Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 196, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 210-217

  Kul, Sibel ^a   Cansu, Aysegul ^a   Alhan, Etem ^a   Dinc, Hasan ^a   Gunes, Gurbuz ^a   Reis, Abdulkadir ^a  

^a KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Breast; Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI); Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE MRI); MRI

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KINETICS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 78650815208     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.4258     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Huang W, Fisher PR, Dulaimy K, Tudorica LA, O'Hea B. Detection of breast malignancy: diagnostic MR protocol for improved specificity. Radiology 2004; 232:585-591 (Pubitemid 38971303)
2. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Viehweg P, Heinig A, Kuchler C. Contrast enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. Eur J Radiol 1997; 24:94-108
3. Schnall MD, Rosten S, Englander S, Orel SG, Nunes LW. A combined architectural and kinetic interpretation model for breast MR images. Acad Radiol 2001; 8:591-597
4. Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ, et al. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. AJR 2000; 175:35-43 (Pubitemid 30415534)
5. Warren RML, Pointon L, Thompson D, et al. Reading protocol for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast: sensitivity and specificity analysis. Radiology 2005; 236:779-788 (Pubitemid 41170838)
6. Peters NH, Borel Rinkes IH, Zuithoff NP, Mali WP, Moons KG, Peeters PH. Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology 2008; 246:116-124
7. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Siegelman ES, et al. Diagnostic performance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial resolution MR imaging of the breast. AJR 1997; 169:409-415
8. Kuhl CK, Mielcarek P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999; 211:101-110 (Pubitemid 29161739)
9. Wiener JI, Schilling KJ, Adami C, Obuchowski NA. Assessment of suspected breast cancer by MRI: a prospective clinical trial using a combined kinetic and morphologic analysis. AJR 2005; 184:878-886 (Pubitemid 43899516)
10. Baum F, Fischer U, Vosshenrich R, Grabbe E. Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:1087-1092 (Pubitemid 36940174)
11. Kacl GM, Liu P, Debatin JF, Garzoli E, Caduff RF, Krestin GP. Detection of breast cancer with conventional mammography and contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Eur Radiol 1998; 8:194-200 (Pubitemid 128546201)
12. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS): breast imaging atlas. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
13. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, et al. Diagnostic and architectural features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 2006; 238:42-53
14. Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 16:172-178 (Pubitemid 34810055)
15. Rubesova E, Grell AS, De Maertelaer V, Metens T, Chao SL, Lemort M. Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24:319-324 (Pubitemid 44188557)
16. Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Kan S, et al. ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors. Magn Reson Med Sci 2005; 4:35-42
17. Hatakenaka M, Soeda H, Yabuuchi H, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficients of breast tumors: clinical application. Magn Reson Med Sci 2008; 7:23-29
18. Marini C, Iacconi C, Giannelli M, Cilotti A, Moretti M, Bartolozzi C. Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion. Eur Radiol 2007; 17:2646-2655
19. Lo GG, Ai V, Chan JK, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of breast lesions: first experiences at 3 T. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009; 33:63-69
20. Tozaki M, Fukuma E. 1H MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: are they useful tools for characterizing breast lesions before biopsy? AJR 2009; 193:840-849
21. Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Kurland BF, Eby PR, White SW, Lehman CD. Differential diagnosis of mammographically and clinically occult breast lesions on diffusion- weighted MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31:562-570
22. Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Okafuji T, et al. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28:1157-1165
23. Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Kurland BF, Eby PR, White SW, Lehman CD. Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value. AJR 2009; 193:1716-1722
24. Yamashita Y, Tang Y, Takahashi M. Ultrafast MR imaging of the abdomen: echo planar imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8:367-374 (Pubitemid 28150946)
25. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, et al. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 168:497-505
26. Kamal RM, Hamed ST, Salem DS. Classification of inflammatory breast disorders and step by step diagnosis. Breast J 2009; 15:367-380
27. Renz DM, Baltzer PA, Böttcher J, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of inflammatory breast carcinoma and acute mastitis: a comparative study. Eur Radiol 2008; 18:2370-2380
28. Ballesio L, Maggi C, Savelli S, et al. Role of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with unilateral nipple discharge: preliminary study. Radiol Med 2008; 113:249-264
29. Woodhams R, Kakita S, Hata H, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast: evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and signal intensity in correlation with histologic findings AJR 2009; 193:260-266
30. Monzawa S, Yokokawa M, Sakuma T, et al. Mucinous carcinoma of the breast: MRI features of pure and mixed forms with histopathologic correlation. AJR 2009; 192:828; [web]W125-W131
31. Kuroki Y, Nasu K, Kuroki S, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer with the sensitivity encoding technique: analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient value. Magn Reson Med Sci 2004; 3:79-85
32. Le Bihan D, Poupon C, Amadon A, Lethimonnier F. Artifacts and pitfalls in diffusion MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24:478-488
33. Ogura A, Hayakawa K, Miyati T, Maeda F. Imaging parameter effects in apparent diffusion coefficient determination of magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol [Epub 2009 Jul 29]
34. Jacobs MA, Barker PB, Argani P, Ouwerkerk R, Bhujwalla ZM, Bluemke DA. Combined dynamic contrast enhanced breast MR and proton spectroscopic imaging: a feasibility study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 21:23-28