Understanding plant reproductive diversity

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 365, Issue 1537, 2010, Pages 99-109

  Barrett, Spencer C H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dioecy; Floral diversity; Mating; Plant sex; Self fertilization; Wind pollination

Indexed keywords

AUTOGAMY; DIOECY; DISPLAY BEHAVIOR; FLORAL TRAIT; HERMAPHRODITISM; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; PLANT BREEDING; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY;

ANIMALIA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 75449092644     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0199     Document Type: Review

References (73)

1. Aguilar, R., Ashworth, L., Galetto, L. & Aizen, M. A. 2006 Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: a review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. Ecol. Lett. 9, 968-980. (doi:10.1111/j.l461-0248.2006. 00927.x) (Pubitemid 44167974)
2. Aizen, M. A. & Vázquez, D. P. 2006 Flower performance in human-altered habitats. In Ecology and evolution of flowers (eds L. D. Harder & S. C. H. Barrett), pp. 159-179. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3. Ashman, T.-L. 2006 The evolution of separate sexes: a focus on the ecological context. In Ecology and evolution of flowers (eds L. D. Harder & S. C. H. Barrett), pp. 204222. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4. Ashman, T.-L. et al. 2004 Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology 85, 2408-2421. (doi:10.1890/038024)
5. Baker, H. G. 1955 Self-compatibility and establishment after 'long-distance' dispersal. Evolution 9, 347-348. (doi:10.2307/2405656)
6. Baker, H. G. 1979 Anthecology: old testament, new testament, apocrypha (banquet address, 8 February 1979). N.Z. J. Bot. 17, 431-440.
7. Barrett, S. C. H. 1989 Mating system evolution and speciation in heterostylous plants. In Speciation and its consequences (eds D. Otte & J. Endler), pp. 257-283. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
8. Barrett, S. C. H. 2000 Microevolutionary influences of global change on plant invasions. In Invasive species in a changing world (eds H. A. Mooney & R. J. Hobbs), pp. 115-139. Covelo, CA: Island Press.
9. Barrett, S. C. H. (ed.) 2008 Major evolutionary transitions in flowering plant reproduction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10. Barrett, S. C. H. 2010 Darwin's legacy: the forms, function and sexual diversity of flowers. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0212)
11. Barrett, S. C. H. & Case, A. L. 2006 The ecology and evolution of gender strategies in plants: the case of Australian Wurmbea (Colchicaceae). The Turner review no. 11. Austral. J. Bot. 54, 417-433. (doi:10.1071/BT05151)
12. Barrett, S. C. H. & Charlesworth, D. 2007 David Graham Lloyd 20 June 1937-30 May 2006. Biogr. Mems. Fell. R. Soc. 53, 203-221. (doi:10.1098/rsbm. 2007.0011)
13. Barrett, S. C. H. & Shore, J. S. 2008 New insights on heterostyly: comparative biology, ecology and genetics. In Self-incompatibility in flowering plants: evolution, diversity and mechanisms (ed. V. Franklin-Tong), pp. 3-32. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
14. Barrett, S. C. H., Morgan, M. T. & Husband, B. C. 1989 Dissolution of a complex genetic polymorphism: the evolution of self-fertilization in tristylous Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Evolution 43, 1398-1416. (doi:10.2307/2409456)
15. Barrett, S. C. H., Harder, L. D. & Worley, A. 1996 The comparative biology of pollination and mating. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351, 1271-1280. (doi:10.1098/ rstb. 1996.0110)
16. Barrett, S. C. H., Dorken, M. E. & Case, A. L. 2001 A geographical context for the evolution of plant reproductive systems. In Integrating ecological and evolutionary processes in a spatial context (eds J. Silvertown & J. Antonovics), pp. 341-363. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
17. Barrett, S. C. H., Ness, R. W. & Vallejo-Marin, M. 2009 Evolutionary pathways to selfing in a tristylous plant. New Phyt. 183, 546-556. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137. 2009.02937.x)
18. Bateman, A. J. 1948 Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 23, 349-368.
19. Bell, G. 1985 On the function of flowers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 224, 223-265. (doi:10.1098/rspb.l985.0031)
20. Boualem, A. et al. 2008 A conserved mutation in an ethylene biosynthesis enzyme leads to andromonoecy in melons. Science 321, 836-838. (doi:10.1126/science.1159023)
21. Brown, A. H. D. & Allard, R. W. 1970 Estimates of the mating system in open pollinated maize populations using isozyme polymorphisms. Genetics 66, 133-145.
