What is the long-term benefit of constraint-induced movement therapy? A four-year follow-up

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 418-423

  Brogårdh, Christina ^a,b   Flansbjer, Ulla Britt ^a,b   Lexell, Jan ^a,b,c  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSTRAINT INDUCED THERAPY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL DISEASE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; SELF REPORT;

ADULT; AGED; DISABILITY EVALUATION; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RESTRAINT, PHYSICAL; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE;

EID: 65549115926     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269215508099861     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Taub E., Wolf S. Constraint induced movement techniques to facilitate upper extremity use in stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil 1997; 3: 38-61.
2. Taub E., Uswatte G., Elbert T. New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002; 3: 228-36.
3. Wolf S., Lecraw D., Barton L., Jann B. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol 1989; 104: 125-32.
4. Taub E., Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med 1993; 74: 347-54.
5. Morris DM, Crago JE, DeLuca SC, Pidikiti RD, Taub E. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery after stroke. Neurorehabilitation 1997; 9: 29-43.
6. Miltner WHR, Bauder H., Sommer M., Dettmers C., Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke. Stroke 1999; 30: 586-92.
7. Kunkel A., Kopp B., Muller G., Villringer K., Villringer A., Taub E. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 624-28.
8. Page SJ, Sisto SA, Levine P., McGrath RE Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 14-18.
9. Taub E., Uswatte G., King DK, Morris D., Crago JE, Chatterjee A. A placebo-controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremity after stroke. Stroke 2006; 37: 1045-49.
10. Brogårdh C., Sjölund BH Constraint induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: A pilot study on effects of small group training and of extended mitt use. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 218-27.
11. Wolf S., Winstein C., Miller J. et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke. The excite randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006; 296: 2095-104.
12. Blanton S., Wolf SL An application of upper-extremity constraint-induced movement therapy in a patient with subacute stroke. Phys Ther 1999; 79: 847-53.
13. Page S., Sisto SA, Johnston MV, Levine P. Modified constraint-induced therapy after subacute stroke: A preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16: 290-95.
14. Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke? Stroke 2000; 31: 2984-88.
15. Ploughman M., Corbett D. Can forced-use therapy be clinically applied after stroke? An exploratory randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1417-23.
16. Page S., Levine P., Leonard AC Modified constraint-induced therapy in acute stroke: A randomized controlled pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005; 19: 27-32.
17. Page S., Sisto SA, Levine P., Johnston MV, Hughes M. Modified constraint induced therapy: A randomized feasibility and efficacy study. J Rehabil Res Dev 2001; 38: 583-90.
18. Taub E., Lum PS, Hardin P., Mark VW, Uswatte G. Automated delivery of CI therapy with reduced effort by therapists. Stroke 2005; 36: 1301-304.
19. Bonifer NM, Anderson KM, Arciniegas DB Constraint-induced therapy for moderate chronic upper extremity impairment after stroke. Brain Inj 2005; 19: 323-30.
20. van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Deville WL, Bouter LM Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients. Stroke 1999; 30: 2369-75.
21. Sollerman C., Ejeskär A. Sollerman hand function test. A standardised method and its use in tetraplegic patients. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1995; 29: 167-76.
22. Brogårdh C., Persson A., Sjölund B. Intra-and interrater reliability of the Sollerman hand function test in patients with chronic stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 145-54.
23. van der Lee JH, Beckerman H., Knol DL, de Vet HCW, Bouter LM Clinimetric properties of the Motor Activity Log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke 2004; 35: 1410-14.
24. Uswatte G., Taub E., Morris D., Vignolo M., McCulloch K. Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke 2005; 36: 2496-99.
25. Uswatte G., Taub E., Morris D., Light K., Thompson P. The Motor Activity Log-28: Assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology 2006; 67: 1189-94.