Molecular phylogenetics of hydatellaceae (Nymphaeales): Sexual-system homoplasy and a new sectional classification

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 99, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 663-676

  Iles, William J D ^a,c   Rudall, Paula J ^b   Sokoloff, Dmitry D ^c   Remizowa, Margarita V ^c   Macfarlane, Terry D ^d   Logacheva, Maria D ^c   Graham, Sean W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS   (United Kingdom)

^c MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^d DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION   (Australia)

Author keywords

Ancestral state reconstruction; Classification; Dioecy; Fruit; Gene tree reconciliation; Morphology; Perenniality; Seed; Sexual system; Trithuria

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; COEXISTENCE; FRUIT; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; PERENNIAL PLANT; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PLASTID; SAMPLING; SEED;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CELL NUCLEUS; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; NYMPHAEACEAE; PHYLOGENY; PLASTID; REPRODUCTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BAYES THEOREM; CELL NUCLEUS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; NYMPHAEACEAE; PHYLOGENY; PLASTIDS; REPRODUCTION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

HYDATELLACEAE; LILIUM; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; NYMPHAEACEAE; NYMPHAEALES; TRITHURIA; TRITHURIA SUBMERSA;

EID: 84860568105     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1100524     Document Type: Article

References (133)

1. AKAIKE, H. 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. N. Petrov and F. Csaki [eds.], Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Information Theory, 267-281. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary.
2. ALFARO, M. E., and M. T. HOLDER. 2006. The posterior and the prior in Bayesian phylogenetics. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 37: 19-42.
3. AMBROSE, B. A., S. ESPINOSA-MATÍAS, S. VÁZQUEZ-SANTANA, F. VERGARASILVA, E. MARTÍNEZ, J. MÁRQUEZ-GUZMÁN, and E. R. ALVAREZ-BUYLLA. 2006. Comparative floral developmental series of the Mexican triurids support a euanthial interpretation for the unusual floral structures of Lacandonia schismatica (Lacandoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 93: 15-35.
4. ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP. 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 531-553.
5. ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 399-436.
6. ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP. 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 161: 105-121.
7. BARRETT, S. C. H. 2002. The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nature Reviews Genetics 3: 274-284.
8. BARRETT, S. C. H. 2010. Understanding plant reproductive diversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences 365: 99-109.
9. BARRETT, S. C. H., and S. W. GRAHAM. 1997. Adaptive radiation in the aquatic plant family Pontederiaceae: Insights from phylogenetic analysis. In T. J. Givnish and K. J. Sytsma [eds.], Molecular evolution and adaptive radiation, 225-258. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
10. BEAULIEU, J. M., I. J. LEITCH, S. PATEL, A. PENDHARKAR, and C. A. KNIGHT. 2008. Genome size is a strong predictor of cell size and stomatal density in angiosperms. New Phytologist 179: 975-986.
11. BULL, J. J., and E. L. CHARNOV. 1985. On irreversible evolution. Evolution 39: 1149-1155.
12. CANTINO, P. D., J. A. D OYLE, S. W. GRAHAM, W. S. J UDD, R. G. OLMSTEAD, D. E. SOLTIS, P. S. SOLTIS, and M. J. DONOGHUE. 2007. Towards a phylogenetic nomenclature of Tracheophyta. Taxon 56: 822-846.
13. CARLQUIST, S. 1974. Island biology. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
14. CARLQUIST, S., and E. L. SCHNEIDER. 2009. Do tracheid microstructure and the presence of minute crystals link Nymphaeaceae, Cabombaceae and Hydatellaceae? Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 159: 572-582.
15. CASE, A. L., S. W. GRAHAM, T. D. MACFARLANE, and S. C. H. BARRETT. 2008. A phylogenetic study of evolutionary transitions in sexual systems in Australasian Wurmbea (Colchicaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 169: 141-156.
16. CHARLESWORTH, D. 1999. Theories of the evolution of dioecy. I n M. A. Geber, T. E. Dawson, and L. F. Delph [eds.], Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants, 33-60. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
17. CHARLESWORTH, D. 2002. Plant sex determination and sex chromosomes. Heredity 88: 94-101.
18. CHARNOV, E. L. 1982. The theory of sex allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
19. COOKE, D. A. 1987. Hydatellaceae. In A. S. George [ed.], Flora of Australia, vol. 45, Hydatellaceae to Liliaceae, 1-5. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, Australia.
