From annuals to perennials: Phylogeny of subtribe Castillejinae (Orobanchaceae)

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 95, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 608-625

  Tank, David C ^a,b   Olmstead, Richard G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Annual; Castilleja; Castillejinae; Cordylanthus; Orobanchaceae; Orthocarpus; Perennial; Polyploidy

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; ANNUAL PLANT; EVOLUTION; LIFE HISTORY; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; PARASITIC PLANT; PERENNIAL PLANT; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; TAXONOMY;

CASTILLEJA; CHANNA; CLEVELANDIA; CORDYLANTHUS; ONCORHYNCHUS; OROBANCHACEAE; ORTHOCARPUS; TRIPHYSARIA;

EID: 44249127468     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.2007346     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. AMES, O. 1939. Economic annuals and human cultures. Botanical Museum of Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
2. ANDREASEN, K., and B. G. BALDWIN. 2001. Unequal evolutionary rates between annual and perennial lineages of checker mallows (Sidalcea, Malvaceae): Evidence from 18S-26S rDNA internal and external transcribed spacers. Molecular Biology and Evolution 18: 936-944.
3. AXELROD, D. I. 1979. Age and origin of the Sonoran desert vegetation. Occasional Papers of the California Academy of Sciences 132: 1-74.
4. BALDWIN, B. G. 1992. Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: An example from the Compositae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 1: 3-16.
5. BALDWIN, B. G., AND S. MARKOS. 1998. Phylogenetic utility of the external transcribed spacer (ETS) of 18S-26S rDNA: Congruence of ETS and ITS trees of Calycadenia (Compositae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 10: 449-463.
6. BALDWIN, B. G., M. J. SANDERSON, J. M. PORTER, M. F. WOJCIECHOWSKI, C. S. CAMPBELL, AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: A valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 247-277.
7. BARKER, F. K., AND F. M. LUTZONI. 2002. The utility of the incongruence length difference test. Systematic Biology 51: 625-637.
8. BEARDSLEY, P. M., AND R. G. OLMSTEAD. 2002. Redefining Phrymaceae: The placement of Mimulus, tribe Mimuleae and Phryma. American Journal of Botany 89: 1093-1102.
9. BEHR, H. H. 1855. A new genus and species, Chloropyron palustre. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 1: 62.
10. BENA, G., B. LEJEUNE, J.-M. PROSPERI, AND I. OLIVIERI. 1998. Molecular phylogenetic approach for studying life-history evolution: The ambiguous example of the genus Medicago L. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences 265: 1141-1151.
11. BENNETT, J. R., AND S. MATHEWS. 2006. Phylogeny of the parasitic plant family Orobanchaceae inferred from phytochrome A. American Journal of Botany 93: 1039-1051.
12. BENTHAM, G. 1846. Scrophulariaceae. In A. de Candolle [ed.], Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, vol. 10, 180-586. Victoris Masson, Paris, France.
13. BRANDLEY, M. C., A. SCHMITZ, AND T. W. REEDER. 2005. Partitioned Bayesian analyses, partition choice, and the phylogenetic relationships of scincid lizards. Systematic Biology 54: 373-390.
14. BREEDLOVE, D. E., AND L. R. HECKARD. 1970. Gentrya, a new genus of Scrophulariaceae from Mexico. Brittonia 22: 20-24.
15. BROWN, J. M., AND A. R. LEMMON. 2007. The importance of data partitioning and the utility of Bayes factors in Bayesian phylogenetics. Systematic Biology 56: 643-655.
16. BULL, J. J., J. P. HUELSENBECK, C. W. CUNNINGHAM, D. L. SWOFFORD, AND P. J. WADDELL. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42: 384-397.
17. CHAMBERS, K. L., D. GREEN, S. POTAMPA, AND L. MCMAHAN. 1998. IOPB chromosome data 13. International Organization of Plant Biosystematists Newsletter 29: 18-22.
18. CHUANG, T. I. 1993. A cladistic analysis of the subtribe Castillejinae (Scrophulariaceae-tribe Pediculareae). Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica 34: 155-161.
19. CHUANG, T. I., AND L. R. HECKARD. 1972. Seed coat morphology in Cordylanthus (Scrophulariaceae) and its taxonomic significance. American Journal of Botany 59: 258-265.
20. CHUANG, T. I., AND L. R. HECKARD. 1973. Taxonomy of Cordylanthus subgenus Hemistegia (Scrophulariaceae). Brittonia 25: 135-158.
