer H, et al. Characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ in magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Imaging 2007; 31:394-400 (Pubitemid 350051365)
5. Fischer DR, Baltzer P, Malich A, et al. Is the "blooming sign" a promising additional tool to determine malignancy in MR mammography? Eur Radiol 2004; 14:394-401 (Pubitemid 38324913)
6. Fischer DR, Malich A, Wurdinger S, Boettcher J, Dietzel M, Kaiser WA. The adjacent vessel on dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI. AJR 2006; 187:338; [web]W147-W151
7. Fischer U, von Heyden D, Vosshenrich R, Vieweg I, Grabbe E. Signal characteristics of malignant and benign lesions in dynamic 2D-MRT of the breast [in German]. Rofo 1993; 158:287-292 (Pubitemid 23148292)
8. Kaiser WA. False-positive results in dynamic MR mammography: causes, frequency, and methods to avoid. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1994; 2:539-555
9. Kuhl CK, Klaschik S, Mielcarek P, Gieseke J, Wardelmann E, Do Schild HH. T2-weighted pulse sequences help with the differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions in dynamic breast MRI? J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9:187-196 (Pubitemid 29115340)
10. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999; 211:101-110 (Pubitemid 29161739)
11. Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MJ, et al. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR 2002; 179:171-178 (Pubitemid 34694831)
12. Malich A, Fischer DR, Wurdinger S, et al. Potential MRI interpretation model: differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses. AJR 2005; 185:964-970
13. Matsubayashi R, Matsuo Y, Edakuni G, Satoh T, Tokunaga O, Kudo S. Breast masses with peripheral rim enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: correlation of MR findings with histologic features and expression of growth factors. Radiology 2000; 217:841-848
14. Morakkabati-Spitz N, Leutner C, Schild H, Traeber F, Kuhl C. Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI. Eur Radiol 2005; 15:2010-2017 (Pubitemid 41222910)
15. Neubauer H, Li M, Kuehne-Heid R, Schneider A, Kaiser WA. High grade and non-high grade ductal carcinoma in situ on dynamic MR mammography: characteristic findings for signal increase and morphological pattern of enhancement. Br J Radiol 2003; 76:3-12 (Pubitemid 36236293)
16. Sakamoto N, Tozaki M, Higa K, et al. Categorization of non-mass-like breast lesions detected by MRI. Breast Cancer 2008; 15:241-246
17. Tozaki M, Fukuda K. High-spatial-resolution MRI of non-masslike breast lesions: interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors. AJR 2006; 187:330-337 (Pubitemid 44148274)
18. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA - preliminary observations. Radiology 1989; 170:681-686 (Pubitemid 19062582)
19. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kinkel K, et al. Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 13:889-895 (Pubitemid 32479947)
20. Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK, et al. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 2005; 365:1769-1778 (Pubitemid 40744657)
21. American College of Radiology. BI-RADS: MRI, 1st ed. In: Breast imaging reporting and data system: BI-RADS atlas. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
22. Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values. BMJ 1994; 309:102
23. Baltzer PA, Renz DM, Herrmann KH, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in MR mammography (MRM): clinical comparison of echo planar imaging (EPI) and half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) diffusion techniques. Eur Radiol 2009; 19:1612-1620
24. Orel SG, Mendonca MH, Reynolds C, Schnall MD, Solin LJ, Sullivan DC. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology 1997; 202:413-420
25. Mendez A, Cabanillas F, Echenique M, Malekshamran K, Perez I, Ramos E. Mammographic features and correlation with biopsy findings using 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVABB). Ann Oncol 2004; 15:450-454 (Pubitemid 38444548)
26. Liberman L, Mason G, Morris EA, Dershaw DD. Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size. AJR 2006; 186:426-430 (Pubitemid 46100312)
27. Putti TC, Pinder SE, Elston CW, Lee AH, Ellis IO. Breast pathology practice: most common problems in a consultation service. Histopathology 2005; 47:445-457
28. Bartella L, Thakur SB, Morris EA, et al. Enhancing nonmass lesions in the breast: evaluation with proton (1H) MR spectroscopy. Radiology 2007; 245:80-87 (Pubitemid 47417790)