Pollen Limitation and the Evolution of Androdioecy from Dioecy

American Naturalist

Volumn 163, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 122-137

  Wolf, Diana E ^a,b   Takebayashi, Naoki ^a,b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Androdioecy; Breeding systems; Evolution; Pollen limitation; Theory

Indexed keywords

ANDRODIOECY; DIOECY; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; POLLEN LIMITATION; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVOLUTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION;

EVOLUTION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION;

EID: 1242321386     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/380493     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Akimoto, J., T. Fukuhara, and K. Kikuzawa. 1999. Sex ratios and genetic variation in a functionally androdioecious species, Schizopepon bryoniaefolius (Cucurbitaceae). American Journal of Botany 86:880-886.
2. Anttila, C. K., C. C. Daehler, E. N. Rank, and D. R. Strong. 1998. Greater male fitness of a rare invader (Spartina alterniflora, Poaceae) threatens a common native (Spartina foliosa) with hybridization. American Journal of Botany 85:1597-1601.
3. Arizmendi, M. C., C. A. Dominguez, and R. Dirzo. 1996. The role of an avian nectar robber and of hummingbird pollinators in the reproduction of two plant species. Functional Ecology 10:119-127.
4. Ashman, T.-L., and C. Diefenderfer. 2001. Sex ratio represents a unique context for selection on attractive traits: consequences for the evolution of sexual dimorphism. American Naturalist 157:334-347.
5. Bawa, K. 1980. Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11:15-39.
6. Burd, M. 1994. Bateman's principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Botanical Review 60:83-139.
7. Byers, D. L., and D. M. Waller. 1999. Do plant populations purge their genetic load? effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30:479-513.
8. Carlsson-Graner, U., T. Elmqvist, J. Agren, H. Gardfjell, and P. Ingvarsson. 1998. Floral sex ratios, disease and seed set in dioecious Silene dioica. Journal of Ecology 86:79-91.
9. Charlesworth, B., and D. Charlesworth. 1978. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. American Naturalist 112:975-997.
10. Charlesworth, D. 1984. Androdioecy and the evolution of dioecy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 23: 333-348.
11. _. 1985. Distribution of dioecy and self-incompatibility in angiosperms. Pages 237-268 in P. J. Greenwood and M. Slatkin, eds. Evolution: essays in honour of John Maynard Smith. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12. _. 1993. Save the males. Current Biology 3:155-157.
13. Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18:237-268.
14. Charlesworth, D., and F. R. Ganders. 1979. The population genetics of gynodioecy with cytoplasmic-genic male-sterility. Heredity 43:213-218.
15. Darwin, C. 1877. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. J. Murray, London.
16. Davidson, C. 1973. An anatomical and morphological study of Datiscaceae. Aliso 8:49-110.
17. Dommée, B., A. Geslot, J. D. Thompson, M. Reille, and N. Delelle. 1999. Androdioecy in the entomophilous tree Fraxinus ornus (Oleaceae). New Phytologist 143:419-426.
18. Fitch, D. H. A., and S. W. Emmons. 1995. Variable cell positions and cell contacts underlie morphological evolution of the rays in the male tails of nematodes related to Caenorhabditis elegans. Developmental Biology 170: 564-582.
19. Fitch, D. H. A., B, Bugaj-Gaweda, and S. W. Emmons. 1995. 18S ribosomal RNA gene phylogeny for some Rhabditidae related to Caenorhabditis. Molecular Biology and Evolution 12:346-358.
20. Fritsch, P., and L. H. Rieseberg. 1992. High outcrossing rates maintain male and hermaphrodite individuals in populations of the flowering plant Datisca glomerata. Nature 359:633-636.
21. Haag, E. S., and J. Kimble. 2000. Regulatory elements required for development of Caenorhabditis elegans hermaphrodites are conserved in the tra-2 homologue of C. remanei, a male/female sister species. Genetics 155: 105-116.
