Phylogenetic analysis of the ecological correlates of dioecy in angiosperms

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 1006-1018

  Vamosi, Jana C ^a   Otto, S P ^b   Barrett, S C H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Correction for phylogeny; Dioecy; Discrete; Ecological correlates; Life history correlates; Maximum likelihood; Plant sexual systems

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; DIOECY; ECOLOGY; EVOLUTION; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; PHYLOGENETICS;

ANGIOSPERM; ARTICLE; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENT; FLOWER; FRUIT; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCTION; THEORETICAL MODEL; TROPIC CLIMATE;

ANGIOSPERMS; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENT; FLOWERS; FRUIT; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCTION; TROPICAL CLIMATE;

ASTERIDS; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; ROSIDS;

EID: 0042878222     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00559.x     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Armbruster, W.S. 2002. Can indirect selection and genetic context contribute to trait diversification? A transition-probability study of blossom-colour evolution in two genera. J. Evol. Biol. 15: 468-486.
2. Axelrod, D.I. 1959. Poleward migration of early angiosperm flora. Science 130: 203-207.
3. Azuma, H., Garcia-Franco, J.G., Rico-Gray, V. & Thien, L.B. 2001. Molecular phylogeny of the Magnoliaceae: the biogeography of tropical and temperate disjunctions. Am. J. Bot. 88: 2275-2285.
4. Barrett, S.C.H. 1984. Variation in floral sexuality in diclinous Aralia (Araliaceae). Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 71: 278-288.
5. Bawa, K.S. 1980. Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11: 15-39.
6. Bawa, K.S., Ashton, P.S. & Nor, S.M. 1990. Reproductive Ecology of Tropical Forest Plants. UNESCO, Paris.
7. Bawa, K.S. & Opler, P.A. 1975. Dioecism in tropical forest trees. Evolution 29: 167-179.
8. Bentham, G. & Hooker, J.D. 1867. Genera Plantarum. L. Reeve & Co., London.
9. Bertin, R.I. & Newman, C.M. 1993. Dichogamy in angiosperms. Bot. Rev. 59: 112-152.
10. Charlesworth, D. 1993. Why are unisexual flowers associated with wind pollination and unspecialized pollinators? Am. Nat. 141: 481-490.
11. Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. 1987. The effect of investment in attractive structures on allocation to male and female functions in plants. Evolution 41: 948-968.
12. Charnov, E.L. 1982. Monographs in Population Biology, 18: The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
13. Charnov, E.L., Maynard Smith, J. & Bull, J.J. 1976. Why be an hermaphrodite? Nature 265: 125-126.
14. de Jong, T.J. 2000. From pollen dynamics to adaptive dynamics. Plant Sp. Biol. 15: 31-41.
15. Dodd, M.E., Silvertown, J. & Chase, M.W. 1999. Phylogenetic analysis of trait evolution and species diversity variation among angiosperm families. Evolution 53: 732-744.
16. Donoghue, M.J. 1989. Phylogenies and the analysis of evolutionary sequences, with examples from seed plants. Evolution 43: 1137-1156.
17. Edwards, A.W.F. 1972. Likelihood. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
18. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
19. Fox, J.F. 1985. Incidence of dioecy in relation to growth form, pollination, and dispersal. Oecologia 67: 244-249.
20. Gaston, K.J. & Williams, P.H. 1996. Spatial patterns in taxonomic diversity. In: Biodiversity: A Biology of Numbers and Difference (K. G. Gaston, ed.), pp. 202-229. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
21. Givnish, T.J. 1980. Ecological constraints on the evolution of breeding systems in seed plants: dioecy and dispersal in gymnosperms. Evolution 34: 959-972.
22. Harder, L.D. & Barrett, S.C.H. 1996. Pollen dispersal and mating patterns in animal-pollinated plants. In: Floral Biology: Studies on Floral Evolution in Animal-Pollinated Plants (D. G. Lloyd & S. C. H. Barrett, eds), pp. 140-190. Chapman & Hall, New York.
23. Heilbuth, J.C. 2000. Lower species richness in dioecious clades. Am. Nat. 156: 221-241.
24. Heilbuth, J.C., Ilves, K.L. & Otto, S.P. 2001. The consequences of dioecy for seed dispersal: modeling the seed-shadow handicap. Evolution 55: 880-888.
25. Helfgott, D.M., Francisco-Ortega, J., Santos-Guerra, A., Jansen, R.K. & Simpson, B.B. 2000. Biogeography and breeding system evolution of the woody Bencomia alliance (Rosaceae) in Macaronesia based on ITS sequence data. Syst. Bot. 25: 82-97.
26. Hutchinson, J. 1964. The Genera of Flowering Plants. Vols 1, 2. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
27. Ibarra-Manriquez, G. & Oyama, K. 1992. Ecological correlates of reproductive traits of Mexican rain forest trees. Am. J. Bot. 79:383-394.
28. Kalkman, C. 1988. The phylogeny of the Rosaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 98: 37-60.
