Automated constraint-induced therapy extension (AutoCITE) for movement deficits after stroke

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 41, Issue 3 A, 2004, Pages 249-257

  Lum, Peter S ^a   Taub, Edward ^b   Schwandt, Douglas ^b   Postman, Monroe ^b   Hardin, Phillip ^b   Uswatte, Gitendra ^b  

^a Virginia Commonwealth University   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Automated rehabilitation; Cerebrovascular accident; CI therapy; Constraint induced movement therapy; Movement; Upper limb

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; CONSTRAINT THEORY; FEEDBACK;

STROKES; THERAPISTS; WORKSTATIONS;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATED CONSTRAINT INDUCED THERAPY EXTENSION; AUTOMATION; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPUTER SYSTEM; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 3543033386     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2003.06.0092     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. American Heart Association. Heart and Stroke Statistical Update, 2000. Also available from http://www.American-heart.org/statistics/stroke.htm.
2. Broderick J, Brott T, Kothari R, Miller R, Khoury J, Pancioli A, et al. The Greater Cincinnati/Northem Kentucky stroke study: preliminary first-ever and total incidence rates of stroke among blacks. Stroke. 1998;29:415-21.
3. Bamford J, Dennis M, Sandercock P, Bum J, Warlow C. The frequency, causes and timing of death within 30 days of a first stroke: The Oxfordshire community stroke project. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat. 1990;53:824-29.
4. Good DC. Treatment strategies for enhancing motor recovery after stroke. J Neurologic Rehabil. 1994;8:177-86.
5. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-Induced Movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation - a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36:237-51.
6. Taub E, Uswatte G. Constraint-Induced Movement therapy: bridging from the primate laboratory to the stroke rehabilitation laboratory. J Rehabil Med. 2003;Suppl 41:1-7.
7. Taub E, Burgio L, Miller NE, Cook EW III, Groomes T, DeLuca S, et al. An operant approach to overcoming learned nonuse after CNS damage in monkeys and man: the role of shaping. J Exp Analysis Behav. 1994;61:281-93.
8. Morgan WG. The shaping game: a teaching technique. Behav Ther. 1974;5:271-72.
9. Panyan MV. How to use shaping. Lawrence, KS: H & H Enterprises; 1980.
10. Skinner BF. The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1938.
11. Skinner BF. The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century- Crofts; 1968.
12. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW 3rd, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:347-54.
13. Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, Cook EW 3rd, Taub E. The reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test for assessing upper limb function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:750-55.
14. Uswatte G, Taub E. Constraint-induced movement therapy: new approaches to outcome measurement in rehabilitation. In: Stuss DT, Winocur G, Robertson IH, editors. Cognitive neurorehabilitation: a comprehensive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 215-29.
15. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.