20. DAHLGREN, R. M. T., and H. T. CLIFFORD. 1982. The monocotyledons: A comparative study. Academic Press, London, UK.
21. DAHLGREN, R. M. T., H. T. CLIFFORD, and P. F. YEO. 1985. Order Hydatellales. In The families of the monocotyledons - Structure, evolution, and taxonomy, 398-400. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
22. DE LANGE, P. J., B. G. MURRAY, and P. M. DATSON. 2004. Contributions to a chromosome atlas of the New Zealand flora-38. Counts for 50 families. New Zealand Journal of Botany 42: 873-904.
23. DELPH, L. F. 2009. Sex allocation: Evolution to and from dioecy. Current Biology 19: R249-R251.
24. DORKEN, M. E., J. FRIEDMAN, and S. C. H. BARRETT. 2002. The evolution and maintenance of monoecy and dioecy in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae). Evolution 56: 31-41.
25. DOYLE, J. A. 2008. Integrating molecular phylogenetic and paleobotanical evidence on the origin of the flower. International Journal of Plant Sciences 169: 816-843.
26. DRUMMOND, A. J., and A. RAMBAUT. 2007. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 214.
27. ECKHART, V. M. 1999. Sexual specialization in flowers and inflorescences. In M. A. Geber, T. E. Dawson, and L. F. Delph [eds.], Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants, 123-148. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
28. EDGAR, E. 1966. The male flowers of Hydatella inconspicua (Cheesem.) Cheesem. (Centrolepidaceae). New Zealand Journal of Botany 4: 153-158.
29. ENDRESS, P. K. 2004. Structure and relationships of basal relictual angiosperms. Australian Systematic Botany 17: 343-366.
30. ENDRESS, P. K. 2008. Perianth biology in the basal grade of extant angiosperms. International Journal of Plant Sciences 169: 844-862.
31. ENDRESS, P. K. 2010. Disentangling confusions in inflorescence morphology: Patterns and diversity of reproductive shoot ramification in angiosperms. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 48: 225-239.
32. ENDRESS, P. K., and J. A. DOYLE. 2009. Reconstructing the ancestral flower and its initial specializations. American Journal of Botany 96: 22-66.
33. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1973. Maximum likelihood and minimum steps methods for estimating evolutionary trees from data on discrete characters. Systematic Zoology 22: 240-249.
34. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confi dence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
35. FITCH, W. M. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: Minimum change for a specifi ed tree topology. Systematic Zoology 20: 406-416.
36. FRIEDMAN, J., and S. C. H. BARRETT. 2009. Wind of change: New insights on the ecology and evolution of pollination and mating in wind-pollinated plants. Annals of Botany 103: 1515-1527.
37. FRIEDMAN, W. E. 2008. Hydatellaceae are water lilies with gymnospermous tendencies. Nature 453: 94-97.
38. GAIKWAD, S. P., and S. R. YADAV. 2003. Further morphotaxonomical contribution to the understanding of family Hydatellaceae. Journal of the Swamy Botanical Club 20: 1-10.
39. GARLand, T., A. W. DICKERMAN, C. M. JANIS, and J. A. JONES. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Systematic Biology 42: 265-292.
40. GILG-BENEDICT, C. 1930. Centrolepidaceae. In A. Engler and K. A. E. Prantl [eds.], Die Natürlichen Pfl anzenfamilien, 15a, 27-33. W. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
41. GRAHAM, S. W., and W. J. D. ILES. 2009. Different gymnosperm outgroups have (mostly) congruent signal regarding the root of flowering plant phylogeny. American Journal of Botany 96: 216-227.
42. GRAHAM, S. W., J. R. KOHN, B. R. MORTON, J. E. ECKENWALDER, and S. C. H. BARRETT. 1998. Phylogenetic congruence and discordance among one morphological and three molecular data sets from Pontederiaceae. Systematic Biology 47: 545-567.
43. GRAHAM, S. W., and R. G. OLMSTEAD. 2000. Utility of 17 chloroplast genes for inferring the phylogeny of the basal angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 87: 1712-1730.
44. GRAHAM, S. W., P. A. REEVES, A. C. E. BURNS, and R. G. OLMSTEAD. 2000. Microstructural changes in noncoding chloroplast DNA: Interpretation, evolution, and utility of indels and inversions in basal angiosperm phylogenetic inference. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: S83-S96.
