Constraint-induced movement therapy: Characterizing the intervention protocol

Europa Medicophysica

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 257-268

  Morris, D M ^a   Taub, E ^a   Mark, V W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

Author keywords

Hemiparesis; Physical fitnesss; Rehabilitation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

CAREGIVER; CONSTRAINT INDUCED THERAPY; FITNESS; HUMAN; LIFE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; REHABILITATION RESEARCH; REVIEW; STROKE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; HUMANS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PHYSICAL MEDICINE; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; RESTRAINT, PHYSICAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33845935325     PISSN: 00142573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. American Heart Association. Heart and Stroke Statistical Update. 2000. 〈http://www.Americanheart.org/statistics/stroke.htm〉
2. CDC. Health. 2004;United States, http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus. htm.
3. Duncan PW. Synthesis of intervention trials to improve motor recovery following stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 1997;3:1-20.
4. Duncan PW, Zorowitz R, Bates B, Choi JY, Glasberg JJ, Graham GD et al. Management of adult rehabilitation care: a clinical practice guideline. Stroke 2005;36:e100-e43.
5. Dijkers M, Kropp GC, Esper RM. The quality of intervention research reporting in medical rehabilitation journals. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002;81:21-33.
6. Whyte J, Hart T. It's more than a black box; it's a Russian doll. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:639-52.
7. Whyte J. Clinical trials in rehabilitation: what are the obstacles? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:S16-S21.
8. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW, III, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:347-54.
9. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation. A clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev 1999;36:237-51.
10. Taub E, Uswatte G, Elbert T. New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002;3:228-36.
11. Taub E. Harnessing brain plasticity through behavioral techniques to produce new treatments in neurorehabilitation. Am Psychol 2004;59:692-704.
12. Morris DM, Taub E. Constraint-induced therapy approach to restoring function after neurological injury. Top Stroke Rehabil 2001;8:16-30.
13. Morris DM, Crago JE, DeLuca SC, Pidikiti RD, Taub E. Constraint-Induced (CI) Movement Therapy for motor recovery after stroke. NeuroRehabilitation 1997;9:29-43.
14. Taub E. Movement in nonhuman primates deprived of somatosensory feedback. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1976;4:335-74.
15. Taub E. Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: implications for rehabilitation medicine. In: Ince LP, editor. Behavioral psychology in rehabilitation medicine: clinical applications. New York: Williams & Wilkins; 1980.p.371-401.
16. Liepert J, Miltner WH, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E et al. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett 1998;250:5-8.
17. Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang HR, Miltner WH, Taub E, Weiller C. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 2000;31:1210-6.
18. Kopp B, Kunkel A, Muhlnickel W, Villringer K, Taub E, Flor H. Plasticity in the motor system related to therapy-induced improvement of movement after stroke. Neuroreport 1999;10:807-10.
19. Bauder H, Sommer M, Taub E, Miltner WHR. Effect of CI therapy on movement-related brain potentials. Psychophysiological 1999;36 Suppl 1:S31.
20. Wittenberg GF, Chen R, Ishii K, Bushara KO, Taub E, Gerber LH et al. Constraint-induced therapy in stroke: magnetic-stimulation motor maps and cerebral activation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2003;17:48-57.
21. Levy CE, Nichols DS, Schmalbrock PM, Keller P, Chakeres DW. Functional MRI evidence of cortical reorganization in upper-limb stroke hemiplegia treated with constraint-induced movement therapy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:4-12.
22. Uswatte G, Taub E. Implications of the learned nonuse formulation for measuring rehabilitation outcomes: lessons from constraint-induced movement therapy. Rehabil Psychol 2005;50:34-42.
23. Taub E, Uswatte G, King DK, Morris D, Crago J, Chatterjee A. A placebo controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremity after stroke. Stroke 2006;37:1045-9.
24. Wolf SL, Winstein C, Miller JP, Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris D et al. The extremity constraint induced therapy evaluation (excite) trial for patients with sub-acute stroke. Plenary session iii late breaking science abstracts, International Stroke Conference. 2006, February; Kissimmee, FL, USA.
25. Miltner WH, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of Constraint-Induced Movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. Stroke 1999;30:586-92.
26. Kunkel A, Kopp B, Muller G, Villringer K, Villringer A, Taub E et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:624-8.