22. Holsinger, K. E. 2000. Reproductive systems and evolution in vascular plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 97:7037-7042.
23. House, S. M. 1992. Population-density and fruit-set in 3 dioecious tree species in Australian tropical rain-forest. Journal of Ecology 80:57-69.
24. Husband, B. C., and D. W. Schemske. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50:54-70.
25. Ishida, K., and T. Hiura. 1998. Pollen fertility and flowering phenology in an androdioecious tree, Fraxinus lanuginosa (Oleaceas), in Hokkaido, Japan. International Journal of Plant Sciences 159:941-947.
26. Krahenbuhl, M., Y. M. Yuan, and P. Kupfer. 2002. Chromosome and breeding system evolution of the genus Mercurialis (Euphorbiaceae): implications of ITS molecular phylogeny. Plant Systematics and Evolution 234: 155-169.
27. Kuwabara, P. E., and J. Kimble. 1992. Molecular genetics of sex determination in C. elegans. Trends in Genetics 8:164-169.
28. Lande, R., and D. W. Schemske. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39:24-40.
29. Lardon, A., S. Georgiev, A. Aghmir, G. Le Merrer, and I. Negrutiu. 1999. Sexual dimorphism in white campion: complex control of carpel number is revealed by y chromosome deletions. Genetics 151:1173-1185.
30. Larson, B. M. H., and S. C. H. Barrett. 2000. A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 69:503-520.
31. Lepart, J., and B. Dommée. 1992. Is Phillyrea angustifolia L. (Oleaceae) an androdioecious species? Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 108:375-387.
32. Levitan, D. R. 1993. The importance of sperm limitation to the evolution of egg size in marine invertebrates. American Naturalist 141:517-536.
33. _. 1998. Does Bateman's principle apply to broadcast-spawning organisms? egg traits influence in situ fertilization rates among congeneric sea urchins. Evolution 52:1043-1056.
34. Lewis, D. 1942. The evolution of sex in flowering plants. Biological Review 17:46-67.
35. Liston, A., L. H. Rieseberg, and T. S. Elias. 1990. Functional androdioecy in the flowering plant Datisca glomerata. Nature 343:641-642.
36. Lloyd, D. G. 1975. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms. Genetica 45:325-339.
37. _. 1992. Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization. International Journal of Plant Sciences 153:370-380.
38. Mattila, E., and M. T. Kuitunen. 2000. Nutrient versus pollination limitation in Platanthera bifolia and Dactylorhiza incarnata (Orchidaceae). Oikos 89:360-366.
39. Maurice, S., and T. H. Fleming. 1995. The effect of pollen limitaion on plant reproductive systems and the maintenance of sexual polymorphisms. Oikos 74:55-60.
40. McCall, C., D. M. Waller, and T. Mitchel-Olds. 1994. Effects of serial inbreeding on fitness components in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 48:818-827.
41. McCauley, D. E., and M. T. Brock. 1998. Frequency-dependent fitness in Silene vulgaris, a gynodioecious plant. Evolution 52:30-36.
42. Molau, U., and H. C. Prentice. 1992. Reproductive system and population structure in three arctic Saxifraga species. Journal of Ecology 80:149-161.
43. Morgan, M. T., D. J. Schoen, and T. M. Bataillon. 1997. The evolution of self-fertilization in perennials. American Naturalist 150:618-638.
44. Muenchow, G. E. 1998. Subandrodioecy and male fitness in Sagittaria lancifolia subsp. lancifolia (Alismataceae). American Journal of Botany 85:513-520.
45. Nei, M., T. Maruyama, and R. Chakraborty. 1975. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29:1-10.
46. Ornduff, R. 1972. The breakdown of trimorphic incompatibility in Oxalis section Corniculatae. Evolution 26: 52-65.
47. Pannell, J. 1997. Widespread functional androdioecy in Mercurialis annua L. (Euphorbiaceae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 61:95-116.
48. _. 2000. A hypothesis for the evolution of androdioecy: the joint influence of reproductive assurance and local mate competition in a metapopulation. Evolutionary Ecology 14:195-211.
49. _. 2002. The evolution and maintenance of androdioecy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 397-425.
50. Philbrick, C. T., and L. H. Rieseberg. 1994. Pollen production in the androdioecious Datisca glomerata (Datiscaceae): implications for breeding system equilibrium. Plant Species Biology 9:43-46.