21. CHUANG, T. I., AND L. R. HECKARD. 1975a. Taxonomic status of Cordylanthus (subg. Dicranostegia) orcuttianus (Scrophulariaceae). Madroño 23: 88-95.
22. CHUANG, T. I., AND L. R. HECKARD. 1975b. Re-evaluation of bract morphology in taxonomy of Cordylanthus (Scrophulariaceae). Madroño 23: 169-173.
23. CHUANG, T. I., AND L. R. HECKARD. 1976. Morphology, evolution, and taxonomic significance of the inflorescence in Cordylanthus (Scrophulariaceae). American Journal of Botany 63: 272-282.
24. CHUANG, T. I., AND L. R. HECKARD. 1982. Chromosome numbers of Orthocarpus and related monotypic genera (Scrophulariaceae, subtribe Castillejinae). Brittonia 34: 89-101.
25. CHUANG, T. I., AND L. R. HECKARD. 1983. Systematic significance of seed-surface features in Orthocarpus (Scrophulariaceae subtribe Castillejinae). American Journal of Botany 70: 877-890.
26. CHUANG, T. I., AND L. R. HECKARD. 1986. Systematics and evolution of Cordylanthus (Scrophulariaceae- Pedicularieae). Systematic Botany Monographs 10: 1-105.
27. CHUANG, T. I., AND L. R. HECKARD. 1991. Generic realignment and synopsis of subtribe Castillejinae (Scrophulariaceae - tribe Pediculareae). Systematic Botany 16: 644-666.
28. CHUANG, T. I., AND L. R. HECKARD. 1992a. New species of bee-pollinated Castilleja from Peru, with a taxonomic revision of South American members of subg. Colacus. Systematic Botany 17: 417-431.
29. CHUANG, T. I., AND L. R. HECKARD. 1992b. A taxonomic revision of Orthocarpus (Scrophulariaceae - tribe Pediculareae). Systematic Botany 17: 560-582.
30. CHUANG, T. I., AND L. R. HECKARD. 1993. Chromosome numbers of neotropical Castilleja (Scrophulariaceae, tribe Pediculareae) and their taxonomic implications. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 974-986.
31. CONTI, E., D. E. SOLTIS, T. M. HARDIG, and J. SCHNEIDER. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships of the silver saxifrages (Saxifraga, sect. Ligulatae Haworth): Implications for the evolution of substrate specificity, life histories, and biogeography. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 13: 536-555.
32. CUNNINGHAM, C. 1997. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 733-740.
33. DARLU, P., AND G. LECOINTRE. 2002. When does the incongruence length difference test fail? Molecular Biology and Evolution 19: 432-437.
34. DEBRY, R. W., AND R. G. OLMSTEAD. 2000. A simulation study of reduced tree-search effort in bootstrap resampling analysis. Systematic Biology 49: 171-179.
35. DOYLE, J. J., AND J. L. DOYLE. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
36. EASTWOOD, A. 1909. Synopsis of the Mexican and Central American species of Castilleja. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts 44: 563-591.
37. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
38. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies - an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
39. FERRIS, R. S. 1918. Taxonomy and distribution of Adenostegia. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 45: 399-423.
40. GIELLY, L., AND P. TABERLET. 1994. The use of chloroplast DNA to resolve plant phylogenies - Noncoding versus rbcL sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 11: 769-777.
41. GLEASON, H. A., AND A. CRONQUIST. 1964. The natural geography of plants. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
42. GRAHAM, S. W., J. R. KOHN, B. R. MORTON, J. E. ECKENWALDER, AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 1998. Phylogenetic congruence and discordance among one morphological and three molecular data sets from Pontederiaceae. Systematic Biology 47: 545-567.
43. GRAHAM, S. W., P. A. REEVES, A. C. E. BURNS, AND R. G. OLMSTEAD. 2000. Microstructural changes in noncoding chloroplast DNA: Interpretation, evolution, and utility of indels and inversions in basal angiosperm phylogenetic inference. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 (6 Supplement): S83-S96.
44. GRAY, A. 1862. Revision of the genus Castilleja. American Journal of Science II 34: 335-339.
45. GRAY, A. 1867. Characters of new plants of California and elsewhere, principally of those collected by H. N. Bolander in the state geological survey. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts 7: 327-402.
46. GREENE, E. L. 1885. Studies in the botany of California and parts adjacent. Bulletin of the California Academy of Science 1: 66-155.
47. GREENE, E. L. 1886. Studies in the botany of California and parts adjacent II. Bulletin of the California Academy of Science 4: 179-228.