27. Sterr A, Elbert T, Berthold I, Kölbel S, Rockstroh B, Taub E. CI therapy in chronic hemiparesis: The more the better? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1374-7.
28. Dettmers C, Teske U, Hamzei F, Uswatte G, Taub E, Weiller C. Distributed form of constraint-induced movement therapy improves functional outcome and quality of life after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:204-9.
29. Mark VW, Taub E. Constraint-induced movement therapy for chronic stroke hemiparesis and other disabilities. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004;22:317-36.
30. Lum P, Taub E, Schwandt D, Postman M, Hardin P, Uswatte G. Automated constraint-induced therapy extension (AutoCITE) for movement deficits after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 2004;41:249-58.
31. Taub E, Lum PS, Hardin P, Mark V, Uswatte G. AutoCITE: automated delivery of CI therapy with reduced effort by therapists. Stroke 2005;36:1301-4.
32. Lum PS, Uswatte G, Taub E, Hardin P, Mark V. A tele-rehabilitation approach to delivery of Constraint-Induced Movement therapy. J Rehabil Res Devel. In press 2006.
33. Skinner BF. The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1938.
34. Skinner BF. The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century- Crofts; 1968.
35. Panyan MV. How to use shaping. Lawrence, KS: HH Enterprises; 1980.
36. Taub E, Crago JE, Burgio LD, Groomes TE, Cook EW III, DeLuca SC et al. An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: overcoming learned nonuse by shaping. J Exp Anal Behav 1994;61:281-93.
37. Dominick KL, Morey M. Adherence to physical activity. In: Bosworth HB, Oddone EZ, Weinberger M, editors Patient treatment adherence: concepts, interventions, and measurement. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc; 2006.
38. Trost SG, Owen N, Bauman AE, Sallis JF, Brown W. Correlates of adults' participation in physical activity: review and update. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002;34:1996-2001.
39. Dishman RK. Determinants of participation in physical activity. In: Bourchard C, Shephard RJ, Stephens T, Sutton JR, McPherson BD, editors. Physical Activity, Fitness and Health: International Proceedings and Consensus Statement. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1994.p.214-38.
40. Sallis JF, Owen N. Physical activity and behavioral medicine. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999.
41. King AC, Blair SN, Bild DE. Determination of physical activity and interventions in adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992;24:S221-S36.
42. McAuley E. The role of efficacy cognitions in the prediction of exercise behavior in middle-aged adults. J Behav Med 1992;15:65-88.
43. Rejeski WJ, Brawley LR, Ambrosius WT. Older adults with chronic disease: benefits of group-mediated counseling in promotion of physical active lifestyles. Health Psychol 2003;22:414-23.
44. McAuley E, Jerome GJ, Marquez DX, Elavsky S, Blissmer B. Exercise self-efficacy in older adults: social, affective, and behavioral influences. Ann Behav Med 2003;25:1-17.
45. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Barman J, Crago J. Contribution of the shaping and restraint components of constraint-induced movement therapy to treatment outcome. NeuroRehabilitation. In press 2006.
46. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Vignolo M, McCulloch K. Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke 2005;36:2493-6.
47. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson P. The Motor Activity Log-28: a method for assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology. In press 2006.
48. Sterr A, Freivogel S. Intensive training in chronic upper limb hemiparesis does not increase spasticity or synergies. Neurology 2004;63:2176-7.
49. Held JM. Recovery of function after brain damage: theoretical implications for therapeutic intervention. In: Carr J, Shepherd RB, editors. Movement science: foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen; 2000.
50. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: theory and practical applications. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott; 2001.
51. Butefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz KH. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci 1995;130:59-68.
52. Hesse S, Malezic M, Schaffrin A, Mauritz KH. Restoration of gait by combined treadmill training and multichannel electrical stimulation in non-ambulatory hemiparetic patients. Scand J Rehabil Med 1995;27:199-204.
53. Hesse S, Berelt C, Jahnke MT, Schaffrin A, Malezic M, Mauritz KH. Restoration of gait in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients by treadmill training with partial body-weight support. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:1087-93.
54. Uswatte G, Taub E. Constraint-induced movement therapy: new approaches to outcome measurement in rehabilitation. In: Struss DT, Winocur G, Robertson IH, editors. Cognitive neurorehabilitation: a comprehensive approach. Cambridge, Mass: Cambridge University Press; 1999.p.215-22.
55. Andrews K, Stewart J. Stroke recovery: he can but does he? Rheumatol Rehabil 1979;18:43-8.