22. Case, A. L., Graham, S. W., MacFarlane, T. D. & Barrett, S. C. H. 2008 A phylogenetic study of evolutionary transitions in sexual systems in Australian Wurmbea (Colchicaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 169, 141-156. (doi:10.1086/523368)
23. Charlesworth, B. 1992 Evolutionary rates in partially selffertilizing species. Am. Nat. 140, 126-148. (doi:10.1086/285406)
24. Charlesworth, D. 1999 Theories of the evolution of dioecy. In Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants (eds M. A. Geber, T. E. Dawson & L. F. Delph), pp. 33-56. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
25. Charlesworth, D. 2002 Plant sex determination and sex chromosomes. Heredity 88, 94-101. (doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800016)
26. Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. 1987 Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18, 237-268. (doi:10.1146/annurev.es.l8.110187.001321)
27. Charnov, E. L. 1982 The theory of sex allocation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28. Coyne, J. A., Barton, N. H. & Turelli, M. 1997 A critique of Sewall Wright's shifting balance theory of evolution. Evolution 51, 643-671. (doi:10.2307/2411143) (Pubitemid 27324459)
29. Darlington, C. D. 1939 The evolution of genetic systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Darwin, C. 1862 The various contrivances by which orchids are fertilised by insects. London, UK: John Murray.
31. Darwin, C. 1876 The effects of cross and self fertilisation in the vegetable kingdom. London, UK: John Murray.
32. Darwin, C. 1877 The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. London, UK: John Murray.
33. Di Stilio, V. S., Martin, C., Schulfer, A. F. & Connelly, C. F. 2009 An ortholog of MIXTA-like2 controls epidermal shape in flowers of Thalictrum. New Phyt. 183, 718-728. (doi:10.1111/j.l469-8137.2009.02945.x)
34. Dorken, M. E. & Barrett, S. C. H. 2004 Sex determination and the evolution of dioecy from monoecy in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 213-219. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2580)
35. Dorken, M. E., Friedman, J. & Barrett, S. C. H. 2002 The evolution and maintenance of monoecy and dioecy in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae). Evolution 56, 31-41. (doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00847.x) (Pubitemid 34243800)
36. Eckert, C. G., Samis, K. E. & Dart, S. 2006 Reproductive assurance and the evolution of uniparental reproduction in plants. In Ecology and evolution of flowers (eds L. D. Harder & S. C. H. Barrett), pp. 183-203. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
37. Fisher, R. A. 1941 Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Ann. Eugen. 11, 53-63.
38. Fox, J. P., Slotte, T., Stahl, E. A., Neuffer, B., Hurka, H. & Wright, S. I. 2009 Recent speciation associated with the evolution of seifing in Capsela. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 5241-5245. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 0807679106)
39. Franklin-Tong, V. E. (ed.) 2008 Self-incompatibility in flowering plants: evolution, diversity and mechanisms. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
40. Friedman, J. & Barrett, S. C. H. 2008 A phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of wind pollination in the angiosperms. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169, 49-58. (doi:10.1086/ 523365) (Pubitemid 351230622)
41. Friedman, J. & Barrett, S. C. H. 2009a Wind of change: new insights on the ecology and evolution of pollination and mating in wind-pollinated plants. Ann. Bot 103, 1515-1527. (doi:10.1093/aob/mcp035)
42. Friedman, J. & Barrett, S. C. H. 2009e The consequences of monoecy and protogyny for mating in wind-pollinated Carex. New Phyt. 321, 836-838.
43. Goodwillie, C., Kalisz, S. & Eckert, C. G. 2005 The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical expectations, and empirical evidence. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36, 47-49. (doi:10. 1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.091704.175539) (Pubitemid 43068850)
44. Hamrick, J. L. & Godt, M. J. W. 1996 Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351, 1291-1298. (doi:10.1098/ rstb.1996.0112)
45. Harder, L. D. 2000 Pollen dispersal and the floral diversity of monocotyledons. In Monocots (eds K. L. Wilson & D. A. Morrison), pp. 243-257. Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO.
46. Harder, L. D. & Aizen, M. A. 2010 Floral adaptation and diversification under pollen limitation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0226)
47. Harder, L. D. & Barrett, S. C. H. 1995 Mating costs of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants. Nature 373, 512-514. (doi:10.1038/373512a0)
48. Harder, L. D. & Barrett, S. C. H. (eds) 2006 Ecology and evolution of flowers. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
