Screening breast MR imaging: Comparison of interpretation of baseline and annual follow-up studies

Radiology

Volumn 259, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 85-91

  Abramovici, Gil ^a   Mainiero, Martha B ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFORMED CONSENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RHODE ISLAND; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 79953008175     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10101009     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57(2):75-89. (Pubitemid 46535708)
2. Taneja C, Edelsberg J, Weycker D, Guo A, Oster G, Weinreb J. Cost effectiveness of breast cancer screening with contrast-enhanced MRI in high-risk women. J Am Coll Radiol 2009;6(3):171-179.
3. Plevritis SK, Kurian AW, Sigal BM, et al. Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA 2006;295(20):2374-2384. (Pubitemid 43788105)
4. Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 2004;351(5):427-437.
5. Riedl CC, Ponhold L, Flöry D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13(20):6144-6152. (Pubitemid 350075074)
6. Warner E. Intensive radiologic surveillance: a focus on the psychological issues. Ann Oncol 2004;15(suppl 1):I43-I47. (Pubitemid 39199331)
7. Frankel SD, Sickles EA, Curpen BN, Sollitto RA, Ominsky SH, Galvin HB. Initial versus subsequent screening mammography: comparison of findings and their prognostic significance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;164(5):1107-1109.
8. Burnside ES, Sickles EA, Sohlich RE, Dee KE. Differential value of comparison with previous examinations in diagnostic versus screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179(5):1173-1177. (Pubitemid 35204369)
9. Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, et al. Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition. Cancer 2006;106(11):2318-2326. (Pubitemid 43787654)
10. Warren RM, Pointon L, Thompson D, et al. Reading protocol for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast: sensitivity and specificity analysis. Radiology 2005;236(3):779-788. (Pubitemid 41170838)
11. Brennan S, Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Morris E. Breast MRI screening of women with a personal history of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195(2):510-516.
12. Lee CH, Dershaw DD, Kopans D, et al. Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 2010;7(1):18-27.
13. American College of Radiology. BI-RADS: MRI. In: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: BI-RADS Atlas. 4th ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2003.
14. Pamilo M, Anttinen I, Soiva M, Roiha M, Suramo I. Mammography screening: reasons for recall and the influence of experience on recall in the Finnish system. Clin Radiol 1990;41(6):384-387. (Pubitemid 20185760)
15. Thurfjell MG, Vitak B, Azavedo E, Svane G, Thurfjell E. Effect on sensitivity and specificity of mammography screening with or without comparison of old mammograms. Acta Radiol 2000;41(1):52-56.
16. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, et al. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23(33):8469-8476.
17. Lehman CD, Blume JD, Weatherall P, et al. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 2005;103(9):1898-1905. (Pubitemid 40563263)
18. Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA, et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 2004;292(11):1317-1325. (Pubitemid 39223222)
19. Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK, et al. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 2005;365(9473):1769-1778. (Pubitemid 40744657)
20. Stoutjesdijk MJ, Boetes C, Jager GJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93(14):1095-1102. (Pubitemid 32717542)
21. Liberman L, Morris EA, Benton CL, Abramson AF, Dershaw DD. Probably benign lesions at breast magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary experience in high-risk women. Cancer 2003;98(2):377-388. (Pubitemid 36828465)
22. Geisel JL, Raghu M, Weinreb JC, Cornfeld D, Varipapa BA, Philpotts LE. Analysis of biopsy recommendations from breast MRI exams: attempts to reduce false positives [abstr]. In: Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2009;292.
23. Sung J, Lee CH, Morris EA, Dershaw DD. Screening breast MRI in women with a history of prior chest irradiation [abstr]. In: Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2009;293.
24. Berg WA, Zhang Z, Cormack JB, et al. Supplemental yield and performance characteristics of screening MRI after combined ultrasound and mammography: ACRIN* 6666 *American College of Radiology Imaging Network [abstr]. In: Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2009; 103.