45. GUINDON, S., and O. GASCUEL. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology 52: 696-704.
46. HAMANN, U. 1976. Hydatellaceae - A new family of Monocotyledoneae. New Zealand Journal of Botany 14: 193-196.
47. HAMANN, U. 1998. Hydatellaceae. In K. Kubitzki [ed.], The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. IV, Flowering plants - Monocotyledons - Alismatanae and Commelinanae, 231-234. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
48. HARMON, L. J., J. T. WEIR, C. D. BROCK, R. E. GLOR, and W. CHALLENGER. 2008. GEIGER: Investigating evolutionary radiations. Bioinformatics 24: 129-131.
49. HELED, J., and A. J. DRUMMOND. 2010. Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27: 570-580.
50. HIERONYMUS, G. 1888. Centrolepidaceae. In A. Engler, and K. A. E. Prantl [eds.], Die Nat ürlichen Pfl anzenfamilien, vol. II, part 4, 11-16. W. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
51. HILU, K. W., T. BORSCH, K. MÜLLER, D. E. SOLTIS, P. S. SOLTIS, V. SAVOLAINEN, M. W. CHASE, ET AL. 2003. Angiosperm phylogeny based on matK sequence information. American Journal of Botany 90: 1758-1776.
52. HOOKER, J. D. 1858. The Antarctic voyage of H.M. Discovery ships Erebus and Terror, part III. Flora Tasmaniae 2: L. Reeve & Co., London, UK.
53. HOOT, S. B., A. CULHAM, and P. R. CRANE. 1995. The utility of atp B gene sequences in resolving phylogenetic relationships: Comparison with rbc L and 18S ribosomal DNA sequences in the Lardizabalaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 194-207.
54. HSIAO, C., N. J. CHATTERTON, K. H. ASAY, and K. B. JENSEN. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships of 10 grass species: An assessment of phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacer region in nuclear ribosomal DNA in monocots. Genome 37: 112-120.
55. HURVICH, C. M., and C.-L. TSAI. 1989. Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76: 297-307.
56. KIM, K.-J., and R. K. JANSEN. 1995. ndhF sequence evolution and the major clades in the sunflower family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 92: 10379-10383.
57. KNIGHT, C. A., R. B. CLANCY, L. GÖTZENBERGER, L. DANN, and J. M. BEAULIEU. 2010. On the relationship between pollen size and genome size. Journal de Botanique 2010: 612017.
58. LANDE, R., and D. W. SCHEMSKE. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24-40.
59. LEMMON, A. R., and E. C. MORIARTY. 2004. The importance of proper model assumption in Bayesian phylogenetics. Systematic Biology 53: 265-277.
60. LEVIN, D. A. 1975. Minority cytotype exclusion in local plant populations. Taxon 24: 35-43.
61. LEWIS, P. O. 2001. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Systematic Biology 50: 913-925.
62. LÖHNE, C., T. BORSCH, and J. H. WIERSEMA. 2007. Phylogenetic analysis of Nymphaeales using fast-evolving and noncoding chloroplast marker. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 154: 141-163.
63. LLOYD, D. G. 1980. Sexual strategies in plants. III. A quantitative method for describing the gender of plants. New Zealand Journal of Botany 18: 103-108.
64. LLOYD, D. G. 1982. Selection of combined versus separate sexes in seed plants. American Naturalist 120: 557-585.
65. MADDISON, W. P. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Systematic Biology 46: 523-536.
66. MADDISON, W. P., and D. R. MADDISON. 2009. Mesquite: A modular system for evolutionary analysis, version 2.6. Website http://mesquiteproject.org.
67. MARTÍNEZ, E., and C. H. RAMOS. 1989. Lacandoniaceae (Triuiridales): Una nueva familia de México. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 76: 128-135.
68. MILLER, J. S., and D. L. VENABLE. 2000. Polyploidy and the evolution of gender dimorphism in plants. Science 289: 2335-2338.
69. MOORE, M. J., N. HASSAN, M. A. GITZENDANNER, R. A. BRUENN, M. ROLEY, A. VANDEVENTER, J. W. HORN, ET AL. 2011. Phylogenetic analysis of the plastid inverted repeat for 244 species: Insights into deeper-level angiosperm relationships from a long, slowly evolving sequence region. International Journal of Plant Sciences 172: 541-558.
70. NIKLAS, K. J. 1985. The aerodynamics of wind pollination. B otanical Review 51: 328-386.
71. OBBARD, D. J., S. A. HARRIS, R. J. A. BUGGS, and J. R. PANNELL. 2006. Hybridization, polyploidy, and the evolution of sexual systems in Mercurialis (Euphorbiaceae). Evolution 60: 1801-1815.