49. Harder, L. D., Richards, S. A. & Routley, M. B. 2008 Effects of reproductive compensation, gamete discounting and reproductive assurance on mating-system diversity in hermaphrodites. Evolution 62, 157-172.
50. Hodgins, K. A. & Barrett, S. C. H. 2008 Natural selection on floral traits through male and female function in wild populations of the heterostylous daffodil Narcissus triandrus. Evolution 62, 1751-1763. (doi:10.1111/ J.1558-5646.2008.00404.X)
51. Husband, B. C. & Barrett, S. C. H. 1998 Spatial and temporal variation in population size of Eichhornia paniculata in ephemeral habitats: implications for metapopulation dynamics. J. Ecol. 86, 1021-1031. (doi: 10.1046/ j.1365-2745.1998.00324.x)
52. Husband, B. C. & Schemske, D. W. 1996 Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50, 54-70. (doi:10.2307/2410780)
53. Igic, B. & Kohn, J. R. 2006 The distribution of plant mating systems: study bias against obligately outcrossed species. Evolution 60, 1098-1103. (Pubitemid 44804507)
54. Lande, R. & Schemske, D. W. 1985 The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39, 24-40. (doi: 10.2307/ 2408514) (Pubitemid 16276773)
55. Linder, H. P. 1998 Morphology and the evolution of wind pollination. In Reproductive biology in systematics, conservation and economic botany (eds S. J. Owens & P. J. Rudall), pp. 123-135. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens.
56. Lloyd, D. G. 1984 Gender allocations in outcrossing cosexual plants. In Perspectives on plant population ecology (eds R. Dirzo & J. Sarukhán), pp. 277-300. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
57. Maddison, W. P., Midford, P. E. & Otto, S. P. 2007 Estimating a binary character's effect on speciation and extinction. Syst. Biol. 56, 701-710. (doi:10.1080/10635150701607033)
58. Morgan, M. T. & Schoen, D. J. 1997 The role of theory in an emerging new plant reproductive biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 231-234. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(97) 01045-8)
59. Pagel, M., Meade, A. & Barker, D. 2004 Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 53, 673-684. (doi:10.1080/10635150490522232) (Pubitemid 39579641)
60. Renner, S. S. & Ricklefs, R. E. 1995 Dioecy and it correlates in the angiosperms. Am. J. Bot. 82, 596-606. (doi:10.2307/2445418)
61. Schemske, D. W. & Lande, R. 1985 The evolution of selffertilization and inbreeding depression. II. Empirical observations. Evolution 39, 41-52. (doi:10.2307/ 2408515) (Pubitemid 16276773)
62. Schoen, D. J. & Brown, A. H. D. 1991 Interspecific variation in population gene diversity and effective population size correlates with mating system in plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci.USA 88, 4494-4497. (doi:10.1073/pnas.88. 10.4494)
63. Schoen, D. J., Johnston, M. O., L'Heureux, A. & Marsolais, J. V. 1997 Evolutionary history of the mating system in Amsinckia (Boraginaceae). Evolution 51, 1090-1099. (doi:10.2307/2411038) (Pubitemid 27393131)
64. Stebbins, G. L. 1974 Flowering plants: evolution above the species level. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
65. Takebayashi, N. & Morrell, P. L. 2001 Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? Revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and a macroevolutionary approach. Am. J. Bot. 88, 1143-1150. (doi:10.2307/3558325)
66. Tang, C. et al. 2007 The evolution of selfing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 317, 1070-1072. (doi:10.1126/science.1143153)
67. Uyenoyama, M. K., Holsinger, K. E. & Waller, D. M. 1993 Ecological and genetic factors directing the evolution of self-fertilization in plants. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 9, 327-381.
68. Vallejo-Marin, M. & Barrett, S. C. H. 2009 Modifications of flower architecture during early stages in the evolution of self-fertilization. Ann. Bot. 103, 951-962. (doi: 10.1093/ aob/mcp015)
69. Vamosi, J. C., Otto, S. & Barrett, S. C. H. 2003 Phylogenetic analysis of the ecological correlates of dioecy in angiosperms. J. Evol. Biol. 16, 1006-1018. (doi: 10.1046/j. 1420-9101.2003.00559.X) (Pubitemid 37078073)
70. Weller, S. G. & Sakai, A. K. 1999 Using phylogenetic approaches for the analysis of plant breeding system evolution. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30, 167-199. (doi:10.1146/ annurev.ecolsys.30.1.167)
71. Willson, M. F. 1979 Sexual selection in plants. Am. Nat. 113, 777-790. (doi: 10.1086/283437)
72. Wilson, P., Thomson, J. D., Stanton, M. L. & Rigney, L. P. 1994 Beyond floral Batemania: gender biases in selection for pollination success. Am. Nat. 143, 283-296. (doi:10. 1086/285604) (Pubitemid 2060447)
73. Wright, S. I., Ness, R. W., Foxe, J. P. & Barrett, S. C. H. 2008 Genomic consequences of outcrossing and selfing in plants. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169, 105-118. (doi:10.1086/523366)