MRI for breast cancer: Current indications

Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 161-169

  Ojeda Fournier, Haydee ^a,c   Comstock, Christopher ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast imaging; Breast screening; Indications; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mammography; MRI

Indexed keywords

SILICONE;

AXILLARY LYMPH NODE; BREAST AUGMENTATION; BREAST CANCER; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EVALUATION; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; LUNG CARCINOMA; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PATIENT MONITORING; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD;

EID: 67650951666     PISSN: 09713026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.48431     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. American College of Radiology Practice Guidelines for the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breasst. Available from: http://www.acr.org. [cited in 2004].
2. Kuhl CK. Current status of breast MR imaging * Part 2, Clinical applications. Radiology 2007;244:672-691
3. Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH, DeAngelis GA, DeBruhl N, Harms S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA 2004;292:2735-2742 (Pubitemid 39628252)
4. Partridge SC, Gibbs JE, Lu Y, Esserman LJ, Sudilovsky D, Hylton NM. Accuracy of MR imaging for revealing residual breast cancer in patients who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:1193-1199 (Pubitemid 35204372)
5. Rosen EL, Blackwell KL, Baker JA, Soo MS, Bentley RC, Yu D, et al. Accuracy of MRI in the detection of residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:1275-1282 (Pubitemid 37296403)
6. Krecke KN, Gisvold JJ. Gisvold, Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: Mammographic findings and extent of disease at diagnosis in 184 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;161:957-960
7. Qayyum A, Birdwell RL, Daniel BL, Nowels KW, Jeffrey SS, Agoston TA, et al. MR imaging features of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: Histopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:1227-1232 (Pubitemid 34411425)
8. Weinstein SP, Orel SG, Heller R, Reynolds C, Czerniecki B, Solin LJ, et al. MR imaging of the breast in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:399-406. (Pubitemid 32105648)
9. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:901-910 (Pubitemid 36363023)
10. Boetes C, Mus RD, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Strijk SP, Wobbes T, et al. Breast tumors: Comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology 1995;197:743-747
11. Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P, Bazzocchi M, Fausto A, Simonetti G, et al. Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:1149-1157 (Pubitemid 44185114)
12. Orel SG, Weinstein SP, Schnall MD, Reynolds CA, Schuchter LM, Fraker DL, et al. Breast MR imaging in patients with axillary node metastases and unknown primary malignancy. Radiology 1999;212:543-549
13. Morris EA, Liberman L, Ballon DJ, Robson M, Abramson AF, Heerdt A, et al. MRI of occult breast carcinoma in a high-risk population. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:619-626 (Pubitemid 37021827)
14. Helvie MA, Bailey JE, Roubidoux MA, Pass HA, Chang AE, Pierce LJ, et al. Mammographic screening of TRAM flap breast reconstructions for detection of nonpalpable recurrent cancer. Radiology 2002;224:211-216
15. Devon RK, Rosen MA, Mies C, Orel SG. Breast reconstruction with a transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap: Spectrum of normal and abnormal mr imaging findings. Radiographics 2004;24:1287-1299 (Pubitemid 39329374)
16. Middleton MS, McNamara MP Jr. Breast implant classification with MR imaging correlation. Radiographics 2000;20:E1.
17. Morris EA, Schwartz LH, Drotman MB, Kim SJ, Tan LK, Liberman L, et al. Evaluation of pectoralis major muscle in patients with posterior breast tumors on breast MR images: Early experience. Radiology 2000;214:67-72. (Pubitemid 30019871)
18. Lee SG, Orel SG, Woo IJ, Cruz-Jove E, Putt ME, Solin LJ, et al. MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: Preliminary results. Radiology 2003;226:773-778 (Pubitemid 36259154)
19. Liberman L, Morris EA, Kim CM, Kaplan JB, Abramson AF, Menell JH, et al. MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:333-341 (Pubitemid 36135009)
20. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1233-1241 (Pubitemid 35176242)
21. Lee JM, Orel SG, Czerniecki BJ, Solin LJ, Schnall MD. MRI before re excision surgery in patients with breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:473-480 (Pubitemid 38116596)
22. Frei KA, Kinkel K, Bonel HM, Lu Y, Esserman LJ, Hylton NM. MR imaging of the breast in patients with positive margins after lumpectomy: Influence of the time interval between lumpectomy and MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:1577-1584
23. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, Harms S, Leach MO, Lehman CD, et al. American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57:75-89. (Pubitemid 46535708)