Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: A replication

Stroke

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 586-592

  Miltner, Wolfgang H R ^b   Bauder, Heike ^c   Sommer, Monika ^c   Dettmers, Christian ^c   Taub, Edward ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Arm; Motor activity; Physical therapy; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; GERMANY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOVEMENT THERAPY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STROKE;

EID: 0033042683     PISSN: 00392499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.30.3.586     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Taub E. Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: implications for rehabilitation medicine. In: Ince LP, ed. Behavioral Psychology in Rehabilitation Medicine: Clinical Applications. New York, NY: Williams & Wilkins; 1980:371-401.
2. Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, Jann BB. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol. 1989;104:125-132.
3. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW III, Fleming WD, Nepomuceno CS, Connell, JS, Crago JE. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:347-354.
4. Taub E, Pidikiti RD, DeLuca SC, Crago JE. Effects of motor restriction of an unimpaired upper extremity and training on improving functional tasks and altering brain behaviors. In: Toole JF, Good DC, eds. Imaging in Neurologic Rehabilitation. New York, NY: Demos Vermande; 1996: 133-154.
5. Taub E, Crago JE, Uswatte G. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new approach to treatment in physical rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol. 1998;43:152-170.
6. Duncan PW. Synthesis of intervention trials to improve motor recovery following stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 1997;3:1-20.
7. Taub E. Movement in nonhuman primates deprived of somatosensory feedback. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1977;4:335-374.
8. Andrews K, Stewart J. Stroke recovery: he can but does he? Rheumatol Rehabil. 1979;18:43-48.
9. Liepert J, Miltner W, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E, Weiller C. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett. 1998;250:5-8.
10. Bütefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz K-H. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci. 1995;130:59-68.
11. Hesse SA, Bertelt CM, Schaffrin A, Malezic MS, Mauritz K-H. Restoration of gait in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients by treadmill training with partial body-weight support. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75: 1087-1093.
12. Morgan WG. The shaping game: a teaching technique. Behav Ther. 1974;5:271-272.
13. Skinner BF. The Behavior of Organisms. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1938.
14. Skinner BF. The Technology of Teaching. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1968.
15. Huber W, Poeck K, Weniger D, Willmes K. Aachener Aphasie Test (AAT). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe; 1983.
16. Zimmermann P, Fimm B. Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitspruefung (TAP). Handbuch Version 1.02c. Wuerselen, Germany: Psytest; 1994.
17. Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan P. Behavioural Inattention Test. Titchfield Hants, England: Thames Valley Test Company; 1987.
18. Horn W. Leistungspruefssystem L-P-S. Handanweisung. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe; 1983.
19. Hartje W. Neuropsychologische Diagnose zerebraler Funktionsbeeinträchtigungen. Der Nervenarzt. 1981;52:649-654.
20. Uswatte G, Taub E. Constraint-induced movement therapy: new approaches to outcome measurement in rehabilitation. In: Stuss DT, Winocur G, Robertson LH, eds. Cognitive Neurorehabilitation: A Comprehensive Approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. In press.
21. McCulloch K, Cook EW III, Fleming WC, Novack TA, Nepomuceno CS, Taub E. A reliable test of upper extremity ADL function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;69:755.
22. Kopp B, Kunkel A, Flor H, Platz T, Rose U, Mauritz K-H, Gruesser K, McCulloch KL, Taub E. The Arm Motor Ability Test: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of an instrument for assessing disabilities in activities of daily living. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:615-620.
23. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1977.
24. Duncan P, Goldstein L, Matchar D, Divine G, Feussner J. Measurement of motor recovery after stroke: outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke. 1992;23:1084-1089.