Barriers to the implementation of constraint-induced movement therapy into practice

Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 104-114

  Viana, Ricardo ^b,c   Teasell, Robert ^a,b,c  

^a LAWSON HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b ST JOSEPH S HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

^c WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

barriers; CIMT; intensity; stroke

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONSTRAINT INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY; CONSTRAINT INDUCED THERAPY; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMAN; LIMITED GENERALIZABILITY; MOVEMENT THERAPY; PATIENT FACTOR; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; PROTOCOL FACTOR; RESOURCE INTENSITY; STROKE;

ANIMALS; ARM; EXERCISE THERAPY; HUMANS; MOVEMENT; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; RESTRAINT, PHYSICAL; STROKE;

EID: 84860152615     PISSN: 10749357     EISSN: 19455119     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/tsr1902-104     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Dettmers C, Teske U, Hamzei F, Uswatte G, Taub E, Weiller C. Distributed form of constraint-induced movement therapy improves functional outcome and quality of life after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:204-209.
2. Morris D, Taub E, Mark VW. Constraint-induced movement therapy: characterizing the intervention protocol. Europa Medicophysica. 2006;42: 257-268.
3. Brogardh C, Flanabjer U. What is the long-term benefit of constraint-induced movement therapy? A four-year follow-up. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23:418-423.
4. Blanton S, Wolf SL. An application of upperextremity constraint-induced movement therapy in a patient with subacute stroke. Phys Ther. 1999;79:847-853.
5. Massie C, Malcolm MP, Greene D, Thaut M. The effects of constraint-induced therapy on kinematic outcomes and compensatory movement patterns: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:571-579.
6. Dahl AE, Askim T, Stock R, Langorgen E, Lydersen S, Indredavik B. Short- and long-term outcome of constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: a randomized controlled feasibility trial. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22:436-447.
7. Kunkel A, Kopp B, Muller G, et al. Constraintinduced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:624-628.
8. Taub E, Uswatte G. Constraint-induced movement therapy: answers and questions after two decades of research. Neurorehabilitation. 2006;21:93-95.
9. Miltner WHR, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronc motor deficits after stroke: a replication. Stroke. 1999;30: 586-592.
10. Rowe VT, Blanton S, Wolf SL. Long-term follow-up after constraint-induced therapy: a case report of a chronic stroke survivor. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;63:317-322.
11. Canadian Stroke Network; Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care: 2010. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadan Stroke Strategy; 2010.http://www.strokebestpractices.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/ 04/2010BPR-ENG.pdf.
12. National Stroke Foundation. Clinical guidelines for stroke rehabilitation and recovery. http://www.strokefoundation.com.au. 2005.
13. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006;296:2095-2104.
14. Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Winstein CJ, et al. The EXCITE stroke trial: comparing early and delayed constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke. 2010;41:2309-2315.
15. Taub E. Movement in nonhuman primates deprived of somatosensory feedback. Exerc Sports Sci Rev. 1977:335-374.
16. Taub E. Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: implications for rehabilitation medicine. In: Ince LP, ed. Behavioral Psychology in Rehabilitation Medicine. New York: Williams & Wilkins; 1980:371-401.
17. Taub E, Uswatte G, Mark VW, Morris DM. The learned nonuse phenomenon: implications for rehabilitation. Europa Medicophysica. 2006;42:241-255.
18. Knapp HD, Taub E, Berman AJ. Effect of deafferentation on a conditioned avoidance response. Science. 1958;128:842-843.
19. Knapp HD, Taub E, Berman AJ. Movements in monkeys with deafferented forelimbs. Exp Neurol. 1963;7:305-315.
20. Lassek AM. Inactivation of voluntary motor function following rhizotomy. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1953;12:83-87.
21. Taub E, Ellman SJ, Berman AJ. Deafferentation of monkeys: effect on conditioned grasp response. Science. 1966;151:593-594.
22. Taub E, Heitmann RD, Barro G. Alertness, level of activity, and purposive movement following somatosensory deafferentation in monkeys. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1977;290:348-365.
23. Dromerick AW, Lang CE, Birkenmeier RL, et al. Very early constraint-induced movement during stroke rehabilitation (VECTORS): a single-center RCT. Neurology. 2009;73:195-210.
24. Page SJ, Levine P, Leonard AC, Szaflarski JP, Kissela BM. Modified constraint-induced therapy in chronic stoke: results of a single blinded randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2008;88:333-340.
25. Shi YX, Tian JH, Yang KH, Zhao Y. Modified constraint-induced movement therapy versus traditional rehabilitation in patients with upperextremity dysfunction after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:972-982.
26. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation-a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36:237-251.