72. OLMSTEAD, R. G. 1995. Species concepts and plesiomorphic species. Systematic Botany 20: 623-630.
73. OLMSTEAD, R. G., and J. A. SWEERE. 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: An empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Systematic Biology 43: 467-481.
74. ORNDUFF, R. 1969. Reproductive biology in relation to systematics. Taxon 18: 121-133.
75. PLEDGE, D. H. 1974. Some observations on Hydatella inconspicua (Cheesem.) Cheesem. (Centrolepidaceae). New Zealand Journal of Botany 12: 559-561.
76. POSADA, D. 2008. jModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25: 1253-1256.
77. PRYCHID, C. J., D. D. SOKOLOFF, M. V. REMIZOWA, R. E. TUCKETT, S. R. YADAV, and P. J. RUDALL. 2011. Unique stigmatic hairs and pollen-tube growth within the stigmatic cell wall in the earlydivergent angiosperm family Hydatellaceae. Annals of Botany 108: 599-608.
78. QIU, Y.-L., L. LI, B. WANG, J.-Y. XUE, T. A. HENDRY, R.-Q. LI, J. W. BROWN, ET AL. 2010. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from sequences of four mitochondrial genes. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 48: 391-425.
79. R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM. 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Website http://www.r-project.org.
80. RAMBAUT, A. 2002. Se-Al version 2.0a11 [computer program]. Website http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/seal/.
81. RAMBAUT, A., and A. J. DRUMMOND. 2009. Tracer v1.5 [computer program]. Website http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/.
82. REMIZOWA, M. V., D. D. SOKOLOFF, T. D. MACFARLANE, S. R. YADAV, C. J. PRYCHID, and P. J. RUDALL. 2008. Comparative pollen morphology in the early-divergent angiosperm family Hydatellaceae reveals variation at the infraspecific level. Grana 47: 81-100.
83. RENNER, S. S., and R. E. RICKLEFS. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. American Journal of Botany 82: 596-606.
84. RONQUIST, F., and J. P. HUELSENBECK. 2003. MrBayes3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
85. RUDALL, P. J., and R. M. BATEMAN. 2010. Defining the limits of flowers: The challenge of distinguishing between the evolutionary products of simple versus compound strobili. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, Biological Sciences 365: 397-409.
86. RUDALL, P. J., T. ELDRIDGE, J. TRATT, M. M. RAMSAY, R. E. TUCKETT, S. Y. SMITH, M. E. COLLINSON, ET AL. 2009a. Seed fertilization, development, and germination in Hydatellaceae (Nymphaeales): Implications for endosperm evolution in early angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 96: 1581-1593.
87. RUDALL, P. J., M. V. REMIZOWA, A. S. BEER, E. BRADSHAW, D. W. TEVENSON, T. D. MACFARLANE, R. E. TUCKETT, ET AL. 2008. Comparative ovule and megagametophyte development in Hydatellaceae and water lilies reveal a mosaic of features among the earliest angiosperms. Annals of Botany 101: 941-956.
88. RUDALL, P. J., M. V. REMIZOWA, G. PRENNER, C. J. PRYCHID, R. E. UCKETT, and D. D. SOKOLOFF. 2009b. Nonflowers near the base of extant angiosperms? Spatiotemporal arrangement of organs in reproductive units of Hydatellaceae and its bearing on the origin of the flower. American Journal of Botany 96: 67-82.
89. RUDALL, P. J., D. D. SOKOLOFF, M. V. REMIZOWA, J. G. CONRAN, J. I. DAVIS, T. D. MACFARLANE, and D. W. STEVENSON. 2007. Morphology of Hydatellaceae, an anomalous aquatic family recently recognized as an early-divergent angiosperm lineage. American Journal of Botany 94: 1073-1092.
90. SAARELA, J. M., H. S. RAI, J. A. DOYLE, P. K. ENDRESS, S. MATHEWS, A. D. MARCHANT, B. G. BRIGGS, and S. W. GRAHAM. 2007. Hydatellaceae identifi ed as a new branch near the base of the angiosperm phylogenetic tree. Nature 446: 312-315.