48. GUSTAFSSON, Å. 1948. Polyploidy, life-form, and vegetative reproduction. Hereditas 34: 1-22.
49. HECKARD, L. R. 1958. Documented chromosome numbers in plants. Madroño 14: 237.
50. HECKARD, L. R. 1968. Chromosome numbers and polyploidy in Castilleja (Scrophulariaceae). Brittonia 20: 212-226.
51. HECKARD, L. R., AND T. I. CHUANG. 1977. Chromosome numbers, polyploidy, and hybridization in Castilleja (Scrophulariaceae) of the Great Basin and Rocky Mountains. Brittonia 29: 159-172.
52. HECKARD, L. R., M. I. MORRIS, AND T. I. CHUANG. 1980. Origin and taxonomy of Castilleja montigena (Scrophulariaceae). Systematic Botany 5: 71-85.
53. HERSCH, E. I., AND B. A. ROY. 2007. Context-dependent pollinator behavior: An explanation for patterns of hybridization among three species of indian paintbrush. Evolution 61: 111-124.
54. HOLMGREN, N. H. 1970. Castilleja. In D. S. Corell and M. C. Johnson [eds.], Manual of the vascular plants of Texas, 1439-1442. Texas Research Foundation, Renner, Texas, USA.
55. HOLMGREN, N. H. 1971. A taxonomic revision of the Castilleja viscidula group. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 21: 1-63.
56. HOLMGREN, N. H. 1976. Four new species of Mexican Castilleja (subgenus Castilleja, Scrophulariaceae) and their relatives. Brittonia 28: 195-208.
57. HOLMGREN, N. H. 1984. Scrophulariaceae. In A. Cronquist, A. H. Holmgren, N. H. Holmgren, J. L. Reveal, and P. K. Holmgren [eds.], Intermountain flora, 344-506. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA.
58. JEFFREY, E. C. 1916. The anatomy of woody plants. University Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
59. JEPSON, J. L. 1925. Manual of flowering plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
60. JOHNSON, A. W. 1968. The evolution of desert vegetation in western North America. In G. W. J. Brown [ed.], Desert BIOLOGY, 101-140. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
61. KASS, R., AND A. RAFTERY. 1995. Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90: 430-773.
62. KECK, D. D. 1927. A revision of the genus Orthocarpus. Proceedings of the California Academy of Science Series 4 16: 517-571.
63. LOCKWOOD, M., AND M. FORSTNER. 1991. IOPB chromosome data 3. International Organization of Plant Biosystematists Newsletter 17: 10.
64. NESOM, G. L. 1992a. Castilleja section Euchroma (Scrophulariaceae) in Mexico: New species and comments on other taxa. Phytologia 73: 384-388.
65. NESOM, G. L. 1992b. New species and taxonomic evaluations of Mexican Castilleja (Scrophulariaceae). Phytologia 72: 231-252.
66. NESOM, G. L. 1992c. Taxonomy of the Castilleja tenuiflora group (Scrophulariaceae) in Mexico, with an overview of sect. Castilleja. Phytologia 73: 389-415.
67. NESOM, G. L. 1994. A new species of Castilleja (Scrophulariaceae) from Chihuahua, Mexico. Phytologia 76: 406-409.
68. NYLANDER, J. A. A., F. RONQUIST, J. P. HUELSENBECK, AND J. L. NIEVES-ALDREY. 2004. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Systematic Biology 53: 47-67.
69. OLMSTEAD, R. G., C. W. DEPAMPHILIS, A. D. WOLFE, N. D. YOUNG, W. J. ELISONS, AND P. A. REEVES. 2001. Disintegration of the Scrophulariaceae. American Journal of Botany 88: 348-361.
70. OWNBEY, M. 1959. Castilleja. In C. L. Hitchcock, A. Cronquist, M. Ownbey, and J. W. Thompson [eds.], Vascular plants of the Pacific Northwest, 295-326. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington, USA.
71. OXELMAN, B., M. LIDEN, AND D. BERGLUND. 1997. Chloroplast rps16 intron phylogeny of the tribe Sileneae (Caryophyllaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 206: 393-410.
72. PENNELL, F. W. 1935. The Scrophulariaceae of eastern temperate North America. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Monographs 1: 1-650.
73. PENNELL, F. W. 1947. Some hitherto undescribed Scrophulariaceae of the Pacific states. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 99: 151-171.
74. PENNELL, F. W. 1951. Scrophulariaceae. In L. Abrams [ed.], Illustrated flora of the Pacific states, 686-859. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, USA.