27. Taub E, Morris DM. Constraint-induced movement therapy to enhance recovery after stroke. Curr Atherosclerosis Rep. 2001;3:279-286.
28. Bonifer NM, Anderson KM, Arciniegas DB. Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: efficacy for patients with minimal upperextremity motor ability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1867-1873.
29. Yen J, Wang R, Chen H, Hong C. Effectiveness of modified contraint-induced movement therapy on upper limb function in stroke subjects. Acta Neurologica Taiwanica. 2005;14:16-20.
30. Page SJ, Levine P, Khoury JC. Modified constraintinduced therapy combined with mental practice: thinking through better motor outcomes. Stroke. 2009;40:551-554.
31. Page SJ, Levine P, Leonard AC. Modified constraintinduced therapy in acute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005;19:27-32.
32. Brogårdh C, Sjölund BH. Constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: a pilot study on effects of small group training and of extended mitt use. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:218-227.
33. Hosomi M, Koyama T, Takebayashi T, et al. A modified method for constraint-induced movement therapy: a supervised self-training protocol. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. In press. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.04.004
34. Taub E, Lum PS, Hardin P, Mark VW, Uswatte G. AutoCITE: automated delivery of CI therapy with reduced effort by therapists. Stroke. 2005;36: 1301-1314.
35. Lum PS, Taub E, Schwandt D, Postman M, Hardin P, Uswatte G. Automated constraint-induced therapy extension for movement deficits after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41:249-258.
36. Lum PS, Uswatte G, Taub E, Hardin P, Mark VW. A telerehabilitation approach to delivery of constraint-induced movement therapy. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43:391-400.
37. Barzel A, Liepert J, Haevernick K, et al. Comparison of two types of constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke patients: a pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2009;27:673-680.
38. Page SJ, Levine P, Sisto S, Bond Q, Johnston MV. Stroke patients' and therapists' opinions of constraint-induced movement therapy. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:55-60.
39. Walker J, Pink MJ. Occupational therapists and the use of constraint-induced movement therapy in neurological practice. Aust Occup Ther J. 2009;56:436-437.
40. Underwood J, Clark PC, Blanton S, Aycock DM, Wolf SL. Pain, fatigue, and intensity of practice in people with stroke who are receiving constraint-induced movement therapy. Phys Ther. 2006;86:1241-1250.
41. Brogardh C, Lexell J. A 1-year follow-up after shortened constraint-induced movement therapy with and without mitt poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:460-464.
42. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris DM, Barman J, Crago JE. Contribution of the shaping and restraint components of constraint-induced movement therapy to treatment outcome. Neurorehabilitation. 2006;21:147-156.
43. Bowman MH, Taub E, Uswatte G, et al. A treatment for a chronic stroke patient with a plegic hand combining CI therapy with conventional rehabilitation procedures: case report. Neurorehabilitation. 2006;21:167-176.
44. Taub E, Uswatte G, King DK, Morris D, Crago JE, Chatterjee A. A placebo-controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremity after stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:1045-1049.
45. Lin KC, Chung HY, Wu CY, et al. Constraint-induced therapy versus control intervention in patients with stroke: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89:177-185.
46. Wang Q, Zhao JL, Zhu QX, Li J, Meng PP. Comparison of conventional therapy, intensive therapy and modified constraint-induced movement therapy to improve upper extremity function after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43:619-625.
47. Sun SF, Hsu CW, Sun HP, Hwang CW, Yang CL, Wang JL. Combined botulinum toxin type A with modified constraint-induced movement therapy for chronic stroke patients with upper extremity spasticity: a randomized controlled study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24:34-41.
48. Boake C, Noser EA, Ro T, et al. Constraintinduced movement therapy during early stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:14-24.
49. Cramer SC. The VECTORS study. When too much of a good thing is harmful. Neurology. 2009;73:170-171.
50. Sirtori V, Corbetta D, Moja L, Gatti R. Constraintinduced movement therapy for upper extremity in stroke patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(4):CD004433.
51. Corbetta D, Sirtori V, Moja L, Gatti R. Constraintinduced movement therapy in stroke patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;46:537-544.
52. Hayner K, Gibson G, Giles GM. Comparison of constraint-induced movement therapy and bilateral treatment of equal intensity in people with chronic upper-extremity dysfunction after cerebrovascular accident. Am J Occup Ther. 2010;64:528-539.
53. Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M. Does the application of contraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke? Stroke. 2000;31:2984-2988.
54. Whitall J, Waller SM, Sorkin JD, et al. Bilateral and unilateral arm training improve motor function through differing neuroplastic mechanisms: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25:118-129.
55. Gauthier LV, Taub E, Perkins C, Ortmann M, Mark VW, Uswatte G. Remodeling the brain: plastic structural brain changes produced by different motor therapies after stroke. Stroke. 2008;39: 1520-1525.