51. Ramsey, M., and G. Vaughton. 2000. Pollen quality limits seed set in Burchardia umbellata (Colchicaceae). American Journal of Botany 87:845-852.
52. Rieseberg, L. H., M. A. Hanson, and C. T. Philbrick. 1992. Androdioecy is derived from dioecy in Datiscaceae: evidence from restriction site mapping of PCR-amplified chloroplast DNA fragments. Systematic Botany 17:324-336.
53. Rieseberg, L. H., C. T. Philbrick, P. E. Pack, M. A. Hanson, and P. Fritsch. 1993. Inbreeding depression in androdioecious populations of Datisca glomerata (Datiscaceae). American Journal of Botany 80:757-762.
54. Ross, M. D., and B. S. Weir. 1976. Maintenance of males and females in hermaphrodite populations and the evolution of dioecy. Evolution 30:425-441.
55. Sassaman, C. 1989. Inbreeding and sex ratio variation in female-biased populations of a clam shrimp, Eulimnadia texana. Bulletin of Marine Science 45:425-432.
56. _. 1991. Sex ratio variation in female-biased populations of Notostracans. Hydrobiologia 212:169-179.
57. _. 1995. Sex determination and evolution of unisexuality in the Conchostraca. Hydrobiologia 298:45-65.
58. Sassaman, C., and S. C. Weeks. 1993. The genetic mechanism of sex determination in the Conchostracan shrimp Eulimnadia texana. American Naturalist 141: 314-328.
59. Seger, J., and V. M. Eckhart. 1996. Evolution of sexual systems and sex allocation in plants when growth and reproduction overlap. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 263:833-841.
60. Sullivan, G., and J. E. Titus. 1996. Physical site characteristics limit pollination and fruit set in the dioecious hydrophilous species, Vallisneria americana. Oecologia (Berlin) 108:285-292.
61. Swensen, S. M., and B. C. Mullin. 1994. Phylogenetic affinities of Datiscaceae based on an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid rbcL gene. Systematic Botany 19:157-168.
62. Swensen, S. M., J. N. Luthi, and L. H. Rieseberg. 1998. Datiscaceae revisited: monophyly and the sequence of breeding system evolution. Systematic Botany 23:157-169.
63. Takebayashi, N., and L. F. Delph. 2000. An association between a floral trait and inbreeding depression. Evolution 54:840-846.
64. Thompson, J. D., K. R. Shivanna, J. Kenrick, and R. Knox. 1989. Sex expression, breeding system, and pollen biology of Ricinocarpus pinifolius: a case of androdioecy. American Journal of Botany 76:1048-1059.
65. Uyenoyama, M. K., and D. M. Waller. 1991. Coevolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression. I. Mutation selection balance at one and two loci. Theoretical Population Biology 40:14-46.
66. Uyenoyama, M. K., K. E. Holsinger, and D. M. Waller. 1993. Ecological and genetic factors directing the evolution of self-fertilization. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 9:327-381.
67. Valiente-Banuet, A., A. Rojas-Martinez, M. Del-Coro-Arizmendi, and P. Davila. 1997. Pollination biology of two columnar cacti (Neobuxbaumia mezcalaensis and Neobuxbaumia macrocephala) in the Tehuacan valley, Central Mexico. American Journal of Botany 84:452-455.
68. Vassiliadis, C., M. Valero, P. Saumitou-Laprade, and B. Godelle. 2000. A model for the evolution of high frequencies of males in an androdioecious plant based on a cross-compatibility advantage of males. Heredity 85: 413-422.
69. Ward, S., and J. S. Carrel. 1979. Fertilization and sperm competition in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Developmental Biology 73:304-321.
70. Westergaard, M. 1946. Aberrant y chromosomes and sex expression in Melandrium album. Hereditas (Lund) 32: 419-443.
71. _. 1958. The mechanism of sex determination in dioecious flowering plants. Advances in Genetics 9:217-281.
72. Wolf, D. E., J. A. Satkoski, K. White, and L. H. Rieseberg. 2001. Sex determination in the androdioecious plant, Datisca glomerata, and its dioecious sister species, D. cannabina. Genetics 159:1243-1257.
73. Wright, S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97-159.
74. Yund, P. O. 1999. How severe is sperm limitation in natural populations of marine free-spawners? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15:10-13.