Short- and long-term outcome of constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: A randomized controlled feasibility trial

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 436-447

  Dahl, Anne Eitrem ^a   Askim, T ^b   Stock, R ^a   Langorgen E ^a   Lydersen, S ^b   Indredavik, B ^a,b  

^a TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMMUNITY BASED REHABILITATION; CONSTRAINT INDUCED THERAPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT THERAPY; MYALGIA; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STROKE; THERAPY EFFECT; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; STROKE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 45149094071     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269215507084581     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Taub E, Uswatte G, Elbert T. New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002; 3: 228-36.
2. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation - a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev 1999; 36: 237-51.
3. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW III, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS, Connell JS, Crago JE. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 347-54.
4. Taub E, Uswatte G, King DK, Morris D, Crago JE, Chatterjee A. A placebo-controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremity after stroke. Stroke 2006; 37: 1045-49.
5. Hakkennes S, Keating JL. Constraint-induced movement therapy following stroke: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Aust J Physiother 2005; 51: 221-31.
6. van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Devillé WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke 1999; 30: 2369-75.
7. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006; 296: 2095-104.
8. Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke? Stroke 2000; 31: 2984-88.
9. Grotta JC, Noser EA, Ro T et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke 2004; 35: 2699-701.
10. Page SJ, Levine P, Leonard AC. Modified constraint-induced movement therapy in acute stoke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005; 19: 27-32.
11. Boake C, Noser EA, Ro T et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy during early stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007; 21: 14-24.
12. Page SJ, Sisto SA, Levine P, Johnston MV, Hughes M. Modified constraint induced therapy: a randomized feasibility and efficacy study. J Rehabil Res Dev 2001; 38: 583-90.
13. Page SJ, Sisto SA, Johnston MV, Levine P. Modified constraint-induced therapy after subacute stroke: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16: 290-95.
14. Page SJ, Sisto SA, Levine P, McGrath RE. Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 14-18.
15. Sterr A, Elbert T, Berthold I, Kölbel S, Rockstroh B, Taub E. Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 1374-77.
16. Suputtitada A, Suwanwela NC, Tumvitee S. Effectiveness of constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke patients. J Med Assoc Thai 2004; 87: 1482-90.
17. Wittenberg GF, Chen R, Ishii K et al. Constraint-induced therapy in stroke: magnetic-stimulation motor maps and cerebral activation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2003; 17: 48-57.
18. WHO MONICA Project. Monica Manual (1998-1999). Part IV: Event Registration. Section 2: Stroke event registration data component. Available from http://www.ktl.fi/publications/monica/manual/part4/ iv-2.htm
19. Sulter G, Steen C, De Keyser J. Use of the Barthel index and modified Rankin scale in acute stroke trials. Stroke 1999; 30: 1538-41.
20. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state." A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiat Res 1975; 12: 189-98.
21. Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry 1979; 134: 382-89.
22. Plummer P, Morris ME, Dunai J. Assessment of unilateral neglect. Phys Ther 2003; 83: 732-40.
23. Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, Cook EW III, Taub E. The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 750-55.
24. Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Morris DM et al. The EXCITE trial: attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005; 19: 194-205.
25. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson PA. The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology 2006; 67: 1189-94.
26. Cohen ME, Marino RJ. The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81(Suppl 2): S21-S29.
27. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke 1999; 30: 2131-40.
28. Vickers AJ, Altman DG. Statistics notes: Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. BMJ 2001; 323: 1123-24.
29. Pocock SJ, Assmann SE, Enos LE, Kasten LE. Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems. Stat Med 2002; 21: 2917-30.
30. van der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Knol DL, de Vet HCW, Bouter LM. Clinimetric properties of the motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke 2004; 35: 1410-14.
31. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Vignolo M, McCulloch K. Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke 2005; 36: 2493-96.
32. Dettmers C, Teske U, Hamzei F, Uswatte G, Taub E, Weiller C. Distributed form of constraint-induced movement therapy improves functional outcome and quality of life after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 204-09.
33. Boylstein C, Rittman M, Gubrium J, Behrman A, Davis S. The social organization in constraint-induced movement therapy. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005; 42: 263-75.
34. Brogårdh C, Sjölund BH. Constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: a pilot study on effects of small group training and of extended mitt use. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 218-27.
35. van Peppen RP, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hendriks HJ, Van der Wees PJ, Dekker J. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? Clin Rehabil 2004; 18: 833-62.