91. SAKAI, A. K., and S. G. WELLER. 1999. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants: A review of terminology, biogeographic patterns, ecological correlates, and phylogenetic approaches. In M. A. Geber, T. E. Dawson, and L. F. Delph [eds.], Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants, 1-31. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
92. SARKISSIAN, T. S., S. C. H. BARRETT, and L. D. HARDER. 2001. Gender variation in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae): Is size all that matters? Ecology 82: 360-373.
93. SCHAEFER, H., and S. S. RENNER. 2010. A three-genome phylogeny of Momordica (Cucurbitaceae) suggests seven returns from dioecy to monoecy and recent long-distance dispersal to Asia. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 54: 553-560.
94. SCHLUTER, D., T. PRICE, A. Ø. MOOERS, and D. LUDWIG. 1997. Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51: 1699-1711.
95. SICARD, A., and M. LENHARD. 2011. The selfi ng syndrome: A model for studying the genetic and evolutionary basis of morphological adaptation in plants. Annals of Botany 107: 1433-1443.
96. SOKOLOFF, D. D., M. V. REMIZOWA, B. G. BRIGGS, and P. J. RUDALL. 2009. Shoot architecture and branching pattern in perennial Hydatellaceae (Nymphaeales). International Journal of Plant Sciences 170: 869-884.
97. SOKOLOFF, D. D., M. V. REMIZOWA, T. D. MACFARLANE, and P. J. RUDALL. 2008a. Classification of the early-divergent angiosperm family Hydatellaceae: One genus instead of two, four new species and sexual dimorphism in dioecious taxa. Taxon 57: 179-200.
98. SOKOLOFF, D. D., M. V. REMIZOWA, T. D. MACFARLANE, R. E. TUCKETT, M. M. RAMSAY, A. S. BEER, S. R. YADAV, and P. J. RUDALL. 2008b. Seedling diversity in Hydatellaceae: Implications for the evolution of angiosperm cotyledons. Annals of Botany 101: 153-164.
99. SOKOLOFF, D. D., M. V. REMIZOWA, T. D. MACFARLANE, S. R. YADAV, and P. J. RUDALL. 2011. Hydatellaceae: A historical review of systematics and ecology. Rheedea 21: 115-138.
100. SOKOLOFF, D. D., M. V. REMIZOWA, S. R. YADAV, and P. J. RUDALL. 2010. Development of reproductive structures in the sole Indian species of Hydatellaceae, Trithuria konkanensis, and its morphological differences from Australian taxa. Australian Systematic Botany 23: 217-228.
101. SOLTIS, D. E., S. A. SMITH, N. CELLINESE, K. J. WURDACK, D. C. TANK, S. F. BROCKINGTON, N. F. REFULIO-RODRIGUEZ, et al. 2011. Angiosperm phylogeny: 17 genes, 640 taxa. American Journal of Botany 98: 704-730.
102. STEBBINS, G. L. 1957. Self fertilization and the population variability in the higher plants. American Naturalist 91: 337-354.
103. STONE, J. L. 2002. Molecular mechanisms underlying the breakdown of gametophytic self-incompatibility. Quarterly Review of Biology 77: 17-32.
104. SUGIURA, N. 1978. Further analysis of the data by Akaike ' s information criterion and the fi nite corrections. Communications in Statistics Theory and Methods A7 7: 13-26.
105. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2003. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
106. SYTSMA, K. J., J. F. SMITH, and P. E. BERRY. 1991. The use of chloroplast DNA to assess biogeography and evolution of morphology, breeding systems, and fl avonoids in Fuchsia sect. Skinnera (Onagraceae). Systematic Botany 16: 257-269.
107. TANK, D. C., and R. G. OLMSTEAD. 2008. From annuals to perennials: Phylogeny of subtribe Castillejinae (Orobanchaceae). American Journal of Botany 95: 608-625.
108. TAYLOR, M. L. 2011. Developmental evolution of the progamic phase in Nymphaeales. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
109. TAYLOR, M. L., T. D. MACFARLANE, and J. H. WILLIAMS. 2010. Reproductive ecology of the basal angiosperm Trithuria submersa (Hydatellaceae). Annals of Botany 106: 909-920.
110. TERACHI, T., Y. OGIHARA, and K. TSUNEWAKI. 1987. The molecular basis of genetic diversity among cytoplasms of Triticum and Aegilops. VI. Complete nucleotide sequences of the rbcL genes encoding Hand L-type Rubisco large subunits in common wheat and Ae. crassa 4x. Japanese Journal of Genetics 62: 375-387.
