Comparison of conventional therapy, intensive therapy and modified constraint -induced movement therapy to improve upper extremity function after stroke

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 43, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 619-625

  Wang, Qiang ^a   Zhao, Jing Li ^b   Zhu, Qi Xiu ^a   Li, Jiang ^a   Meng, Ping Ping ^a  

^a QINGDAO UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Jiaozhou Peopleaposs Hospital   (China)

Author keywords

Constraint induced movement therapy; Intensive therapy; Stroke; Upper extremity

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMAN; KINESIOTHERAPY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STROKE; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STROKE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 79961181880     PISSN: 16501977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0819     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Taub E, Miller NE, Novach TA, Cook EW, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficits after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 347-354. (Pubitemid 23115348)
2. Taub E, Uswatte G. Constraint-induced movement therapy: answers and questions after two decades of research. NeuroRehabilitation 2006; 21: 93-95. (Pubitemid 44253284)
3. Morris D, Grago J, DeLuca S, Pidikiti R, Taub E. Constraintinduced (CI) movement therapy for motor recovery after stroke. Neurorehabilitation 1997; 9: 29-43. (Pubitemid 27279593)
4. Miltner WHT, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke. Stroke 1999; 30: 586-592. (Pubitemid 29115396)
5. Saunders A, Sterr A. CI therapy distribution: theory, evidence and practice. Neurorehabilitation 2006; 21: 97-105. (Pubitemid 44253285)
6. Dromerick AW, Edwards EF, Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after stroke? Stroke 2000; 31: 2984.
7. Boake C, Noser EA, Ro T, Baraniuks, Gaber M, Johnson R, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy during early stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007; 21: 14-24. (Pubitemid 44926968)
8. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris D, et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006; 296: 2095-2104. (Pubitemid 44664704)
9. Page SJ, Levine P, Sisto S, Bond Q, Johnston MV. Stroke patientsapos and therapistsapos opinions of constraint-induced movement therapy. Clin Rehabil 2002; 16: 55-60. (Pubitemid 34100551)
10. Page SJ, Sisto S, Levine P, McGrath RE. Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a single blinded randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 14-18. (Pubitemid 38049585)
11. Atteya AA. Effects of modified constraint-induced therapy on upper limb function in subacute stroke patients. Neuroscience 2004; 9: 24-29.
12. Page SJ, Levine P. Effects of modified constraint induced therapy extension: using remote technologies to improve function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 922-927. (Pubitemid 46963226)
13. Sterr A, Elbert T, Berthold I, Kölbel S, Rockstroh B, Taub E. Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 1374-1377.
14. Taub E, Wolf SL. Constraint induced movement techniques to facilitate upper extremity use in stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil 1997; 3: 38-61. (Pubitemid 27100569)
15. Nelles G. Cortical reorganization - effects of intensive therapy. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004; 22: 239-244.
16. Kwakkel G. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 823-830.
17. Surong G, Evaluation of aphasis. In: Surong Gao, editor. Apha- sia. Beijing: Beijing Medical University & China Union Medical University Publishing House; 2006, p. 434-452.
18. Ling L, Evaluation of psychological function. In: Denkun N, editor. Rehabilitation medicine. Beijing: Peopleaposs Medical Publishing House; 2004, p. 96.
19. Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, Jann BB. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nouse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol 1989; 104: 125-132. (Pubitemid 19122839)
20. Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, Cook EW 3rd, Taub E. The reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 750-755. (Pubitemid 32520783)
21. Hayner K, Gibson G, Giles GM. Comparison of constraint-induced movement therapy and bilateral treatment of equal intensity in people with chronic upper-extremity dysfunction after cerebrovascular accident. Am J Occup Ther 2010; 64: 528-539.
22. Lin JH, Hsu MJ, Sheu CF, Wu TS, Lin RT, Chen CH, et al. Psychometric comparisons of 4 measures for assessing upper-extremity function in people with stroke. Phys Ther 2009; 89: 840-850.
23. Park SW, Wolf SL, Blanton S, Winstein C, Nichols-Larsen DS. The EX CITE Trial: Predicting a clinically meaningful motor activity log outcome. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008; 22: 486-493.
24. Woodbury M, Velozo CA, Thompson PA, Light K, Uswatte G, Taub E, et al. Measurement structure of the Wolf Motor Function Test: implications for motor control theory. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010; 24: 791-801.
25. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A, et al. Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 2001; 32: 1635-1639. (Pubitemid 32631916)
26. Taub E, Uswatte G. Constraint-induced movement therapy: answers and questions after two decades of research. NeuroRehabil 2006; 21: 93-95. (Pubitemid 44253284)
27. Blanton S, Wilsey H, Wolf SL. Constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke rehabilitation: perspectives on future clinical applications. NeuroRehabil 2008; 23: 15-28. (Pubitemid 352038559)
28. Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, Wood Eauphinee S, Richards C, Ashburn A, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke, a meta-analysis. Stroke 2004; 35: 2529-2536. (Pubitemid 39458412)
29. Kwakkel G. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 823-830.
30. Lincoln NB, Parry PH, Vass C. Randomised controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. Stroke 1999; 30: 573-579. (Pubitemid 29115394)
31. Rodgers H, Machintosh J, Price C, Wood R, McNamee P, Fearon T, et al. Does an early increased-intensity interdisciplinary upper limb therapy programme following acute stroke improve outcome? Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 579-589. (Pubitemid 37063045)
32. Wolf SL, Newton H, Maddy D, Blanton S, Zhang Q, Winstein CJ, et al. The Excite trial: relationship of intensity of constraint induced movement therapy to improvement in the wolf motor function test. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2007; 25: 549-562. (Pubitemid 351525717)
33. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Barman J, Crago J. Contribution of the shaping and restraint components of constraint-induced movement therapy to treatment outcome. NeuroRehabil 2006; 21: 147-156. (Pubitemid 44253289)
34. Brogärdh C, Vestling M, Sjölund BH. Shortened constraint-induced movement therapy in subacute stroke - no effect of using a restraint: a randomized controlled study with independent observers. J Rehabil Med 2009; 41: 231-236.
35. Brogärdh C, Sjölund BH. Constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: a pilot study on effects of small group training and of extended mitt use. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 218-227.