An application of upper-extremity constraint-induced movement therapy in a patient with subacute stroke

Physical Therapy

Volumn 79, Issue 9, 1999, Pages 847-853

  Blanton, Sarah ^a   Wolf, Steven L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Constraint induced movement therapy; Learned nonuse; Physical therapy; Rehabilitation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM EXERCISE; ARTICLE; BRAIN INFARCTION; CASE REPORT; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT THERAPY; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0032842181     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/79.9.847     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:852-857.
2. Russo SG. Hemiplegic upper extremity rehabilitation: a review of the forced-used paradigm. Neurology Report. 1995;19:17-22.
3. Taub E, Goldberg IA, Taub P. Deafferentation in monkeys: pointing at a target without visual feedback. Exp Neurol. 1975;46:176-186.
4. Tower SS. Pyramidal lesions in the monkey. Brain. 1940;63:36-90.
5. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:347-354.
6. Knapp HD, Taub E, Berman AJ. Movements in monkeys with deafferented limbs. Exp Neurol. 1963;7:305-315.
7. Taub E, Berman AJ. Movement and learning in the absence of sensory feedback. In: Freedman SJ, ed. The Neurophysiology of Spatially Oriented Behavior. Homewood, Ill: Dorsey Press; 1968:173-192.
8. Ostendorf CG, Wolf SL. Effect of forced use of the upper extremity of a hemiplegic patient on changes in function: a single-case design. Phys Ther. 1981;61:1022-1028.
9. Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, Jann BB. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol. 1989;104: 125-132.
10. Morris DM, Crago JE, DeLuca SC, et al. Constraint-induced (CI) movement therapy for recovery after stroke. Neurorehabilitation. 1997; 9:29-43.
11. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state": a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189-198.
12. Uswatte G, Taub E. Constraint-induced movement therapy: new approaches to outcome measurement in rehabilitation. In: Stuss DT, Winocur G, Robertson IH, eds. Cognitive Neural Rehabilitation: A Comprehensive Approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. In press.
13. Miltner WM, Bauder H, Sommer M, et al. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. Stroke. 1999;30:586-592.
14. Taub E. Motor behavior following deafferentation in the developing and motorically mature monkey. In: Herman R, Grillner S, Ralston HJ, et al, eds. Neural Control of Locomotion. New York, NY: Plenum Publishing Corp; 1976:075-705.
15. Taub E. Movement in nonhuman primates deprived of somatosensory feedback. Exerc Sports Sci Rev. 1976;4:335-374.
16. Taub E, Berman AJ. Avoidance conditioning in the absence of relevant proprioceptive and exteroceptive feedback. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1963;56:1012-1016.
17. Taub E. Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: implications for rehabilitation medicine. In: Ince L, ed. Behavioral Psychology in Rehabilitation Medicine: Clinical Applications. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1980:371-440.
18. Sunderland A, Tinson DJ, Bradley EL, et al. Enhanced physical therapy improves recovery of arm function after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992;55:530-535.
19. Taub E, Wolf SL. Constraint-induced movement techniques to facilitate upper extremity use in stroke patients. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 1997;3(4):38-61.
20. Bach-y-Rita P. Recovery from brain damage. Journal of Neurologic Rehabilitation. 1993;6:191-199.
21. Bütefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz K. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci. 1995;130: 59-68.
22. Chollet F, DiPiero V, Wise RJ, et al. The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: a study with position emission tomography. Ann Neurol. 1991;29:63-71.