29. Kaplan, S.M. & Mulcahy, D.L. 1971. Mode of pollination and floral sexuality in Thalictrum. Evolution 25:659-668.
30. Lloyd, D.G. 1982. Selection of combined versus separate sexes in seed plants. Am. Nat. 120:571-585.
31. Mabberley, D.J. 1997. The Plant Book: A Portable Dictionary of the Higher Plants. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
32. Malcomber, S.T. 2002. Phylogeny of Gaertnera Lam. (Rubiaceae) based on multiple DNA markers: evidence of a rapid radiation in a widespread, morphologically diverse genus. Evolution 56: 42-57.
33. Manos, P.S. & Stanford, A.M. 2001. The historical biogeography of Fagaceae: tracking the tertiary history of temperate and subtropical forests of the northern hemisphere. Int. J. Plant Sci. 162 (6 Suppl.): S77-S93.
34. Muenchow, G.E. 1987. Is dioecy associated with fleshy fruit. Am. J. Bot. 74: 287-293.
35. Pagel, M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255: 37-45.
36. Pagel, M. 1997. Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zool. Script. 26:331-348.
37. Patterson, T.B. & Givnish, T.J. 2002. Phylogeny, concerted convergence, and phylogenetic niche conservatism in the core Liliales: insights from rbcL and ndhF sequence data. Evolution 56: 233-252.
38. Renner, S.S. & Ricklefs, R.E. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. Am. J. Bot. 82: 596-606.
39. Rice, W.R. 1989. Analysing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223-225.
40. Richards, A.J. 1997. Plant Breeding Systems. Allen and Unwin, London.
41. Ricklefs, R.E. & Renner, S.S. 1994. Species richness within families of flowering plants. Evolution 48: 1619-1636.
42. Sakai, A.K., Wagner, W.L., Ferguson, D.M. & Herbst, D.R. 1995. Origins of dioecy in the Hawaiian flora. Ecology 76: 2517-2529.
43. Sakai, A.K., Weller, S.G., Wagner, W.L., Soltis, P.S. & Soltis, D.E. 1997. Phylogenetic perspectives on the evolution of dioecy: adaptive radiation in the endemic Hawaiian genera Schiedea and Alsinidendron (Caryophyllaceae: Alsinoideae). In: Molecular Evolution and Adaptive Radiation (T. J. Givnish, ed.), pp. 455-473. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
44. Sakai, A.K. & Weller, S.G. 1999. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants:a review of terminology, biogeographic patterns, ecological correlates, and phylogenetic approaches. In: Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants (M. A. Geber, T. E. Dawson & L. F. Delph, eds), pp. 1-31. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
45. Sanderson, M.J. & Donoghue, M.J. 1996. Reconstructing shifts in diversification rates on phylogenetic trees. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:15-20.
46. Schluter, D. 2000. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
47. Schluter, D., Price, T., Mooers, A.Ø. & Ludwig, D. 1997. Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51: 1699-1711.
48. Silvertown, J., Franco, M. & Harper, J.L. (eds) (1997) Plant Life Histories: Ecology Phylogeny and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
49. Soltis, P.S., Soltis, D.E. & Chase, M.W. 1999. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology. Nature 402:402-404.
50. Takhtajan, A. 1997. Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
51. Thomson, J.D., McKenna, M.A. & Cruzan, M.B. 1989. Temporal patterns of nectar and pollen production in Aralia hispida: implication for reproductive success. Ecology 70: 1061-1068.
52. Thomson, J.D. & Brunet, J. 1990. Hypotheses for the evolution of dioecy in seed plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5: 11-16.
53. Tiffney, B.H. 1985. Perspectives on the origin of the floristic similarity between eastern Asia and eastern North America. J. Arnold Arboretum 66: 73-94.
54. Vamosi, J.C. & Otto, S.P. 2002. When looks can kill: the evolution of sexually dimorphic floral display and the extinction of dioecious plants. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 269: 1187-1194.
55. Webb, C.J. 1999. Empirical studies: evolution and maintenance of dimorphic breeding systems. In: Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants (M. A. Geber, T. E. Dawson & L. F. Delph, eds), pp. 61-95. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
56. Weiblen, G.D., Oyama, R.K. & Donoghue, M.J. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of dioecy in monocotyledons. Am. Nat. 155: 46-58.
57. Wen, J. 2000. Internal transcribed spacer phylogeny of the Asian and Eastern North America disjunct Aralia sect. Dimorphanthus (Araliaceae) and its biogeographic implications. Int. J. Plant. Sci. 161: 959-966.
58. Worley, A.C. & Barrett, S.C.H. 2000. Evolution of floral display in Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae): direct and correlated response to selection in flower size and number. Evolution 54: 1533-1545.
59. Yampolsky, C. & Yampolsky, H. 1922. Distribution of sex forms in the phanerogamic flora. Biblio. Genet. 3: 1-62.