75. PINKAVA, D. J., T. REEVES, E. LEHTO, AND L. A. MCGILL. 1979. Plants new to Arizona flora. VII. Chromosome counts and new distribution records of noteworthy species. Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science 14: 37.
76. POSADA, D., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. MODELTEST: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 14: 817-818.
77. RAMBAUT, A. 1996. Se-Al: Sequence Alignment Editor. Available at http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/. Institute of Evolutionary Biology, Edinburgh, UK.
78. RAMBAUT, A., AND A. J. DRUMMOND. 2004. Tracer. Available at http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/. Institute of Evolutionary Biology, Edinburgh, UK.
79. RAMSEY, J., AND D. W. SCHEMSKE. 1998. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29: 467-501.
80. RAMSEY, J., AND D. W. SCHEMSKE. 2002. Neopolyploidy in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 589-639.
81. RONQUIST, F., AND J. P. HUELSENBECK. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 19: 1572-1574.
82. REVEAL, J. L., AND R. SPELLENBERG. 1976. Miscellaneous chromosome counts of western American plants III. Rhodora 78: 37-52.
83. RYDBERG, P. A. 1917. Flora of the Rocky Mountains and adjacent plains. Published by the author, New York, New York, USA.
84. SCOTLAND, R. W., R. G. OLMSTEAD, AND J. R. BENNETT. 2003. Phylogeny reconstruction: The role of morphology. Systematic Biology 52: 539-548.
85. SHIMODAIRA, H., AND M. HASEGAWA. 1999. Multiple comparisons of loglikelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 1114-1116.
86. SIMMONS, M. P., AND H. OCHOTERENA. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology 49: 369-381.
87. SOLTIS, D. E., AND P. S. SOLTIS. 1993. Molecular data and the dynamic nature of polyploidy. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 12: 243-273.
88. SOLTIS, D. E., P. S. SOLTIS, AND J. A. TATE. 2003. Advances in the study of polyploidy since Plant speciation. New Phytologist 161: 173-191.
89. SPELLENBERG, R. 1986. Chromosome number reports 90. Taxon 35: 197.
90. STEARNS, S. C. 1992. The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
91. STEBBINS, G. L. 1938. Cytological characteristics associated with different growth habits in the dicotyledons. American Journal of Botany 25: 189-198.
92. STEBBINS, G. L. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
93. STEBBINS, G. L. 1957. Self fertilization and population variability in the higher plants. American Naturalist 91: 337-354.
94. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4b10. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
95. SWOFFORD, D. L., G. J. OLSEN, P. J. WADDELL, AND D. M. HILLIS. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. In D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable [eds.], Molecular systematics, 407-514. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
96. TABERLET, P., L. GIELLY, G. PAUTOU, AND J. BOUVET. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109.
97. TANK, D. C., P. M. BEARDSLEY, S. A. KELCHNER, AND R. G. OLMSTEAD. 2006. L. A. S. Johnson review no. 7. Review of the systematics of Scrophulariaceae s.l. and its current disposition. Australian Systematic Botany 19: 289-307.
98. VERBOOM, G. A., H. P. LINDER, AND W. D. STOCK. 2004. Testing the adaptive nature of radiation: Growth form and life history divergence in the African genus Ehrharta (Poaceae: Ehrhartoideae). American Journal of Botany 91: 1364-1370.
99. WATSON, S. 1871. United States geological exploration of the fortieth parallel, Clarence King, Geologist-in-Charge. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., USA.
100. WETTSTEIN, R. 1891. Scrophulariaceae. In A. Engler and K. Prantl [eds.], Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 39-107. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
101. WIGGINS, I. L. 1933. New plants from Baja California. Contributions from the Dudley Herbarium 1: 161-187.
102. WOLFE, A. D., C. P. RANDLE, L. LIU, AND K. E. STEINER. 2005. Phylogeny and biogeography of Orobanchaceae. Folia Geobotanica 40: 115-134.
103. YODER, A. D., J. A. IRWIN, AND B. A. PAYSEUR. 2001. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Systematic Biology 50: 408-424.
104. YOUNG, N. D., K. E. STEINER, AND C. W. DEPAMPHILIS. 1999. The evolution of parasitism in Scrophulariaceae/Orobanchaceae: plastid gene sequences refute an evolutionary transition series. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86: 876-893.
105. YOUNG, T. P., AND C. K. AUGSPURGER. 1991. Ecology and evolution of long-lived semelparous plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 6: 285-289.