On the flexibility of letter position coding during lexical processing: The case of Thai

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 68-73

  Perea, Manuel ^a   Winskel, Heather ^b   Ratitamkul, Theeraporn ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b SOUTHERN CROSS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c CHULALONGKORN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Letter coding; Lexical decision; Masked priming

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; REACTION TIME; READING; RECOGNITION;

HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 84860109319     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000127     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Acha, J., & Perea, M. (2008). The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: Evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 245-264.
2. Acha, J., & Perea, M. (2010). Does kaniso activate CASINO? Input coding schemes and phonology in visual-word recognition. Experimental Psychology, 57, 245-251.
3. Carreiras, M., Ferrand, L., Grainger, J., & Perea, M. (2005). Sequential effects of phonological priming in visual word recognition. Psychological Science, 16, 585-589. (Pubitemid 41284637)
4. Davis, C. J. (1999). The Self-Organising Lexical Acquisition and Recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
5. Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117, 713-758.
6. Davis, C. J., & Andrews, S. (2001, April). Inhibitory effects of transposed-letter similarity for words and nonwords of different lengths. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Australian Experimental Psychology Conference, Melbourne, Australia.
7. Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680-698.
8. Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 39A, 211-251.
9. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 116-124. (Pubitemid 37545055)
10. Gómez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115, 577-601.
11. Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), Mental lexicon: Some words to talk about words (pp. 1-23). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
12. Johnson, R. L., Perea, M., & Rayner, K. (2007). Transposed-letter effects in reading: Evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 209-229.
13. Kinoshita, S., Castles, A., & Davis, C. (2009). The role of neighbourhood density in transposed letter priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 506-526.
14. Lee, C. H., & Taft, M. (2009). Are onsets and codas important in processing letter position? A comparison of TL effects in English and Korean. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 530-542.
15. Luksaneeyanawin, S. (2004). Thai word frequency based on two million word corpus of written genre texts. Bangkok, Thailand: Center for Research in Speech and Language Processing. Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University.
16. Norris, D., Kinoshita, S., & van Casteren, M. (2010). A stimulus sampling theory of letter identity and order. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 254-271.
17. O'Connor, R. E., & Forster, K. I. (1981). Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 9, 78-92.
18. Perea, M., Abu Mallouh, R., & Carreiras, M. (2010). The search of an input coding scheme: Transposed-letter priming in Arabic. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17, 375-380.
19. Perea, M., Abu Mallouh, R., García-Orza, J., & Carreiras, M. (2011). Masked priming effects are modulated by expertise in the script. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 902-919. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.512088
20. Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2006). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1600-1613. (Pubitemid 44180436)
21. Perea, M., & Estévez, A. (2008). Transposed-letter similarity effects in naming pseudowords: Evidence from children and adults. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 33-46. (Pubitemid 350125713)
22. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 97-120). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
23. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231-246. (Pubitemid 38989933)
24. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2007). La posición de las letras externas en el reconocimiento visual de palabras. Psicothema, 19, 559-564.
25. Perea, M., Nakatani, C., & van Leeuwen, C. (2011). Transposition effects in reading Japanese Kana: Are they orthographic in nature? Memory and Cognition, 39, 700-707. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0052-1
26. Perea, M., & Pérez, E. (2009). Beyond alphabetic orthographies: The role of form and phonology in transposition effects in Katakana. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 67-88.
27. Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (2000). Repetition and form priming interact with neighborhood density at a short stimulus-onset asynchrony. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 668-677.
28. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception, Part II: The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60-94.
29. Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333-367. (Pubitemid 38867828)
30. Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2011). Words with and without internal structure: what determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing? Cognition, 118, 141-156. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.013
31. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 221-243. (Pubitemid 33604173)