Recent advances in breast-specific imaging

Cancer Control

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 338-349

  Berman, Claudia G ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b Radiology Service   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DIGITAL IMAGING; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; REVIEW; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 37249043690     PISSN: 10732748     EISSN: 15262359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107327480701400404     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1773-1783. Epub 2005 Sep 16.
2. Berns EA, Hendrick RE, Solari M, et al. Digital and screen-film mammography: comparison of image acquisition and interpretation times. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:38-41.
3. James JJ. The current status of digital mammography. Clin Radiol. 2004;59:1-10.
4. Lewin JM, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE, et al. Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:671-677.
5. Skaane P, Young K, Skjennald A. Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading - Oslo I study. Radiology. 2003;229:877-884.
6. Skaane P, Skjennald A. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program. The Oslo II study. Radiology. 2004;232:197-204. Epub 2004 May 20.
7. Morton MJ, Whaley DH, Brandt KR, et al. Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection: prospective evaluation. Radiology. 2006;239:375-383. Epub 2006 Mar 28.
8. Yankaskas BC, Schell MJ, Bird RE, et al. Reassessment of breast cancers missed during routine screening mammography: a community-based study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:535-541.
9. Ganott MA, Harris KM, Klaman HM, et al. Analysis of false-negative cancer cases identified with a mammography audit. Breast J. 1999;5:166-175.
10. Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood SA, D'Orsi CJ, et al. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology. 2000;215:554-562. Erratum in: Radiology. 2000;216:306.
11. Destounis SV, DiNitto P, Logan-Young W, et al. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience. Radiology. 2004;232:578-584. Epub 2004 Jun 30.
12. Baum F, Fischer U, Obenauer S, et al. Computer-aided detection in direct digital full-field mammography: initial results. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:3015-3017. Epub 2002 Jun 12.
13. Castellino RA, Roehrig J, Zhang W. Improved computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithms for screening mammography. Radiology. 2000;217:400.
14. Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology. 2001;220:781-786.
15. Dean JC, Ilvento CC. Improved cancer detection using computeraided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:20-28.
16. Brem RF, Rapelyea JA, Zisman G, et al. Evaluation of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection system by mammographic appearance and histopathology. Cancer. 2005;104;931-935.
17. Ko JM, Nicholas MJ, Mendel JB, et al. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:1483-1491.
18. Ho WT, Lam PW. Clinical performance of computer-assisted detection (CAD) system in detecting carcinoma in breasts of different densities. Clin Radiol. 2003;58:133-136.
19. Brem RF, Hoffmeister JW, Rapelyea JA, et al. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:439-444. Erratum in: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:1968.
20. Chu WC, Lam WW, Pang AL, et al. Computer-assisted detection as a second reader in symptomatic Asian women with palpable breast cancer. Acta Radiol. 2004;45:148-153.
21. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG, et al. Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology. 1997;202:833-841.
22. Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, et al. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology. 1989;171:95-103.
23. Hulka CA, Edmister WB, Smith BL, et al. Dynamic echo-planar imaging of the breast: experience in diagnosing breast carcinoma and correlation with tumor angiogenesis. Radiology. 1997;205:837-842.
24. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. Radiology. 1989;170(3 pt 1):681-686.
25. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology. 1999;211:101-110.
26. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG, et al. Correlation of lesion appearance and histologic findings for the nodes of a breast MR imaging interpretation model. Radiographics. 1999;19:79-92.
27. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG. Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model. Radiology. 2001;219:484-494.
28. Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayama S, et al. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. Radiology. 1996;200:639-649.
29. Nunes LW. Architectural-based interpretations of breast MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin North Am. 2001;9:303-320, vi.
30. Boetes C, Mus RD, Holland R, et al. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology. 1995;197;743-747.
31. Weinstein SP, Orel SG, Heller R, et al. MR imaging of the breast in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176: 399-406.
32. Mumtaz H, Hall-Craggs MA, Davidson T, et al. Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997:169:417-424.
33. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of pre-operative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 1999;213:881-888.
34. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, et al. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:901-910.
35. Hlawatsch A, Teifke A, Schmidt M, et al. Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:1493-1501.
36. Liberman L, Morris EA, Kim CM, et al. MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:333-341.
37. Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1295-1303. Epub 2007 Mar 28.
38. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, et al. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet. 2007;370:485-492.
39. Orel SG, Reynolds C, Schnall MD, et al. Breast carcinoma: MR imaging before re-excisional biopsy. Radiology. 1997;205:429-436.
40. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233-1241.
41. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227-1232.
42. Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology. 2001;220:13-30.
43. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Siegelman ES, et al. Diagnostic performance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:409-415.
44. Lee CH, Smith RC, Levine JA, et al. Clinical usefulness of MR imaging of the breast in the evaluation of the problematic mammogram. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:1323-1329.
45. Brinck U, Fischer U, Korabiowska M, et al. The variability of fibroadenoma in contrast-enhanced dynamic MR mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:1331-1334.
46. Westerhof JP, Fischer U, Moritz JD, et al. MR imaging of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications: is there any value? Radiology. 1998;207:675-681.
47. Morris EA, Schwartz LH, Dershaw DD, et al. MR imaging of the breast in patients with occult primary breast carcinoma. Radiology. 1997;205:437-440.
48. Orel SG, Weinstein SP, Schnall MD, et al. Breast MR imaging in patients with axillary node metastases and unknown primary malignancy. Radiology. 1999;212:543-549.
49. Olson JA Jr, Morris EA, Van Zee KJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging facilitates breast conservation for occult breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:411-415.
50. Krämer SC, Rieber A, Görich J, et al. Diagnosis of papillomas of the breast: value of magnetic resonance mammography in comparison with galactography. Eur Radiol. 2000;10:1733-1736.
51. Orel SG, Dougherty CS, Reynolds C, et al. MR imaging in patients with nipple discharge: initial experience. Radiology. 2000;216:248-254.
52. Knopp MV, Brix G, Junkermann HJ, et al. MR mammography with pharmacokinetic mapping for monitoring of breast cancer treatment during neoadjuvant therapy. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1994;2:633-658.
53. Morris EA, Liberman L, Ballon DJ, et al. MRI of occult breast carcinoma in a high risk population. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:619-626.
54. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2000;57:75-89.
55. Monticciolo DL, Nelson RC, Dixon WT, et al. MR detection of leakage from silicone breast implants: value of a silicone-selective pulse sequence. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:51-56.
56. Berg WA, Caskey CI, Hamper UM, et al. Single- and double- lumen silicone breast implant integrity: prospective evaluation of MR and US criteria. Radiology. 1995;197:45-52.
57. Rosen EL, Turkington TG, Soo MS, et al. Detection of primary breast carcinoma with a dedicated, large-field-of-view FDG PET mammography device: initial experience. Radiology. 2005;234:527-534.
58. D'Orsi CJ, Hall FM. BI-RADS lexicon reemphasized. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:29-37.
59. Tafra L, Cheng Z, Uddo J, et al. Pilot clinical trial of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission mammography in the surgical management of breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2005;190:628-632.
60. Berg WA, Weinberg IN, Narayanan D. High-resolution fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with compression ("positron emission mammography") is highly accurate in depicting primary breast cancer. Breast J. 2006;12:309-323.
61. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NesAiver MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology. 2004;233:830-849. Epub 2004 Oct 14.