111. THIEN, L. B., H. AZUMA, and S. KAWANO. 2000. New perspectives on the pollination biology of basal angiosperms. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: S225-S235.
112. THIEN, L. B., T. L. SAGE, T. JAFFRE, P. BERNHARDT, V. PONTIERI, P. H. WESTON, D. MALLOCH, ET AL. 2003. The population structure and floral biology of Amborella trichopoda (Amborellaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 90: 466-490.
113. THIERS, B. 2011 [CONTINUOUSLY UPDATED]. Index herbariorum, part 1: The herbaria of the world. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA. Website http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/ [accessed 31 October 2011].
114. THOMSON, J. D., and J. BRUNET. 1990. Hypotheses for the evolution of dioecy in seed plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 5: 11-16.
115. TILLICH, H.-J., R. TUCKETT, and E. FACHER. 2007. Do Hydatellaceae belong to the monocotyledons or basal angiosperms? Evidence from seedling morphology. Willdenowia 37: 399-406.
116. TRATT, J., C. J. PRYCHID, H.-D. BEHNKE, and P. J. RUDALL. 2009. Starchaccumulating (S-type) sieve-element plastids in Hydatellaceae: Implications for plastid evolution in flowering plants. Protoplasma 237: 19-26.
117. TUCKETT, R. E., D. J. MERRITT, F. R. HAY, S. D. HOPPER, and K. W. DIXON. 2010a. Comparative longevity and low-temperature storage of seeds of Hydatellaceae and temporary pool species of south-west Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 58: 327-334.
118. TUCKETT, R. E., D. J. MERRITT, P. J. RUDALL, F. HAY, S. D. HOPPER, C. C. BASKIN, J. M. BASKIN, ET AL. 2010b. A new type of specialized morphophysiological dormancy and seed storage behaviour in Hydatellaceae, an early-divergent angiosperm family. Annals of Botany 105: 1053-1061.
119. VAMOSI, J. C., S. P. OTTO, and S. C. H. BARRETT. 2003. Phylogenetic analysis of the ecological correlates of dioecy in angiosperms. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16: 1006-1018.
120. VOLZ, S. M., and S. S. RENNER. 2008. Hybridization, polyploidy, and evolutionary transitions between monoecy and dioecy in Bryonia (Cucurbitaceae). American Journal of Botany 95: 1297-1306.
121. WAGNER, W. L., and D. H. LORENCE. 1999. A revision of Trimenia Seem. (Trimeniaceae) in the Marquesas Islands with description of a new species, Trimenia nukuhivensis. Adansonia 21: 225-230.
122. WAKELEY, J. 2008. Coalescent theory: An introduction. Roberts and Co., Greenwood Village, Colorado, USA.
123. WELLS, R. D. S., J. S. CLAYTON, and M. D. DE WINTON. 1998. Submerged vegetation of Lakes Te Anau, Manapouri, Monowai, Hauroko, and Poteriteri, Fiordland, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 32: 621-638.
124. WHITE, T. J., T. BRUNS, S. LEE, and J. W. TAYLOR. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky, and T. J. White [eds.], PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications, 315-322. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
125. WIENS, J. J., and M. C. MORRILL. 2011. Missing data in phylogenetic analysis: Reconciling results from simulations and empirical data. Systematic Biology 60: 719-731.
126. WOLF, D., and N. TAKEBAYASHI. 2004. Pollen limitation and the evolution of androdioecy from dioecy. American Naturalist 163: 122-137.
127. WOLFE, K. H. 2001. Yesterday ' s polyploids and the mystery of diploidization. Nature Reviews Genetics 2: 333-341.
128. YADAV, S. R., and M. K. JANARTHANAM. 1994. Hydatellaceae: A new family to Indian flora with a new species. Rheedea 4: 17-20.
129. YADAV, S. R., D. D. S OKOLOFF, M. V. REMIZOWA, and P. J. RUDALL. 2011. Biology of Trithuria konkanensis, the sole Indian species of Hydatellaceae. In Proceedings of the International Botanical Congress 2011, p. 247, Melbourne, Australia [abstract].
130. YAMASHITA, J., and M. TAMURA. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of the Convallariaceae (Asparagales). In K. Wilson and D. Morrison [eds.], Monocots: Systematics and evolution, 387-400. CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia.
131. YANG, Z. 2006. Computational molecular evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
132. YANG, Z., and B. RANNALA. 1997. Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: A Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 717-724.
133. ZWICKL, D. J. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.